Objective To provide references for the rational allocation of health personnel in rural hospitals through understanding the status of health human resources of rural hospitals in remote and poor areas of Sichuan Province. Methodes This study used cluster sampling method, combined with questionnaire survey and qualitative interviews. A total of 711 health workers of 29 rural hospitals in Pengzhou and Baoxing of Sichuan Province were interviewed. SPSS16.0 was used for descriptive analysis.Results The average age of rural hospitals health personnel in remote and poor areas of Sichuan Province was 30 years old. Post-secondary education accounted for 58.12%, and Bachelor degree or above accounted for 7.2%. The number of medium and senior professional titles account for 8.4 %. The ratio of doctors to nurses was 1:0.55. In the survey of health workers, those doctors with practice (assistant) license accounted for 38.5%, and those without any qualification occupied 27.1 %. Conclusions The professional titles of medical personnel of rural hospitals in remote and poor areas in Sichuan province are generally low. The distribution of professional categories is irrational. The staff in charge of prevention and care are inadequate. There exist a large number of unqualified medical workers. Therefore, the government should increase the investment in rural health and take measures to stabilize the team structure, introduce the talented, and strengthen the training for health personnel of rural hospitals to improve their overall quality.
Objective To understand the demands on portable medicine kit of rural residents in well-off township hospitals, and to provide the basis for scientifically designing portable medicine kit for rural residents. Methods The methods of combining simple random sampling and cluster sampling were used to investigate and analyze the demands on portable medicine kit for 162 households from three well-off township hospitals in Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Sichuan province, respectively. Results The demand rate of 162 rural households on portable medicine kit was 75.3% (122/162). The main drugs that demanders expected in the portable medicine kit were cold medicine (86.1%), wound paste (82.0%), cooling oil (61.5%), essential balm (54.9%) and antihypertensive (34.4%); and the main medical devices that demanders expected were thermometer (82%), cotton swab (73%) and sphygmomanometer (32.8%). The sizes of portable medicine kit that demanders expected were 23.7±8.5 cm in length, 17.1±6.4 cm in width, and 14.1±6.5 cm in height. The main function characteristics of portable medicine kit that demanders expected were applicability (74.6%), safety (60.7%), light weight (68.0%), economics (60.7%), and waterproof (46.7%). A total of 72.1% of demanders expected the price of less than 15 yuan, and 91.8% expected kit made of hard materials as plastic as the first choice. Conclusion The demand rate of rural residents on portable medicine kit is higher in well-off township hospital. The design and production of portable medicine kit should fully meet the demands of rural residents. Only when sufficiant respect for the market demand is paid, can the promotion and application of portable kits will be ensured.
Objective To investigate the spectrum of diseases and the current situation of antibiotic use in rural hospitals and community health service centers in Chengdu, so as to provide evidence for selecting essential medicines and promoting rational use of antibiotics. Method We selected 7 township/community health institutions, from which we collected inpatient and outpatient information. Information about antibiotic use was also collected, including categories, cost, and dosage. A standard questionnaire was used to investigate physicians’ prescription behavior for principal diseases. Result Urban and rural areas had different spectrums of diseases. The major diseases in urban areas included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory tract infection; while those in rural areas were infectious diseases of the respiratory system, digestive system, and urinary system. The physicians’ prescription behavior was mainly based on their personal experience. Antibiotics accounted for 30-50% of the total medicine cost. The top four types of antibiotics with the highest cost were cephalosporins, penicillin, quinolones, and macrolides. Conclusion Based on the different spectrums of diseases, essential drug lists and standard treatment guidelines appropriate for rural health care should be developed to improve the rational use of drugs. Factors such as the average cost of daily dose and the course of treatment should be taken into consideration to reduce the overall cost of medicine. An antimicrobial resistance monitoring system and special training courses on rational use of antibiotics should be utilized in the rural health institutions.
