Objective To investigate the most suitable anaesthesia method for the tension-free herniorrhaphy.Methods A total of 422 unilateral inguinal hernia cases from 2002 to 2005 were collected and randomly divided into the local anaesthesia group and epidural anaesthesia group. Observation indices and some relative data, such as operative duration, date of ambulation, date of foodintake, length of hospital stay, operation-correlated complications, anaesthesia complications, usage rate of ancillary drug, satisfactory rate for anesthesia, cost of hospitalization, were included and recorded in the questionnaire, and all the patients who took the tension-free herniorrhaphy were asked to answer it as the follow-up research. Results It was found that the occurrence of postoperative anaesthetic complications, the cost of hospitalization, length of stay of local anaesthesia group were significantly less than those of epidural anaesthesia group, and the date of moving and the date of foodintake were also significantly earlier than those of the other group (P＜0.05). However, there was no significant difference of operative duration, postoperative recovery situation and the satisfactory rate between two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The local anaesthesia is suitable for most of the tension-free herniorrhaphy, and it may be used as the conventional anaesthetic method.
目的探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在腹外疝修补术中的价值。方法回顾性总结1999年5月至2002年10月我院应用疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹外疝患者58例，共62例次。其中合并高血压、心肺功能不全、前列腺肥大、糖尿病者占39.7%（23/58）。 结果切口均为一期愈合。术后3～7 d出院。随访１～29个月，平均18个月，随访率为89.7%（52/58）,无一例复发。结论疝环充填式无张力疝修补术具有创伤小、符合解剖生理、痛苦少、恢复快及复发率低等优点。
ObjectiveTo summarize the changes of inguinal hernia in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in the past 7 years and the curative effect of each procedure.MethodsRetrospectively searched the clinical data of 1 078 patients with inguinal hernia operated in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2011 to December 2017. According to the surgical procedure, patients were divided into tissue repair group, laparoscopic hernia repair group (laparoscopic group), and open tension-free hernia repair group (open group). Subsequently, the patients of the open group were divided into the mesh plug technique group, the plain patch technique group, and the Ultrapro Hernia System (UHS) group. The postoperative of each procedure, such as recurrence, chronic pain, foreign body sensation, hard touch of the surgical site, male sexual function, and fertility status were compared.ResultsIn 1 078 patients, 52 patients underwent tissue repair, 889 patients underwent open tension-free hernia repair (687 patients were counted with mesh-seal tablets, 100 patients with plain patch count, 102 patients with preperitoneal hernia repair), and 137 patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complication, chronic pain, foreign body sensation, and male sexual function decline in the laparoscopic group and the open group (P>0.05). However, the recurrence rate and hard touch of the surgical site rate of the laparoscopic group were lower (P<0.05), and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score was also slightly lower (P=0.047). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the recurrence, chronic pain, foreign body sensation, and male sexual function decline between the three subgroups of the open group, but the total complication rate and hard touch of the surgical site rate in the UHS group were lower than those in the mesh plug group and the plain patch group (P<0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic repair of the inguinal herniorrhaphy has lower incidence of occurrence, it is worthy of clinical promotion. In the open tension-free surgery, the retroperitoneal herniorrhaphy may be a better choice.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of inguinal hernia treated by tension-free hernioplasty in adult. Methods Electronic databases were searched including CNKI (1993 to 2003), MEDLINE (1993 to 2003) and OVID (1993 to 2003). Personal contact with experts in the field of tension-free hernioplasty was performed to identify potentially relevant trials. Randomized controlled trials of plug amp; Mesh versus Mesh only repair and laparoscopic versus open Mesh hernia repair in recurrence, peri-operative complication or long term postoperative complication were included. Data related to the clinical outcome were extracted by two reviewers independently. Statistical analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2 software. Results Twenty one studies involving 4 154 patients met the inclusion criteria from 1993 to 2003. Compared with Mesh only repair, plug amp; Mesh repair had no significant difference in recurrence rate (OR 1.14, 95%CI 0.37 to 3.47, P=0.82), preoperative complication rate (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.63, P=0.95) and long term postoperative complication rate (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.18 to 1.16, P=0.1). Compared with open Mesh hernioplasty, transabdominal preperitoreal repair (TAPP) group had no significant difference in recurrence rate (OR1.24, 95%CI 0.65 to 2.36, P=0.52), preoperative complication rate (OR 0.89, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.22, P=0.46) and persistent pain (OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.48 to 1.19, P=0.22); totally extrapevitoreal repair (TEP) group had no significant difference in recurrence rate (OR1.07, 95%CI 0.51 to 2.24, P=0.70) or persistent pain (OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.65, P=0.86), and had lower tendency persistent pain (OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.73, P=0.000 4) with statistical significance. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that there is no significant difference between anterior approach plug amp; Mesh repair (Rutkow’s repair) and the Mesh only repair (Lichtenstein’s repair). TEP of Laparoscopic hernioplasty is superior to open Mesh hernia repair in preoperative complication. More researches are needed for recurrence rate, persistent pain.
