Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods This article conducted the forward-looking analysis on the information of 227 patients undergoing the pancreatoduodenectomy in West China Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017, and then compared the differences between the patients subjected to ERAS (ERAS group) and thosesubjected to regular measures (control group) with respect to time of setting in sickbed, time of mobilizing out ofsickbed, time of starting drink water, time of resumption of diet, exhaust time, defecation time, the time of nasogastric tube, postoperative hospitalization duration and expenses, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain scores. Results ① Postoperative indexes: by comparison of the ERAS group and the control group, it was found that the ERAS group had shorter (or lower) time of setting in sickbed, time of mobilizing out of sickbed, time of starting drink water, time of resumption of diet, exhaust time, defecation time, the time of nasogastric tube, postoperative hospitalization duration and expenses (P<0.05). ② Postoperative complications: of all postoperative complications, including pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, abdominal infection, incision complication, lung infection, and heart complication were without statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between the 2 groups.③ Reoperation and readmission: there was no significant difference on the incidences of reoperation and readmission between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ④ Postoperative pain scores: except 22 : 00 of the 6-day after operation, the pain scores in the ERAS group were all lower than those in the control group at 2 h and 8 h after operation, and the time points of 1–6 days after operation (8 : 00, 16 : 00, and 22 : 00), with statistically differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Without increasing the incidence of complications, ERAS may speed up the rehabilitation of patients undergoing the pancreatoduodenectomy and mitigate the pain of patients.
Objective To evaluate the use of fast track surgery （FTS） in the treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of common bile duct （CBD） by combination of laparoscope and duodenoscope. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD underwent laparoscopic cholecyst-ectomy （LC） and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） were divided into FTS group （n=55） and conventional group （n=65），which were accepted the perioperative therapy of FTS or conventional therapy，respectively. After operation，the incision pain，nausea and vomiting，infusion time，loss of body weight，out-of-bed time，dieting time，postoperative hospitalization，hospital costs，and complications were compared in two groups. Results Compared with the conventional group，the postoperative infusion time，dieting time，out-of-bed time，and postoperative hospitali-zation were shorter，the incidence rates of pulmonary infection，and urinary systems infection，pancreatitis，nausea and vomiting， and incision pain were lower，the loss of body weight was lower in the FTS group （P＜0.05），but the differences of WBC and serum amylase at 24 h after operation were not significant between the FTS group and conventional group（P＞0.05）. Conclusion The FTS is safe，economic，and effective in the treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with calculus of CBD by combination of laparoscope and duodenoscope.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of tubless therapy for pulmonary bulla resection under the concept of fast track surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 45 patients (29 males and 16 females at an average age of 26.1 years) with pulmonary bullae in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2017. These patients were divided into two groups. Among them, 25 patients were treated with preoperative gastric tubes and catheters, tracheal intubation anesthesia and postoperative drainage tubes (a tube group). And 20 patients were treated with no preoperative gastric tube or catheter, sublaryngeal anesthesia and no postoperative drainage tube (a tubless group). ResultsThere was a statistical difference in postoperative pain index (2.60±1.14 vs. 5.16±1.24, P<0.001) and larynx complication (P=0.00) between the two groups. Shorter period of epidural analgesic tubes (1.40±0.50 d vs. 2.84±0.75 d, P<0.001), shorter operation and anesthesia time (15.00±2.59 min vs. 18.56±2.10 min, P<0.001; 95.30±4.38 min vs. 105.50±4.59 min, P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (9.45±1.66 d vs. 12.80±1.87 d, P<0.001), and less expense (20 245.96±1 113.02 yuan vs. 22 147.06±1 735.01 yuan, P<0.001) in the tubless group were found compared with the tube group. But there was no statistical difference in incidence of complication of lung (P=0.43) between the two groups.ConclusionTubless therapy in the treatment of pulmonary bulla resection can accelerate the postoperative recovery with shorter hospital