ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application of combined transverse upper gracilis flap and adductor magnus perforator flap in breast reconstruction of breast cancer patients after mastectomy.MethodsBetween August 2016 and February 2017, the combined transverse upper gracilis flap and adductor magnus perforator flap was used in 12 cases of breast cancer patients who received modified radical surgery for breast reconstruction. All patients were females with the age of 32 to 59 years (mean, 41.5 years). There were 7 cases in left side and 5 cases in right side. Eight cases were received breast reconstruction by one-stage operation and 4 cases by two-stage operation. In one-stage operation cases, pathological diagnosis includes invasive ductal carcinoma in 4 cases and invasive lobular carcinoma in 4 cases. The disease duration ranged from 2 to 9 months (mean, 4.5 months). In two-stage operation cases, the time interval between mastectomy and breast reconstruction ranged from 12 to 70 months (mean, 37.4 months). The length of flap was 20-28 cm, the width of flap was 5.5-7.5 cm, the thickness of flap was 2.5-4.5 cm. The length of gracilis flap pedicle was 6.5-9.2 cm, the length of adductor magnus perforator flap pedicle was 7.5-10.4 cm. The weight of flap was 295-615 g.ResultsThe ischemia time of flap ranged from 95 to 230 minutes (mean, 135 minutes). All flaps were successfully survived. All incisions of recipient donor sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 7-14 months (mean, 9.5 months). The reconstructed breasts’ shape, texture, and elasticity were good and no flap contracture deformation happened. Only linear scar left in the donor sites, but the function of thighs was not affected. No local recurrence happened during follow-up.ConclusionWith appropriate patient selection and surgical technique, the combined transverse upper gracilis flap and adductor magnus perforator flap can be a valuable option as an alternative method for autologous breast reconstruction.
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of breast reconstruction with dual plane prosthesis implantation or anterior pectoralis prosthesis implantation under endoscopy by using prospective comparative study, in order to provide a reference for clinical surgical selection. Methods A total of 54 female patients with breast cancer admitted between January 2023 and December 2023 and met the selection criteria were selected as research subjects. According to the random number table, 54 patients were divided into trial group and control group with 27 cases in each. The patients in the trial group and control group were treated with dual plane prosthesis implantation and anterior pectoralis prosthesis implantation for breast reconstruction after glandular resection under endoscopy, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in the terms of age, body mass index, affected side, breast clinical stages, molecular typing, disease duration, breast volume of healthy side, breast ptosis of affected side, and preoperative Breast-Q score (social mental health, sexual health, breast satisfaction, chest somatic health). The operation-related indicators (operation time, total volume of drainage within 7 days after operation, extubation time, and hospital stay), occurrence of complications, breast reconstruction efficacy related indicators (transverse and longitudinal distance difference), and the pre- and post-operative differences (change values) of Breast-Q scores for each item were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, total volume of drainage within 7 days after operation, extubation time, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients of the two groups were followed up 3-12 months (mean, 6.3 months). Three patients (11.11%) in trial group and 5 patients (18.52%) in control group experienced complications, and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of complications (P>0.05). At 7 days after operation, the transverse and longitudinal distance differences were significantly less in trial group than in control group (P<0.05). The Breast-Q scores of the two groups at 7 days after operation were significantly higher in all items than those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in all change values between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with breast cancer, comparison of breast reconstruction with anterior pectoralis prosthesis implantation, breast reconstruction with dual plane prosthesis implantation has better breast reconstruction effectiveness and higher safety.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of endoscopic radical mastectomy for breast cancer combined with total pectoral muscle reconstruction with breast implants. Methods The clinical data of 138 female patients with breast cancer who met the selection criteria between April 2019 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 43.8 years (range, 27-61 years). The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 1.00 to 7.10 cm, with an average of 2.70 cm. Pathological examination showed that 108 cases were positive for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and 40 cases were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. All patients underwent endoscopic radical mastectomy for breast cancer combined with total pectoral muscle reconstruction with breast implants. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, prosthesis size, and occurences of nipple-areola complex (NAC) ischemia, flap ischemia, infection, and capsular contracture were recorded. The Breast-Q2.0 score was used to evaluate breast aesthetics, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (including the social mental health score, breast satisfaction score, and chest pain score). Patients were divided into two groups based on the time of operation after the technique was implemented: group A (within 1 year, 25 cases) and group B (after 1 year, 113 cases). The above outcome indicators were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, based on the postoperative follow-up duration, patients were classified into a short-term group (follow-up time was less than 1 year) and a long-term group (follow-up time was more than 1 year). The baseline data and postoperative Breast-Q2.0 scores were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe average operation time was 120.76 minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was 23.77 mL, and the average prosthesis size was 218.37 mL. Postoperative NAC ischemia occurred in 21 cases (15.22%), flap ischemia in 30 cases (21.74%), infection in 23 cases (16.67%), capsular contracture in 33 cases (23.91%), and prosthesis removal in 2 cases (1.45%). The operation time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, prosthesis size, and related complications between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3-48 months (mean, 20 months). There were 33 cases in the short-term group and 105 cases in the long-term group. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, body mass index, number of menopause cases, number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cases, number of axillary lymph node dissection cases, breast cup size, degree of breast ptosis, and postoperative radiotherapy constituent ratio between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the breast satisfaction score in the patients’ Breast-Q2.0 score ranged from 33 to 100, with an average of 60.9; the social mental health score ranged from 38 to 100, with an average of 71.3; the chest pain score ranged from 20 to 80, with an average of 47.3. The social mental health score of the long-term group was significantly higher than that of the short-term group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in breast satisfaction scores and chest pain scores between the two groups (P>0.05). No patient died during the follow-up, and 2 patients relapsed at 649 days and 689 days postoperatively, respectively. The recurrence-free survival rate was 98.62%. Conclusion Endoscopic radical mastectomy for breast cancer combined with total pectoral muscle reconstruction with breast implants has fewer complications and less damage, and the aesthetic effect of reconstructed breast is better.
