ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and safety of the axial load mechanical testing for removing external fixator. MethodsBetween January 2014 and August 2015, 27 patients with tibia and fibula fractures caused by trauma underwent an external fixation. Of 27 patients, 21 were male and 6 were female with the average age of 45 years (range, 19-63 years), including 7 cases of closed fracture and 20 cases of open fracture. X-ray film results showed spiral unstable fracture in 4 cases and comminuted unstable fracture in 23 cases. All patients underwent an external fixation. Bone nonunion occurred in 3 cases because of infection, and bone nonunion combined with bone defect occurred in 1 case, who received tibial osteotomy lengthening surgery. When X-ray film showed continuity high density callus formation at fracture site, axial load mechanical test was performed. If the axial load ratio of external fixator was less than 10%, the external fixator was removed. ResultsAt 21-85 weeks after external fixation (mean, 44 weeks), axial load mechanical test was performed. The results showed that the axial load ratio of external fixation was less than 10% in 26 cases, and the external fixator was removed; at 6 weeks after removal of external fixator, the patients could endure full load and return to work, without re-fracture. The axial load ratio was 14% in 1 case at 85 weeks, and the X-ray film result showed that fracture did not completely heal with angular deformity; re-fracture occurred after removing external fixator, and intramedullary fixation was used. ConclusionExternal fixator axial load mechanical testing may objectively reveal and quantitatively evaluate fracture healing, so it is safe and reliable to use for guiding the external fixator removal.
The causes of development of 56 cases of bone defects from firearm injuries of extremities were analyzed, and the advantages of transfer of vascularized iliac bone graft with deep iliac circumflex vessels in 28 cases and the indications of transfer of vascularked fibular bone graft with fibular vessel in 15 cases and the exporiences in 9 cases from the methed of transter of seapula-cutaneous composite graft were summarized. It was emphatically pointed out that the half-circle typo externa fixators had its unique advantages in the treatment of the bone defects of long bones of extremities from firearm injuries. It would enentually become the method of priority for the treatment of fractures, nonunion of fractures and bone defects of extremities from firearm injuries.
【Abstract】 Objective To determine the three-dimensional stabil ity of atlantoaxial reconstruction withanterior approach screw fixation through C2 vertebral body to C1 lateral mass and Gall ie’s technique (ASMG) for C1,2instabil ity. Methods Twenty-five human cadaveric specimens (C0-3 ) were divided randomly into 5 groups (n=5). Thethree-dimensional ranges of motion C1 relative to C2 were measured under the five different conditions：the intact state group (group A), type II odontoid fracture group (group B), posterior C1,2 transarticular screw fixation group (group C), ASM group (group D) and ASMG group (group E). The three-dimensional ranges of motions C1 relative to C2 by loading ± 1.5 Nm were measured under the six conditions of flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation. The obtained data was statistically analyzed. Results In each group, the three-dimensional ranges of motion C1 relative to C2 under the six conditions of flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation were as follows: in group A (8.10 ± 1.08), (8.49 ± 0.82), (4.79 ± 0.47), (4.93 ± 0.34), (28.20 ± 0.64), (29.30 ± 0.84)°; in group B (13.60 ± 1.25), (13.80 ± 0.77), (9.64 ± 0.53), (9.23 ± 0.41), (34.90 ± 0.93), (34.90 ± 1.30)°; in group C (1.62 ± 0.10), (1.90 ± 0.34), (1.25 ± 0.13), (1.37 ± 0.28), (0.97 ± 0.14), (1.01 ± 0.17)°; in group D (2.03 ± 0.26), (2.34 ± 0.49), (1.54 ± 0.22), (1.53 ± 0.30), (0.80 ± 0.35), (0.76 ± 0.30)°; in group E (0.35 ± 0.12), (0.56 ± 0.34), (0.44 ± 0.15), (0.55 ± 0.16), (0.43 ± 0.07), (0.29 ± 0.06)°. Under the six conditions, there were generally significant differences between group A and other four groups, and between group B and groups C, D and E (P lt; 0.001), and between group E and groups C, D in flexion/ extension and left/right lateral bending (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between group E and groups C, D in left/right axial rotation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion In vivo biomechanical studies show that ASMG operation has unique superiority in the reconstruction of the atlantoaxial stabil ity, especially in controll ing stabil ity of flexion/extension and left/right lateral bending, and thus it ensures successful fusion of the implanted bone. It is arel iable surgical choice for the treatment of the obsolete instabil ity or dislocation of C1, 2 joint.
A new fixator for spine was designed to restore the stability of spine in improving the treatment of thoraco-lumbar dislocation. This instrument was composed of six nails, two longitudinal connecting rods and two transverse connecting rods. On the surface of the nails, there were furrows engraved, instead of screw thread. It fixed the spine through pedicle of vertebra from the posterior approach. The fixed vertebrae were limited between two vertebrae. From 1989 th 1995, twelve patients with fracture-dislocation of thoraco-lumbar spine were reduced with this instrument. After four years follow-up, it showed that the deformity was corrected and the spine firmly fixed. Compared with Dick’s screws, it had the following advantages such as simple manipulation, increased strergth of nails and minimal damage to tissue during operation.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of orthopedic robot-assisted sacroiliac joint screws in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Methods Patients who underwent sacroiliac joint screw fixation in People’s Hospital of Deyang City between January 2018 and August 2021 were included, and the patients were divided intoa robotic group and a manual group by randomization. The robot group used robot-assisted insertion of sacroiliac joint screws, and the manual group used manual insertion of sacroiliac joint screws. The general condition, time of sacroiliac joint screw placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, guide needle drilling times, surgical blood loss, and Majeed pelvic function score were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 42 patients were included, and there was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index , injury type or injury cause between the two groups (P>0.05). Finally, 21 screws were placed in 19 patients in the robotic group and 23 screws in 23 patients in the manual group. The wounds of the two groups were completely healed after operation, and there was no wound infection, iatrogenic vascular and nerve injury, and no loosening of internal fixation. There was no significant difference in screw placement time, blood loss or Majeed score between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of fluoroscopy (14.53±4.54 vs. 19.87±5.48) and drilling times (1.00±0.00 vs. 7.24±3.77) in the robotic group were less than those in the manual group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Orthopedic surgical robots have the advantages of minimally invasive, less fluoroscopy, and accurate screw placement in sacroiliac joint screw placement, and have good clinical results in the treatment of pelvic fractures.