【摘要】 目的 分析慢性乙肝患者血清生化、血常规、血清病毒载量及乙型肝炎标志物与肝组织炎症分级、纤维化分期的相关性,以找到有较好相关性的临床指标；通过肝活检证实临床诊断与病理诊断的符合情况,探讨肝活检的重要性及价值。方法 对2007年6月—2009年8月在传染科行肝穿刺活检的359例慢性乙型肝炎患者的血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、总胆红素(TB)、白蛋白(ALB)、球蛋白(GLB)等指标,白细胞(WBC)、血小板(PLT)等指标,凝血酶原时间(PT),血清HBV DNA定量及乙肝标志物的不同状态与肝穿病理分级、分期的相关性进行分析；统计慢性乙肝患者临床诊断与病理诊断的符合情况。结果 肝组织炎症分级及纤维化分期之间有一定相关性(Plt;0.05)；血清ALT、AST、ALB、GLB、PT有助于判断肝组织炎症程度(Plt;0.05)；ALB、GLB、WBC、PLT、PT对肝组织纤维化程度的评估有意义(Plt;0.05)；HBV DNA复制水平与肝组织炎症及纤维化无关(Pgt;0.05),但存在负相关的趋势；纤维化程度高的患者HBeAg阴性组较HBeAg阳性组更多(Plt;0.05)。慢性乙型肝炎患者临床与病理诊断总符合率为56.3％。结论 动态监测慢性乙肝患者肝功能、血常规、凝血常规在一定程度上有助于判断疾病的程度,但要确诊肝组织炎症分级及纤维化分期,肝组织病理活检是必需的。
In order to provide more standardized guidance for the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in China and to achieve the World Health Organization’s goal of “eliminating viral hepatitis as public health threats by the year 2030”, the Hepatology and Infectious Diseases Societies of the Chinese Medical Association organized experts to update the guideline for the prevention and treatment of CHB, emphasizing more extensive screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers in the general population and more active antiviral treatment for HBV-infected patients. This article introduced and studied the key update points of the new guideline.
ObjectiveAntiviral treatments could benefit chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with the regression or improvement of liver fibrosis. However, the degree of dynamic change of liver fibrosis for patients who had not received antiviral treatment remained to be studied. The current study aimed to observe the long-term variation of liver stiffness measurement (LSM), virological and biochemical response on patients without standard antiviral therapy.MethodsA total of 220 patients who were diagnosed with chronic HBV infection, who had not reached the standard of antiviral therapy, and completed a follow-up date of over 2 years in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. According to the changes of LSM in baseline and follow-up period, the patients were divided into regression group, non-progressive group, and progressive group. The virological and biochemical characteristics of each group were analyzed.ResultsAmong the 220 patients, 153 patients (69.5%) had no progress in LSM degree. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBV DNA, and HBsAg in a few patients increased or slightly decreased, while the vast majority remained in a relatively stable state. 89.5% (137/153) of the non-progressive patients were in grade F0. In addition, 58 patients showed spontaneous improvement with a decreasing rate of 0.460 kPa per year. Patients with ALT of 1-2 ULN had a statistically significant decrease in LSM improvement compared to patients with normal ALT. 82.8% of the LSM-improving patients showed baseline LSM of F1-F3. Only 9 patients showed LSM deterioration, however, which could not be explained by virus replication or necroinflammatory activity. ConclusionsFor patients unsatisfying standard antiviral therapy, most patients with baseline LSM of F0 grade fail to progress, and patients with baseline LSM of F1-F3 show a decrease during follow-up, LSM progression occurs in 4.1% of patients.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with hepatic B surface antigen (HBsAg).MethodsScopus, EMbase, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant studies on HCC after HBsAg seroclearance from inception to October 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analysis was then conducted using R 3.5.3 software.ResultsA total of 28 studies involving 105 411 patients were included. Among 105 411 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), 7 656 patients occurred spontaneously HBsAg seroclearance, while 1 248 patients had HBsAg seroclearance after interferon or nucleoside analogue therapy. The rate of HBsAg seroclearance was 6.77%. Meta-analysis showed that risk factors for HCC after serum HBsAg conversion included cirrhosis (OR=6.43, 95%CI 3.56 to 11.60, P<0.001), male (OR=2.72, 95%CI 1.66 to 4.46,P<0.001), and age ≥50 years at HBsAg seroclearance (OR=3.71, 95%CI 2.17 to 6.35,P<0.001).ConclusionsPatients with CHB after HBsAg seroclearance are still at risk of developing HCC. Therefore, periodic surveillance is recommended, especially for male patients, patients with cirrhosis, and patients who experience HBsAg seroclearance when over 50.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the association between human leukocyte antigen DQ (HLA-DQ) gene rs2856718A>G, rs9275572A>G polymorphisms and the risk of chronic hepatitis B. