目的 探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的手术方法及其临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2008年3月至2012年6月期间笔者所在医院收治并行腹腔镜胆总管探查联合胆道镜治疗的67例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的临床资料。结果 67例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者中，6例经胆囊管探查取石并行胆囊管一期结扎，15例行胆总管探查取石并行胆总管一期缝合，46例行胆总管探查取石后经T管引流。所有患者的手术均获成功，无中转开腹，无术后大出血及手术死亡。手术时间为（120±30）min（90～150min），术中失血量为（30±10）mL（20～40mL），平均住院时间为8.3d（7～14d）。术后3例患者发生轻度漏胆，经引流后痊愈；4例发生切口感染，经引流并给予抗生素治疗后治愈；1例发生术后早期炎性肠梗阻，经胃肠减压、灌肠、给予生长抑素加地塞米松等保守治疗后痊愈。术后所有患者均获访，随访时间为1个月～3年，平均随访时间为2.1年。随访期间，均无胆道感染和胆管狭窄发生，无结石复发。结论 腹腔镜胆总管探查联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石安全有效。
目的 探讨纤维胆道镜在胆道探查术中及术后的应用价值。方法 对113例在胆道探查术中及术后应用纤维胆道镜治疗患者的疗效进行回顾性分析。结果 23例胆总管扩张合并黄疸且术前未见结石的患者，其中19例术中胆道镜发现结石并于术中取净结石，2例炎性狭窄，1例胆管癌，1例未见异常。58例胆总管结石患者术中胆道镜取净结石。32例肝内、外胆管结石患者术中胆道镜取净结石21例; 2例胆道镜发现结石集中于肝左外叶合并肝内胆管狭窄, 行肝左外叶切除; 其余9例患者的结石术中未取净，于术后6～8周再经胆道镜T管窦道取净结石。113例患者术后均无严重并发症发生。术后获随访98例（86.7%），随访时间6～24个月，平均14个月，2例复发，其余96例未见结石复发。结论术中应用纤维胆道镜可明确胆管内病变，降低胆管残余结石的发生率; 术后经T管窦道取石是治疗胆管残余结石的有效方法，可避免再次手术的痛苦。
Objective To investigate feasibility and clinical efficacy of exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Methods The patients who had left extrahepatic bile duct stones with choledocholithiasis from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Among these patients, 29 cases underwent an exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (observation group) and 26 cases underwent an exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via incision of common bile duct during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (control group). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative nutritional, and complications rate were compared between these two groups. Results The operations were performed successfully and no perioperative death happened in both groups. There were no significant differences in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). Moreover, the postoperative hospital stay of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the complications of the bile leakage, subphrenic infection, and biliary residual stones between the two groups (P>0.05). Also, the levels of prealbumin and the lymphocytes in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group on the 3rd and 6th day after the operation (P<0.05). Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that exploration and removal of stones through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis is relatively safe and reliable, its procedure is simplified, could avoid relevant complications due to biliary incision and T tube drainage.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients and non-elderly patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 185 cases of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who treated in our hospital from September 2010 to November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Then the 185 cases of holecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis were divided into elderly patients group (n=74) and the non-elderly patients group (n=111). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, incidence of complications, unplanned analgesia, stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, recurrence of stone, and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results① Intraoperative and postoperative indexes. No significant difference was noted in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.050), but the postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and ratio of indwelling T tube of elderly patients group were all higher or longer than corresponding index of non-elderly patients group (P < 0.050). ② Postoperative complications and unplanned analgesia. There was no striking discrepancy in incidence of complications (including biliary leakage, peritonitis, haemorrhage, vomit, ectoralgia, and fever), and Clavien-Dindo grade (P > 0.050), except unplanned analgesia (P=0.007), the rate of unplanned analgesia in elderly patients group was higher than that of non-elderly patients group. ③Surgical effect. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and rate of recurrence of stone between the 2 groups (P > 0.050). ConclusionLC+LCBDE is also safe and effective in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients, it's worthy to be expanded and be used broadly.
ObjectiveTo explore the diagnostic value of “Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration in patients with peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 409 gastric adenocarcinoma patients from July 2016 to August 2020 who underwent “Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration in West China Hospital. The descriptive case series study was conducted to analyze the outcome of laparoscopic exploration combined with CY (cytology test), stepwise treatment plans, and the rates of CY1 and P1 (peritoneal metastasis) among cT3–4 patients during different periods. SPSS 22.0 software was used to conduct the univariate and multivariate logistic regression to analyze the high risk factors associated with P1 and (or) CY1.ResultsA total of 409 gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration were enrolled in our study. Among them, 65 patients were confirmed to be P1 and (or) CY1. Stratified analysis by cT and cN staging showed that there were 7 (7.4%) and 55 (27.9%) patients with peritoneal metastasis in cT3 staging and cT4 staging, respectively. After laparoscopic exploration, 168 patients received laparoscopic gastrectomy, 35 patients received laparotomy, 143 patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and 63 patients received conversion therapy. The bar chart showed an ascending tendency in the diagnosis rate of P1 over time among cT3–4 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ascites was an independent risk factor of CY1 and (or) P1 (P<0.001). Additionally, the postoperative complication rate was 2.9% in the patients who merely underwent laparoscopic exploration, including 4 patients with pulmonary infection and 2 patients with urinary retention.Conclusions“Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration is reliable and feasible for gastric cancer. “Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration has high diagnostic value for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. Our study shows that most of peritoneal metastasis distribute in cT3 and cT4 patients. For these patients, laparoscopic exploration should be recommended to identify if peritoneal metastasis exists and avoid unnecessary laparotomy.
