目的 探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后影响局部复发与远处转移的相关因素。方法 对陕西省汉中市铁路中心医院略阳医院2000年3月至2007年3月期间行乳腺癌改良根治术且资料完整的637例原发性乳腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 66例（10.36%）患者术后发生局部复发和远处转移，其中局部复发50例（7.85%），远处转移16例（2.51%）；术后3～4年内发生复发与远处转移者47例（71.21%）。术后复发和远处转移与患者年龄、肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移情况、TNM分期、激素受体（ER/PR）表达情况及术后是否接受正规的辅助治疗有关，与患者有无家族史无关。结论 肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移情况、TNM分期、ER/PR表达情况及术后是否接受正规的辅助治疗是影响乳腺癌改良根治术后复发与远处转移的危险因素，重视乳腺癌术后随访，规范乳腺癌的手术方式，强化乳腺癌的综合治疗是降低乳腺癌改良根治术后复发与远处转移率的主要措施。
ObjectiveTo investigate effectiveness of the combination of serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants for breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy.MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2015, 25 female patients with breast cancer were enrolled, aged 24-62 years (mean, 40.6 years). The tumor located at left side in 9 cases and right side in 16 cases; 14 cases were in the left upper quadrant, 4 cases were in the left lower quadrant, 7 cases were on the top of the breast. All cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. According to TNM staging, 14 cases were at stageⅠand 11 cases were at stageⅡA. The diameter of lumps were all less than 3 cm. All those lumps were solitary and without distant metastasis. The sentinel nodes were all negative. After modified radical mastectomy, the breasts were reconstructed by serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants. The nipples were spared in 22 cases.ResultsThe operation time was 113-148 minutes (mean, 136 minutes). All breasts survived and incisions healed at stageⅠ. There was no complication such as hematoma, infection, etc. All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 15 months). Except 1 case, the others were evaluated according to the criteria of the reconstructed breast at 12 months after operation. Among them, 23 cases were evaluated as good and 1 case as fair. There was no tumor recurrence during the follow-up period.ConclusionThe combination of serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants after the modified radical mastectomy is a handy approach of breast reconstruction which is less harmful with few postoperative complications. It also gains a high degree of satisfaction from patients for good breast shape.
ObjectiveTo investigate the anatomy and function of pectoralis fascia in breast cancer operation, and the choice of resection and preservation of pectoralis fascia in different operation methods.MethodWe searched the articles related to pectoralis fascia and breast cancer through PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, WanFang Medical Network, SinoMed, and other databases, and then selected the Chinese and foreign articles that met the objective of this paper, and made an review after reading the articles.ResultsIn the immediate breast reconstruction of breast prosthesis after breast cancer operation, the preservation of pectoralis fascia was beneficial to the complete coverage of breast prosthesis and improved the cosmetic effect after operation. The purpose of preserving pectoralis fascia adipose tissue in breast-conserving surgery was to reduce the loss of breast volume and to pursue the cosmetic effect after operation. At present, there had been reports on the safety of pectoralis fascia oncology, but there was no final conclusion on the safe distance between tumor and pectoralis fascia, and the current research could not provide sufficient evidence for the preservation of pectoralis fascia.ConclusionsThe question of whether the pectoralis fascia needs to be removed in breast cancer surgery is still controversial. The preservation of pectoralis fascia is more for better immediate breast reconstruction after operation. However, the current evidence of evidence-based medicine is not sufficient. Clinicians need to conduct multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials to improve the evidence.
Objective To explore the preventive effectiveness of early physiotherapy on arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Methods A total of 206 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer in The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University from June 2014 to June 2016, enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Then these patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group equally. Patients in the control group received routine treatment, and the patients in the intervention group began to use the air pressure pump combined with the microwave physiotherapy on the second day after the radical surgery. The incidences of limb lymphedema in 6 months and 1 year after operation between the 2 groups were compared, and the influencing factors of arm lymphedema were explored. Results The clinical data of 195 patients were analyzed at end, including 99 patients of the intervention group and 96 patients of the control group. ① There were statistical significance in the incidences of arm lymphedema in 6 months and 1 year after operation between the 2 groups (P<0.05), that incidences of arm lymphedema in the intervention group were both lower than those of the control group at the2 time points [6 months after operation: 2.0% (2/99)vs. 9.4% (9/96); 1 year after operation: 5.1% (5/99) vs. 17.7% (17/96)]. ② The results of non-conditional logistic regression analysis shown that, age (OR=1.45, P=0.008), tumor location (OR=1.72, P<0.001), TNM stage (OR=2.01, P=0.033), the number of invasive axillary lymph nodes (OR=1.15, P=0.005), and postoperative radiotherapy (OR=1.23, P=0.016) were the influencing factors of arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, patients with age older than 60 years, tumor position at the outside area, stage Ⅲ of TNM, the number of invasive axillary lymph nodes >5, and patients received radiotherapy after operation had high risk of arm lymphedema. Conclusion Early physiotherapy can effectively prevent the occurrence of arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, and early physiotherapy should be performed for patients with high risk of arm lymphedema.