Objective To investigate the decision-making situation of doctors in the township hospitals in Gaolan, Gansu province, and to discuss its scientificity and rationality. Methods Self-designed questionnaire was adopted to investigate the clinical decision-making situation of 108 doctors from 7 township hospitals in Gaolan county. The investigation contained three parts as follows: basic information of respondents, general information of clinical decision-making evidence, and comparison between respondents’ decision-making situation and current best clinical evidence. Results Among the total 108 questionnaires distributed, 89 valid were retrieved. The feedback showed that 79% of the doctors diagnosed and treated patients in accordance with medical textbooks; 53% took curative effect into consideration in the first place; 33% failed to consider patients’ willingness properly when making clinical decisions; and 52% made clinical therapy regimen for common diseases based on the evidence which was different from that in BMJ published Clinical Evidence. Conclusion While making clinical decisions, doctors in the township hospitals do not adequately refer to the best clinical evidence as their decision-making basis, and fail to take patients’ value and willingness into consideration properly. It is necessary to promote the concept of evidence-based medicine and spread the best evidence in the township health departments.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute cholecystitis using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Three guidelines were included (two foreign guidelines, one domestic guideline; two based on evidence, one based on expert consensus). (2) Results of two RCTs (n=200, low quality) and two CCTs (n=230, low quality) indicated efficiencies of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin combined with metronidazole, and ceftazidime combined with metronidazole were 92.5%, 92.6%, 92.5% and 91.3%. A result of three RCTs (n=661, low quality) indicated that lavofloxacin had efficiencies of 82.2% to 95.8% which were 84.4% to 94.7% when combined with metronidazole. A result of three RCTs (n=553, low quality) indicated that for acute cholecystitis, ceftriaxone had an efficiency of 90.0%, cefuroxime 73.7% and cefoperazone/sulbactam 95.6% (Efficiency: ceftriaxone 93.3%, cefuroxime 82.5% and cefoperazone/sulbactam 92.3%, when combined with metronidazole). A result of one RCT (n=72, low quality) indicated that cephazoline had an efficiency of 70.9% with bacteria resistance rates of 70% for G+ and 87% for G. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for piperacillin/tazobactam and cefoperazone/sulbactam used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild, moderate and severe). We offer a b recommendation for meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin and metronidazole as alternatives for severe acute cholecystitis. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for ceftazidime and cefepime used in the treatment of severe acute cholecystitis and a weak recommendation for cefotiam, ampicillin/sulbactam and cefuroxime used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild and moderate). We offer a weak recommendation for lavofloxacin and ciprofloxacin used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild and severe) and a weak recommendation for ceftriaxone used in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (mild, moderate and severe). (3) We make a recommendation against cephazoline as routine use. (4) More large-scale, multi-center, double-blinded RCTs are needed in clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies of acute cholecystitis and outcome indicator should be improved in order to produce high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for diabetes mellitus based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Six guidelines were included, three of which were evidence-based and published from 2006 to 2011. (2) Five recommended medicines were included according to recommendations and evidence of WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010) and other guidelines. They were metformin, glibenclamide, glipizide, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Domestic evidence of the first three drugs was evaluated. (3) The first three have been marketed with the specifications and dosage forms corresponding to guidelines in China. The FBG cost-effectiveness ratios of metformin with different dosage forms as immediate release compressed tablet, enteric-coated tablet and sustained release capsule were 3.37, 3.76 and 3.50 respectively. 