【摘要】目的 探讨经胆囊管行术中胆道镜胆道探查的临床应用价值。 方法 对1997年9月至2004年12月期间60例开腹胆囊切除术患者经胆囊管行术中胆道镜胆道探查术，8例腹腔镜下经胆囊管行胆道镜胆道探查术的资料进行回顾性分析。结果 所有患者结石清除率为100%，术后平均住院7.2 d。结论 在无禁忌证的前提下，无论是开腹还是腹腔镜手术，应首先考虑经胆囊管途径行胆道镜胆道探查取石术。
目的:总结应用腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆总管结石的体会。方法:回顾分析2003年1月至2009年5月成都市第五人民医院联合应用腹腔镜胆道镜治疗胆总管结石的临床资料。结果:经胆囊颈管取石成功21例,切开胆总管取石27例,其中胆总管I期缝合17例,T管引流31例,3例术后发生胆总管残余结石,经T管窦道胆道镜取石治愈,5例中转开腹。结论:选择合适病例,腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆总管结石患者创伤小,效果好,且安全可靠。
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics associated with hospital infections in patients with common bile duct stones treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), thereby providing a basis for selecting treatment strategies and formulating hospital infection prevention measures for such patients. Methods Patients with common bile duct stones at Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2020 and July 2023 were retrospectively selected and divided into ERCP and LCBDE groups according to their surgical methods. Basic patient data, length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, perioperative infection-related indicators, and occurance of hospital infections were compared between groups. Results A total of 402 patients were enrolled, with 242 in the ERCP group and 160 in the LCBDE group. Significant differences were noted in smoking, alcohol consumption, history of lung diseases, history of heart diseases, history of cholecystectomy/biliary surgery, presence of cholecystitis, presence of cholecystolithiasis, number of stones, maximum stone diameter, common bile duct diameter, total hospital stay, and total expenses (P<0.05). Twenty-four hours before surgery, except for the neutrophil count, which was slightly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LCBDE group (P=0.043), the infection-related indicators did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). Twenty-four hours after surgery, the levels of serum white blood cell, neutrophil, and aspartate aminotransferase in the ERCP group were lower than those in the LCBDE group (P<0.05), and the levels of alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase in the ERCP group were higher than those in the LCBDE group (P<0.05). A total of 179 bile samples were collected and tested, identifying 137 strains of pathogenic bacteria (78 in the ERCP group and 59 in the LCBDE group). In the ERCP group, 42 strains (53.85%) were Gram-negative bacteria, 34 strains (45.59%) were Gram-positive bacteria, and 2 strains (2.56%) were fungi; in the LCBDE group, 33 strains (55.93%) were Gram-negative bacteria and 26 strains (44.07%) were Gram-positive bacteria. No significant difference was observed in the composition of pathogenic bacteria between the two groups (χ2=1.174, P=0.695). Among the 402 patients, 38 cases of hospital infection occurred postoperatively, with an infection rate of 9.45%. The difference in the infection rate between the ERCP group and the LCBDE group were statistically significant (11.98% vs. 5.63%; χ2=4.550, P=0.033). The main sites of infection were bloodstream, lungs, and abdominal-pelvic cavity. Conclusions The predominant pathogens isolated after both ERCP and LCBDE are Gram-negative bacteria. Compared with LCBDE, ERCP has less impact on inflammatory markers, hospital stay, and costs, but has a higher incidence of hospital infections.
ObjectiveTo explore how to select the suitable indications of ERCP for clinical diagnosis and treatment. MethodsThe data of patients treated by ERCP between January 2005 and December 2009 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsTotal 221 patients received ERCP, among whom 99 (45%) cases of common bile duct stones, 44 (20%) cases of malignant tumor, 9 (4%) cases of papilla narrow, 45 (20%) cases were negative, and 24 (11%) cases were failed. It had the trend that the number of the patients received ERCP reduced year by year. The postoperative complication rate was 11% (25 cases), including 15 cases of postoperative pancreatitis, 3 cases of bleeding, 5 cases of biliary duct infection, and 2 cases of basket stranded. ConclusionIn the modern medical condition, with the advancement of image and laparoscopy technology, we should select the diagnosis and treatment methods with the principles of no damage or less damage for patients, without unlimitedly broadening the clinical indications of ERCP.