An elderly female patient, with systemic multiple organ dysfunction, suffered from severe aortic valve stenosis, was to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). She was intolerance of the computed tomography examination before surgery. Bedside echocardiography was employed to evaluate the patient’s aortic valve stenosis, valve anatomy and type, the condition of aortic root, the distance from coronary to aortic root, and lower-extremity vascular access. Finally, the emergent TAVR was successfully performed under general anesthesia, and the aortic valve trans-prosthetic gradient met a remarkable decrease after surgery.
Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumor in the world, and about 57.6% of colorectal cancer surgical cases in our country are rectal cancer patients, which occupies a major proportion. Some patients with rectal cancer may already have emergencies such as intestinal obstruction or limited perforation at the time of consultation, which require immediate relevant treatment measures. Currently, there are multiple surgical and endoscopic treatment strategies available for obstructive and perforated rectal cancer. Surgeons need to perform an accurate and comprehensive assessment of the disease, define the goals of the current treatment, and formulate an appropriate treatment plan based on the patient’s clinical and oncological status in order to optimize the patient’s oncological outcome while minimizing the risk of complications associated with emergency colorectal surgery.
Objective To evaluate and compare the outcomes of simple closed reduction, selective fragment excision after closed reduction, and emergency fragment excision and reduction in the treatment of Pipkin type I fracture of femoral head associated with posterior dislocation of the hip. Methods Between January 2002 and January 2008, 24 patients with Pipkin type I fracture of the femoral head associated with posterior dislocation of the hip were treated with simple closed reduction (closed reduction group, n=8), with selective fragment excision after closed reduction (selective operation group, n=8), and with emergency fragment excision and reduction (emergency operation group, n=8). In the closed reduction group, there were 6 males and 2 females with an average age of 37.6 years (range, 19-56 years); injuries were caused by traffic accident in 6 cases, by fall ing from height in 1 case, and by crushing in 1 case with a mean disease duration of 3.1 hours (range, 1.0-7.5 hours); and the interval from injury to reduction was (4.00 ± 2.14) hours. In the selective operation group, there were 7 males and 1 female with an average age of 37.3 years (range, 21-59 years); injuries were caused by traffic accident in 7 cases and by fall ing from height in 1 case with a mean disease duration of 3.2 hours (range, 1.0-6.0 hours); and the interval from injury to reduction was (3.90 ± 1.47) hours. In the emergency operation group, there were 5 males and 3 females with an average age of 35.5 years (range, 20-58 years); injuries were caused by traffic accident in 5 cases, by fall ing from height in 1 case, and by crushing in 2 cases with a mean disease duration of 3.3 hours (range, 1.5-6.5 hours); and the interval from injury to open reduction was (5.10 ± 2.04) hours. There was no significant difference in the age, gender, disease duration, and interval from injury to reduction among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All wounds in selective operation group and emergency operation group healed primarily. All the patients were followed up 24 to 58 months (mean, 38.7 months). According to Thompson-Epstein system, the excellent and good rates were 50.0% (4/8) in the closed reduction group, 87.5% (7/8) in the selective operation group, and 87.5% (7/8) in the emergency operation group at 24 months after operation, showing significant difference among 3 groups (χ2=9.803, P=0.020). Heterotopic ossification was found in 1 case (12.5%) of the closed reduction group, in 4 cases (50.0%) of the selective operation group, and in 4 cases (50.0%) of the emergency operation group, and avascular necrosis of femoral head was found in 2 cases (25.0%) of the closed reduction group; there was no significant difference in compl ications among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of Smith-Petersen approach and fragment excision by selective operation or emergency operation has similar outcome, which are better than the treatment of simple closed reduction.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture in reducing wound infections of emergency gastrointestinal surgeries. MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, single center study. From May 2009 to August 2010, 412 patients underwent emergency gastrointestinal operations in our department, 198 of them were chose randomly as experimental group using triclosancoated polyglactin 910 suture for abdominal wall closure， 214 using traditional braiding suture were taken as control. The risk factors for wound healing were analyzed, and wound infection rate was compared between two groups. ResultsThere were no significant differences of gender, age, body mass index, combined diabetes, use of immunosuppressant, and glucocorticoid steroid, type of incision, intraoperative bleeding volume, and operation time between two groups (Pgt;0.05). Wound infection rate of experimental group 〔3.0% (6/198）〕 was significantly lower than that of control group 〔11.7% (25/214), Plt;0.001〕. Especially in subgroup of type Ⅲ incision and operative time more than 120 min, wound infection rate was significantly different between experimental group and control group 〔3.5%(5/141) versus 14.3%(22/154); 3.3%(2/60) versus 21.2%(11/52) respectively, Plt;0.001〕. ConclusionTriclosancoated polyglactin 910 suture can reduce wound infection rate of gastrointestinal emergency operations, especially with type Ⅲ incision and operation time ≥120 min.
ObjectiveTo evaluate safety and effectiveness of stent placement and emergency surgery in treatment of proximal colon cancer obstruction.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Data, etc. were searched comprehensively. The literatures of Chinese and English randomized controlled trial and retrospective comparative study of stent placement and emergency surgery for the proximal colon cancer obstruction were retrieved. The RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 softwares were used. The meta-analysis was made on the safety and effectiveness of these two treatments.ResultsA total of 9 literatures involving 636 patients were included, all of them were the retrospective studies, 4 of them only reported the clinical success rate and technical success rate. The technical success rate of stent placement was 0.94 [95% CI (0.91, 0.96)]. The clinical success rate was 0.90 [95% CI (0.87, 0.93)]. Compared with the emergency surgery group, the total complication rate and the temporary stoma rate were lower [OR=0.32, 95% CI (0.11, 0.94), P=0.04; OR=0.18, 95% CI (0.05, 0.65), P=0.009] and the hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.97, 95% CI (–4.52, –1.41), P=0.000 2] in the stent placement group. The perioperative mortality rate, laparoscopic surgery rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate, and 5-year overall survival rate had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with emergency surgery, endoscopic stent placement for treatment of proximal colon cancer obstruction has a lower incidence of complications, temporary colostomy rate, shorter hospital stay, and it has no significant differences in mortality, laparoscopic surgery rate, and survival rate.
