ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in post-extubation intensive care unit (ICU) patients.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP Databases were searched for all published available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies about HFNC therapy in post-extubation ICU patients. The control group was treated with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), while the experimental group was treated with HFNC. Two reviewers separately searched the articles, evaluated the quality of the literatures, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis. The main outcome measurements included reintubation rate and length of ICU stay. The secondary outcomes included ICU mortality and hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) rate.ResultsA total of 20 articles were enrolled. There were 3 583 patients enrolled, with 1 727 patients in HFNC group, and 1 856 patients in control group (841 patients with COT, and 1 015 with NIPPV). Meta-analysis showed that HFNC had a significant advantage over COT in reducing the reintubation rate of patients with postextubation (P<0.000 01), but there was no significant difference as compared with that of NIPPV (P=0.21). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in reducing reintubation rate in patients of postextubation (P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in ICU mortality between HFNC and COT (P=0.38) or NIPPV (P=0.36). There was no significant difference in length of ICU stay between HFNC and COT (P=0.30), but there had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV (P<0.000 01). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay (P=0.04). There was no significant difference in HAP rate between HFNC and COT (P=0.61) or NIPPV (P=0.23).ConclusionsThere is a significant advantage to decrease reintubation rate between HFNC and COT, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, length of ICU stay or HAP rate. There is a significant advantage to decrease length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, reintubation rate or HAP rate.
ObjectiveTo assess the safety of the removal of pericardial and mediastinal drain within different drainage volume after cardiac valvular replacement surgery.MethodsBetween July 2013 and July 2017, 201 patients with rheumatic heart disease (CHD) were treated with valve replacement in our hospital, including 57 males and 144 females, aged 15 to 72 years. They were divided into two groups according to the amount of 24-h drainage before the drain removal: a group one with 24-h drainage volume≤50 ml (n=127) and a group two with 24-h drainage volume>50 ml (n=74). The postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of severe complications between the two groups were compared.ResultsThere was no difference between the two groups in the baseline information or the incidence of severe pericardial effusion and tamponade, while the group two tended to have a shorter length of hospital stay after surgery (8.0 d vs. 7.5 d, P=0.013).ConclusionIn CHD patients undergoing valvular surgery, compared with a relatively low amount of drainage before the drain removal, drawing the tube at a greater amount of drainage (24-h drainage volume>50 ml) will shorten the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery while incidence of severe complications remains the same.
Objective To investigate the appropriate indication about removing abdominal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Method The clinical data of 156 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, with 76 patients in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group and 80 patients in the control group according to the type of indications about removing abdominal drainage. The time of removing abdominal drainage, hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and readmission rate during 30 days after surgery were compared between the2 groups. Results Compared with the control group, the time of removing abdominal drainage 〔(6.2±2.5) dvs. (10.8±2.2) d,P<0.001〕and hospital stay〔(11.8±3.4) dvs. (15.7±3.6) d,P<0.001〕 of the ERAS group were both shorter, incidence of abdominal infection was lower〔1.3% (1/76)vs. 10.0% (8/80), P=0.020〕 , but there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula 〔18.4% (14/76) vs. 21.3% (17/80)〕 , delayed gastric emptying〔1.4% (1/76) vs. 7.5% (6/80)〕 , and the readmission rate during 30 days after surgery〔5.3% (4/76) vs. 3.8% (3/80)〕 , P>0.05. Conclusions Indications about removing abdominal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy by authors are safe.
