Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, radicality, and short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision （TME） in comparison with open procedure for the middle-lower rectal cancer. Methods From October 2005 to October 2008， 52 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer received laparoscopic TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma， while 46 patients underwent conventional open TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma. The operative procedures, clinicopathological data， and short-term and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. Results The other patients were successful in both groups in addition to 2 （3.8%） patients were converted to open procedure in laparoscopic TME group. There was no perioperative death in both groups. The intraoperative blood loss, the time for bowel movement retrieval （first flatus）， and the incision healing in laparoscopic TME group were better than that in open TME group （P＜0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in anastomotic leakage and pulmonary infection （P＞0.05）. Comparison of specimen, no significant differences were observed between two groups in negative distal margin and circumferential resection margin, number of lymph nodes resected, distance of distal resection margin to the tumor （P＞0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in cancer-related death, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 3-year survival rate （P＞0.05）. Conclusions Laparoscopic TME for middle-low rectal cancer is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive technique, and can achieve satisfactory oncological outcome, which provides similar short-term and mid-term outcome compared with the traditional open procedure.
目的:探讨全直肠系膜切除术(total mesorectal excision,TME)结合双吻合器(DST)治疗低位直肠癌的效果及临床价值。方法:对我院85 例低位直肠癌患者采用 TME和DST联合治疗的方法,观察治疗后的排便功能及疗效.结果:所有患者手术均顺利,无吻合口瘘和狭窄,切割环均完整,无手术闭合失败及手术死亡。随访时间6 个月～5年,局部复发率4例(4.7%)。排便控制功能:优75 例(88.2%),良9 例(10.6%),差1 例(1.2%)。结论:TME和 DST联用治疗低位直肠癌,保肛效果满意,并发症少,提高了患者的生存质量,值得临床推广。
After more than 10 years of development, transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has played an important role in anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. Existing studies have shown that taTME is not significantly different from traditional laparoscopy in the short-term and long-term efficacy of the treatment of low rectal cancer, and that taTME has potential advantages in postoperative functional recovery. With the maturity of taTME technology, transanal endoscopic approach has gradually been clinically applied to other rectal tumors, anastomotic stenosis, lateral lymph node dissection and other scenarios. Clinical practice shows that the transanal endoscopic approach can dissect pelvic tissues more accurately, greatly reduce the difficulty of surgery for complex pelvic diseases, improve the safety of surgery, and provide new ideas for clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo summarize the functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).MethodThe literatures about functional outcomes and existing problems secondary to TaTME in China and abroad were collected to make a review.ResultsNeither the TaTME or the laparoscopic TME (LTME) had few serious impact on the quality of life of patients. At present, only a few studies were involved in the postoperative sexual function, and no definite conclusion could be drawn. From the current data only, the TaTME had few serious impact on the sexual function and it didn’t show some advantages as compared with the LTME. The urinary and defecation functions showed no obvious differences between the TaTME and the LTME, which of the patients after the TaTME might be impaired to some extent. The defecation disorders mainly occurred in 1—6 months after the TaTME, but it would recover to a certain extent as time went on.ConclusionsAlthough TaTME has more advantages in protecting pelvic autonomic nerves, there is no obvious difference in postoperative organ function as compared with LTME surgery at present. Multi-center, large sample size, and long-term follow-up studies are still needed to validate long-term results.
