ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, safety and economy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to provide basis for clinical dosing and decision-making. MethodsComputerized searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and official websites of domestic and international health technology assessment (HTA) organizations were conducted to collect HTA reports, safety and economic data on the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nabulizumab, pembrolizumab, cimeplizumab, atilizumab, and duvarizumab) for NSCLC HTA reports, systematic reviews (SR)/Meta-analyses, and pharmacoeconomic studies, all with a search timeframe of March 2024 from the time of library construction. After data extraction and quality assessment, the results of the included studies were analyzed descriptively. ResultsA total of 16 papers were included, including 16 SR/Meta-analyses and 2 pharmacoeconomic studies. Compared with first-line chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increased the efficiency and disease control rate, prolonged the survival time, improved the quality of survival, and reduced grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse effects (including fatigue, dyspnea, anemia, pneumonia, severe skin reactions, nausea, diarrhea, decreased appetite, and leukopenia) in NSCLC patients. Cemiplizumab was cost-effective when the WTP threshold was $100 000/QALY, and pembrolizumab was cost-effective when the WTP threshold was $150 000/QALY. ConclusionPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nabulizumab, pabolizumab, cimiplizumab, atilizumab, and duvarizumab) are efficacious, safe, and cost-effective for use in NSCLC; however, given the small number of pharmacoeconomic studies included, economic conclusions drawn need to be interpreted with caution.
Objective According to health technology assessment (HTA) methodology, to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of metoprolol in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Based on the principles of HTA, we searched some important medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CMCC, as well as several national special heart disease databases and side effect centers. We selected eligible studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and critically assessed their quality. Results Intravenous metoprolol 10 mg - 15 mg could control rapid ventricular rate in patients with chronic AF. On either rest or exercise, oral metoprolol 150 mg/d had a better control of rapid ventricular rate than 50 mg/d in patients with chronic AF. For preventing postoperative AF (POAF), the intravenous metoprolol 20 mg group and the 30 mg group could decrease the incidence of POAF compared to the 10 mg group. Oral metoprolol 150 mg/d was more effective than 100 mg/d in preventing POAF. In addition, intravenous metoprolol therapy was well-tolerated and more effective than oral metoprolol therapy in preventing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Results from several national side effect centers demonstrated that the incidence of adverse reactions associated with metoprolol was low. Conclusion Present evidence showed that high dose of metoprolol was superior to low dose in treating AF, however, the evidence available is insufficient. It is suggested that adequate evidence through further studies are needed. The safety profile of different doses of metoprolol is similar.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness of eight angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in order to provide evidence for adjustment of Essential Drug List in China. Method Collecting all clinical trials by searching Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese Biomedical Database and conducting critical appraisal. High quality randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were included to assess the effectiveness of ACEIs. Non-randomized controlled trials were also included to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness. Results New generation of ACEIs are better than enalapril and captopril in antihypertension and endurance. Meta-analysis showed that T/P ratio was less than 50% in prindopril, benazepril and captopril. Enalapril and captopril had the most adequate evidence in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The effects of lisinopril, prindopril, benazepril and cilazapril positive influence on heart failure were assessed by surrogates. Captopril, lisinopril could reduce the total death rate of acute period (during 36 hours of AMI). Enalapril, captopril, ramipril and prindopril had the effect of heart protection in late period of AMI (3 days after AMI). Only ramipril, lisinopril and prindopril had evidence to support the protective effect on cerebral vessels. The available evidence, though not adequate, showed all the ACEIs except benazepril could diminish proteinuria and delay the renal failure. The new generations of ACEIs were similar in adverse reactions to enalapril and captopril, while incidences were lower than enalapril and captopril. Few evidence on cost-effectiveness of ACEIs were identified. The available evidence showed enalapril was cost-effective in treating heart failure. However, it compromised to lisinopril. The studies on ethics were not available. Conclusions It was difficult to generally rank the eight ACEIs according to available evidence. Not all eight ACEIs had adequate evidence in organs protection. It was suggested that clinicians should select ACEIs with adequate evidence to treat patients on states.
With the development of health technology assessments, the public are increasingly aware of the importance of assessing timeliness for health decision-making, which emerges the requirement for early and timely assessment for emerging health technologies. Providing early and timely assessments prior to a technology accesses the market or prior to implementation can provide decision-makers with sufficient time to develop an application program for a new technology. This paper mainly summarizes the profiles of three emerging health technology horizon scanning systems in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Sweden, and compares and analyzes their related contents, thus providing reference experience for the construction of emerging health technology horizon scanning system in China.
Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi), in conjunction with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), initiated a joint Task Force and published guideline and a checklist for deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA). Currently, there is a lack of guidance for designing and implementing deliberative processes of HTA in China, so this paper performs a detailed interpretation of the guideline and checklist, with a view to providing a reference for China's HTA and deliberative process, in order to promote the dissemination and application of the HTA methodology, and advance the construction of domestic HTA deliberative processes capacity and institutional mechanism.
