Objective To investigate the value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output ( PiCCO) monitoring in the treatment of septic shock.Methods Patients with septic shock were selected in intensive care unit ( ICU) . After initial empirical resuscitating and using vasoactive drugs, the patients with circulation instability were connected with the PiCCO temperature probe to monitor hemodynamics and to resuscitate in the target of intrathoracic blood volume index ( ITBVI) , cardiac index ( CI) , extravascular lung water index ( EVLWI) . Hemodynamic parameters, oxygen metabolic variability and 24h-fluid management after 0h ( before) , 8h, 24h, the rate of implementing resuscitation goals, oxygen metabolic variability and fluid resuscitation at different times in the guidance of PiCCO parameters were compared. The data of age, APACHEⅡ score, central venous pressure ( CVP) , CI, ITBVI, mean arterial pressure ( MAP) , systemic vascular resistance index ( SVRI) and EVLWI after 0h and 24h were substituted into the regression equation by the multiple linear regression, to determine the indexes which would affect the 28-day prognosis. Results A total of 80 patients with septic shock were recruited in the study. Comparing fluid resuscitation at different times in the guidance of PiCCO,MAP( 73.6 ±13.4 and 75.1 ±10.2 mm Hg) , ITBVI ( 843.5 ±168.9 and 891.5 ±232.9 mL/m2 ) and CI ( 3.2 ±1.1 and 3.9 ±0. 4 L· min-1 · m-2 ) on 8h and 24h were significantly higher than that at 0h ( 69.1 ±21.4 mm Hg, 781.2±146.7 mL/m2 and 2.7 ±1.5 L·min-1·m-2 ) , and Lac( 2.0 ±1.4 and 1.1 ±1.0 mmol /L) and SVRI ( 1 624. 2 ±301. 7 and 1 543.6 ±435.4 d·s·m2·cm-5 ) were declined than that at 0h( 3.1 ±2.4 mmol /L and 1 796.2 ±399.1 d·s·m2 ·cm-5 ) ( Plt;0.05) . The rate of implementing resuscitation goals at 8h ( 64.7% ) and 24h ( 66.9% ) were significantly higher than that at 0h ( 55.7% ) ( Plt;0.05) , but there was no significant difference between 8h and 24h ( Pgt;0.05) . All of the patients were divided into a survival group ( n=54) and a death group ( n=26) . The rate of implementing resuscitation goals at 0h and 24h in the survival group ( 57.1% and 71.3% ) were significantly higher than that of the death group( 28.6% and 39.3% ) . By the prognosis on 28-day as the dependent variability in the multiple linear regression, multiple linear regression equation were established, and there was significantly difference ( F=55.03, Plt;0.05) . By the layer-wise screening, equation was fitted, both the CI ( R=0.431) and ITBVI ( R=0.627) at beginning and EVLWI ( R= 0.305) at 24h were determined to influence the 28-day prognosis. Conclusions The fluid resuscitation under the guidance of PiCCO can achieve the goal better and improve the prognosis. CI, ITBVI and EVLWI were useful goaldirectors for the prognosis evaluation in critical ill patients.
Objective To evaluate the effects of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired hypernatremia (IAH) on the outcome of septic shock patients. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 116 septic shock patients admitted to the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from August 2018 to December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: IAH group and normonatremia group. χ2 test, t test and the Mann-Whitney U test of the non-parametric test were used to compare the differences in clinical data between the two groups. Independent risk factors for IAH were identified by unconditioned Logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine their role in predicting IAH. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the effects of IAH and its duration on 28-day survival. Results Renal insufficiency, K+ concentration, body temperature max, mechanical ventilation, chronic critical illness, rapid recovery, sepsis-associated encephalopathy, persistent inflammation, immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome, and the length of stay in ICU had significant differences (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed: total urine volume in the previous 3 days [odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 - 1.16, P=0.019] and sodium content in enteral nutrition preparations (670 mg) (OR 6.00, 95%CI 1.61 - 22.42, P=0.006) were independent risk factors for IAH. In addition, the area under the ROC curve of total urine output in the first 3 days was 0.800 (95%CI 0.678 - 0.922, P=0.001). Finally, the duration of IAH was significantly correlated with 28-day survival rate (P=0.020). Conclusions IAH is a common and serious complication in septic shock, and is the main cause of poor prognosis. Sodium status may act as an ideal screening tool for patients with septic shock.
