Objective To improve the diagnosis and treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum. MethodsLiteratures were reviewed.ResultsThe morbidity of primary duodenal adenocarcinoma was low and its clinical manifestation had no characteristics.The most effective methods in the diagnosis of the disease were gastrointestinal radiography and endoscopy with the accuracy of 88% and 89% respectively.The disease could be cured by resection of the lesion. The selection of operative type depended on the stage and position of the tumor.Radical resection and tumor stage played an important role in the prognosis.Conclusion Early diagnosis and rational operation are the major ways to improve the resectability and to modify the therapeutic result.
目的:探讨MRI不同检查方法对十二指肠乳头旁憩室(periampullary diverticulum,PAD)的诊断价值。方法:应用MRI多序列检查方法诊断PAD23例,并进行分析。结果:T1WI显示为囊状低信号影,与十二指肠相通者1例,其余22例表现为不均匀略低及高低混杂信号,均未明确诊断;横断位压脂T2WI显示含气液平面囊性病灶15例;冠状位FIESTA序列表现为混杂高信号或高信号影15例;呼吸触发3D MRCP表现为高或混杂高信号影16例;冠状位屏气3DCE LAVA动态增强扫描均清晰显示。其中合并胆系结石13例,胆系炎症及感染13例,胰腺炎3例,胆胰管扩张3例,十二指肠炎症3例。结论:MRI能多序列、多方位、直观、无创的清晰显示PAD的部位、大小、范围及与邻近结构的关系,同时显示胆胰疾病形态学改变。故MRI多序列检查非常必要,是PAD诊断及鉴别诊断的重要方法。
Modified Goligher’s highly selective vagotomy (HSV) for 217 cases of duodenal ulcers is reported. In this series they were: duodenal ulcer (100 cases), combined gastric and duodenal ulcers (79 cases) and complicated perforating, bleeding or stenosed ulcers (38 cases). In the complicated duodenal ulcer, HSV was usually carried out with suturing bleeding point, perforated ulcer or with pyloroplasty. With a follow-up of 3~20 years, the recurrence rate werelt;2% and 85.7% of cases had excellent or good results as Visick classification. Considerations relevant to the HSV technic are deemed worthy of emphasis; complete resection of gastric branches of anterior and posterior vagal trunks and preservation of the first limb of the "Crow’s foot", extended dissection of the distal 5-7cm of the esophagus and division of the distal 8-10cm of the bundle of the gastroepiploic vessels in order to deprive the whole parietal cell mass of its vagal supply. In 4 patients, recurrence were easily controlled with remedies or operation for gastric retention by rational type. The authors suggest that the modified HSV plus mucusdeprived antrectomy be the rational surgical choice for duodenal ulcer.
目的 探讨闭合性十二指肠损伤的诊断与术式选择及其效果。 方法对1980～1999年间收治的33例闭合性十二指肠损伤患者临床资料进行回顾性总结分析。结果 合并伤27例，其中胰腺损伤占24.2%(8/33)，术前诊断率为18.2%(6/33)，术中漏诊率为15.2%(5/33)。术式选择：单纯十二指肠损伤以修补为主，十二指肠裂口较大或缺损者，可采用空肠浆膜覆盖术及十二指肠空肠Y型吻合术等其它术式，合并有胰腺损伤者宜行Graham简化术。同时应行充分的十二指肠减压和腹腔引流。术后并发症发生率为39.4%(13/33)，治愈率为84.8%(28/33)，死亡率为15.2%(5/33)。 结论 十二指肠损伤应重视早期诊断，在剖腹探查中应识别其损伤特征，并掌握切开探查方法，防止漏诊；术式选择宁简勿繁，不同患者适时、适当地采用最佳的诊断和治疗方法是十二指肠损伤手术成功的关键。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of drained versus nondrained pancreaticojejunostomy on prevention of the pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsSeventysix patients underwent the standard pancreaticoduodenectomy including resection of the distal stomach,common bile duct, the head of pancreas and the duodenum.Pancreaticenteric reconstruction was accomplished via either pancreaticojejunostomy by endtoside anastomsis or pancreaticojejunostomy by ducttomucosa anastomsis.The stented external drainage of pancreatic duct was used in 45 of 76 patients. ResultsPancreatic leakage was identified in 1 patient in the drained group consisting of 45 patients,in 7 patients in the nondrained group consisting of 31 patients, the incidence of pancreatic leakage in the drained group (2.2%) was significantly less than in the nondrained group (22.6%,P＜0.05).ConclusionComparing the incidences of pancreatic leakage from both groups,the authors believe that the stented external drainage of pancreatic duct can significantly reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the occurrence and treatment of postoperative complications after laparoscopic laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPPPD) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodThe clinical data of 130 patients undergoing LPD from October 2010 to December 2015 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsOf 130 patients, postoperative complications occurred in 55 cases, including 24 