ObjectiveTo observe the level of extravascular lung water index (ELWI) in serious septic patients with ARDS,and the effects of ulinastatin (UTI) on ELWI. MethodsA perspective control study was performed on 48 severe septic patients with ARDS from the emergency department and ICU in Shanghai Changzhen Hospital from January 2010 to December 2012. Pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PICCO) technique was utilized for measuring ELWI. Meanwhile the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was detected. The patients were randomized as an UTI group (n=30) and a control group (n=18). Both groups received routine comprehensive treatments,and the UTI group additionally received 30 000 units/kg UTI intravenous drip 4 times a day for continuous 3 days. The PaO2/FiO2,ELWI,Murray lung injury score,APACHEⅡ score,SOFA score and 28-day mortality were determined. ResultsThe APACHE Ⅱ score,Murray and SOFA score had no statistical difference between the UTI group and the control group before treatment (P>0.05),and decreased significantly after 4 and 7 days of treatment in both groups compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). There were varying degrees of PaO2/FiO2 decrease and ELWI increase before treatment in both groups with no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). After treatment,the PaO2/FiO2 increased and ELWI decreased in both groups,and the UTI group had better PaO2/FiO2 and ELWI than the control group (P<0.05). The difference in 28-day mortality between the UTI group and the control group was statistically significant (10.0% vs. 33.3%,P<0.05). ConclusionsSevere septic patients with ARDS are all complicated with ELWI increase. Routine therapy combined with UTI can decrease ELWI,improve clinical symptoms,and decrease 28-day mortality.
【摘要】 目的 探讨严重腹腔感染合并呼吸循环功能障碍的有效治疗方法。方法 选择2004 年10 月至2006 年5 月期间我院ICU 收治的严重腹腔感染合并呼吸循环功能障碍患者42 例,其中治疗组( n = 22) 应用乌司他丁和生长激素联合治疗方案,对照组( n = 20) 应用常规治疗。比较2 组病例的临床病死率,并对2 组病例的ICU 住院时间及呼吸支持时间、循环支持时间的差异进行分析。结果 治疗组与对照组的临床病死率(22. 7 % vs35. 0 %) 差异无统计学意义( Pgt; 0. 05) ,而治疗组较对照组ICU 住院时间〔(12. 1 ±4. 2) d vs (18. 8 ±3. 6) d〕、呼吸支持时间〔(10. 1 ±3. 1) d vs (15. 4 ±4. 4) d〕及循环支持时间〔(5. 6 ±1. 8) d vs (11. 3 ±2. 1) d〕明显减少( P lt;0. 05) 。结论 乌司他丁和生长激素联合使用可以改善严重腹腔感染合并呼吸循环功能障碍的治疗效果。
Objective To study the protective effects of ulinastatin( UTI) on lung function after cardiopulmonary bypass( CPB) . Methods 42 Patients, ASA score Ⅱ ～Ⅲ, scheduled for elective cardiac valve replacement, were randomly allocated into three groups, ie. a control group, a low dose UTI group( UTI 8000U/kg) , and a high dose UTI group( UTI 12 000 U/kg) . Inspiratory pressure( PIP) , Plateau pressure ( Pplat) , alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference ( AaDO2 ) , static lung compliance ( Cs) and dynamic lung compliance ( Cd) were recorded before operation ( T1 ) and at 1 hour ( T2 ) , 4 hours ( T3 ) , 24 hours ( T4 ) after CPB termination. Results Compared with pre-CPB, postoperative PIP, Pplat and AaDO2 increased, and Cs and Cd decreased significantly in the control group( all P lt; 0. 05) . Compared with the control group at T2 ～T3 , postoperative PIP, Pplat, AaDO2 were significantly lower( P lt;0. 05) , and Cs and Cd were significantly higher in the two UTI groups( P lt;0. 05) . Compared with the low dose UTI group at T2 ～T3 , the PIP, Pplat and AaDO2 were significantly reduced( P lt;0. 05) , and the Cs and Cd were significantly increased in the high dose UTI group( P lt; 0. 05) . Conclusion UTI can alleviate lung injury and improve lung function during valve replacement surgery with CPB in a dose dependent manner.
Objective To investigate the effects of ulinastatin on Treg/Th17 and immune status in patients with severe sepsis.Methods A total of 80 patients with severe sepsis, who were hospitalized in ICU during October 2011 to July 2012, were randomly divided into a routine group and a ulinastatin group. The patients in the ulinastatin group were intravenously administered 30mg ulinastatin three times per day for 5 days in addition to routine bundle treatment. The expression of Treg, Th17 and HLA-DR were detected on the first day in ICU and 5 days after treatment. 20 healthy individuals served as controls. Results Compared with the control group, the severe sepsis group had overexpression of Treg and Th17 ( P lt;0. 01) , higher ratio of Treg/Th17( P lt;0. 01) , and decreased HLA-DR expression of CD14 monocyte ( P lt; 0. 01) . In the severe sepsis patients, ulinastatin injection reduced the abnormal expression of Treg and Th17 ( P lt; 0. 01) , decreased the ratio of Treg/Th17( P lt; 0. 01) , and improved the expression of HLA-DR ( P lt; 0. 01) more effectively compared with the routine treatment. Ulinastatin also lowered 28-day mortality of the patients with sepsis, but the difference between the ulinastatin group and the routine group was not significant. Conclusions In severe sepsis patients, there were abnormal overexpression of Treg and Th17, imbalance of Treg/Th17, and underexpression of HLA-DR which imply an immune suppression. Ulinastatin can decrease the expression of Treg and Th17, inverses the ratio of Treg/Th17, and improve the expression of HLA-DR, so as to improve the prognosis of severe sepsis patients.
