ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2013, 16 patients (16 hips) underwent acetabular revision with a metal reconstruction cage. There were 4 males and 12 females, with the mean age of 62.7 years (range, 49-78 years). The time from total hip arthroplasty to revision was 3-15 years (mean, 8.2 years). The causes for revision were aseptic acetabular loosening in 15 cases, and femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 1 case. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, there were 12 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV; according to the Paprosky classification, there were 12 cases of type IIIA and 4 cases of type IIIB. Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the thigh. X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient, and was cured after anticoagulation therapy. No complications of infection, neurovascular injury, and prosthetic dislocation were found. Sixteen patients were followed up 6.8 years on average (range, 2-9 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from preoperative 42.44±4.66 to 91.88±3.28 at last follow-up (t=–106.30, P=0.00). Two patients had mild pain in the thigh, but pain disappeared at 1 year after operation. At immediate after operation, the abduction angle was 37-54° (mean, 42.9°). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was (33.67±12.19) mm for preoperative value and was (20.67±9.63) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–9.60, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was (34.98±12.30) mm for preoperative value and was (40.04±6.61) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–3.15, P=0.00). X-ray film results showed bony fusion at the osteotomy sites at 4 to 12 months after operation. No continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, or osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was observed in all patients. No patient received re-revision due to prosthetic loosening. ConclusionThe metal reconstruction cage for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for patients with serious bone defect.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the shared decision-making scheme in postoperative out-of-hospital extended care for patients with total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Methods Patients who underwent THA/TKA in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between October 2023 and April 2024 were included using convenience sampling. Patients were divided into the control group (odd-numbered dates) and the intervention group (even-numbered dates) based on the surgical dates. The intervention group was received care guided by a shared decision-making protocol, whereas the control group was followed the standard post-arthroplasty follow-up procedures. Differences between the two groups were compared in terms of decision-making capacity, decision satisfaction, and hip/knee function at the following time points: on the day of discharge, 3 weeks after discharge, 2 months after discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results A total of 118 patients were included, with 59 cases in each group. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of decision-making, compared with the control group, the experimental group had stronger decision-making ability, lower decision-making conflict, and more satisfaction with the decision-making process (P<0.05). In terms of joint function, the experimental group showed better joint function than the control group at 3 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the pain dimension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index between the two groups (P=0.199). Conclusions Compared with the traditional follow-up protocol, the shared decision-making protocol can enhance patient engagement in medical decision-making, reduce decisional conflict, improve satisfaction with the decision-making process, and simultaneously promote joint functional recovery and expedite the rehabilitation process.
Objective To improve the accuracy of the acetabular component placement using the nonimage based surgical navigation system. Methods Twenty-three patients (14 males, 9 females; age, 28-55 years;26 hips）with hip disease underwent the total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the nonimage based surgicalnavigation system from February 2004 to April 2006. Rheumatoid arthritis was found in 3 patients (3 hips), necrosis of the femoral head in 6 patients (6 hips), and osteoarthritis in 14 patients (16 hips). All the patients were randomly divided into the following 2 groups: the navigated group (11 patients, 13 hips), treated by THA using the nonimage based surgical navigation system; and the control group (12 patients, 13 hips), treated by the traditional THA. According to thedesign of the study, the acetabular component was placed in the best inclination angle (45°) and the anteversion angle (15°). The postoperative component position was examined. Results No fracture, dislocation, infection or injury to the sciatic nerve was found. In the navigated group, the inclination and the anteversion reached 15.4±1.4° and 45.5±1.3°, respectively. In the control group,the inclination and the anteversion were 13.9±7.6° and 43.7±6.4°, respectively. The inclination difference was considered statistically significant (Plt;0.01). All the patients were followed up for 10-40 months,averaged 26 months. In the navigated group, the postoperative average Harris hip score was 95 (range,85-110), with an excellent result in 11 hips and a good result in 2 hips. In the control group, the postoperative average Harris hip score was 92 (range,75-110), with an excellent result in 9 hips, a good result in 3 hips, and a fair result in 1 hip. The Harris hip score difference was considered statistically significant (Plt;0.05). There was a significantly better result obtained in the navigated group than in the control group. Conclusion The acetabular component can be implanted accurately by the nonimage based surgical navigation system, which can reduce the incidence of the loosening of the prostheses and has an important value in clinical practice.