ObjectiveTo understand the current research status of conservative mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer, so as to provide a reference for surgeons and patients with breast cancer to choose surgical method. MethodThe recently domestic and foreign literature on the research of conservative mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer was reviewed and summarized. ResultsAt present, conservative mastectomy mainly included nipple sparing mastectomy, skin sparing mastectomy, and skin reduction mastectomy. All three surgical methods were safe and effective in the treatment of breast cancer, and the complications could be controlled. When combined with breast reconstruction, the better cosmetic effect could be obtained, and the postoperative satisfaction and quality of life of patients were markedly improved. ConclusionsAfter comprehensively preoperative evaluation for patients with breast cancer, conservative mastectomy provides a treatment choice for them. After conservative mastectomy, individualized reconstruction scheme is formulated according to size and sagging degree of breast, as well as individual expectations of patients, which can obtain a higher quality of life while treating diseases for patients with breast cancer.
From 1985 through May of 1989, a total of 6 cases of breast carcinomas underwent primary reconstruction of breast immediately following radical mastectomy by using transposition of vaseularized latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of breast. The re- sults of all these 6 cases were satisfactory. The design of the operation and the operative technique were detailed. The importance of the reconstruction of breast immediately after the radical mastectomy and the advantages of using vascularized latissimus dousi myocutanous flap for reconstruction were discussed.
Objective To summarize types of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and present situation. Method The relevant literatures about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in recent years were reviewed. Results With the increasing incidence of the breast cancer and the progressing of the treatment methods, it has become a trend for the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. If the patient’s condition is allowed, the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction can be performed. At present, the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction mainly include the implant based reconstruction, autologous tissue reconstruction, autologous fat transplantation, etc.. There are different options for the breast reconstruction according the indicators and it had the corresponding complications. So the selection of reconstruction technique depend on the individual requirements, determining by the patient choice, advice of the reconstructive surgeon, and anticipated post-mastectomy therapy, particularly the needs for the radiotherapy and chemotherapy, etc.. Conclusions Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is common abroad, corresponding research has been carried out in our country, experiences in learning are shairing. With deepening of domestic and foreign exchanges and progressing of technology, it is believed that post-mastectomy breast reconstruction might become one of conventional reconstruction options in future.
Objective To evaluate the application effect of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in immediate breast reconstruction after mammary mastectomy with prosthetic implants. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with breast cancer undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with prosthetic implantation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into ADM group (n=43) and non-ADM group (n=25), according to the use of ADM in the posterior space of pectoralis major muscle while prosthesis implantation or not. The size of breast prosthesis, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage duration, total drainage, total hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative cosmetic effect and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups. Results Patients in the ADM group showed no statistically significant difference regarding operative time, drainage duration, total drainage, hospital stay, postoperative complications and intraoperative removed gland volume with the non-ADM group (P>0.05). The average intraoperative blood loss in the ADM group was less than that of the non-ADM group, the average volume of prosthesis in the ADM group was bigger than that of the non-ADM group, the volume difference between prosthesis and removed gland in the ADM group was smaller than that of the non-ADM group, which was considered statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The subjective satisfaction and objective measurement scores of patients in the ADM group were significantly better than those of the non-ADM group, especially in the symmetry of breast, surgical scar and distance of lateral displacement of nipple (P<0.05). The postoperative quality of life in the ADM group was significantly better than that of the non-ADM group in terms of body image, sexual function and sexual interest (P<0.01). Conclusions It is safe and feasible to use ADM-assisted the immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mammary mastectomy with prosthetic implantation. As an extension of the pectoralis major muscle, ADM can enlarge the posterior space for the prosthesis implantation, making the choice of the prosthesis much more easier. The combined application of ADM can obtain a better cosmetic effect, meanwhile improving the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the methods of breast reconstruction surgery with laparoscopically harvested pedicled omental flap (LHPOF), and analyze the patient’ evaluation, operation process and postoperative follow-up. MethodsPatients with pathologically proven breast cancer or plasma cell mastitis who underwent LHPOF breast reconstructive surgery were retrospectively collected from the Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from February 2022 to December 2023. ResultsA total of 16 patients were collected. The mean age of patients was 43.3 (ranging from 27 to 68) years old, the mean body mass index of patients was 23.0 kg/m2 (ranging from 18.3 to 28.6 kg/m2). One patient underwent transplant omental flat removal surgery due to postoperative flap thrombosis, and one patient choose to give up breast reconstruction due to insufficient flap volume. The single-stage surgery was performed successfully in the rest patients with no requirement of laparotomy. All patients made an uneventful recovery after surgery. During the follow-up period, which averaged 13 months and ranged from 9 to 17 months, the major symptoms were mild epigastric bulge (2 patients) and flap atrophy (1 patient), no serious flap-related or donor site-related complications such as flap loss, bowel dysfunction and abdominal incisional hernia. In general, the aesthetic results were satisfactory. ConclusionsUsing LHPOF in immediate breast reconstruction surgery can achieve satisfied aesthetic result, for the soft and natural appearance of the reconstructed breast. In the mean time, compared with other autologous tissue reconstruction approaches, LHPOF has lower incidences of complications of donor-site and flap-site.