Objective To explore the application value of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in the risk management of unplanned extubation after esophageal cancer surgery. Methods A total of 1 140 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery in our department from January 2015 to May 2017 were selected as a control group, including 948 males and 192 females with an average age of 64.45±4.53 years. FMEA was used to analyze the risk management process of unplanned extubation. The potential risk factors in each process were found by calculating the risk priority number (RPN) value, and the improvement plan was formulated for the key process with RPN>125 points. Then 1 117 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery from June 2017 to December 2019 were selected as a trial group, including 972 males and 145 females with an average age of 64.60±5.22 years, and the FMEA risk management mode was applied.Results The corrective measures were taken to optimize the high-risk process, and the RPN values of 9 high-risk processes were reduced to below 125 points after using FMEA risk management mode. The rate of unplanned extubation in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of FMEA in the risk management of unplanned extubation after esophageal cancer surgery can reduce the rate of unplanned extubation, improve the quality of nursing, and ensure the safety of patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics during endotracheal extubation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with hypertension. MethodsA total of 120 hypertension patients ready to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia between December 2013 and December 2014 were chosen to be our study subjects. They were randomly divided into 4 groups with 30 patients in each:saline control group (group C), low-dose dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection group (group D1), moderate-dose dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection group (group D2), and high-dose dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection group (group D3). The anesthesia methods and drugs were kept the same in each group, and 20 mL of saline, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (diluted to 20 mL with saline) were given to group C, D1, D2, and D3 respectively 15 minutes before the end of surgery. Time of drug administration was set to 15 minutes. We observed and recorded each patient's mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in 5 particular moments:the time point before administration (T1), immediately after administration (T2), extubation after administration (T3), one minute after extubation (T4), and 5 minutes after extubation (T5). Surgery time, recovery time, extubation time and the number of adverse reactions were also detected. ResultsCompared at with, MAP and HR increased significantly at the times points of T3, T4, T5 compared with T1 and T2 in Group C and group D1 (P<0.05), while the correspondent difference was not statistically significant in group D2 and D3 (P>0.05). Compared with group C, MAP and HR decrease were not significantly at the time points of T3, T4, T5 in group D1 (P>0.05). However, MAP and HR decrease at times points of T3, T4, T5 in group D2 and D3 were significantly different from group C and D1 (P<0.05). After extubation, there were two cases of dysphoria in group C and two cases of somnolence in group D3, but there were no cases of dysphoria, nausea or shiver in group D1, D2, D3. ConclusionIntravenously injecting moderate dose of dexmedetomidine 15 minutes before the end of surgery can effectively reduce patients' cardiovascular stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy extubation for patients with hypertension, and we suggest a dose of 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of lidocaine injected prior to tracheal extubation in preventing hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in general anesthesia.MethodsPubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of lidocaine administrated prior to extubation in preventing hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia from inception to October, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 13.0 software.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 525 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with control group, lidocaine could reduce mean arterial pressure in 5 min after extubation (MD=–5.10, 95%CI –9.41 to –0.79, P=0.02), weaken the increase in systolic blood pressure caused by extubation from the moment before extubation to 5 minutes after extubation (before extubation: MD=–7.22, 95%CI –10.34 to –4.11, P<0.000 01; at extubation: MD=–14.02, 95%CI –19.42 to –8.62, P<0.000 01; 1 minutes after extubation: MD=–15.82, 95%CI –22.20 to –9.45, P<0.000 01; 3 minutes after extubation: MD=–12.55, 95%CI –20.36 to –4.74, P=0.002; and 5 minutes after extubation: MD=–12.05, 95%CI –20.35 to –3.74, P=0.004), and weakened extubation-induced increase in diastolic blood pressure at extubation (MD=–9.71, 95%CI –16.57 to –2.86, P=0.005). In addition, lidocaine inhibited heart rate in all time points except the moment of before and at 10 minutes after extubation.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that lidocaine can inhibit the increase in blood pressure and heart rate caused by extubation at certain times. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.
【摘要】 目的 探讨降低冠状动脉支架植入术后拔管所致血管迷走神经反射（vasovagal reflexs，VVR）的护理干预措施及效果。 方法 将2011年1-3月冠状动脉支架植入患者120例随机分为两组，对照组58例，试验组62例，对照组按常规方法拔管，试验组除常规方法外根据患者不同情况予针对性护理干预。 结果 120例患者中共发生VVR 10例，其中对照组发生8例，试验组发生2例。两组比较差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。 结论 冠状动脉支架植入手术患者实施针对性的护理干预可有效降低血管迷走神经反射的发生，提高手术成功率。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the nursing intervention measures and effects on reducing the vasovagal reflexs (VVRs) after the coronary stent extubation. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients who underwent coronary stenting between January and March 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into control group (n=58) treated with conventional coronary stent extubation and experiment group (n=62) treated with conventional coronary stent extubation and professional nursing intervention care. Results In 120 patients, VVRs occurred in 10 including 8 in the control group and 2 in the experiment group. The difference between the two groups was significant (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The coronary stent implantation with specific nursing interventions can effectively reduce the vascular vagal reflex, and leads to a higher success rate of the surgery.