Objective To testify the efficacy of revised trauma score （RTS） in evaluating the severity of trunk injury，analyze its inadequacy and make modifications to improve its specificity and accuracy in evaluating trunk injury. Methods Medical records of 278 patients undergoing emergency surgery for the treatment of trunk injury in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2006 and June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 231 males and 47 females in the age of 1-75 （33.7±14.1） years. RTS was calculated for each patient. Hemoglobin （Hb） concentrations in these patients acquired at the emergency room were included to reflect the severity of blood loss. The correlations between RTS and patient response to treatment as well as RTS and prognosis were analyzed. Patient response to treatment and prognosis were compared between the normal RTS group and the abnormal RTS group. Univariate analysis was performed followed by multivariate analysis for the variables which may impact prognosis. Modified RTS was established by regression analysis. Results RTS was significantly correlated with patient response to treatment as well as prognosis. RTS was significantly correlated with the time duration between the onset of injury and the beginning of operation （r =0.249，P＜0.001）， thoracic and abdominal blood loss volume （r = -0.255，P＜0.001），fluid resuscitation volume （r = -0.244，P＜0.001） as well as length of ICU stay （r = -0.202，P=0.001）. Mortalities in patients with different RTS were statistically different （P=0.004）. In the patient group with normal RTS the mortality was 5.1%，which indicates the inadequacy of RTS in evaluating trunk injury. Univariate analysis revealed that both emergency room Hb and RTS were correlated with patients’ prognosis. After putting these two factors into the regression analysis，a new formula to calculate modified RTS is established：Logit （P death）=6.450-0.769×RTS-0.029×Emergency room Hb. Conclusion Modified RTS is more specific in evaluating trunk injury and maintains the advantages of simplicity and rapidness.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for neurological complications after emergency surgery of acute type A aortic dissection.MethodsThe clinical data of 51 patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection who were admitted to Shanghai Delta Hospital from October 2018 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 37 males (72.5%) and 14 females (27.5%), aged 29-85 (55.1±12.3) years. The patients were divided into two groups, including a N1 group (n=12, patients with postoperative neurological insufficiency) and a N0 group (n=39, patients without postoperative neurological insufficiency). The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere were statistical differences in age (62.6±11.2 years vs. 51.7±11.4 years, P=0.003), preoperative D-dimer (21.7±9.2 µg/L vs.10.8±10.7 µg/L, P=0.001), tracheal intubation time (78.7±104.0 min vs. 19.6±31.8 min, P=0.003), ICU stay time (204.1±154.8 min vs. 110.8±139.9 min, P=0.037) and preoperative coagulation factor activity R (4.0±1.5 vs. 5.1±1.6, P=0.022). Preoperative coagulation factor activity R was the independent risk factor for neurological insufficiency after emergency (OR=2.013, 95%CI 1.008-4.021, P=0.047).ConclusionFor patients with pre-emergent acute aortic dissection who are older (over 62.6-64.5 years), with reduced coagulation factor R (less than 4.0), it is recommended to take more active brain protection measures to reduce the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications in patients with acute aortic dissection, and further improve the quality of life.
ObjectiveTo compare the short- and long-term effects of emergency surgery (ES) and self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) in treatment of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction.MethodsThe patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from October 2010 to October 2020 were retrospectively collected and divided into ES group (n=43) and SEMS group (n=22). The baseline data, surgical data, postoperative data, and prognosis (overall survival and relapse free survival) were compared, and the risk factors of tumor recurrence after surgery were further analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression model. ResultsIn this study, 65 cases of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction were included, including 43 cases in the ES group and 22 cases in the SEMS group. There were no statistical differences in the baseline data of the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications [13.6% (3/22) vs. 23.3% (10/43), P=0.555], recurrence rate [40.9% (9/22) vs. 37.2% (16/43), P=0.772], and rate of receiving postoperative chemotherapy [68.2% (15/22) vs. 48.8% (21/43), P=0.138] between the SEMS group and ES group. Compared with the ES group, although the median hospitalization time was longer (20 d vs. 12 d, P=0.001), and the median hospitalization cost was higher (65 033 yuan vs. 40 045 yuan, P=0.001), the stoma rate of the SEMS group was lower [36.4% (8/22) vs. 88.4% (38/43), P=0.001], and the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) rate was higher [36.4% (8/22) vs. 7.0% (3/43), P=0.008]. There were no significant differences in the 4-year cumulative overall survival (46.9% vs. 48.4%, P=0.333) and 4-year cumulative relapse free survival (36.2% vs. 44.8%, P=0.724) between the SEMS group and ES group, but the overall survival of the SEMS group was better than that of the ES group for the patients with stage Ⅲ–Ⅳ (χ2=4.644, P=0.047). Multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that increased TNM stage increased the risk of postoperative tumor recurrence of patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction [HR=2.092, 95%CI (1.261, 3.469), P=0.004]. ConclusionsShort- and long-term effects of ES and SEMS in treatment of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction are equivalent. Although SEMS mode has a longer hospital stay and higher hospitalization costs, stoma rate is lower and laparoscopic surgery rate is higher. Overall survival of SEMS mode in treatment malignant left-sided colonic obstruction patients with stage Ⅲ–Ⅳ is better.