Objective To investigate the operative methods, cl inical outcomes and compl ications of total hi p arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of patient with hi p joint flexion rigidity due to ankylosing spondyl itis (AS). Methods From May 1992 to July 2004, 56 patients (32 left hips and 39 right hips) with AS received THA through a modified anterolateral approach, including 52 males (67 hips) and 4 females (4 hips) aged 17-48 years with an average of 35.5 years. All the hips were ankylosed in (43.1 ± 7.2)° of flexion and 15 patients had bilaterally ankylosed hips. Preoperatively, Harris hip score was (42.6 ± 5.3) points and all the hips were classified as stage IV according to the standard of American College of Rheumatology (ACR). And the course of disease was 3-11 years. Results Intraoperatively, 1 patient suffering from proximal femur fracture due to severe osteoporosis was treated with titanium wire fixation, and the fracture was healed 6 weeks later. All the patients were followed up for 3-15 years (average 5.3 years). Postoperatively, 1 patient (1 hip) got subcutaneous soft tissue infection at 8 days, 1 patient (1 hip) got wound disunion at 11 days, 2 patients (2 hips) got infection at 11 months and 3 years, respectively. All the infections were healed after symptomatic treatment. The wounds of the rest 52 patients were healed by first intention without joint infections. The postoperative X-rays demonstrated that 4 hips (5.6%) had loose acetabulum prosthesis, 3 hips (4.2%) had loose femoral prosthesis and 5 hips had loose acetabulum and femoral prosthesis (7.0%), and the total loosening rate was 16.8%. Among which, 8 hips received revision resulting in satisfactory therapeutic effects, and the rest 4 hips had no further treatment. Fifteen hips (21.1%) had heterotopic ossification, which was rel ieved after taking nonsteroidal anti-inflamatory drugs. Harris hip score at final follow-up was (82.7 ± 4.1) points, indicating there was a significant difference between before and after operation (P lt; 0.05). Ten hips were evaluated as excellent, 43 hips good, 14 hips fare, and 4 hips bad, and the excellent and good rate was 74.7%. Conclusion THA through the anterolateral approach is effective for the treatment of patient with hip joint flexion rigidity caused by AS.
Objective To explore the related factors of femoral stem anteversion (FSA) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), so as to provide reference for clinical design of FSA before operation and reduce the risk of hip dislocation after arthroplasty. Methods Ninty-three patients (103 hips) who underwent THA between October 2021 and September 2022 and met the selection criteria were selected as the study subjects. Among them, there were 48 males and 45 females with an average age of 58.5 years (range, 25-88 years). Body mass index was 18.00-37.84 kg/m2, with an average of 24.92 kg/m2. There were 51 cases (57 hips) of osteonecrosis of femoral head, 35 cases (39 hips) of hip osteoarthritis, and 7 cases (7 hips) of congenital hip dysplasia. Based on CT images, the following indicators were measured: preoperative femoral neck anteversion (FNA), preoperative femoral rotation angle (FRA), preoperative acetabular anteversion (AA), and preoperative combined anteversion (CA; the sum of preoperative FNA and AA); postoperative FSA and the change in femoral anteversion angle (the difference between postoperative FSA and preoperative FNA). Based on preoperative X-ray films, the following indicators were measured: femoral cortical thickness index (CTI) and canal flare index (CFI), the proximal femoral medullary cavity was classified according to Noble classification (champagne cup type, normal type, chimney type), neck-shaft angle (NSA), and femoral offset (FO). Pearson correlation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and Point-biserial correlation analysis were used to investigate the correlation between postoperative FSA, postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle, and patient diagnosis, proximal femoral medullary cavity anatomy type, gender, age, as well as preoperative FNA, FRA, AA, CA, NSA, FO, CTI, and CFI. FSA was used as the dependent variable and the independent variables that may be related to it were included for multiple linear regression analysis. Results Based on CT image measurement, preoperative FNA was (15.96±10.01)°, FRA (3.36±10.87)°, AA (12.94±8.83)°, CA (28.9±12.6)°, postoperative FSA (16.18±11.01)°, and postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle was (0.22±9.98)°. Based on preoperative X-ray films measurements, the CTI was 0.586±0.081; the CFI was 4.135±1.125, with 23 hips classified as champagne cup type, 68 hips as normal type, and 12 hips as chimney type in the proximal femoral medullary cavity anatomy; NSA was (132.87±7.83)°; FO was (40.53±10.11) mm. There was no significant difference between preoperative FNA and postoperative FSA (t=−0.227, P=0.821). Pearson correlation analysis showed that postoperative FSA was positively correlated with preoperative FNA, preoperative CA, postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle, and age (P<0.05), while negatively correlated with preoperative FRA (P<0.05). The postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle were positively correlated with preoperative FRA and postoperative FSA (P<0.05), and negatively correlated with preoperative CA and FNA (P<0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis showed that the above two indicators were not correlated with diagnosis and the proximal femoral medullary cavity anatomy type (P>0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a linear correlation between FSA and FNA, CA, age, and FRA (F=10.998, P<0.001), and the best fit model was FSA=0.48×FNA–2.551. Conclusion The factors related to FSA after THA include patient’s age, preoperative FNA, CA, FRA and postoperative femoral anteversion, of which preoperative FNA is the most closely related. When designing a surgical plan before surgery, attention should be paid to the patient’s preoperative FNA, and if necessary, CT around the hip joint should be scanned to gain a detailed understanding of the proximal femoral anatomical structure.
