Objective To discuss the impacts of completion rate of fast track items on postoperative management of colorectal cancer surgery. Methods Between February 2010 and May 2010, 100 patients (Group “Year 2010”) were analyzed retrospectively, who were compared with 76 patients (Group “Year 2008”) from the same period of 2008. Postoperative recovery indexes, complications, and completion rate of fast track items were studied and compared. Results For major fast track items, the completion rates of restrict rehydration, early out-of-bed mobilization, early oral intaking, and management of gastric tube and drains were significantly higher in Group “Year 2010” than those in Group “Year 2008” (Plt;0.05). Meanwhile, the completion rate of urinary catheter management was significantly higher in Group “Year 2008” than that in Group “Year 2010” (Plt;0.05). In early rehabilitation, the first flatus of patients in Group “Year 2010” 〔(3.86±1.05) d〕 was significantly earlier than that in Group “Year 2008” 〔(4.28±1.22) d〕, Plt;0.05; for postoperative hospital stay, though, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). As to the complications, there was also no statistically significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions As the concepts of fast track surgery became increasingly favorable, completion rates of fast track items are increased. As a result, more and more fast track items turn into regular perioperative care. Although enhanced recovery has been achieved, better collaboration and localilzation are still needed to make the full advantage of fast track surgery.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) has been well accepted by medical providers, which can be realized by a multidisciplinary team approach and minimally invasive surgical technology performed during perioperative periods. As the outcomes of the ERAS protocols, well effects are anticipated, and consistent outcomes are actually obtained. At the same time, there are some aspects which are not consistent including ① the evolution and challenge of ERAS concept:connotation and extension, ② consensus and arguments on the evaluation standard of ERAS protocol, ③ the cause of poorly compliance in medical providers and patient, ④ the function of multimodal programme and multidisciplinary team approach in ERAS protocol, which one is better? ⑤ methods and barriers of implementing enhanced recovery in clinic application.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of applying the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) to the perioperative management of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 64 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 patients admitted from January to December in 2017 were in ERAS group, and 32 patients admitted from January to December 2016 were in control group. The control group used conventional orthopedic perioperative management measures, and the ERAS group combined the ERAS concept on the basis of conventional treatment measures for perioperative management. The incidence of perioperative complications, Visual Analogue Scale score, modified Barthel Index score, inpatient satisfaction and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, combined disease, modified Barthel Index or Visual Analogue Scale score at admission, or time from injury to surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of perioperative complications (12.5% vs. 37.5%) and length of hospital stay [(8.09±2.33) vs. (10.41±3.63) d] in the ERAS group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The Visual Analogue Scale scores of the two groups of patients before operation, on the first day and the third day after operation were lower than those at admission (P<0.05). The comparison between the two groups at each time point showed that the Visual Analogue Scale scores of patients in the ERAS group were lower than those in the control group before operation, on the first day and the third day after operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The modified Barthel Index scores of the two groups of patients on the third day, and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation showed a rising trend with time. The modified Barthel Index scores of the ERAS group were better than those of the control group on the third day, and 1 month and 3 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups 6 months after operation (P>0.05). The hospitalization satisfaction score of the ERAS group was 95.56±5.12, which was higher than that of the control group (92.84±5.62), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe implementation of ERAS perioperative management for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures may reduce the incidence of perioperative complications, relieve patient pain, promote the short-term recovery of activities of daily living of patients, improve the inpatient satisfaction and shorten the length of hospital stay.
Doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a unique type of VSD which is located beneath both the aortic and pulmonary valve. Open-heart repair is traumatic especially for pediatric patient while trans-catheter device closure is also not suitable for this type of VSD. Minimally invasive per-ventricular device closure has been introduced as an alternative method in the treatment of doubly committed VSD with encouraging results. In the review, we will illustrate the surgical technique as well as perioperative management strategy as for this technique in treating doubly committed VSD.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical efficacy and safety of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) prophylaxis with a single dose of tranexamic acid (TXA). MethodsThe Embase, PubMed, WanFang Data, VIP, CNKI, ChiCTR and Cochrane Library were electronically retrieved to collect clinical studies related to appraising the efficacy and safety in parturients after cesarean section used TXA perioperatively from inception to September, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using R software. A trial sequential analysis of outcomes was carried out to investigate the reliability and conclusiveness of findings. ResultsA total of 43 RCTs including 23 497 parturients that compared the prophylactic use of a single dose of TXA with placebo or no treatment in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. The results of meta-analysis revealed that there was a significantly reduced risk of PPH (RR=0.52, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.67, P<0.01), total blood loss (SMD=−183.73mL, 95%CI −220.87 to −146.60, P<0.01), need for blood transfusion (RR=0.42, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.60, P<0.01), and use of additional uterotonics (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.70, P<0.01) with TXA use. There were no statistical differences in thromboembolic events between TXA and control groups (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.54 to 2.03, P=0.11), and results were consistently in favor of TXA use across subgroups, and trial sequential analyses. ConclusionTaken as a whole, existing evidence suggests that TXA can effectively reduce PPH in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Further, prophylactic TXA administration for parturients significantly reduced blood loss and need for blood transfusion, without increasing adverse events and use of additional uterotonics, supporting its use as a safe and effective strategy for reducing PPH in this population.
Objective To illustrate the situation of delayed discharge of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under fast-track (FT) recovery model, and analyze the reasons. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 152 patients who accepted perioperative management under fast-track model from January to December 2014. The reasons for discharging over 72 hours after hospitalization were analyzed. Results Among the 152 patients, 119 were discharged over 72 hours after surgery, and the rate was 78.2%. The main reasons for delayed discharge were pain (32.8%), limited range of motion (31.9%) and unwillingness to be discharged (27.7%), respectively. Conclusion For patients who have undergone TKA, FT model can shorten hospital stay, save expenses, and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, but there is still much room for improvement.