【摘要】 目的 比较在乳腺癌Auchincloss改良根治术中使用超声刀及电刀手术的优、缺点。 方法 2009年6月－2010年7月将176例乳腺癌患者通过信封法随机分为超声刀组和电刀组，每组88例，分别比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结检出数目、术后引流量、皮下积液及术后出血量的差异。 结果 手术时间:超声刀组为（145.72±50.76） min，电刀组为（171.27±66.68） min，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.005）；术中出血量:超声刀组为（71.56±31.34） mL，电刀组为（84.99±36.39） mL，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.009）；清扫出的淋巴结个数:超声刀组为（20.92±9.09）个，电刀组为（17.90±6.74）个，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.013）。而在术后平均引流量和术后积液例数方面两组的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。两组均无术后出血的情况。 结论 在乳腺癌Auchincloss改良根治术中使用超声刀，较单独使用电刀能缩短手术时间，减少出血量，并增加淋巴结检出的数量。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the disadvantages and advantages between modified radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel (HS) and conventional electro-scalpel (ES) for patients with breast cancer. Methods Between June 2009 and July 2010, 176 patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into two groups including the HS group and the ES group. The operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, the number of lymph nodes detected, postoperative drainage volume, subcutaneous hydrops, and postoperative hemorrhage volume between the two groups of patients were compared. Results There were significant differences between the HS and ES groups in terms of operation time [(145.72±50.76) minutes vs. (171.27±66.68) minutes, P=0.005], intra-operative bleeding volume [(71.56±31.34) mL vs. (84.99±36.39) mL, P=0.009], and number of lymph nodes detected (20.92±9.09 vs. 17.90±6.74, Plt;0.05). The postoperative drainage volume and subcutaneous hydrops were not significantly different between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). No postoperative hemorrhage occurred in both groups. Conclusion Compared with ES, the use of HS can reduce operation time and intra-operative bleeding volume, and increase the number of lymph nodes detected during modified radical mastectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical application value of immediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of 28 patients with breast cancer undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy from January 2006 to December 2009 were included in this study. The perioperative results, breast appearance evaluation and followup results were analyzed. ResultsAll 28 patients received axillary lymph node dissection and the number of lymph node dissected was 14-32 (median 21). The operation time was 117-140 min (mean 126 min), blood loss was 82-124 ml (mean 98 ml), and the time to drainage tube removal was 3-5 d. No wound infection, skin necrosis, and foreign body reaction occurred in all the patients, especially in 22 patients underwent nippleareola complex-sparing mastectomy, no ischemia or necrosis occurred in nippleareola complex. For evaluation of breast appearance, excellent was in ten cases and good in 18 cases, thus, the excellent and good rate was 100%. All patients were followed up for 12-48 months (median 24 months) after operation, and distant metastasis, local recurrence, upper extremity edema, and dysfunction were not found. No fiber kystis contracture was found and all patients were satisfied with breast appearance and good handfeels. ConclusionsImmediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skinsparing modified radical mastectomy has the advantage of minimal invasion, safety, simple operation, and quick postoperative recovery for patients with breast cancer and the appearance of reconstructed breast is excellent, which can be clinically used widely.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of immediate breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy for patients with early-middle breast cancer. MethodsSixty patients diagnosed with early-middle breast cancer by needle biopsy from November 2009 to October 2012 in this hospital were divided into two groups according to the surgical method.The breast reconstruction group (30 cases) were performed immediate breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy, the control group (30 cases) were performed traditional modified radical mastectomy.The postoperative complications, clinical efficacy, quality of life, and recurrence and metastasis were compared in two groups. Results①The ipsilateral breast was completely missing in the control group.The aesthetic effect in the breast reconstruction group was satisfactory including excellent in 22 patients, good in 7 patients, general in 1 patient.②The rates of flaps effusion, flap necrosis, and affectied limb activity limitation had no significant differences in two groups (P > 0.05).The wound healing time, operation area drainage time, hospital stay, and post-operative chemotherapy start time all had no significant differences in two groups (P > 0.05).③The frequency of psycho-logical pressure (inferiority/anxiety/fear) and rate of un-satisfaction of secondary sexual characteristics (body/curve) in the breast reconstruction group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001).The rate of social interaction fitness in the breast reconstruction group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001).④The following-up time was 12 to 38 months with an average 25 months, one case died because of brain metastasis in the control group, the rest 59 patients had no local recurrence and distant metastasis. ConclusionsThe immediate breast reconstruction with exte-nded latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy can cure cancer on the basis of satisfactory cosmetic results of breast, excellent quality of life of patients, and fewer surgical complica-tions.It does not affect postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy and short-and long-term efficacy for breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences in preventing subcutaneous effusion, skin flap necrosis, and patient comfort between simple negative pressure drainage and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsOne hundred and ninety-six patients underwent radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2010 to December 2012 in this hospital were collected.The simple negative pressure drainage (SNPD group, n=84) and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging (NPD+CB group, n=112) after radical mastectomy for breast cancer were used to prevent postoperative subcutaneous effusion.The postoperative complications, postoperative 3 d drainage volume, and patient comfort were compared in two groups. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-six patients with breast cancer were females.The differences of general clinical data were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The differences of chest wall mean extubation time, axillary mean extubation time, postoperative 3 d mean drainage volume, and incidences of subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The rate of comfort satisfactory in the SNPD group was significantly higher than that in the NPD+CB group [76.2%(16/84) versus 22.3%(25/112), P < 0.001].The chemotherapy was not affected after operation in two groups. ConclusionsComparing with negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging, simple negative pressure drainage do not increase postoperative subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis, but it greatly improves the patients satisfactory rate.