Objective To systemically review the efficacy and safety of dopamine versus norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Methods Database searches of MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, VIP, CNKI, and CBM (from the date of database establishment to June 2011) were conducted. Additional studies for collecting relevant data were retrieved via both references of articles and direct contact with authors. Prospectively, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dopamine compared with norepinephrine therapy in septic shock patients were selected. The quality of included trials was assessed and relevant data were extracted. Then statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1. Results Nine trials with 3 179 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with norepinephrine, dopamine was associated with a significant 12% elevation in the risk ratio of in-hospital death events of septic shock patients (RR=1.12, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.21, P=0.002). The risk of arrhythmias in dopamine group was 2.63-fold than that in norepinephrine group (RR=2.63, 95%CI 1.51 to 4.55, P=0.000 6). The cardiac index of septic patients in dopamine group was higher than that in norepinephrine group (MD=0.42, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.63, Plt;0.000 1). No significant difference could be found in the heart rate (MD=17.05, 95%CI –0.71 to 34.81, P=0.06) and mean arterial pressure (MD= –0.87, 95%CI –24.97 to 7.62, P=0.30). Conclusion Findings from this meta-analysis suggest that compared with dopamine, norepinephrine significantly reduces both 28-day mortality of septic shock patients and incidence rate of arrhythmias. Norepinephrine is better than dopamine in aspects of efficacy and safety.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of inferior vena cava inspiratory collapsibility (ΔIVC) in guiding septic shock resuscitation with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT).MethodsA single center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at an 812-bed hospital in Mianyang, Sichuan. Adult patients with early septic shock in the intensive care unit were assessed and treated at defined intervals over 6 h using an ΔIVC-guided resuscitation protocol or an EGDT protocol. Feasibility outcomes were fluid balance and norepinephrine administration. The primary clinical outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, 90-day survival rate. Secondary outcomes included incidence of acute kidney injury and consumption of health resources.ResultsSixty-eight patients with septic shock were enrolled in this study. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The ΔIVC-guided septic shock resuscitation group was lower than the EGDT group in the ICU 24 h fluid replacement (L): 3.8 (4.0, 5.3) vs. 4.7 (4.0, 6.6), 72 h liquid positive balance (L): 0.2 (–0.65, 1.2) vs. 2.5 (0.0, 4.1), intensive care unit length of stay (d): 7.5 (5.0, 14.0) vs. 15.0 (7.0, 21.5), mechanical ventilation cumulative time (d): 3.0 (0.0, 7.0) vs. 7.5 (2.2, 12.0), ICU costs (ten thousand yuan): 3.4 (2.1, 5.9) vs. 8.6 (4.2, 16.5), bedside blood purification treatment costs (ten thousand yuan): 2.3 (1.1, 3.3) vs. 6.8 (2.1, 10.0) (P<0.05). No difference was observed in the incidence of acute kidney injury (P > 0.05), in-hospital mortality and 90-day survival between the two groups (log-rank χ2=0.35, P>0.05).ConclusionsAmong patients with septic shock, a ΔIVC-guided septic shock resuscitation, compared with EGDT, did not reduce in-hospital mortality. It might prevent the risk of over resuscitation, shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation, and lead to a better utilization of intensive care unit resources.
目的通过漂浮导管（Swan-Ganz导管）监测外周血管阻力指数（SVRI）作为优化的心功能不全状态下感染性休克早期目标导向治疗（EGDT）的临床意义。 方法2012年1月至2014年1月第四军医大学附属西京医院心血管外科ICU收治体外循环心脏术后感染性休克患者8例，其中男7例、女1例，年龄（50.9±11.1）岁。以中心静脉压（CVP）为复苏目标行经验性容量复苏治疗，循环未见改善，则实施漂浮（Swan-Ganz）导管监测血流动力学指标，以外周血管阻力指数（SVRI）为优化目标复苏，观察Swan-Ganz导管复苏前及复苏6 h、24 h后的血流动力学及氧代谢指标，分析复苏达标所需时间。 结果8例患者平均住ICU时间（16.87±3.35）d，发生肺部并发症8例，急性肾功能衰竭5例，急性肝功能衰竭1例，消化道出血1例。6例28 d后病情好转存活，死亡2例。8例感染性休克患者经Swan-Ganz导管目标导向治疗6 h和24 h后平均动脉压（MAP）分别为（65.8±2.76）mm Hg、（67.8±3.79）mm Hg，中心静脉压（CVP）分别为（12.75±3.37）cm H2O、（9.75±2.86）cm H2O，心排血量指数（CI）分别为（2.36±0.12）L·min-1·m-2、（2.41±0.39）L·min-1·m-2，外周血管阻力指数（SVRI）分别为（1 892.60±2 294.62）dyn·s·m2·cm-5、（2 053.90±205.54）dyn·s·m2·cm-5，各项指标均较治疗前升高；治疗6 h和24 h后动脉血乳酸分别为（11.83±1.16）mmol/L、（6.47±2.59）mmol/L，较治疗前[（14.98±0.45）mmol/L]下降。 结论采用Swan-Ganz导管监测SVRI作为优化目标导向治疗心功能不全状态下感染性休克可以提高6 h复苏成功率，改善患者预后。