stay and less expense, and is an advantageous treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of fast track surgery (FTS) in hepatobiliary surgery, and discuss the postoperative stress response and its efficacy and safety assessment. MethodsA total of 171 patients undergoing different hepatobiliary operations in our ward from August 2008 to Jule 2011 were randomly divided into control group (n=89) and FTS group (n=82). Patients in the FTS group received the improved methods while those in the control group received traditional care. A series of indicators such as hospital stay, hospital expense, duration of intravenous infusion, postoperative complications, and the C-reaction protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in serum were observed postoperatively. ResultsFor the FTS and control group, the first exhaust time was respectively (2.4±0.3) and (3.3±0.6) days, postoperative hospital stay was (9.1±2.7) and (14.1±4.1) days, hospitalization expense was (16 432±3 012) and (21 612±1 724) yuan, all of which had significant differences (P<0.05). Before surgery and on the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th day after surgery, IL-6 serum level for the FTS group was respectively (8.57±2.58), (30.21±12.44), (17.41±11.73), (11.14±7.12), and (10.50±5.19) ng/L, and for the control group was respectively (9.13±2.99), (51.31±19.50), (36.82±12.33), (28.23±9.18), and (15.44±4.33) ng/L. There was no significant difference in the preoperative IL-6 level between the two groups (P>0.05), while IL-6 level was significantly lower in the FTS group than the control group after surgery (P<0.05). Before surgery and on the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th day after surgery, CRP serum level for the FTS group was respectively (18.41±4.01), (69.74±26.03), (45.52±20.50), (39.14±11.23), and (29.03±6.47) μg/L, and for the control group was respectively (17.74±2.11), (99.23±23.50), (86.81±17.34), (68.22±15.60), and (37.70±9.55) μg/L. There was no significant difference in the preoperative CRP level between the two groups (P>0.05), while CRP level was significantly lower in the FTS group than the control group after surgery (P<0.05). Postoperative complication rate after surgery was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe application of FTS in some hepatobiliary operations is effective and safe by decreasing the stress response.
Objective To explore the perioperative safety of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in Day Care Unit and the risk factors for delayed discharge under centralized management model. MethodsThe patients with VATS managed by the Day Care Unit of the Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School in 2021 were retrospectively collected. The patients’ postoperative data and risk factors for delayed discharge were analyzed. ResultsA total of 383 patients were enrolled, including 179 males and 204 females with an average age of 46.09±14.82 years. Eleven (2.87%) patients developed grade 3-4 postoperative complications during the hospitalization. Eighteen (4.70%) patients visited unscheduled outpatient clinic within 7 days, and 6 (1.57%) patients were re-hospitalized within 30 days after discharge. The remaining patients had no significant adverse events during the 30-day follow-up. The average length of hospital stay was 2.27±0.35 d. The length of hospital stay was over 48 h in 48 (12.53%) patients. The independent risk factor for delayed discharge was lobectomy or combined resection (OR=3.015, 95%CI 1.174-7.745, P=0.022). ConclusionVATS can be safely conducted under the centralized management in Day Care Unit. The risk factor for delayed discharge is the extent of surgical resection.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of fast track surgery in perioperative patients with adrenalectomy.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of fast track surgery in perioperative patients with adrenalectomy from inception to January 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1 034 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: fast track surgery in perioperative patients with adrenalectomy could shorten first exhaust time (MD=−17.16, 95%CI −21.86 to −12.46, P<0.000 01), postoperative catheter indwelling time (MD=−43.44, 95%CI −46.65 to −40.23, P<0.000 01) and drainage tube indwelling time (MD=−39.91, 95%CI −57.58 to −22.23, P<0.000 01), and reduce the incidence of complications after adrenalectomy (OR=0.26, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.39, P<0.000 01). There were no statistically differences in operation time (MD=−1.18, 95%CI −3.22 to 0.86, P=0.26) and blood loss (MD=0.25, 95%CI −2.84 to 3.34, P=0.88) between two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with the conventional rehabilitation group, fast track surgery can promote postoperative recovery of patients with adrenalectomy more safely and effectively, which has clinical promotion value. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.