Objective To improve hand hygiene executive ability of healthcare workers in medical institutions in Anhui Province by multi-modal interventions with the administrative intervention as the guide. Methods The PDCA management mode was adopted in a step-by-step implementation of plan, implementation, inspection, improvement, and effectiveness evaluation in Anhui Province from April 2014 to December 2016. The management indicators of hand hygiene before and after the intervention in 1 353 hospitals were investigated and evaluated. Results The overall evaluation of the hand hygiene at the end of the implemention showed that 85.29% (58/68) of the tertiary hospitals, 84.07% (227/270) of the second-class hospitals and 66.63% (595/893) of the primary-level hospitals had well-equipped hand hygiene facilities. About 92.65% (63/68) of the tertiary hospitals, 100.00% (270/270) of the second-class hospitals and 50.06% (447/893) of the primary-level hospitals had staff training of hand hygiene knowledge. The compliance of hand hygiene before and after intervention increased from 36.68% to 61.93%, the correct rate of hand washing increased from 37.60% to 89.28%, the awareness rate of related knowledge increased from 41.20% to 86.07%, and the dosage of hand disinfectant increased from 2.59 mL to 7.10 mL. Conclusion To take multi-model interventions with the administrative intervention as the guide, can effectively improve the quality of hand hygiene management and the executive force.
Objective To analyze the main problem of continuous hand hygiene improvement by PDCA cycle, find out the causes and carry out corresponding measures, in order to improve hand hygiene management continuously. Methods Between January and June 2014, PDCA cycle was used to strengthen comprehensive training, enhance awareness of hand hygiene, reinforce supervision, and evaluate the effect of continuous hand hygiene improvement. The knowledge of hand hygiene, increase of hand hygiene facilities, use of hand hygiene products and hand hygiene implementation before (from July to December 2013) and after PDCA application (from January to June 2014) were compared and analyzed. Results After the implementation of PDCA cycle, the pass rate of hand hygiene knowledge increased from 61.0% to 88.3%; the total amount of hand hygiene use increased from 1 817 046 mL to 3 347 386 mL; the hand hygiene compliance rate increased from 43.03% to 71.31%; and the correct rate of hand hygiene implementation increased from 62.68% to 87.68%. All the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). After the implementation of PDCA cycle, the compliance rate of different hand hygiene indications became significantly different (P<0.05). The growth rate of hand hygiene implementation before aseptic manipulation and after contact with body fluids were relatively higher (34.56% and 34.01%, respectively). Conclusion Through the application of PDCA cycle, hand hygiene compliance rate and correct rate have gradually increased.
ObjectiveTo compare the investigation results of compliance and accuracy of hand hygiene in medical staff achieved by Hospital Infection Management Department and Department Infection Management Teams, and analyze the reasons for differences of the results and take measures to improve the investigation ability of hand hygiene in hospitals. MethodsWe statistically analyzed the results of compliance and accuracy of hand hygiene from January to December 2013 investigated by the infection management department and 25 infection management teams. Both the hospital and departments used "WHO Standard Observation Form". Single-blind method was used to observe the implementation of hand hygiene in medical staff. ResultsThe hospital infection management department investigation showed that hand hygiene compliance and accuracy were 64.97% and 87.78%, respectively, while the investigation by infection management teams showed that hand hygiene compliance and accuracy were 90.54% and 93.37%, respectively. The differences between the investigation results of two-level organizations were statistically significant (χ2=286.2, P<0.001; χ2=532.6, P<0.001). ConclusionWe should take measures to enforce the training of hand hygiene implementation and the observation method, and improve the guidance and assessment, promote investigators' working responsibility and observation ability, so that the survey data can accurately reflect the actual situation to urge medical staff to form good hand hygiene habits.