cases of pancreatic fistula, 14 cases of gastric emptying disorder, 3 cases of anastomotic bleeding, 6 cases of peritoneal infection, 1 case of bile leakage, 1 case of venous thrombosis, 1 case of chylous leakage, 5 cases of peritoneal effusion, without the occurrence of stress ulcer and incision complications. There were significant difference in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P=0.025), gastric emptying disorder (P=0.034), anastomotic bleeding (P=0.020), and peritoneal infection (P=0.016) among prophase group, metaphase group, and the later stage group. ConclusionsThe most common complication after LPD is pancreatic fistula. With the improvement of surgical techniques and procedures, incidences of some postoperative complications decreases gradually.
Objective To investigate the risk factors and preventions of functional delayed gastric emptying (FDGE) after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD). Methods The clinical data of 41 patients after undergoing PPPD between 2003 and 2009 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively.Results In all 41 cases, postoperative complications developed in 13 patients (31.7%), in which 7 patients developed FDGE (17.1%). The complications excluding FDGE (P=0.010) and diabetes (P=0.024) had remarkable relations with the FDGE in the univariate analysis; Compared with the non-FDGE patients, the albumin was declined obviously (P=0.020) while the serum direct bilirubin increased significantly (P=0.036) in the FDGE patients, while the development of FDGE had relation only with the albumin (P=0.039) and the complication of diabete (P=0.047) by the binary logistic regression analysis. Conclusion In the patients undergoing PPPD, preoperative control of the blood glucose, preoperative correction of hypoproteinemia and hyperbilirubinemia, and centralizing PPPD in high-volume have possibly positive significance for the prevention of FDGE.
ObjectiveTo analyze the surgical effect, postoperative complications and effects on the body inflammatory response of laparoscopic gastroduodenal perforation repair, and to further evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic perforation repair. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 123 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation treated between February 2010 and February 2015. Among the patients, 65 underwent laparoscopic gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair (laparoscopic group), and 58 underwent routine open gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair (open group). Then, we compared the surgical effects (average bleeding volume, ambulation time, postoperative ventilation time, postoperative hospital stay), postoperative complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence, gastroduodenal fistula, abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction), inflammatory reaction[preoperative and 1, 3, 5-day postoperative white blood cells (WBC) count, peripheral blood procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] between the two groups. ResultsPatients in both the two groups underwent the surgery successfully. No patients in the laparoscopic group were transferred to open surgery. Compared with the open surgery, surgical bleeding volume, ambulation time, anal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay of the laparoscopic group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications rate of the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of the open group (P < 0.05). One and 3-day WBC, PCT and CRP after surgery increased obviously in both the two groups. The above three indicators on the fifth day after surgery were not significantly different from those before the surgery in the laparoscopic group (P > 0.05), while they were significantly different from those before the surgery in the open group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsCompared with open perforation repair, laparoscopic perforation repair surgery is superior for its better surgical effects, fewer postoperative complications and lighter inflammatory response. It is a safe, effective and minimally-invasive treatment for gastroduodenal perforation.