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were systematically searched from inception to April 2015 to collect case-control studies about HLA-DQ gene polymorphisms and the risk of chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and Stata 12.0 software was used for sensitivity and publication bias analysis. ResultsA total of 6 papers involving 8 case-control studies were included, which involved 3 690 cases and 6 267 controls. The results of meta-analysis showed that:the rs2856718A>G polymorphism was associated with the decreased risk of chronic hepatitis B (AG+GG vs. AA:OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.78, P=0.000; GG vs. AG+AA:OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.61 to 0.79, P=0.000; GG vs. AA:OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.48 to 0.64, P=0.000; GA vs. AA:OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.88, P=0.006; G vs. A:OR=0.74, 95%CI 0.68 to 0.79, P=0.000). The rs9275572A>G polymorphism was not associated with the risk of chronic hepatitis B (AG+GG vs. AA:OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.55 to 2.23, P=0.770; GG vs. AG+AA:OR=1.10, 95%CI 0.84 to 1.45, P=0.500; GG vs. AA:OR=1.14, 95%CI 0.54 to 2.41, P=0.730; AG vs. AA:OR=1.06, 95%CI 0.56 to 2.02, P=0.860; G vs. A:OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.48, P=0.490). ConclusionHLA-DQ gene rs2856718 A>G polymorphism is significantly associated with decreased risk of chronic hepatitis B, but the rs9271319 A>G polymorphism is not associated with the risk of chronic hepatitis B.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of combined therapy of Gankang Granule and Entecavir for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods A total of 118 patients with chronic hepatitis B treated between January 2012 and January 2013 were randomly divided into treatment group (n=59) and control group (n=59). Patients in the treatment group were treated with Gankang Granule and Entecavir, while those in the control group were treated with Entecavir alone. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups in such liver fibrosis evaluation indexes as hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), procollagenⅢ(PCⅢ), and collegen typeⅣ(CⅣ) (P > 0.05). After treatment, the two groups had significant differences in HA, LN, PCⅢ, and CⅣ(P < 0.05). After 48 weeks of treatment, the alanine aminotransferase recovery rate was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05); but there was no significant difference in hepatitis B virus DNA negative conversion rate, hepatitis B e antigen negative conversion rate and hepatitis B e antibody seroconversion rate (P > 0.05). Forty-eight weeks after treatment began, 45 patients underwent liver biopsy which showed that liver fibrosis alleviation was significantly better in the treatment group than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Gankang granule combined with antiviral drug Entecavir for chronic hepatitis B is better in protecting the liver and alleviating hepatic fibrosis than the sole Entecavir. The combined method is worthy of being promoted.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of Heluo Shugan capsule in the treatment of hepatitis B fibrosis. MethodWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2015), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from their inception to August 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Heluo Shugan capsule for hepatitis B fibrosis. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 840 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: (1) As for reduced level of serum hyaluronic acid (HA), Heluo Shugan capsule was superior to placebo (MD=82.31, 95%CI 37.44 to 127.19, P=0.000 3), but worse than Fuzheng Huayu capsule (MD=-137.45, 95% CI-196.29 to-78.62, P < 0.000 01), Fufang Biejia Ruangan tablet (MD=-51.19, 95% CI-67.58 to-34.81, P < 0.000 01) and Anti-fibrosis decoction (MD=-82.13, 95% CI-102.37 to-61.88, P < 0.000 01). (2) As for reduced level of serum laminin (LN), Heluo Shugan capsule was superior to placebo (MD=36.83, 95% CI 11.84 to 61.82, P=0.004), but worse than Fufang Biejia Ruangan tablet (MD=-36.00, 95% CI-64.29 to-7.71, P=0.01), Ganfujian capsule (MD=-22.14, 95% CI-37.28 to-7.00, P=0.004) and Anti-fibrosis decoction (MD=-38.64, 95% CI-75.00 to-2.29, P=0.04). (3) As for reduced level of serum procollagen type III peptide (PCIII), Heluo Shugan capsule was superior to placebo (MD=47.17, 95% CI 32.68 to 61.66, P < 0.000 01), but worse than Fuzheng Huayu capsule (MD=-4.80, 95% CI-9.08 to-0.51, P=0.03), Dahuang Zhechong pills (MD=-53.77, 95% CI-105.01 to-2.53, P=0.04), Ganfujian capsule (MD=-46.82, 95% CI-66.30 to-27.34, P < 0.000 01) and Anti-fibrosis decoction (MD=-28.68, 95% CI-55.59 to-1.77, P=0.04). (4) As for reduced level of serum type-IV-collagen (IV-C), Heluo Shugan capsule was superior to placebo (MD=72.77, 95% CI 47.65 to 97.89, P < 0.000 01), but worse than Fuzheng Huayu capsule (MD=-34.69, 95% CI-56.65 to-12.73, P=0.002), Dahuang Zhechong pills (MD=-21.26, 95%CI-38.79 to-3.73, P=0.02), Fufang Biejia Ruangan tablet (MD=-69.04, 95%CI-124.38 to-13.69, P=0.01), Ganfujian capsule (MD=-19.84, 95% CI-37.41 to-2.27, P=0.03) and Anti-fibrosis decoction (MD=-37.98, 95% CI-72.99 to-2.96, P=0.03). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, Heluo Shugan capsule was superior to placebo, but worse than Fufang Biejia Ruangan tablet, Fuzheng Huayu capsule, Dahuang Zhechong pills, Ganfujian capsule and Anti-fibrosis decoction in reducing the level of serum hepatic fibrosis. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality, large-scale RCTs are need to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of foscarnet sodium in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from 1978 to June 2006. Randomized controlled trials of foscarnet sodium versus other drugs or no drugs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B were identified. The quality of the included trials was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was done using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.7. Results Seven studies (337 patients) were included; one compared foscarnet sodium versus interferon, and the other six compared foscarnet sodium versus no drugs. All the included studies were graded in terms of the quality of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding. All 7 studies were graded as level C. The meta-analysis showed that: ① foscarnet sodium was not significantly different from interferon in clinical efficacy, liver function, negative-conversion rate of virological markers and side effects. ② compared with the no drugs group, the negative-conversion rate of virological markers was significantly higher for the foscarnet sodium group, HBeAg (RR 6.20, 95%CI 1.76 to 21.79) and HBV-DNA (RR 4.13, 95%CI 1.32 to 12.86); but there were no significant differences in clinical efficacy, liver function and side effects. Conclusions Available evidence shows that: in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B the effectiveness and safety of foscarnet sodium are not significantly different from interferon, but only one trial is included in this review, so the evidence is weak. Compared with no drugs, foscarnet sodium significantly improves the negative-conversion rate of virological markers, but the evidence is insufficient to show whether foscarnet sodium could improve clinical efficacy and liver function, as well as reduce side effects.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatment with Fuzheng Huayu capsule for liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials (CCTR), CBMweb and CNKI up to March 2008. The references of retrieved literature were also hand searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared Fuzheng Huayu capsule with placebo or other drugs were collected. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’ s software RevMan 4.2.10 was used for data analyses. Results Seven RCTs involving 590 cases of liver fibrosis of CHB were included. As for their methodological quality, one was graded A, one was graded B and the others were graded C. We carried out subgroup analyses based on treatment course and intervention measures. In terms of reducing haluronic acid, Fuzheng Huayu capsule was more effective than Huoluo Shugan capsule when the treatment course was 3 months (WMD=–61.75, 95%CI –105.20 to –18.30); significant differences were also noted between Fuzheng Huayu capsule and placebo (WMD=–187.72, 95%CI –244.23 to –31.21) or Huoluo Shugan capsule (WMD=–120.03, 95%CI –158.41 to –81.65) when the treatment course was 6 months. In terms of reducing IV-C, Fuzheng Huayu capsule was more effective than Gantaile when the treatment course was 6 months (WMD=–72.32, 95%CI –84.30 to –60.34). As for improving liver fibrosis at stage S, significant differences were observed between Fuzheng Huayu capsule and Gantaile (RR=2.33, 95%CI 1.37 to 3.96) or Huoluo Shugan capsule (RR=1.30, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.65). Except a very small number of gastrointestinal reactions, no significant adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion Fuzheng Huayu capsule is effective in reducing haluronic acid and improving liver fibrosis at stage S, especially when the treatment course is prolonged from 3 months to 6 months. No significant adverse reactions are reported. Because most of the included trials are of poor quality and small sample size, more high-quality RCTs are needed.
目的 观察茵陈柴平汤治疗重度慢性乙型肝炎的疗效及不良反应。 方法 2009年3月－2010年3月，选择采用茵陈柴平汤联合常规保肝药物治疗50例重度慢性乙型肝炎患者（治疗组），并与50例仅用常规保肝药物治疗的重度慢性乙型肝炎患者（对照组）进行比较，观察治疗2、4周时的临床症状、肝功能及凝血酶原活动度等指标的变化。 结果 治疗2、4周时，治疗组在肝功能及凝血酶原活动度等指标均有显著改善，无严重不良反应；4周时，治疗组的症状缓解率（84%）明显高于对照组（66%）；其总有效率（96%）亦高于对照组（80%）。 结论 茵陈柴平汤治疗重度慢性乙型肝炎具有较好的临床疗效，且无严重不良反应。