Objective To understand the effect of World Health Organization(WHO) multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy on hand hygiene compliance among acupuncturists. Methods All the acupuncturists in departments (Department of Acupuncture, Department of Encephalopathy, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology) with acupuncture programs in Xi’an Hospital of TCM were chosen in this study between September 2015 and August 2016. Based on the WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy, comprehensive measures were regulated among acupuncturists. Hand hygiene compliance and accuracy, and hand hygiene knowledge score were compared before and after the strategy intervention. Then, the effects of key strategies were evaluated. Results Overall hand hygiene compliance rate, accuracy and knowledge scores increased from 51.07%, 19.86% and 81.90±2.86 before intervention to 72.34%, 51.70%, and 98.62±2.92 after intervention (P<0.05). Hand hygiene compliance rates also increased in various occasions such as before contacting the patient, after contacting the patient, before acupuncture treatment, and before acupuncture needle manipulation (P<0.05). Conclusion Hand hygiene compliance in acupuncturists can be significantly improved by the implementation of WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application and effect of quality control circle (QCC) in the management of hand hygiene for nurses in hemodialysis center. MethodsQCC was applied in the management of hand hygiene in hemodialysis center from March 2013 to February 2014. Factors affecting the compliance and correctness of hand hygiene in hemodialysis nurses were analyzed, and counter measurements were established and applied. Moreover, effect of QCC management was also assessed. ResultsAfter the application of QCC, the compliance and correctness of hand hygiene in hemodialysis nurses increased significantly from 41.02% to 88.46% (P<0.05) and 46.88% to 91.30% (P<0.05), respectively. Moreover, maneuver application, team spirit, professional knowledge, communication and cooperation among nurses were also increased by QCC management. ConclusionThe application of QCC can not only increase the compliance and correctness of hand hygiene in hemodialysis nurses but also improve team cohesiveness, which is worth recommendation and promotion.
Objective To know the present situation of hand hygiene compliance in medical staff and analyze problems in the management of hand hygiene and related influencing factors, in order to take effective control measures and gradually improve hand hygiene compliance in medical staff. Methods Between January and October 2014 and between January and October 2015, 8-10 healthcare workers respectively from Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Surgery and Department of Rehabilitation were selected to be observed. The healthcare workers between January and October 2014 before the application of plan-do-check-action (PDCA) cycle were regarded as the control group, and hand hygiene observation was performed in October 2014; the healthcare workers between January and October 2015 were regarded as the observation group (after PDCA application), and hand hygiene observation was carried out in October 2015. Under the PDCA cycle, we set up hand hygiene management working group to investigate the hand hygiene work before PDCA cycle was applied. Hand hygiene knowledge survey was carried out. Fishbone diagram was used to find out the causes of poor hand hygiene compliance. Based on these factors, improvement plans of hand hygiene were regulated and implemented. Then, continuous improvement was promoted according to PDCA cycle management process. Results After PDCA implementation, healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance (79.67%), correct handwashing rate (94.97%), and hand hygiene compliance before contacting the patients (85.96%), before sterile operation (68.14%), after contacting the patients (78.02%), after contacting patients’ blood or body fluid (85.96%), and after contacting patients’ surroundings (79.14%) were all significantly higher than those before the PDCA implementation (46.39%, 69.62%, 38.42%, 23.20%, 49.14%, 53.78% and 48.39%) (P<0.05). After the implementation of PDCA cycle, the amount of disinfectants consumed per day and the amount of hand sanitizer was 10.13 mL, significantly more than that before PDCA implementation (2.8 mL). The hospital was equipped with full hygiene equipment. Conclusion Applying PDCA cycle for continuous improvement of hand hygiene work can promote the hand hygiene compliance for medical staff.
ObjectiveTo investigate the hand hygiene status of nursing staff in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) isolation ward, find out the difficulties and problems in hand hygiene implementation, and then put forward scientific and feasible suggestions to improve the compliance of hand hygiene.MethodsSelf-designed Questionnaire on Hand Hygiene Status of Nursing Staff in COVID-19 Isolation Ward was distributed through the Wenjuanxing, a platform to collect data. The questionnaire, which included general information, knowledge related to hand hygiene, and the status of hand hygiene in isolation ward, was distributed to the nurses working in isolation wards in Wuhan, Hubei Province from March 15th, 2020 to March 22nd, 2020.ResultsValid questionnaires were collected from 492 nurses. The difficulty in performing hand hygiene in the isolation ward was ranked ≥level 3 by 248 nurses (50.41%), the degree of which was divided into 10 levels (level 1 was no difficulty, level 10 was the most difficult). A total of 369 participants (75.00%) thought that wearing gloves for hand disinfection would damage the gloves. There were 161 participants who thought that gloves should be changed every 2 hours, accounting for the largest proportion (32.72%); while 226 participants actually changed gloves every 4 hours, accounting for the largest proportion (45.93%).ConclusionsThe difficulty of performing hand hygiene in isolation ward should be paid attention to. It is recommended to carry out further research on the replacement time of gloves.