Objective To explore the nursing quality standards of joint surgery based on “structure-process-outcome” three-dimensional quality evaluation model, and provide a reference for improving the quality of joint surgery nursing. Methods From March to July 2023, based on the “structure-process-outcome” three-dimensional quality structure model as the theoretical framework, combined with systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews, the quality standards of joint surgery specialist nursing were preliminarily formulated. The Delphi method was used for screening, demonstration, and correction, then the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights. Results The recovery rates of the two rounds of expert letter consultation were 93.75% and 100.00%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients of both rounds were 0.95. The positive coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 0.93 and 1.00, respectively. The coefficients of variation after the second round of correspondence were 0-0.20. In the second round of correspondence inquiry, the Kendall harmony coefficients of primary standards, secondary standards and tertiary standards were 0.156, 0.115 and 0.285, respectively, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Finally, the quality standards of joint specialty nursing included 3 primary standards, 23 secondary standards and 99 tertiary standards. Conclusion The construction process of nursing quality standards of joint surgery specialty based on “structure-process-outcome” three-dimensional quality structure model is scientific and reliable, the index evaluation results are less volatile, and the opinions are concentrated, which can provide a basis for comprehensively, accurately and pertinently improving the quality of joint surgery specialty nursing.
In the context of the burgeoning development of day surgery, the shortened hospital stay has led to a relative reduction in the professional care that patients receive. As a result, more stringent requirements for nursing quality management have emerged. Scientific and objective sensitive indicators can provide quantitative standards for monitoring and evaluating nursing quality. This article comprehensively reviews the definition, classification, construction steps, and methods of nursing quality sensitive indicators. Additionally, it delves into the current status of the construction and application of such indicators for day surgery both at home and abroad. Those insights can offer a scientific foundation for the management of nursing quality in day surgery settings.
目的 探讨提高临床护理质量的管理方法。 方法 利用归因理论,对2009年12月-2010年11月护理部3级综合质量检查、午夜间及节假日2级护理质量检查、科室1级护理质量自查存在的128项问题进行回顾性归因分析。 结果 危重患者护理、病房规范化管理、5年内护士、午间时段为扣分项目多发点。 结论 护理人力资源合理配置、质控归因分析会、低年资护士培训、抓重点时间段、注重人性化管理等有望改变现状。
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of clinical nursing pathway on rehabilitation indicators in patients who had undergone transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). MethodsA total of 241 patients underwent TURP between July 2010 and March 2014 were randomly divided into path group (121 cases) and control group (120 cases). The nursing results of the two groups were observed. ResultsThe complication rate of bladder spasm, secondary hemorrhage, urethral stricture in path group were lower than those in the control group with significant differences (P<0.05). ConclusionThe performance of clinical nursing pathway on TURP patients may reduce the complications rate, and promote the health economics indicators and quality of care.
ObjectiveTo carry out health education to day surgery patients, assist the smoothness of their operation, promote early recovery of patients and improve the quality of nursing and patients' degree of satisfaction. MethodsA total of 1 888 operations from January to May, 2013 were chosen to be the control group; and 2 136 operations from January to May, 2014 were regarded as the trail group. Patients in the control group accepted routine nursing and health education, while patients in the trail group accepted health education before and after surgery, and through telephone during the follow-up period. ResultsThe rate of failure to keep the appointment, the readmission rates, and the satisfaction rate to the nursing work were 0.28%, 0.94% and 94.71% respectively in the trial group, while were 3.50%, 3.07%, and 90.20%, respectively in the control group. the differeces between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). ConclusionPersonalized health education can ensure the smooth operation of day surgery, advance wound healing of the patients, and improve the day surgery ward care quality and patient satisfaction.