目的 探讨胰管结石慢性胰腺炎的诊断和治疗。方法 收集我院1993年3月至2003年9月经手术治疗的胰管结石慢性胰腺炎患者34例的临床资料并进行回顾性分析。结果 全组病例均经B超和CT检查确诊，均经手术治疗。手术方式： 胰十二指肠切除术5例； 胰管切开取石、胰空肠Roux-Y吻合术27例，其中同时行胆囊切除术6例，Oddi扩约肌切开、T管引流术4例，胆肠Roux-Y吻合术2例； 胃空肠、胆肠吻合加活检术2例。治愈31例，缓解2例，死亡1例。结论 影像学检查是诊断本病的重要手段，准确率高。根据合并症和胰管扩张程度选择合适的手术方式，可取得良好治疗效果。
ObjectiveTo investigate the etiology of pediatric pancreatitis and the effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in it. MethodsPatients hospitalized for pancreatitis in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from Jan. 2008 to Jun. 2023 were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Totally, 241 cases (207 cases with acute pancreatitis and 34 with chronic pancreatitis) were included. Patients were divided into primary group (n=168) and recurrent group (n=73) according to their previous medical history. ResultsThe duration of hospitalization in the primary group was longer than that in the recurrent group [10.0 (7.0, 16.0) d vs. 7.5 (6.0, 11.8) d, P=0.012]. The proportion of acute pancreatitis in primary group (163/168, 97.0%) was higher than that in the recurrent group (44/73, 60.3%), P<0.001. There was no significant difference in the etiological component ratio between the primary and recurrent groups (χ2=7.504, P=0.347). However, in the primary group, the first etiology was biliary factors (38/163, 23.3%), and the second was biliary pancreatic anatomic abnormality (22/163, 13.5%). In the recurrence group, biliary pancreatic anatomic abnormality (13/44, 29.5%) was the first cause, and biliary factor (7/44, 15.9%) was the second cause. Among 207 cases with acute pancreatitis, there were 114 cases (55.1%) with clear etiology, including 45 cases (21.7%) of biliary factors, 35 cases (16.9%) of abnormal biliary pancreatic structure, 12 cases (5.8%) of traumatic factors, and 10 cases (4.8%) of drug-induced factors. In this study, 66 cases were treated with ERCP for pancreatitis, and a total of 103 ERCP operations were performed with cannulation success rate of 100%. Twenty-three cases (23/37, 62.2%) of acute pancreatitis resulted from biliary and biliary pancreatic structure abnormalities received ERCP. In biliary acute pancreatitis, the removal rate of choledocholithiasis in single ERCP operation was 80.0% (8/10). The clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, jaundice, and fever) of all cases were significantly improved after surgery, and no complications such as cholangitis, bleeding and perforation occurred. ConclusionsBiliary, congenital pancreatic anatomical abnormalities, drugs and trauma are the common causes of acute pancreatitis in children. ERCP is a safe and effective treatment for children with biliary pancreatitis, pancreatic anatomical abnormalities, and chronic pancreatitis.
Objective To explore the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograph (ERCP) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of pancreatic duct stones. Methods A retrospective collection of 28 patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic duct stones admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology from January 2010 to August 2021 was performed. According to the treatment of patients, they were divided into ERCP direct stone extraction group and ESWL combined ERCP stone extraction group. We compared the treatment effects of the two groups of patients, including the success rate of stone extraction, postoperative complications of ERCP, postoperative symptom improvement, and so on. Results Among the 28 patients, 19 cases underwent ERCP direct stone extraction, and 9 cases underwent ESWL combined with ERCP stone extraction. In the ERCP direct stone extraction group, 7 cases (36.84%) were completely extracted, 1 case was partially extracted (5.26%), and 11 cases (57.89%) failed to extract and only placed stents and drained; 5 cases (26.32%) had elevated white blood cells at 6 hours postoperatively, C-reactive protein increased in 4 cases (21.05%), 3 cases (15.79%) were diagnosed as ERCP-related pancreatitis, and 2 cases (10.53%) were diagnosed as hyperamylaseemia. The abdominal pain symptoms were completely relieved in 14 cases (73.68%) during a follow-up period of 3 to 6 months. The body mass of 17 cases (89.47%) increased in the 6 months after stone extraction. ESWL combined with ERCP had complete stone extraction in 5 cases (55.56%), partial stone extraction in 3 cases (33.33%), and failure in stone extraction and only stent drainage in 1 case (11.11%). One case (11.11%) had elevated white blood cells at 6 hours postoperatively, and 1 case (11.11%) had elevated C-reactive protein . One case (11.11%) was diagnosed with ERCP-related pancreatitis. One case (11.11%) got abdominal pain and transient hematuria during ESWL, which resolved spontaneously 3 days later. After 3 to 6 months of follow-up, 9 patients (100%) had complete relief of abdominal pain symptoms, and the body mass of 9 patients (100%) increased in the 6 months after stone extraction. The stone clearance rate of the ESWL combined with ERCP stone extraction group was higher than that of the ERCP direct stone extraction group (P=0.033), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of ERCP-related complications, relief of abdominal pain, and weight gain (P>0.05). Conclusion ESWL combined with ERCP in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis complicated with pancreatic duct stone extraction is more effective than ERCP direct stone extraction.
目的 探讨胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎的诊断要点与个体化术式的选择原则。方法 回顾性分析2000年4月至2011年9月期间我院收治的10例胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎患者的临床资料。结果 本组平均发病年龄47.3岁，平均病程69.1d，平均总胆红素99.4µmol/L，CA19-9 55～78U/ml。10例B超检查示肝内胆管及胆总管扩张，5例CT检查报告胰头部占位性病变伴主胰管不规则扩张或钙化灶，2例MRCP检查诊断胆总管下段占位。3例术中多点穿刺快速活检后行胆胰管引流术，7例术前误诊为胰头癌或壶腹癌均行胰十二指肠切除，术后出现并发症8例，死亡1例，9例平均随访44.2个月无复发和癌变。结论 把握发病年龄、病程、波动性黄疸等临床特征和CA19-9水平及CT、MRCP等影像检查要点是胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎与胰头癌鉴别诊断的关键，用个体化术式合理实施胰十二指肠切除、胆胰管内外引流术是胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎外科处理明智的选择。
ObjectiveTo summarize of clinical application and progress of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).MethodThe relevant literatures published recently at domestic and abroad about the clinical application and progress of DPPHR were collected and reviewed.ResultsFor the benign lesions, low-grade malignancies and borderline tumors of the head of pancreas, the DPPHR could achieve the same expected therapeutic effect as the classical pancreatoduodenectomy. The DPPHR could reserve the continuity of stomach and duodenum while resecting lesions and improve the symptoms of patients, reduce the reconstruction of digestive tract and the resection of pancreas and surrounding tissues as much as possible, and retain the pancreas-intestinal axis, which was more in line with the physiology of human beings.ConclusionsAt present, DPPHR is worthy of further development and promotion in department of pancreas surgery, but current studies only focus on occurrence of short-term complications after operation. Because patients with benign diseases of pancreatic head have better prognosis and longer survival time after operation, we should pay attention to the long-term complications such as diarrhea, anemia and reflux cholangitis. More clinical studies need in future to be demonstrated superiority of DPPHR in clinical efficacy and to evaluate occurrence of long-term complications and their impact on quality of life of patients with DPPHR by comprehensive analysis of multiple evaluation indicators.