2-hour BG cost-effectiveness ratios of metformin were 3.74, 4.00 and 3.71 respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratio of glibenclamide and glimepiride were 11.23 and 13.81 respectively. Conclusion We offer a recommendation for: (1) Metformin (immediate release tablet/capsule for oral use, 0.25 g), contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency. (2) Glibenclamide (tablet, 2.5 mg; capsule, 1.75 mg) and glipizide (tablet, 2.5 or 5mg; dispersible tablet, 5 mg), contraindicated in children, women during pregnancy or lactation, patients in the perioperative period of major operation, patients after total pancreatectomy, and patients allergic or adversely reacted to sulfa drug. (3) Evidence-based and standardized primary healthcare guidelines as well as clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies on diabetes mellitus (large-scale, multi-centre, randomized and double-blinded) are needed to produce high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for bone fracture using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) 17 guidelines were included, six of which were evidence-based or based on expert consensus. We found that for fracture, global guidelines recommended surgical treatment and analgesics, while domestic guidelines recommended Chinese patent drugs. (2) A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) shortened the clinical recovery time of fracture (MD=–4.2, 95%CI –5.25 to –3.14). A result of one RCT indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian had a higher total clinical efficiency compared with San Qi Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.47). A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) had a better effect than Shenyang Hong Yao Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) in promoting the growth of osteotylus (RR=1.48, 95%CI 1.27 to 1.73) and also it had a higher clinical recovery rate (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.9) compared to Shenyang Hong Yao Pian. A result of one RCT (moderate quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian was slightly better than Die Da Wan (name of Chinese patent drug) in regard to the recovery score of fracture (MD=0.25, 95%CI 0.026 to 0.47). A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that compared to fracture reduction alone Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian efficiently relieved pain (MD=–25.9, 95% –32.6 to –19.19) and shortened pain time (MD=–38.6, 95% –41.44 to –35.77). A result of one quasi-RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian had a higher efficiency in relieving pain than benorylate (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.23). A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian had a higher efficiency than Shenyang Hong Yao Pian in relieving pain and swelling (RR=2.4, 95%CI 1.88 to 3.02). A result of one RCT (moderate quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian was superior to Die Da Wan in relieving pain and swelling (MD=–0.4, 95%CI –0.60 to –0.2). A result of two RCT (n=198) indicated that Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian caused no adverse reaction. With good applicability, Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian (taken with warm water or rice wine) cost 7.47 yuan daily. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian and Jie Gu Qi Li Pian used in the treatment of adult fracture. (2) We should carry out more large-sample and controlled trials and improve outcome indicator in order to produce high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute gastroenteritis using evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Five guidelines were included, two of which were evidence-based. (2) Recommended medicines included eight antidiarrheals (of four classes) and three antemetics. (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence, we offered a weak recommendation for ondansetron, metoclopramide, smectite, racecadotril and loperamide applied in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis. We made a recommendation against antibiotics, dexamethasone, kaolin-pectin, activated charcoal, attapulgite and bismuth subsalicylate. (4) Evidence from domestic studies: a result of 14 CCTs (n=1 635, low quality) indicated that in the significant efficiency and total efficiency, smectite (smecta) was superior to routine liquid infusion, norfloxacin, gentamicin or furaxone. Among these 14 CCTs, two CCTs reported smectite (smecta) caused nausea and vomiting (three cases); one CCT reported pain and distention in the abdomen (one case) and general discomfort (one case); and the rest reported no adverse reaction. A result of 10 CCTs (n=1 017, low quality) indicated that for acute diarrhea, racecadotril was superior to routine treatment in the significant efficiency (OR=2.55, 95%CI 1.64 to 3.94, Plt;0.01) and total efficiency (OR=4.32, 95%CI 2.96 to 6.30, Plt;0.01). A result of two CCTs (n=344, low quality) indicated that racecadotril was superior to smectite in the total efficiency in treating acute diarrhea. A result of two CCTs (n=1 056, low quality) indicated that racecadotril was superior to routine treatment in the total efficiency in treating acute adult diarrhea (OR=5.19, 95%CI 3.54 to 7.63, Plt;0.01). A result of two CCTs (n=182, low quality) reported children presented with nausea (two cases). A result of one CCT (n=947, low quality) reported adults presented with constipation (fifteen cases), anorexia (four cases), headache (nine cases) and abdominal pain (one case). Conclusion For acute gastroentitis, we offer a weak recommendation for smectite (powder, for oral use) used in adults (once 3 g, tid., mixed with warm water before intake), child under one year of age (3 g daily, bid.), and child above one year of age (once 3 g, qd. or bid.). Retention enema could be appiled to children with acute gastroenteritis. We also offer a weak recommendation for racecadotril (capsule) used in adults (one capsule, tid., taken continuously less than seven days). Due to the lack of evidence from clinical trials, we make a recommendation against racecadotril applied to women with pregnancy and lactation or children. In order to produce high-quality local evidence, we propose that (1) Further clinical studies should be standardized in diagnosis and criteria. (2) The design and implementation quality of clinical studies should be improved. (3) Original studies on pharmacoeconomic studies and drug applicability are needed.