Objective To compare the long-term outcome between breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy therapy for early stage invasive breast cancer through a Meta analysis of the randomized controlled trials published worldwide. Methods Cochrane systematic evaluation was used to search through Cochrane libraries of clinical comparative trials, PubMed, Embase, Cancer Lit, and so on. The quality of literatures was independently evaluated and cross-checked by two evaluators, indicators for assessment including death number at the end of follow-up, locoregional and total recurrence. The results were analyzed with RevMan 4.2.2 software. Results Six articles were involved in the Meta analysis with total 3 933 patients. No statistical difference was found in the death at the end of follow-up between breast-conserving therapy group and mastectomy therapy group (OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.93—1.19， P=0.45). Locoregional and total recurrence rate of breast-conserving therapy group were statistical higher than those in mastectomy therapy group (OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.10—2.44， P=0.01； OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.22—1.64， Plt;0.01). Conclusions Breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy therapy have comparable effects on mortality in patient with early stage invasive breast cancer, even after long-term follow up. However, breast-conserving therapy is associated with significantly greater risk of locoregional recurrence.
目的探讨保乳手术对Ⅳ期乳腺癌的应用价值。方法对13例Ⅳ期乳腺癌保乳手术患者进行回顾性分析。结果13例患乳成形形态良好，体积较对侧缩小1/4～1/3，平均随访2年，仅1例局部复发。结论Ⅳ期乳腺癌有保乳手术的相对适应证，作为综合治疗的一部分，保乳手术在有效减瘤的同时，能最大限度地改善患者的生活质量。
Objective To explore the tumor shrinking model, the accurate image evaluation of the residual tumor, and the selection criteria for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods To review literature on the clinical, imaging, and pathologic study of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results The possibility of breast-conserving for patients with large primary tumor is enhanced with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The tumor shrinking mode after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its correlation factors are still unclear. MRI is the most accurate image evaluation of the residual tumor at present. M.D.Anderson prognostic index and the American National Cancer Institute selection criteria for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are helpful for selection of surgical type. Conclusion Tumor shrinking mode and its accurate image evaluation is a key to the selection of breast-conserving surgery and the control of local recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and is the research direction in future.
Endoscopic technology can reduce the surgical incision, and on the basis of ensuring tumor safety, effectively improve aesthetic outcomes and enhance patient satisfaction. Endoscopic breast-conserving surgery can offer benefits to scar appearance for patients with early breast cancer; however, for patients with tumors in the lower quadrant, the trauma of surgery should be carefully considered. Endoscopic breast reconstruction provides a preferred option for the patients underwent total mastectomy by reshaping a scarless breast. The choice of surgery should be considered by oncological safety, postoperative aesthetic effects, patient’s willingness, and medical conditions. The more high-quality clinical studies are needed to provide reference for decision-making. The development of endoscopic technology will provide better treatment options for patients with breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors of breast cancer patients who met breast-conserving conditions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy when choosing surgical mode.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted on 228 breast cancer patients who met breast-conserving conditions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chi square test, nonparametric rank sum test and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting the choice of surgical mode.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that age, clinical stage, family history of cancer, molecular type, neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect, surgeon’s recommendation, chemotherapy side effects, and surgical complications were the factors affecting patient’s chose for breast-conserving surgery (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [OR=0.312, 95%CI (0.255, 0.662), P<0.001] and the surgeon’s recommendation [OR=53.947, 95%CI (4.570, 6.239), P=0.002] were independent factors that affected the choice of surgery.ConclusionsThe decision of the surgical mode is a process in which doctors and patients participate together. Individualized neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the remission rate and the progress of the surgeon’s comprehensive treatment strategy can play a role in improving the breast-conserving rate and the rate of breast-conserving success. Doctors should give positive guidance in accordance with the specific situation of the patient to make the best choice.
At present, breast cancer is most common malignant tumor among female population. The treatment of breast cancer comprises surgery, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, with surgical as the main treatment approach. Common surgical methods for breast cancer include breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. This article reviews the recent researches about the survival of breast cancer patients receiving BCS, the quality of life for patients receiving BCS, the survival of young and elderly patients receiving BCS, BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BCS for patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation, and BCS for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, so as to provide reference for the follow-up work of medical staff.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical and cosmetic outcome of patients with early breast cancer underwent oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery. MethodsClinical data of 59 patients with early stage breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic techniques in the breast conserving surgery were analyzed retrospectively from January 2007 to March 2011. Cosmetic outcome score and patient satisfaction questionnaire were also assessed. ResultsThe age of the patients was (53.5±9.8) years (range, 32 to 77 years). The diameter of tumors was (1.6±0.7) cm (range, 0.5 to 4.0 cm). The foci located at upper quadrant in 38, lower quadrant in 17, central area in 4. During operation, single incision approach was used in 25 patients, two incisions approach in 34 patients. A variety of methods were used to repair breast defects including mammary gland direct suture in 9 patients, mammary gland pedicle flaps in 35, local flaps or adipofascial flap in 9, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in 2, and reduction mammaplasty with “J” or double ring incision in 4. The mean followup period was 30 months (range, 3 to 53 months), no local recurrence was detected. However, bone metastases was found in one patient on 14 months after operation. Fifty-three patients (89.8%) had good to excellent aesthetic results with cosmetic outcome score ≥26. Patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that 40 patients (67.8%) were excellent, 14 (23.7%) good, 3 (5.1%) fair, and 2 (3.4%) poor. ConclusionOncoplastic techniques in the breast conservative therapy for early stage breast cancer is a safe and effective procedure, with highly satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in the majority of patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the anatomy and function of pectoralis fascia in breast cancer operation, and the choice of resection and preservation of pectoralis fascia in different operation methods.MethodWe searched the articles related to pectoralis fascia and breast cancer through PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, WanFang Medical Network, SinoMed, and other databases, and then selected the Chinese and foreign articles that met the objective of this paper, and made an review after reading the articles.ResultsIn the immediate breast reconstruction of breast prosthesis after breast cancer operation, the preservation of pectoralis fascia was beneficial to the complete coverage of breast prosthesis and improved the cosmetic effect after operation. The purpose of preserving pectoralis fascia adipose tissue in breast-conserving surgery was to reduce the loss of breast volume and to pursue the cosmetic effect after operation. At present, there had been reports on the safety of pectoralis fascia oncology, but there was no final conclusion on the safe distance between tumor and pectoralis fascia, and the current research could not provide sufficient evidence for the preservation of pectoralis fascia.ConclusionsThe question of whether the pectoralis fascia needs to be removed in breast cancer surgery is still controversial. The preservation of pectoralis fascia is more for better immediate breast reconstruction after operation. However, the current evidence of evidence-based medicine is not sufficient. Clinicians need to conduct multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials to improve the evidence.
Objective To review the development of endoscopic techniques in breast surgery, focusing on their use in benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer, and also summarize the development and application of these techniques in China, highlighting promotion and homogenization challenges and future directions. Methods A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to trace the historical evolution, clinical applications, and related research of endoscopic techniques in breast surgery, emphasizing their advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Results Endoscopic benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer have improved patients’ postoperative psychological health and quality of life, particularly in scar-free surgery. However, challenges such as limited intraoperative visibility and prolonged surgery time lead to controversy in clinical practice. Conclusion Despite significant advancements, endoscopic techniques in breast surgery also face challenges. Future efforts should focus on technological improvements and clinical research to address these issues, promoting widespread application and standardization. The key to future development lies in the promotion and homogenization of these technologies.