ObjectiveTo analyze whether transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) can achieve high-quality TME, explore the non-patient factors affecting the quality of taTME, improve the quality of taTME.MethodsThe clinical data of 76 patients undergoing taTME from January 2015 to September 2018 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Nanchong Central Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, intra-operative bleeding volume, positive rate of circumferential margin, integrity of mesorectum, positive rate of margin and complications were taken as the observation indexes of operative quality. The improvement of surgical equipment, structured training, and the accumulation of surgical cases (No. 1–25 cases was early group, No. 26–50 cases was mid-term group, No. 51–76 cases was later stage group) were compared as grouping conditions, and various factors affecting the quality of taTME were analyzed.Results① Pre- and post-the improvement of surgical equipment: compared to the pre-improvement of surgical equipment group, the distance between tumors and anal margin of patients in the post-improvement of surgical equipment was closer ［(4.9±1.3) cm vs. (5.9±2.7) cm, P=0.040］ and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter ［(10.6±3.9) d vs. (12.4±2.7) d, P=0.023］, while there were no significant difference in the amount of bleeding, the positive rate of circumferential margin, the integrity of mesorectum, the positive rate of margin and the complications in the two groups (P>0.05). ② Pre- and post-training for surgeon: compared to the pre-training group, the operative time in the post-training group was shortened ［(224.6±70.2) min vs. (275±77.0) min, P=0.020］, while there were no statistical differences in the amount of bleeding, the integrity of mesorectum, the difference of the positive rate of circumferential margin, the positive rate of distal margin, postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). ③ The cumulative grouping of cases: compared to the later stage group ［（218.8±69.5）min］, the operative time in the early group ［(275.2±82.6) min］ and the mid-term group ［(278.8±37.5) min］ were shortened with statistical difference (P=0.022, P=0.003). Moreover, compared to the early group ［(12.9±2.4) d］, the postoperative hospital stay in the mid-term group ［(10.8±4.0) d］ and the later stage group ［(10.2±3.6) d］ were shortened with statistical significance (P=0.032, P=0.007). However, there were no significant difference in the volume of bleeding, the positive rate of circumferential margin, the positive rate of incisal margin and the degree of mesangial integrity among the three groups (P>0.05).ConclusionstaTME can achieve high-quality TME. With the improvement of equipment, the participation of structured training and the accumulation of surgical cases, taTME achieved consistent quality in about 50 cases. The improvement of surgical equipment is the guarantee of the quality of taTME. Structured training is the key to improve the surgical quality of taTME.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for the middle-lower rectal cancer in municipal hospital.MethodsThe pathological data of 94 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer (49 cases underwent laparoscopic TME, while 45 cases received open TME), who treated in The First People’s Hospital of Ziyang from Jan. 2015 to Jun. 2017, were retrospectively collected and analyzed.ResultsTwo patients (4.1%) in laparoscopy group were converted to open surgery. Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had significantly less volume of intraoperative bleeding, shorter abdominal incision, earlier time to the first flatus and liquid diet, and lower rate of 30-day postoperative complication (P<0.05), but had longer operative time (P=0.033). While there were no significant difference on postoperative stay, the specimen length, distal margin, and number of harvested lymph nodes between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic TME is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive technique for middle-lower rectal cancer, and produce more favourable short-term outcome than open surgery in municipal hospital.
Objective To summarize the research progress of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. Methods The literatures about current status, limitations, and prospects of TaTME in China and abroad were collected to make an reviewe. Results TaTME is conformed to the principle of total mesorectal excision (TME), by using the ‘bottom-up’ approach and assisting in the laparoscopic technique platform, to ensure an adequate oncological distal margin, and it could improve the quality of the mesorectum specimens, reduce the circumferential margin involvement rate, afford more precise autonomic nerve preservation rate, and increase sphincter preservation rate. But it is also facing new complications, oncological and functional outcomes problems. Conclusions Although the experience with TaTME remains limited, the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes are acceptable. Nevertheless, there is a need for multicenter, large sample size, and long-term follow-up clinical studies focusing on the long-term outcomes to further improve the oncological safety of TaTME, before widespread application can be recommended.