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Eleven guidelines were included (nine foreign guidelines, two domestic guidelines; nine based on evidence, two based on expert consensus). For CAP, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium had efficiencies of 77.1% and an incidence of 18.8% as to adverse reaction that mainly included gastrointestinal reaction, skin rashes, etc. Piperacillin/tazobactam had an efficiency of 92.1% and a bacterial clearance rate of 88.9%. Cefuroxime had an efficiency of 89% and a bacterial clearance rate of 85.5%. There was no statistical significance between azithromycin and cefuroxime for CAP (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.9 to 1.06); however, azithromycin was superior to cefuroxime in shortening fever-relief time (MD=–0.98, 95%CI –1.24 to –0.55) and cough-relief time (MD=–1.36, 95%CI –1.94 to –0.78). Efficiencies of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, moxifloxacin and lavofloxacin were all more than 80% and among the three, moxifloxacin was the most efficient (RR=1.08, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.13, P=0.004). Meropenem had an efficiency of 90%, a bacterial clearance rate of 83.3% and an incidence of 3.33% as to adverse reaction that mainly included diarrhea. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for antibiotics such as amoxicillin, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin, cefuroxim, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, lavofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem and vancocin. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for penicillin G, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. (3) We propose that doctor should choose optimal antibiotics based on commonly-seen pathogenic bacteria that cause CAP, local criteria of antibiotic susceptibility, severity of CAP, and risk factors of patients.
Objective To provide basic data for further application of national essential medicine list (EML) in Chengdu, through a survey of key-workers or persons, who attended the lecture of EML, in charge of village town hospitals or community medical service centers, and to find out their awareness of and attitudes to the essential medicine and requirements and suggestions for EML training. Methods Based on principles and methods of modern cognitive psychology, we designed the questionnaire and carried out the survey face to face. Two people input the data independently and verified them. Proportions were used to analyze the data through the Excel software. Results (1) The proportions ofcorrect answers to the questions of essential medicine conception, use range of EML and the relationship between EML and essential insurance medicines list were 89%, 91% and 87%, respectively. (2) 46% of the persons investigated (117 persons) chose “always consider preferentially using the essential medicine when prescribing”, 31% (81 persons) “consider using the essential medicine in most cases”. (3) 41% of the persons investigated (103 persons) chose “comparatively welcome” for the EML. (4) Problems of implementing EML in village town hospitals or community medical service centers, in the order of importance decreasing, were: “income and compensation”, “awareness of the essential medicine and prescribing habit of the doctor”, “patient’s cognition of essential medicine and preference to drug use”, “safety and effectiveness of the essential medicine”, “the applicability of essential medicine ” and “the purchase and delivery of essential medicine”, respectively. (5) The ways of getting information of essential medicine were 19.6% (187 person-time) through documents, 18.6% (177 persontime) through conferences and 15.3% (146 person-time) through lectures. (6) 60% of the persons investigated (154 persons) attended training of the essential medicine once or twice. (7) 77% of the persons investigated (196 persons) were trained for less than one week for essential medicine. (8) Requirements and suggestions on the training of essential medicine: 42% (71 person-time) enlarging the targeted people, 22% (38 person-time) increasing the training time,16% (27 person-time) improving practicability and specificity of training contents, 11% (18 person-time) diversifying training ways, 9% (15 persontime) requiring “training according to needs ” which addresses specific problems after investigation. Conclusion Training of essential medicine should be strengthened for medical workers in the village town hospitals or community medical service centers, and researches should be carried out on evaluation of EML applicability, performance of EML implementation, financial aiding, income of medical worker, procurement and reimburse, etc.