ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
摘要:目的:定量测定50 %小儿在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度。方法:25例择期行四肢及体表手术的患儿,高流量吸入七氟烷诱导并以七氟烷和氧化亚氮维持麻醉,不使用肌肉松弛剂及静脉麻醉药物,手术结束后停止吸入氧化亚氮,并维持设定的七氟烷浓度10min后拔除喉罩。根据Dixon序贯法确定喉罩拔除时的七氟烷浓度,每0.1 Vol%七氟烷为1个增减单位。患儿未出现咳嗽、牙关紧闭、体动、屏气及喉痉挛则认为拔除喉罩平稳。结果:50 %小儿平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度(EC50)为1.22 Vol%(95 %的置信区间分别为0.99 Vol%～1.49 Vol%)。结论:在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下,3～8岁患儿喉罩满意拔除时呼气末七氟烷EC50值为1.22 Vol%。Abstract: Objective: To determine the concentration of sevoflurane where 50%( EC50 ) of the attempts to remove the laryngeal mask airway (LMA ) with the Teracainum Gel would be successful in children. Methods: Twentyfive nonpremedicated children, aged 38 years old, ASA physical status I, scheduled for extremities or peripherical surgery were enrolled in this study. General anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. After the surgery, the target concentration was maintained for at least 10 min, and then the LMA was removed. Each target concentration was predetermined by the Dixon’s upanddown method (with 0.1 Vol% as a step size), starting at 1.20 Vol% concentration of sevoflurane. A removal accomplished without coughing, teeth clenching, gross purposeful movement, breath holding or laryngospasm, during or within 1 min after removal was considered to be successful. Results:The concentration of sevoflurane to achieve successful LMA removal in 50% of children was 1.22 Vol% (95%CL, 0.99 Vol%1.49 Vol%). Conclusion: The EC50 value of sevoflurane for LMA smooth extubation in children aged 38 years old with teracainum gel was 1.22 Vol%.
目的评价喉罩或单腔气管内插管在胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的应用效果。 方法选择80例行胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的手汗症患者，采用计算机随机法将患者分为A、B两组，每组各40例。其中A组男20例、女20例，平均年龄24岁；B组男21例、女19例，平均年龄23岁。A组使用喉罩通气，B组使用单腔气管内导管，均应用小潮气量较快频率正压通气及间歇人工气胸。观察两组麻醉期间各时点心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）、呼气末二氧化碳分压（PetCO2）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、心电图（ECG）的变化。同时记录喉罩/单腔导管置入时间、CO2充气时间、手术时间、术中术后不良反应和并发症。 结果两组患者手术顺利，无并发症。A组喉罩/插管置入时间和喉罩/单腔管呛咳、术后咽喉疼痛发生率低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。B组MAP、HR水平在T2（喉罩/单腔管置入后）和T7（苏醒后拨喉罩/单腔管时）明显高于T1（麻醉诱导完成），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组MAP、HR水平在T2和T7时亦明显低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。所有患者术中ECG、SpO2和PetCO2无明显变化。 结论喉罩或单腔气管内插管结合间歇的人工气胸都能满足胸交感神经切断术的操作需要，喉罩具有更稳定的血流动力学状态和更高的安全性。
目的 探讨双管喉罩与气管插管用于全身麻醉妇科腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。 方法 2009年1月-5月择期妇科腹腔镜手术患者60例，ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级，随机分为喉罩组（P组）和气管插管组（T组）。记录入室基础值（T0），置罩（管）前（T1），置罩（管）后即刻（T2），置罩（管）后5 min（T3 ），拔除罩（管）即刻（T4），拔除罩（管）后5 min（T5）的收缩压（systolic pressure, SBP），舒张压（diastolic pressure, DBP），心率（heart rate, HR）和脉搏血氧饱和度（pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2），喉罩和气管插管控制呼吸时气腹前后不同时段的气道峰压（airway. maximum pressure, Pmax），潮气量（vital volume, VT）和呼气末二氧化碳分压（end tidal CO2, PETCO2）。记录插罩（管）成功率，及相关并发症。 结果 T2时T组SBP，DBP和HR显著高于P组（P＜0.05），两组术中通气均满意；Pmax，VT和PETCO2组间比较各时点无差异（P＞0.05）。气腹后Pmax和PETCO2组内比较均高于气腹前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。置罩（管）成功率组间比较差异无统计学意义，拔罩（管）期及术后24 h并发症，喉罩组明显低于气管导管组，差异显著（P＜0.05）。 结论 双管喉罩用于全麻妇科腹腔镜手术通气效果满意，安全可行。
Objective To investigate the effective dose of remimazolam benzenesulfonate to suppress cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask placement in elderly patients. Methods Elderly patients undergoing laryngeal mask anesthesia between March and June 2023 were selected. Combined with sulfentanil 0.2 μg/kg, remimazolam was used as induction hypnotic. The first patient was given remizolam benzenesulfonate 0.16 mg/kg infused by pump for 1 min. The dose of remimazolam for the next patient was determined by the biased coin up-and-down method based on the patient’s response to the laryngeal mask placement. The score of Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alert/Sedation, vital signs and anesthesia depth index (AI) were recorded during induction. Probit analysis was used to calculate the half effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95) and half effective AI (AI50). According to the statistical requirements, at least 45 negative patients were required. Results A total of 53 elderly patients were enrolled in the study until the end of the trial. The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam benzenesulfonate for inhibiting cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask insertion were 0.154 mg/kg [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.034, 0.170) mg/kg] and 0.207 mg/kg [95%CI (0.190, 0.614) mg/kg], respectively. AI decreased during induction, with an AI50 of 64.119 [95%CI (60.609, 69.984)]. Conclusion When combined with 0.2 μg/kg sufentanil, infusing 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam benzenesulfonate for 1 min is effective and safe for laryngeal mask anesthesia induction in elderly patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of laryngeal mask general anesthesia as a replacement of tracheal intubation general anesthesia in the "three-port" thoracoscopic thymectomy via subxiphoid and subcostal arch for thymoma patients without myasthenia.MethodsFrom January 2018 to June 2019, clinical data of patients with thymoma who underwent the novel "three-port" operation in our institution were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia methods, including a tracheal intubation general anesthesia group and a laryngeal mask general anesthesia group. There were 70 patients in the tracheal intubation general anesthesia group, including 42 males and 28 females, with an average age of 45.83±15.89 years. There were 39 patients in the laryngeal mask general anesthesia group, including 26 males and 13 females, with an average age of 43.31±15.64 years. The clinical data of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups were well balanced (P>0.05). No massive bleeding, conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative myasthenia or death occurred in those patients. No patient with laryngeal mask anesthesia had a conversion to tracheal intubation anesthesia during the operation. There was no significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative maximum partial pressure of CO2, lowest partial pressure of oxygen and anesthesia effect score between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no statistical difference in postoperative aspiration, gastrointestinal discomfort, length of hospital stay, pain score and patient satisfaction degree between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the anesthesia time before operation and the time of awake after anesthesia in the laryngeal mask anesthesia group were significantly shorter than those in the tracheal intubation general anesthesia group (P<0.05), and the incidence of transient arrhythmia, laryngeal discomfort and hoarseness in the laryngeal mask general anesthesia group was significantly lower than that in the tracheal intubation general anesthesia group (P<0.05).ConclusionThe "three-port" thoracoscopic thymectomy via subxiphoid and subcostal arch under laryngeal mask general anesthesia is safe and feasible in the treatment of thymoma without myasthenia, and can be recommended routinely.
Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) compared with endotracheal tube (TT) for airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Methods Databases such as PubMed (1992 to February 2012), EMbase (1984 to February 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1964 to February 2012), SCI (1992 to February 2012), CNKI (1992 to February 2012), CBM (2002 to 2012) as well as WanFang Data (1992 to February 2012) were searched for relevant literature. The references of the included articles were also manually traced. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of methodology. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 664 patients were included. Results of meta-analysis showed that: a) as for side effects, none of the patients experienced regurgitation or hypoventilation during operation; b) as for extubation response, SLIPA was proved fewer than TT during extubation with a significant difference (RR=0.14, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.36, Plt;0.000 1); c) SLIPA was superior to TT with regard to reducing postoperative sore throat (RR=0.15, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.38, Plt;0.000 1); d) SLIPA was similar to TT with regard to Ppeak after peritoneal insufflations (WMD=–0.07, 95%CI –0.73 to 0.59, P=0.83); e) as for PETCO2, the SLIPA group was lower than the TT group obviously after peritoneal insufflations (WMD=–1.09, 95%CI –1.70 to –0.49, P=0.000 4); f) as for hemodynamic change, the SLIPA group was more stable than the TT group during the operation with significant differences (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Current studies suggest that it is safe and effective to apply SLIPA for ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are need.