ObjectiveTo explore the effect of different ventilation modes on pulmonary complications (PCs) after laparoscopic weight loss surgery in obese patients. MethodsThe obese patients who underwent laparoscopic weight loss surgery in the Xiaolan People’s Hospital of Zhongshan from January 2019 to June 2023 were retrospectively collected, then were assigned into pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) group and volume controlled ventilation (VCV) group according to the different ventilation modes during anesthesia. The clinicopathologic data of the patients between the PCV-VG group and VCV group were compared. The occurrence of postoperative PCs was understood and the risk factors affecting the postoperative PCs for the obese patients underwent laparoscopic weight loss surgery were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. ResultsA total of 294 obese patients who underwent laparoscopic weight loss surgery were enrolled, with 138 males and 156 females; Body mass index (BMI) was 30–55 kg/m2, (42.40±4.87) kg/m2. The postoperative PCs occurred in 63 cases (21.4%). There were 160 cases in the PCV-VG group and 134 cases in the VCV group. The anesthesia time, tidal volume at 5 min after tracheal intubation, peak inspiratory pressure and driving pressure at 5 min after tracheal intubation, 60 min after establishing pneumoperitoneum, and the end of surgery, as well as incidence of postoperative PCs in the PCV-VG group were all less or lower than those in the VCV group (P<0.05). The indicators with statistical significance by univariate analysis in combination with significant clinical indicators were enrolled in the multivariate logistic regression model, such as the smoking history, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, hypertension, BMI, operation time, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity, and intraoperative ventilation mode. It was found that the factors had no collinearity (tolerance>0.1, and variance inflation factor<10). The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the patients with higher BMI and intraoperative VCV mode increased the probability of postoperative PCs (P<0.05). ConclusionsFrom the preliminary results of this study, for the obese patients underwent laparoscopic weight loss surgery, the choice of ventilation mode is closely related to the risk of developing postoperative PCs. In clinical practice, it is particularly important to pay attention to the risk of postoperative PCs for the patients with higher degree obesity.
ObjectiveTo investigate the difference of DNA methylation before and after bariatric surgery.MethodThe relevant literatures of the research on the changes of DNA methylation level and gene expression regulation in blood and tissues before and after bariatric surgery were retrieved and reviewed.ResultsDNA methylation was an important method of epigenetic regulation in organisms and its role in bariatric surgery had been paid more and more attention in recent years. Existing studies had found that there were changes of DNA methylation in blood and tissues before and after bariatric surgery. The degree of methylation varies with different follow-up time after bariatric surgery and the same gene had different degrees of methylation in different tissues, and some even had the opposite results.ConclusionsDNA methylation levels before and after bariatric surgery are different in different tissues. And studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up time are needed, to further reveal relationship among DNA methylation, obesity, and bariatric surgery.
Objective To investigate the clinical application value of unsymmetrical four-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The clinical data of 114 patients with obesity who were admitted to Mianyang Central Hospital from June 2021 to May 2022 were retrospective analyzed. All the 114 patients underwent unsymme-trical four-port LSG, and were observed their surgical and postoperative conditions, complications and follow-up the patient’s esthetic satisfaction of wounds at 3 months after surgery. Results All 114 patients underwent unsymmetrical four-port LSG successfully, without conversion to open surgery. The operative time was 68–160 min, average (104.2±26.1) minutes; volume of intraoperative blood loss was 2–50 mL, average (10.7±7.6) mL; the duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3–6 d, average (4.0±0.7) days. Of the 114 patients, 8 patients (7.0%) had fat liquefaction of wounds, 68 patients (59.6%) had postoperative nausea and vomiting in the 24 hours after operation, and all patients had no serious complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, or gastric leakage. One hundred and fourteen patients were followed-up for 3–14 months, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Forty patients (35.1%) had hair loss, 3 patients (2.6%) had mild anemia. Of the 114 patients, 2 (1.8%) were dissatisfied with the cosmetic effects of wounds, 64 (56.1%) were satisfied, and 48 (42.1%) were very satisfied. The satisfaction rate was 98.2% (112/114). Conclusion The unsymmetrical four-port LSG is safe and feasible, it does not affect esthetic satisfaction of wounds.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2014), CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LRYGB vs. LSG for obesity and T2DM. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs including 828 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:There were no significant differences between the LRYGB group and the LSG group in body mass index (MD=-1.02, 95%CI -2.90 to 0.86, P=0.29), remission rate of T2DM (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.73, P=0.64), reoperation rate (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.01 to 7.42, P=0.05), level of fasting plasma glucose (MD=2.71, 95%CI -0.80 to 6.21, P=0.13), and level of serum low density lipoprotein (MD=-23.85, 95%CI -47.20 to -0.50, P=0.05). However, the LSG group had lower postoperative complication rate (OR=2.28, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.62, P=0.000 5) than that of the LRYGB group. ConclusionIn short term, both LRYGB and LSG were equally efficient in the treatment of obesity and T2DM, but LSG has lower postoperative complication rate than LRYGB. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety of the incision along the upper umbilical margin (referred to as the “upper incision”) versus the transverse umbilical incision (referred to as the “transverse incision”) for single-port bariatric surgery, and to assess their effects on postoperative scar appearance and patient’s psychological adaptation. MethodsThis study was designed as a multi-center retrospective analysis. The patients who underwent bariatric surgery via the upper incision and transverse incision at the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from December 2024 to April 2025. The incidence of postoperative complications and the pionts of scar appearance (evaluated using the POSAS 3.0 scale) and psychological adaptation (measured with the BODY-Q scale) between the two incision methods were compared. Furthermore, multiple linear regression model was employed to evaluate the impact of different incision methods on points of scar appearance and psychological adaptation. ResultsA total of 194 patients who underwent single-port bariatric surgery were included, with 134 in the transverse incision group and 60 in the upper incision group. There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of incision complications between the transverse and upper incision groups [11.9% (16/134) vs. 18.3% (11/60), χ2=0.930, P=0.335]. The transverse incision group showed significantly better outcomes than the upper incision group in the overall points of BODY-Q scale [(39.86±1.02) points vs. (37.63±4.70) points, t=–6.090, P<0.001] and POSAS scale [(17.60±2.35) points vs. (21.25±6.00) points, t=5.239, P<0.001]. After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as history of diabetes mellitus, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, keloid tendency, and use of scar improvement products in the multiple linear regression model, the advantage of the transverse incision remained significant [β(95%CI)=–1.81 (–2.84, –0.78), P<0.001]. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the transverse incision significantly improves the overall appearance of the postoperative scar and enhances patient’s psychological adaptation compared to the upper incision in single-port bariatric surgery. This advantage persists independently after adjusting for multiple confounding factors. Therefore, the transverse incision could be considered a more favorable approach in terms of cosmetic outcomes and patient’s psychological adaptation.
