west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "主钉" 2 results
  • 股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术后尾帽退出并发症临床报道

    目的总结股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)内固定术后尾帽退出患者资料,为临床医生认识该并发症提供参考。方法 回顾分析2018年1月—2020年5月6例股骨转子间或转子下骨折PFNA内固定术后发生尾帽退出患者临床资料。男2例,女4例;年龄32~82岁,平均55岁。股骨转子间骨折Evans-Jensen分型,ⅠB型1例,ⅡB型3例,股骨转子下骨折Seinshemer分型,ⅡA型1例,Ⅴ型 1例;术中透视及术后首次X线片证实尾帽与主钉均锁紧无间隙;尾帽与螺旋刀片静态锁定4例,动态锁定2例。使用广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)评分于内固定术后2周、初次发现尾帽退出后2周、末次随访时对患者焦虑程度进行评估。结果 6例患者均获随访,随访时间10~24个月。骨折均愈合,愈合时间3~5个月。内固定术后2周GAD-7评分2~7分,平均4.8分,正常2例、轻度焦虑4例;初次发现尾帽退出后2周GAD-7评分4~12分,平均8.2分,正常1例、轻度焦虑3例、中度焦虑2例;末次随访时GAD-7评分0~4分,平均2.0分,均为正常。末次随访时尾帽退出高度为3.6~10.0 mm,平均6.77 mm;尾帽均部分留存于主钉内,无完全脱出者;行内固定物保留4例,内固定物取出治疗2例。6例患者均未出现患髋部疼痛、髋关节功能障碍、内固定失效、骨折延迟愈合、再次骨折等并发症;末次随访时髋关节功能Harris评分94~98分,均获优。结论 尾帽退出是股骨转子间或转子下骨折PFNA内固定术后内固定物机械松动的罕见形式,当其发生时可加重患者焦虑程度,但不会造成严重危害,应根据具体情况选择适当处理方法。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of precise guided temporary fixation in proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation for intertrochanteric fractures

    Objective To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of self-made auxiliary devices in assisting the guide pin placement and precise temporary fixation of the main nail in proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 60 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures over 65 years old who met the selection criteria between January 2020 and June 2022 and were treated with PFNA internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into the trial group (auxiliary device guided main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation) and the control group (conventional treatment), with 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and combined medical diseases between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by CHANG Shimin et al. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function at 1 year after operation. Results In the trial group, 2 temporary fixation needles were successfully placed 2-5 times, including 2 times in 13 cases (43.3%), 3 times in 8 cases (26.7%), 4 times in 7 cases (13.3%), and 5 times in 2 cases (6.7%). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and intraoperative blood loss in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group, and the reduction quality score was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative blood transfusion between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). There was no complication such as incision infection, deep vein thrombosis, and internal fixation loosening. At 1 year after operation, the Harris score of the affected hip joint in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The technique of main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation under the guidance of auxiliary devices in PFNA internal fixation can achieve faster insertion of the main nail guide pin, accurate temporary fixation to maintain reduction, and avoid the subsequent operation space, so as to improve the effectiveness.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content