Health insurance system has been proved to be an effective way to promote the quality of health service in many countries. However, how to control health expenditure under health insurance system remains a problem to be resolved. Some developed countries like UK, Canada and Sweden linked their health technology assessment results with decision making and health insurance management, and made prominent achievements in both expenditure control and quality improvement. China is carrying out its health system reform and running a new health insurance project. Using the experiences of other countries is undoubtedly of great importance in developing and managing our health insurance system.
ObjectiveTo rapidly review the effectiveness, safety, costs and applicability of helical tomotherapy (HT), so as to provide currently-available best evidence for decision makers of government health policies. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM and other relevant professional websites. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed quality, and then performed descriptive analysis. Resultsa) We finally included 150 studies, encompassing 5 health technology assessments (HTAs), 18 clinical controlled trials (CCTs), and 127 observational studies. b) Four included HTAs were published during 2006-2009, providing fairly less evidence of low quality and the results of 145 primary studies showed that:HT was mainly used in the treatments of 14 types of cancer, with relatively low total toxicity and high survival rates. Although the quality of the included studies was poor, there was much evidence about prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, nasopharynx cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer and liver cancer, with accumulatively enough sample size and fairly reliable results in HT's efficacy and safety. And c) a total of 56 clinical trials had bee registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, most of which were registered by the occident; among them, 9 had been come to the end, yet without results published. ConclusionCurrent evidence of this study showed that, HT is safe and effective in clinic. But the abovementioned conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies with long-term follow-up. The costs of HT in procurement, maintenance and application are high; and the skills, training and qualification of operators are required. We suggest that the procurement of HT should be reduced; it should be allocated rationally and effectively used after comprehensive assessment in China's cancer epidemiology characteristics, health resource allocation, disease burden, medical service level, etc.; and also high quality studies with long-term follow-up should be financially supported on the basis of establishing projects, so as to provide local evidence and consistently guide and improve scientific decision making.
Objective To investigate present status of health care in peri-brain-death and analyze its effectiveness and health economic characteristics. Method Retrospective analysis of case series was conducted and a total of 940 patients from surgical intensive care unit (SICU) were reviewed on treatment and part of direct medical expenditure. The patients admitted from Jun. 1999 to Dec. 2000 and Nov. 2001 to Jun. 2002 were included in this study. Data were processed by SPSS 10.0. Results Patients were included if they had two of the three symptoms for at least one hour: deep coma, pupillar light reflex disappear, and no autonomic respiratory. Ultimately 115 patients were included, with a total cost of ￥2 515.9 per day for each case, whereas mortality was 99.10%. Mortality increased with the state of peri-brain-death prolonged. Eighty percent of patients included were dead within 72 hours after admission. Conclusions Attempts to resuscitate patients of peri-brain-death have been the most widely applied in China, however, it resulted in great unnecessary consumption of health resources. It is of great importance to promote legislation of brain death in China.
Objective This review compared clinical effectiveness, cardiac safety and economics of astemizole, loratadine, cetirizine and terfenadine to provide evidence for adjustment of Essential Drug List in China. Search strategy We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese Biomedical Database. Fourteen databases for drug safety and pharmaceutical economics were additionally searched. Selection Criteria Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, published in English and Chinese and comparing two or more of these four antihistamines for allergic rhinitis and urticaria were included for study of effectiveness. Non-randomized clinical trials were additionally included for economic evaluation. Cardiac safety studies of antihistamines for allergic diseases of any type were included. Quality Appraisal Jadad scale was primarily applied to randomized controlled trials. Allocation concealment and intention-to-treat analysis were also appraised. The QUOROM statement was applied to systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Data extraction and analyses For the study of effectiveness, composite data were primarily extracted and analyzed by fixed effect model. Sensitivity analysis was done to explore the heterogeneity. For the study of cardiac safety, cases of adverse drug reactions and death were summarized. Difference of occurrence rate in sex and age were analyzed if possible.Electrocardiography and clinical symptoms were summarized. Results No studies on economic evaluation were identified. 27 and 6 randomized controlled trials, including 3 227 participants, for allergic rhinitis and urticaria were identified. Cetirizine was superior to loratadine (n=709) in symptom score and onset of action, superior to terfenadine (n=645) in Quality of Life and superior to astemizole (n=498) in patient satisfaction and onset of action. 73 h-ADR cases were identified in astemizole, 27 cases in terfenadine, 1 case in loratadine and none in cetirizine. No deaths were identified. Combination of terfenadine plus grapefruit juice (n=l8), itraconazole (n=6), nefazodone (n=67), and loratadine administration concomitant with cemitidine (n=30) significantly prolonged QTc interval. Conclusions Cetirizine was superior to other three antihistamines in terms of clinical effectiveness and drug safety. Astemizole and terfenadine could cause significantly more cardiac-related adverse reactions than cetirizine and loratadine.