Objective To compare the differences in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patient-reported Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) and nurse-reported RHDS were delivered to 130 CRC patients and 40 nurses respectively. All patients were followed ERAS pathway during perioperative periods. The differences were compared in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and CRC patients. Results This study investigated 130 CRC patients and 40 responsible nurses. The scores of RHDS from nurses and patients were 162.86±27.95 and 149.86±33.65 respectively. When evaluating whether patients were ready to go home after discharge, the consistency between nurses’ results and patients’ results was weak（κ=0.365, P<0.001）. Items in patients’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, coping ability, knowledge, and personal status. Items in nurses’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, knowledge, coping ability, and personal status. Besides the " social support” dimension, the scores of other 3 dimensions from nurses were significantly higher than those from patients (P<0.05). Conclusion There is a gap between the assessment of RHDS from nurses and patients, nurses overestimated patients’ discharge readiness level.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on intestinal flora in patients with colorectal cancer.MethodsBy convenient sampling method, 60 patients with colorectal cancer were selected from August 2018 to December 2019 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and randomly divided into ERAS group and traditional treatment group (traditional group). Among them, the perioperative clinical management was carried out according to the ERAS management and traditional treatment process in the the ERAS group and in the traditional group, respectively. The fresh fecal samples were collected within 24 h after admission and the first natural defecation after operation. The bacterial 16 Sr DNA V3–V4 region was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq sequencer, and the results were analyzed by bioinformatics.ResultsA total of 60 patients with colorectal cancer were included, 30 cases in the traditional group and 27 cases in the ERAS group (3 people temporarily withdrew from the study). There were no significant differences in the basic informations between the two groups (P>0.05). ① Before or after operation, there were no significant differences in Shannon index and Simpson index between the two groups. The difference between preoperative and postoperative comparison in the same group was also not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Beta diversity analysis showed that there was no significant difference in community composition between the traditional group and the ERAS group before operation, and there was a clear boundary between the traditional group and the ERAS group after operation. ③ At the phylum level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance Firmicutes decreased by 26.5% and 5.5% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Bacteroidetes increased by 21.6% and 4.7% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Proteobacteria increased by 7.2% and 2.2% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively. At the genus level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance of Bacteroides in the traditional group increased by 17.6% and in the ERAS group decreased by 1.6%; Bifidobacterium decreased by 1.8% and 1.3% in the traditional group and in the ERAS group, respectively.ConclusionsERAS does not affect species diversity of intestinal flora. Although ERAS has some damage to structure of intestinal flora, it is weaker than traditional process, so it is more conducive to reconstruction and restoration of intestinal microecological environment.
ObjectiveTo analyze the current situation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) application in colorectal surgery in China, and summarize the existing problems.MethodsAfter the questionnaire was developed, members of the Chinese Society of Colorectal Cancer were selected as respondents and results were collected by online questionnaire. All the respondents volunteered to visit the homepage of the questionnaire through the link address. After completing the questionnaire, they were saved and submitted.ResultsA total of 120 questionnaires were sent out and finally 107 respondents completed the electronic questionnaire survey. Among them, 73 (68.2%) routinely carried out ERAS programmes and 34 (31.8%) didn’t carry out ERAS programmes. Among the 11 ERAS programmes, most surgeons carried out 3–7 ERAS programmes, among which 4 ERAS programmes was the most (25 surgeons, 23.4%). The survey results for different ERAS programmes showed that only 4 out of 11 ERAS programmes had implemented more than half of the respondents. Respondents with older than 45 years old were more inclined not to undergo mechanical bowel preparation before surgery (P<0.001) and were more likely early postoperative oral intake (P=0.008), respondents with more than 1 000 hospital beds were more likely to select preoperative oral carbohydrate (P=0.012) and postoperative multimodal analgesia (P<0.001), respondents with more than 200 cases of colorectal surgery per year were more inclinedto take oral carbohydrate before surgery (P=0.018), and respondents whose rate of minimally invasive surgery was higher than 50% were more inclined to choose multimode analgesia (P=0.047). On the contrary, the respondents in the tumor hospitals recommended shortening the length of postoperative hospital stay and recommending early discharge (P=0.014). Hospitals that routinely performed ERAS (P<0.001), preoperative oral carbohydrate (P<0.001), without preoperative gastric tube (P=0.019), early postoperative drinking water (P=0.012), and early postoperative oral feeding (P=0.038) were associated with a shorter average postoperative hospital stay.ConclusionERAS has not been popularized in the field of colorectal surgery in China, and there are differences between different doctors and between different hospitals, which still need to be promoted continuously.
In the context of accelerated rehabilitation, nutritional support for patients with orthopedic cervical spondylosis is an important condition for lessening postoperative stress response, reducing postoperative complications, shortening patient’s length of hospital stay, lowering medical expenses, and promoting early recovery of patients. Based on this, West China Hospital of Sichuan University explored and established the West China Hospital program for nutritional management in cervical spondylosis from the aspects of team building, nutritional assessment and monitoring, and nutritional intervention.