Objective To investigate the effects of high dose ulinastatin with lung protective ventilatory strategies on respiratory function and prognosis in critical disease patients combined with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods Using retrospective analysis, we involved the critical disease patients combined with ALI/ARDS in ICU of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. According to whether they were treated with high dose ulinastatin with lung protective ventilatory strategies or not, the patients were divided into the treatment group and the control group. Then pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), oxygenation index, length of SIRS, length of stay in ICU and APACHE Ⅱ score were observed. Statistic analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 software. Results A total of 24 patients were included, 13 cases in the treatment group and 11 cases in the control group. After 72 h, PVPI (P=0.016), EVLWI (P=0.045), length of SIRS (P=0.002), length of stay in ICU (P=0.024) and APACHE Ⅱ score (P=0.002) decreased significantly, while oxygenation index (P=0.004) increased significantly in the treatment group compared with the control group. Conclusion High dose ulinastatin with lung protective ventilatory strategies decreased lung capillary permeability, reduced lung blood capillary leakage and extravascular lung water, resulted in the improvement of lung oxygenation function, decreased of length of stay in ICU and the improvement of prognosis in critical disease patients combined with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Objective To investigate the possible role of ulinastatin(UTI) in f lipopolysacccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung injury(ALI).Methods Thirty male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups，ie.a normal control group，a LPS group and a LPS plus UTI group.The rats were injected with 1 mL of normal saline via caudal vein in the control group，with LPS 5 mg/kg via caudal vein in the LPS group，and with UTI 100000 U/kg shortly after injection with LPS in the LPS plus UTI group.The rats were sacrificed 4 h after the injection.Lung wet/dry weight ratio was measured.IL-18 level in serum and lung tissue was determined by ELISA and the expression of NF-κB in lung tissue was determined by immunohistochemistry.Pathological changes of rats’ lung were observed by optical and electron microscope.Results Compared with the control group，IL-18 level in serum and NF-κB expression in lung tissue were significantly higher in the LPS group(Plt;0.01).The IL-8 level was somewhat elevated in the LPS+UTI group but with no significant difference from that in control group was found (Pgt;0.05).The lung inflammation in the LPS+UTI group was milder than that in the LPS rats.Conclusion UTI can alleviate LPS-induced inflammatory reaction and lung injury in rat model.
Objective To investigate the protective effects of ulinastatin on acute lung injury ( ALI)induced by seawater drowning in rats. Methods Thirty male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups, ie. a control group, a model group, and an ulinastatin treatment group. The rats in the model group and the ulinastatin treatment group received intratracheal artificial seawater ( 4 mL/kg) instillation. Then the ulinastatin treatment group received ulinastatin ( 100 000 U/kg) injection after infusion of seawater while the model group received an injection of same amount of saline. The rats were sacrificed at 4 hours after instillation. The pathological changes of lung were evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin stain under light microscope. Lung wet/dry weight ratios were measured to assess the level of pulmonary edema.Concentrations of tumor necrosis factor ( TNF) -α, interleukin ( IL) -1β, IL-6, and IL-10 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid ( BALF) were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA) . The myeloperoxidase activity in lung tissue homogenates were measured by colorimetric method. Results Ulinastatin treatmentsignificantly relieved the decline of PaO2 and lung pathological changes, inhibited myeloperoxidase activity,and reduced lung wet/dry weight ratios. Ulinastatin also inhibited the release of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6,whereas increased the expression of IL-10 simultaneously. Conclusion Ulinastatin attenuates seawater induced ALI, which may be related to its inhibitory effects on inflammation reaction through regulating cytokine secretion.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of ulinastatin in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of ulinastatin for acute pancreatitis was performed. Trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE, EMBASE (1984-2004) and Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978-2004), handsearching, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. All RCTs comparing ulinastatin with other interventions were included. Two reviewers assessed the quality of each studiy, and extracted data independently. Statisticsal analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2. Results Seventeen trials involving 1 199 patients were included. Most included trials were of poor quality. Only two trials reported death at the end of follow-up. Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs showed that the clinical effective rate of Ulinastatin plus basic treatment group was 93.12% (176/189), and was 73.33% in basic treatment group. A statistic significant difference was found between the two groups (Peto OR 4.29, 95%CI 2.49 to 7.37, P＜0.000 01). Compared with basic treatment group, Ulinastatin plus basic treatment group significantly reduced the mean hospitalization (WMD -4.93, 95%CI -7.76 to -2.09, P＜0.000 7). Meta-analysis of 2 RCTs showed that the clinical effective rate of Ulinastatin plus basic treatment group was 86.75% (131/151), and was 80.49% (99/123) in other drugs plus basic treatment group. No statistic significant difference was found between the two groups (Peto OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.76 to 2.80, P＜0.26). One trial found that comparing with control group (23.5±7.5 days), Ulinastatin group (34.0±6.4 days) significantly reduced the mean hospitalization (P＜0.05).The reported severe adverse events of ulinastatin appeared to be rare (7/488, 1.43%). Conclusion Ulinastatin appears to be a modality of safe and effective treatment with a favorable trend, but there is no enough evidence to support this conclusion at present as the published trials with poor quality. More trials with enough sample size and scientifically sound methodology are required.