Objective To formulate an individualized evidence-based treatment for a patient with severe obesity. Methods According to the PICO (patient intervention comparison outcome) principle, the evidence was collected and critically assessed after the clinical issues were put forwarded. The patient’s preference was also taken into account in the decision making process. Results Nine clinical guidelines, eight systematic reviews or meta-analyses and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. According to the data from the included studies and patient’s special condition, a reasonable surgical treatment regime was made to reduce the weight, relieve all kinds of complications and improve the life quality which were all regarded as the expected target. After one year’s follow-up, the patient’s weight reduced by 20 kg, and some obesity-related co-morbidities such as sleep apnea syndrome and hyperlipoidemia were also improved significantly. Conclusion The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band is an effective operation for severely obese individuals. This procedure can not only achieve weight loss, but also improve some obesity-related co-morbidities.
ObjectiveTo understand the present situation and effect of da Vinci robot in the treatment of obesity.MethodThe literatures about the application of da Vinci surgical robot in metabolic surgery for weight loss were reviewed.Resultsda Vinci surgical robot was a minimally invasive surgical system in recent years. Because of its unique structure, it broke through the limitations of traditional laparoscopic surgery, such as lack of field of vision, two-dimensional imaging, unstable lens, limited range of movement, and so on. It provided a solution way for metabolic surgery for weight loss with narrow operation space and high technical difficulty. At present, there were differences in operation time and postoperative complications between da Vinci surgical robot and laparoscopic weight loss.ConclusionsIn recent years, da Vinci surgical robot has been widely used in metabolic surgery for weight loss. It not only overcomes many limitations of laparoscopic assisted weight loss surgery, but also it is safe, feasible, and has a similar clinical effect. It provides a new choice for metabolic surgery for weight loss.
Both bariatric surgery and pharmacotherapy, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), are effective interventions for obesity, yet each has its own advantages and limitations. Drawing on the “bridging” concept from cancer therapy, this commentary explores an innovative obesity management strategy that involves the combined application of GLP-1RA and bariatric surgery during the perioperative period, with the aim of optimizing treatment outcomes. The present analysis focuses specifically on the potential value of this approach: preoperatively, GLP-1RAs serve as a “bridging therapy” to promote weight loss and reduce surgical risks in severely obese patients; postoperatively, they might be used to manage weight rebound or insufficient weight loss. This multimodal integrated strategy is designed to overcome the inherent limitations of single therapies and offer patients more comprehensive treatment options. Emphasizing that future research must urgently focus on optimizing treatment parameters (e.g., timing, dosage), evaluating long-term safety and efficacy, and establishing patient selection criteria for combination therapy. Integrating surgical and pharmacological treatments, this comprehensive strategy based on the oncological “bridging” concept represents a highly promising paradigm shift in obesity management.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the research progress in the selection of metabolic bariatric procedures, efficacy, safety, complication prevention, and long-term management for elderly patients, so as to provide references for surgical decision-making and perioperative management in future metabolic and bariatric surgery for elderly obese patients. MethodA review of recent domestic and international literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery in elderly patients was conducted. ResultsWith the intensification of societal aging, the incidence of obesity and related metabolic diseases among the elderly population has significantly increased. Metabolic and bariatric surgery has been proven to effectively reduce weight and improve obesity-related metabolic diseases in elderly patients. Current guidelines no longer consider age an absolute contraindication for surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly used procedures internationally. SG is superior to RYGB in terms of surgical safety, while RYGB has greater advantages in improving metabolic diseases. Although the postoperative mortality and complications risks in elderly obese patients are higher than those in younger obese patients, strict preoperative assessment and individualized procedure selection can significantly reduce these risks. ConclusionsMetabolic and bariatric surgery can serve as an effective treatment for elderly obese patients, offering comprehensive benefits in weight loss and metabolic improvement. Procedure selection requires individualized assessment, balancing the patient’s baseline condition and metabolic needs. Postoperative success hinges on systematic long-term follow-up and management to ensure sustained benefits and safety. Future efforts should focus on clarifying the definitions or standards of “elderly” and “obesity,” followed by more large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled studies to validate the safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery.