Objective To assess the efficacy of telbivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of telbivudine therapy vs. lamivudine therapy in both Chinese and English were retrieved from seven electronic databases with a cut-off date in February 2010, including PubMed, EMbase, VIP, CBM, CNKI, and The Cochrane library. The meta-analyses and evaluation on methodology quality were performed for the included studies. Results Two RCTs as Grade-A study were included. The meta-analyses showed that telbivudine was superior to lamivudine in aspects of therapeutic response (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.48, P=0.001), ALT normalization (RR=1.12, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.23, P=0.02), and PCR-negative HBV DNA or below the lower limit (RR=1.44, 95%CI 1.36 to 1.53, Plt;0.000 01), primary treatment failure (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.18, to 0.43, Plt;0.000 01), viral breakthrough (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.47, Plt;0.000 01) and viral resistance (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Based on the current clinical evidence, telbivudine demonstrates superiority in comparison with lamivudine on all direct measures of antiviral efficacy for CHB. Because of the short follow-up duration and the small sample size of the included studies, it is expected to further discuss the long-term efficacy.
目的 采用干扰素和阿德福韦酯治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者经拉米夫定治疗后出现YMDD变异，比较两种治疗策略的临床疗效。 方法 选择2002年2月-年12月经100 mg拉米夫定治疗后出现YMDD变异的慢性乙型肝炎患者76例。其中，男52例，女24例；年龄18~55岁，平均年龄33岁。服用100 mg拉米夫定52～156周发生YMDD变异，HBV DNA低于治疗前水平，丙氨酸转移酶(alanine aminotransferase，ALT)lt;2×ULN/L患者分为A组(26例)，继续用100 mg拉米夫定治疗48周；服用100 mg拉米夫定52～156周发生YMDD变异，HBV DNA定量检测高于或等于治疗前水平，ALTgt;2×ULN/L，根据患者自愿分为B组(27例)和C组(23例)。B组用100 mg拉米夫定联合10 mg阿德福韦酯治疗48周；C组用干扰素治疗48周。分别观察3组ALT复常率及HBV DNA转阴率、HBeAg阳性患者血清学转换率。 结果 治疗48周时，B、C组患者ALT复常率分别是74.1%和78.3%，明显高于A组的34.6%，差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)；B、C组患者HBV DNA转阴率分别是77.7%和73.9%，明显高于A组的11.5%，差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)；3组HBeAg阳性患者血清学转换率比较，差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。 结论 慢性乙型肝炎患者经拉米夫定治疗后出现YMDD变异，继续用拉米夫定治疗疗效不理想，改用干扰素或联合阿德福韦酯治疗更安全有效。
目的 比较拉米夫定+阿德福韦酯联合治疗与阿德福韦酯单药治疗对阿德福韦酯停药后出现病毒学反弹而无基因型耐药变异患者的疗效及安全性。 方法 回顾研究2007年1月－2012年1月在传染科门诊就诊的67例阿德福韦酯治疗获得病毒学应答但停药后出现病毒学反弹的e抗原阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者，分别给予拉米夫定+阿德福韦酯联合治疗（联合组，n=35）和阿德福韦酯单药治疗（单药组，n=32）。 结果 治疗1年后，联合组（32例，85.7%）较单药组（21例，65.6%）有更多的患者重新获得了丙氨酸转氨酶复常（P=0.009），联合组34例（97.1%）乙型肝炎病毒DNA阴转，单药组22例（68.8%）阴转，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.002）；在血清学转换方面，联合组和单药组分别有4例（11.4%）和1例（3.1%）患者获得了e抗原的血清学转换。在治疗中所有患者均未发生任何严重不良反应。 结论 阿德福韦酯停药后出现病毒学反弹，选择拉米夫定与阿德福韦酯联合治疗可使患者重新获得较好的生化学和病毒学应答。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs for hepatitis B with YMDD motif variant. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE (1989-April, 2004), EMBASE (1989-April, 2004), CBMdisc (expand) (1989-April, 2004), and handsearched unpublished Chinese conference proceedings. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials in patients with chronic hepatitis B with YMDD motif variant correlative to lamivudine were collected. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of literature independently. The data were then analyzed by RevMan 4.2 software. Results Five studies involving 6 trials and 284 patients were included. According to the results of meta-analysis, antiviral therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine showed significantly better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg and normalization of ALT than that of lamivudine alone (RR 16.61, 95%CI 2.29 to 120.71; RR 6.66, 95%CI 1.23 to 35.88 and RR 6.26, 95%CI 2.29 to 17.12 respectively); also, oxymatrine plus thymothin showed obviously better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg (RR 2.96, 95%CI 1.26 to 6.93 and RR 2.51, 95%CI 1.05 to 5.98 respectively).But adefovir alone showed no better effects on clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg than that of lamivudine alone (RR 11.00, 95%CI 0.65 to 186.02 and RR 7.00, 95%CI 0.39 to 126.92 respectively); interferon plus lamivudine showed no better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA, HBeAg and the normalization of ALT (RR 3.50, 95%CI 0.90 to 13.58; RR 4.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 35.10 and RR 2.80, 95%CI 0.91 to 8.12 respectively). Chinese herbs plus lamivudine showed no better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA (RR 1.16, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.51). There were no significant side effects in the groups, except flu like symptom in the interferon group, slight kidney impairment in the adefovir group, and aggravation of rare cases in lamivudine group. Conclusions Antiviral therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine, or oxymatrine plus thymothin, shows better effects than with lamivudine alone in terms of antiviral therapy and clinical outcome improvement. However, the evidence is too weak to draw a definite conclusion in this systematic review. Larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized, double blind, placebo control trials are required for future study.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety interferon-α (IFN-α) combined with lamivudine vs. IFN-α alone in treating children with Hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on IFN-α combined with lamivudine in treating children with hepatitis B. Two reviewers screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results 8 RCTs were included, with comparable baseline. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared to the IFN-α alone group, the combined therapy group had higher negative rates of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of anti-Hbe and the incidence of adverse reaction between the two groups. Conclusion Current evidence shows that IFN-α combined with lamivudine was more effective than IFN-α alone in treating children’s hepatitis B.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data from their inception to December 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of LAM+ADV versus ETV for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs and 5 cohort studies involving 1 336 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses of RCTs showed that:there were no significant differences between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.10, P=0.94), HBeAg (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.17, P=0.43), serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.05, P=0.45) and serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.24, P=0.22) at the 48th week. The results of meta-analyses of cohort studies showed that:there were no significant differences between the two groups in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.06, P=0.13) and serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.12, P=0.87), but the ETV group had higher serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.79, P=0.02). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy of LAM+ADV is similar to ETV at the 48th week for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of peginterferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) initially combined with lamivudine (LAM) or adefovir (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2014), PubMed, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about PEG-IFNα initially combined with LAM or ADV for HBeAg-positive CHB. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 2031 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: After 48 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus ADV group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (8.6% vs. 0%, OR=7.73, 95%CI 1.53 to 39.05, P=0.01) or the ADV monotherapy group (8.5% vs. 0%, OR=7.75, 95%CI 1.07 to 56.23, P=0.04); and the HBsAg seroclearance rate in the combination therapy group was significantly higher than that of the ADV monotherapy group (10.5% vs. 1.2%, OR=5.56, 95%CI to 2.14 to 14.47, P=0.0004). After 52 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus LAM group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (11.6% vs. 5.6%, OR=2.21, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.72, P=0.04). After 26 weeks of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the combination therapy group and the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group in HBsAg seroclearance rate and HBsAg seroconversion rate (all P values >0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with PEG-IFNα, LAM, or ADV monotherapy, PEG-IFNα plus LAM or ADV could improve the HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion rate after 48-52 weeks of treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB, but this effect is still limited. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy of zidovudine and lamivudine (ZDV+3TC) for preventing mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using the methodology of The Cochrane Collaboration. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, AIDSearch, AIDSLINE, AIDSTRIALS, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2007), AIDSDRUGS, AIDSinfo, CRD (Center of Review and Dissemination) databases and three Chinese Databases (CBM, CNKI, VIP) were searched from their establishment to 31 May 2007. We also searched documents of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the proceedings of relevant conferences, including the International AIDS Conferences, and the annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. RCTs assessing the effects of ZDV+3TC for preventing MTCT were included. Trial selection, quality assessment and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently. Different opinions were resolved by discussion with a third party. Meta-analyses were conducted using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.9 software. Results Three studies in breastfeeding populations were included. One trial (PETRA, 1797 participants) found that ZDV+3TC decreased the risk of transmission by 35%-65% within 15 months compared with placebo. However, there was no evidence that ultra-short course ZDV+3TC (during labor) decreased the risk of transmission, compared with placebo. The safety of different courses of ZDV+3TC and placebo were similar (Pgt;0.05). Another trial (SAINT, 1317 participants) found that short course ZDV+3TC (from 36weeks gestation to labor) did not significantly reduce HIV infection among children at 8 weeks after delivery, when compared with single dose nevirapine given to the mother and the infant (Pgt;0.05). No significant difference was found in the maternal and infants mortality and side effects of two groups. One small trial (Moodley1998, 20 participants) found no infant infection in both ZDV+3TC and 3TC alone within 2 weeks after birth. Conclusions Long course (from 36 weeks gestation to 1 week after delivery) and short course (from 36 weeks gestation to labor) ZDV+3TC were more effective than placebo in preventing MTCT of HIV in breastfeeding women with a similar safety profile. Short course ZDV + 3TC had similar effects to single dose nevirapine, and long course ZDV + 3TC had similar effects to lamivudine alone.