Objective To assess the feasibility and adequacy of Harmonic Scalpel in a totally laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) and low,ultralow,colo-anal anastomoses for rectal cancer. Methods Excision of the mesorectum and low，ultralow site anastomoses were performed laparoscopically on 30 patients with low rectal cancer based on the concept of TME. Results All 30 TME were successfully completed by laparoscopic approach, and no one was converted to open procedures. A cholecystectomy and/or an ovariotomy were meanwhile performed laparoscopically for 3 patients with rectal cancer,and 1 patient with chronic cholesyctitis, gallstone,ovarian cyst and torsion of the ovary. The operation time was 155 min (115-320 min). Operative blood loss was 20 ml (5-80 ml).The time of bowel function returned and the time to resume postoperative diet was 1-2 days after the operation. Fourteen patients had postoperative analgesic requirement. Average hospital stay was 8 days (5-14 days) and there were no intraoperative and postoperative complications in all 30 patients.Conclusion Laparoscopic excision of the mesorectum and low,ultralow,coloanal anastomoses with Harmonic Scalpel for low rectal cancer is a perspective minimally invasive technique, which is feasible, safe, effective and has dramatic high rates of sphincter preservation with decreased postoperative pain, rapid recovery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the postoperative anal function of rectal cancer patients treated with transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME), and to analyze the influencing factors which resulted in low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after taTME in this paper, so as to provide guidance for clinical practice.MethodsThe data about the patients with rectal cancer treated with taTME were collected at the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from December 2018 to December 2019, including the clinical data and follow-up data. Postoperative recovery condition of the patients’ anal function and the affecting factors caused the occurrence of severe LARS after taTME were analyzed. The patients’ anal function within 1, 6, and 12 months after taTME were evaluated, and the evaluation tools were LARS scale and Wexner scale. The follow-up period was up to December 30, 2020.ResultsA total of 67 patients were completed preoperative and postoperative follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months. In terms of anal function, within 1 month after taTME was the worst period in which the anal function was the worst among all the points of time evaluated (1.49±0.33, 10.28±0.64, 6.42±0.60, and 3.73±0.61, respectively), and there was time trend during the follow-up period (F=66.101, P<0.001). In the first year after taTME, the patient’s anal function was in a state of continuous recovery, and the differences between the three points of time at 1, 6, and 12 months after taTME and preoperative anal function were statistically significant (P<0.010). The results of multivariate analysis indicated that the distance between the anastomotic stoma and the anal verge was independent risk factor affecting the postoperative anal function of the patients with taTME at 1 month and 6 months (P<0.010).ConclusionsWith time going, the postoperative anal function of the patients with taTME can be recovered to a certain extent. The distance between the anastomotic stoma and the anal verge was the independent factor affecting the postoperative function of the rectal cancer patients received taTME.
ObjectiveTo investigate risk factors of anastomotic fistula after total mesorectum excision (TME) in middle and low rectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 446 patients with middle and low rectal cancer received TME surgery from June 2004 to June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.Single-factor analysis of risk factors was used by χ2 test,multiple-factor analysis was used by logistic regression analysis. ResultsThere were 36 patients with anastomotic fistula in these 446 patients,which of 22 patients were recovered after conservative treatment,of 14 patients were recovered after colostomy.The results of single-factor analysis showed that the age>60 years,preoperative hemoglobin<110 g/L,preoperative albumin<35 g/L,accompanied with diabetes mellitus,neoadjuvant chemoradiation,distance from anasto-mosis to anus<5 cm,non-strengthen suture by hand were the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after TME in the middle and low rectal cancer (P<0.05).The results of multiple-factor analysis showed that the preoperative hemoglobin<110 g/L,preoperative albumin<35 g/L,accompanied with diabetes mellitus,neoadjuvant chemoradiation,and distance from anastomosis to anus<5 cm were the independent risk factors of anastomotic fistula after TME in the middle and low rectal cancer (P<0.05). ConclusionsRisk of anastomotic fistula after TME in middle and low rectal cancer is higher.Basic complications of patient and local conditions of anastomosis,and intraoperative factors could affect incidence of anastomotic fistula,it should be paid enough attention.In general,most of anastomotic fistula could be cured with conservative treatment,in case of conservative treatment is invalid,colostomy is feasible.