Objective To explore effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on maintaining homeostasis of patient body and role of ERAS in alleviating stress response of physiological and psychological of patient and promoting recovery of patient from operative trauma as soon as possible. Method The related literatures published at home and abroad about the ERAS and its influence on the perioperative stress degree of patient were reviewed and analyzed. Results The ERAS was a new perioperative management mode established under the guidance of evidence-based medicine, whose core was to reduce the perioperative physiological and psychological stress level of the patient through a series of optimized measures, and to promote the postoperative rehabilitation. At the same time, the ERAS had been more and more widely accepted by the surgeons and patients because of its unique advantages, especially in shortening the hospital stay and reducing the operating costs. Conclusions Although concept of ERAS is not yet accepted by most clinicians, ERAS does provide a more optimal perioperative management strategy for patient, could obviously reduce perioperative stress level, improve patient outcome, accelerate postoperative recovery of patient, and provide benefit for patient underwent surgery.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical effects and hospitalization costs of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode for patients underwent radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodThe clinicopathologic data of adult patients who underwent radical resection of HCC in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2017 to December 2019 were collected retrospectively. ResultsA total of 1 082 patients were collected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria in this study, including 469 patients in the ERAS mode group and 613 patients in the traditional mode group. There were no significant differences in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, preoperative complications, operation type, and medical group between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the traditional mode group, the total hospitalization cost, medical service fee, examination fee, bed fee, and cooling and heating fee in the ERAS mode group were lower (P<0.05), the average total hospitalization time was shortened by about 1.2 d (P<0.01), the preoperative hospitalization time was shortened by about 0.3 d (P=0.03), and the postoperative hospitalization time was shortened by about 0.8 d (P<0.01) in the EARS mode group. There were no significant differences in the incidences of specific complications and total complications between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionERAS for patients with HCC might play a role in improving rehabilitation efficiency and reducing hospitalization costs.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in elderly patients with right colon cancer. MethodsA total of 90 elderly patients who were diagnosed as right colon cancer and underwent radical resection of right colon cancer in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from April 2018 to October 2018 were enrolled prospectively. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: ERAS group (n=44) receiving ERAS during perioperative period and control group (n=46) undergoing conventional surgical treatment. To compare the occurrence of postoperative complications, the recovery of gastrointestinal function, and the changes of serum inflammatory factors between the two groups before and after operation. Results① There was no significant difference in the incidence of total postoperative complications and the incidence of complications (including anastomotic leakage, incision infection, postoperative bleeding, intestinal obstruction, cardiovascular complications, pulmonary infection, and urethral infection） between the ERAS group and the control group (P>0.05). ② The first anal exhaust time, postoperative fever time, postoperative hospitalization time, quality of life score, and hospitalization cost of the ERAS group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). ③ There were no significant difference in serum IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP levels between the two groups before operation (P>0.05), but on the 1st and 3rd day after operation, the three indexes of the control group were higher than those of the ERAS group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe application of the idea of ERAS in the elderly patients with right colon cancer can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, shorten the hospitalization time, and improve the clinical outcome.
With the widespread promotion and application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept in the surgical fields, the implementation of the ERAS concept in the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was explored in the vascular surgery. The “Six-Step” comprehensive treatment protocol and the establishment of the ERAS system for lower extremity DVT developed by the Department of Vascular Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were elaborated. The protocol includes steps such as filter placement, thrombus clearance, relief of venous outflow obstruction, dissolution of residual thrombus, filter retrieval, and standardized post-discharge anticoagulation management, along with their respective advantages. Additionally, the training and dissemination efforts undertaken to promote the “Six-Step” comprehensive treatment protocol were described. A comparison was made between ERAS and traditional recovery surgery, highlighting the comprehensive clinical benefits of the former. The aim is to promote the standardized implementation of the ERAS system in lower extremity DVT treatment and to bring greater benefits to patients.
The great clinical efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been illustrated by the decreased incidence of perioperative complications and the shortened length of in-hospital stay. Furthermore, the ERAS programs have their own key techniques and strategies in the clinical application to the unique diseases and operative modes. The key technology of an ERAS program is the minimally invasive surgery, which has been widely utilized in the surgical specialties. The main strategy in an ERAS program consists of the intensive pulmonary rehabilitation and optimal perioperative care that aim to improve the in-hospital outcomes of lung cancer patients who are considered at high surgical risk. Pulmonary rehabilitation is regarded as the mainstay of the ERAS strategies but its clinical protocols still remain less mature. The purpose of this overview is to summarize the current pulmonary rehabilitation programs in terms of the suitable crowd, the feasible protocols and the clinical significance.
[Abstract]Elderly patients with lung cancer have a significantly increased risk of perioperative cardiopulmonary complications due to physiological decline, high incidence of complications and reduced surgical tolerance, which directly affects postoperative recovery and long-term survival. Although the concepts of minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery have improved clinical outcomes, early recognition and intervention of postoperative complications in elderly patients remains a significant challenge in the field of thoracic surgery. By integrating recent literature and clinical practice, this paper systematically analyzes the pathophysiological mechanism and risk factors of perioperative cardiopulmonary complications in elderly patients with lung cancer, and discusses individualized intervention strategies based on risk stratification and multidisciplinary team, in order to provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for optimizing perioperative management and improving postoperative prognosis in elderly patients.