Total hip arthroplasty is an end-stage treatment for hip diseases such as hip osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Traditional surgery models are still mostly used in China, and related day surgery models abroad have shown that day surgery for total hip arthroplasty is as safe and feasible as traditional pattern without increase in complications and readmission. It can also shorten the length of hospitalization for patients, reduce hospitalization costs, thereby speeding up bed turnover and increasing the utilization of medical resources. This article reviews the patient admission, perioperative management, anesthesia and surgical techniques, post-discharge rehabilitation and nursing care of patients undergoing day surgery for total hip arthroplasty, and aims to providea reference for the development of day surgery for total hip arthroplasty in China.
ObjectiveTo investigate the femoral bone remodeling and long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with anatomic medullary locking (AML) prosthesis.MethodsThe clinical data of 24 cases (26 hips) who were treated with THA with AML prosthesis between November 1997 and January 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 12 females with an age of 32-69 years (mean, 53.7 years). There were 5 cases (5 hips) of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, 6 cases (7 hips) of secondary osteoarthritis of the hip dysplasia, 6 cases (6 hips) of femoral neck fracture, 2 cases (2 hips) of primary osteoarthritis, 3 cases (3 hips) of revision surgery, 1 case (2 hips) of ankylosing spondylitis, 1 case (1 hip) of femoral head fracture. The patients were followed up at immediate, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then every year after operation for imaging evaluation (X-ray film was taken immediately after operation to evaluate the femoral isthmus compression, Engh standard was used to evaluate the biological fixation of the femoral shaft prosthesis, and Brooker method was used to evaluate the occurrence of heterotopic ossification); bone reconstruction evaluation [reconstruction of prosthesis and bone interface (type of bone reaction, Gruen zone, incidence, and occurrence time were recorded), reconstruction of bone around prosthesis (proximal femur stress shielding bone absorption was evaluated according to Engh and Bobyn methods, and bone mineral density change rate was measured)]; clinical efficacy evaluation [Harris score for efficacy, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for thigh pain].ResultsAll patients were followed up 15 years and 2 months to 20 years and 4 months, with a median of 16 years and 6 months. At immediate after operation, 24 hips (92.3%) had good femoral isthums compression, 24 hips (92.3%) had good bone ingrowth. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 patients with degree 1, 2 patients with degree 2, and 1 patient with degree 3 at 3-6 months after operation. Hyperplastic bone reactions were more common in Gruen 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, and 12 zones, mainly occurring at 6-20 months after operation, with the incidence of 3.8%-69.2%, with the highest incidence of spot welding. All absorptive bone reactions were osteolysis, which was common in Gruen 1 and 7 zones, and mainly occurred at 8 years after operation, with an incidence of 42.3%. No clear line (area) or enlarged sign of medullary cavity was observed. Twenty-one hips (80.8%) had 1 degree stress shieding, and 5 hips (19.2%) had 2 degree stress shieding. It mainly occurred at 10-24 months after operation in Gruen 1 and 7 zones. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry showed that bone mineral density mainly decreased in Gruen 1, 2, 6, and 7 zones, mainly increased in Gruen 3, 4, and 5 zones. Bone mineral density loss progressed slowly after 2 years of operation, and it was stable in 5-8 years, but decreased rapidly in 8-9 years, and stabilized after 10 years. The Harris score increased from 51.1±6.2 before operation to 88.3±5.1 at last follow-up (t=–21.774, P=0.000). Mild thigh pain occurred in only 2 cases (7.7%) with the VAS score of 2. No aseptic loosening or revision of femoral prosthesis occurred during the follow-up.ConclusionThe application of AML prosthesis in THA has a good bone remodeling and a good long-term effectiveness.
Objective To evaluate precise assessment methods for predicting the optimal acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A clinical data of 73 patients (80 hips) who underwent primary THA between December 2022 and July 2024 and met the inclusion criteria was analyzed. There were 39 males and 34 females with an average age of 66.3 years (range, 56-78 years). Among them, 66 cases were unilateral THA and 7 were bilateral THAs. There were 29 patients (34 hips) of osteoarthritis, 35 patients (35 hips) of femoral neck fractures, and 9 patients (11 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Based on anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, three methods were employed to predict acetabular cup size, including preoperative template planning, radiographic femoral head diameter (FHD) measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement. The predicted acetabular cup sizes from these methods were compared with the actual implanted sizes. Results The predicted acetabular cup sizes using the preoperative template planning, radiographic FHD measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement were (51.25±2.81), (49.72±3.11), and (49.90±2.74) mm, respectively, compared to the actual implanted cup size of (50.57±2.74) mm, with no significant difference (P>0.05). Regarding agreement with the actual implanted cup size, the preoperative template planning achieved exact matches in 35 hips (43.75%), one-size deviation in 41 hips (51.25%), and two-size deviations in 4 hips (5%); the radiographic FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 12 hips (15%), one-size deviation in 57 hips (71.25%), and two-size deviations in 11 hips (13.75%); and the intraoperative FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 26 hips (32.5%), one-size deviation in 52 hips (65%), and two-size deviations in 2 hips (2.5%). There were significant differences in agreement distributions between the three methods and the actual implanted cup sizes (H=18.579, P<0.001). Conclusion The intraoperative FHD measurement, as a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method, effectively guides acetabular cup selection, reduces the risk of prosthesis wear, enhances postoperative joint stability.
Objective To investigate the development trajectories of kinesiophobia and their influencing factors in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Patients after THA from three tertiary hospitals in Wuhan from February to June 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method. The general situation questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEE), Groningen Orthopaedic Social Support Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Patient Health Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were distributed 1-2 d after surgery (T1), which were used again 1 week (T2), 1 month (T3), and 3 months (T4) after surgery, to evaluate the level of kinesiophobia and the physical and psychological conditions of the patients. The latent category growth model was used to classify the kinesiophobia trajectories of patients after THA, and the influencing factors of different categories of kinesiophobia trajectories were analyzed. Results A total of 263 patients after THA were included. The kinesiophobia trajectories of patients after THA were divided into four potential categories, including 29 cases in the C1 high kinesiophobia persistent group, 41 cases in the C2 medium kinesiophobia improvement group, 131 cases in the C3 low kinesiophobia improvement group, and 62 cases in the C4 no kinesiophobia group. Multicategorical logistic regression analysis showed that compared to the C4 no kinesiophobia group, the influencing factors for the kinesiophobia trajectory in THA patients to develop into the C1 high kinesiophobia persistent group were age [odds ratio (OR)=1.081, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.025, 1.140)], chronic comorbidities [OR=6.471, 95%CI (1.831, 22.872)], the average SEE score at T1-T4 time points [OR=0.867, 95%CI (0.808, 0.931)], and the average VAS score at T1-T4 time points [OR=7.981, 95%CI (1.718, 37.074)], the influencing factors for the kinesiophobia trajectory to develop into the C2 medium kinesiophobia improvement group were age [OR=1.049, 95%CI (1.010, 1.089)], education level [OR=0.244, 95%CI (0.085, 0.703)], and the average VAS score at T1-T4 time points [OR=8.357, 95%CI (2.300, 30.368)], and the influencing factors for the kinesiophobia trajectory to develop into the C3 low kinesiophobia improvement group were the average SEE score [OR=0.871, 95%CI (0.825, 0.920)] and the average VAS score at T1-T4 time points [OR=4.167, 95%CI (1.544, 11.245)] . Conclusion Kinesiophobia in patients after THA presents different trajectories, and nurses should pay attention to the assessment and intervention of kinesiophobia in patients with advanced age, low education level, chronic diseases, low exercise self-efficacy, and high pain level.