摘要:目的:分析妇科口服中成药的用药情况,为临床合理用药提供依据。方法:对我院2007～2008年妇科口服中成药用的种类、用量、销售金额、用药频度、日均费用等进行分析。结果:妇康丸、益母草胶囊、五加生化胶囊临床应用广泛,而宫血宁胶囊受同类西药品种的影响,其用药量呈大幅下降趋势,一些新进药品如大黄蛰虫片使用量呈快速上升趋势。结论:我院妇科口服中成药使用情况基本合理。Abstract: Objective: To analyze the utilization of Gynecological oral Chinese patent medicines in our hospital for reference of their rational use. Methods:Gynecological oral Chinese patent medicines used in our hospital during 20072008 were analyzed in terms of drug varieties,consumption quantity,consumption sum, defined daily dose(DDDs)and defined daily cost(DDC)etc.Results:There was a widespread application of Fukang pills, Yimucao capsules and Wujia Shenghua capsules.The consumption of Gongxuening capsules witnessed a great reduction on account of western medicine.Some new Chinese patent medicines such as Dahuang zhechong tablets assumed fast increaseing tendency in consumption quantity. Conclusion:The utilization of Gynecological oral Chinese patent medicines in our hospital was basically rational.
The western medicine are main drugs in treatment of infectious diseases, but the combination of Traditional Chinese and western medicine are used in China. In recent years, proportion of proprietary Chinese medicine increased significantly in this field. However, the classification of proprietary Chinese medicine and matching with the counterparts of western medicine were difficult, and the package inserts were less scientific and normative. By searching the terms of "Qing kai ling" and "Infection", the paper found the quality of post-marketing clinical researches was low. The use proportion of Qing kai ling combined with other drugs was more than 50%, 70% of which was western medicine. The further studies are needed to explore some proprietary Chinese medicine with obvious competitive advantage and improve the quality of methodology and reporting, in order to standardize and guide the rational use of proprietary Chinese medicine in infectious diseases.
ObjectiveTo analyse the quality of implementation in clinical application guidelines of the Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of common diseases. MethodsWe retrieved clinical application guidelines of the Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of common diseases published from February, 2019 to August, 2022 in databases. The clinical practice guideline (CPG) implementation evaluation tool was used to evaluate the implementation of the included guidelines. ResultsA total of 29 guidelines were included. The implementation quality of included guidelines was moderate. Thirteen (44.8%) were high quality and 16 (55.2%) were moderate quality. ConclusionThe quality of implementation of clinical application guidelines of the Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of common diseases is higher than that of other traditional Chinese medicine CPG. The CPG implementation evaluation tool can be used in traditional Chinese medicine CPGs and particularity of TCM should also be considered.
The preferred reporting items for comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine (PRICE-CPM) were developed, and comprised six domains, 21 items and 72 sub-items. The EQUATOR collaboration network for the formulation and revision of reporting specifications was referred to and the final report list items were established by adopting the literature analysis method, the expert committee discussion and the Delphi method, and considering the characteristics of CPM evaluation.
ObjectiveThis study aims to conduct a systematic review and quality assessment of published domestic and foreign studies on the pharmacoeconomics of Chinese patent medicines, with the goal of identifying relevant issues and proposing improvement suggestions. MethodsThe methods used in this study involved systematic searches of the CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and PubMed databases for domestic and foreign studies related to the pharmacoeconomics of Chinese patent medicines, with a search deadline of May 20, 2022. The studies were evaluated systematically based on various aspects such as title, year, author, journal, research perspective, research type, disease area, research object, research design type, research method, application model, model calibration, sensitivity analysis, cost calculation, effectiveness indicators, and adverse reaction comparison. The evaluation of report quality and methodological quality was conducted using the consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) and the quality of health economic studies (QHES) tools, respectively. ResultsThis study included a total of 249 articles, including 247 in Chinese and 2 in English. The first article on the pharmacoeconomics of Chinese patent medicine was published in 2000. The diseases studied covered 59.26% of the ICD-11 disease areas. Articles reporting on the research perspective accounted for 16.87% of the total number of studies, while 32.4% of studies provided an explanation of the research type. The main method used was cost-effectiveness analysis, accounting for 86.75% of the studies, and the main cost component was direct medical costs, accounting for 89.56%. The primary effectiveness indicator was the overall effective rate, accounting for 78.31% of the studies. The average compliance rate with the CHEERS 2022 standard was 43.58%, and the average QHES score was 56.7. ConclusionA considerable part of the existing research on the pharmacoeconomics of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) suffers from problems such as the lack of research methods or non-standardized methods. Therefore, the relevant research abilities of researchers who conduct TCM pharmacoeconomic research need to be improved.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a significant public health challenge due to high prevalence, multiple risk factors, and poor prognosis. While western medicine offers effective treatment for CKD, it is often associated with substantial side effects and limited efficacy in delaying disease progression. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and specifically its herbal preparations, offer a potentially valuable adjunct therapy. These preparations boast demonstrable efficacy, controllable quality, and high safety profiles. Combining TCM with western medicine may further improve symptoms and slow CKD progression, yet a lack of robust evidence-based guidelines hinders clinical application. Therefore, the Nephropathy TCM Development Research Professional Committee of the China Association of Chinese Medicine, in collaboration with the Standardization Project Group of the "Clinical Application Guidelines for TCM in Advantageous Disease Categories", established a multidisciplinary guideline development team. Strictly adhering to the principle of "evidence-based medicine as the primary basis, consensus as a supplement, and experience as a reference", this guideline provides recommendations categorized by drug type to address defined clinical questions. The aim is to provide nephrologists and other clinicians with evidence-based guidance on the use of TCM in the treatment of CKD stages 1-3.
The number of clinical practice guidelines for traditional Chinese patent medicine has been increasing recently. However, the quality of guidelines was still low compared to international guidelines. Considering the characteristics of traditional Chinese patent medicine, we suggested the following items should be taken into account when developing traditional Chinese patent medicine guidelines: ensuring the standardized guidelines of traditional Chinese patent medicine research problem is scientific based on reliable evidence; identifying the common questions according to these research problems; understanding the strength of evidence and how to recommend correctly; inviting some experts in other fields to take part in the development of guidelines; paying more attention on the changes of disease burden and the impact of new methods and technologies when developing the guideline; paying more attention to the non-consensus opinions and evidence supporting these opinions; insisting on quality is the priority, while speed is secondary.
Objective To systematically evaluate the quality of published pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines for neoplasms. Methods Datasets including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMbase were searched to collect pharmacoeconomics studies of Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms from the establishment of the database to September 30, 2022. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) and quality of health economics studies (QHES) were used to evaluate the reporting quality and methodological quality. Results A total of 25 studies were included, with an average CHEERS 2022 coincidence rate of 40.09% and an average QHES score of 53.2. Conclusion The quantity and quality of pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms are insufficient and flawed. It is suggested to strenthen the collaboration between scientific research institutions and hospitals and standardize the pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms to provide hygienic decision-making evidence for Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms.
The preferred reporting items for comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine (PRICE-CPM) regulate the specific requirements of forming integrity, clear, and transparent reports from title to conclusion. It contains six domains with twenty-one items and seventy-two sub-items and is important to promote the integrity, scientificity, transparency, and applicability of relevant reports. Additionally, it indicates that comprehensive evaluation results reports of post-marketing Chinese patent medicine should refer to PRICE-CPM. Therefore, this article provides a detailed interpretation of the report list and references for future users.