目的 探讨应用人工合成材料双层聚丙烯补片修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法 21例腹壁切口疝（15例大切口疝和及6例巨大切口疝）患者采用双层聚丙烯补片行无张力修补，对术中及术后情况进行分析。结果 全组病例手术顺利，手术时间 87～189 min，平均123 min。无严重并发症发生，痊愈出院。术后随访5～36个月（平均 17个月），无复发病例。结论 双层聚丙烯补片修补中下腹壁大切口疝及巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法，是临床上治疗切口疝可供选择的一种手术方式。
目的 探讨腹股沟疝的病因及如何降低无张力疝修补术后的复发率。方法 对716例行无张力疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。 结果 所有患者手术均顺利，无手术死亡和切口感染。术后出现阴囊积液11例，经穿刺抽液后痊愈； 并发尿潴留23例，经导尿处理后24～48 h恢复正常。术后随访3～51个月，复发1例，复发率为0.1%。结论 腹内高压是导致成人腹股沟疝的重要因素，为有效降低无张力疝修补术后复发率，除了建立腹股沟区现代解剖生理的新概念外，必须注意防治腹内高压及遵循手术治疗中的“个体化” 原则。
目的探讨无张力疝修补术在双侧腹股沟疝中的临床应用价值。 方法1999年5月至2002年4月采用无张力疝修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝25例，其中采用充填法18例, 双层补片5例, 一侧充填一侧双层补片2例。结果全组病例切口均一期愈合, 术后5~7 d出院，随访至今无复发。结论无张力疝修补术具有手术创伤小、痛苦少、术后恢复快等优点, 是治疗双侧腹股沟疝的最佳术式。
目的总结Millikan无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的经验。方法对笔者2008年1月至2010年1月期间完成的Millikan无张力疝修补术患者的临床资料进行总结、分析。结果本组 32例共35侧疝，按国内疝学组分型(2003年)，Ⅰ型2侧，Ⅱ型9侧，Ⅲ型21侧，Ⅳ型3侧。直疝6侧，斜疝29侧。其中行急诊疝修补术2例。术后发生尿潴留2例(6.25%),无切口感染、血肿、睾丸炎等并发症发生； 住院时间3~5 d，平均3.5 d。随访2~24个月，平均18个月，无复发及慢性疼痛者。结论Millikan手术是一种操作简便、安全、符合无张力疝修补原理的术式，适用于Ⅱ~Ⅳ型腹股沟疝的修补。
目的:探讨腹股沟马鞍疝无张力疝修补手术方式的选择。方法:回顾性调查206例腹股沟马鞍疝患者,其中行巴德网塞充填式修补术57例,普里灵疝装置腹膜前间隙修补术149例,观察两种修补方式的手术时间、手术方式及要点、术后并发症、恢复情况、平均住院日及复发率。结果:两种方式修补的患者围手术期均无死亡。手术时间、恢复情况、术后平均住院天数和并发症两种方式差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。患者术后平均随访分别为(2.3±0.5)和(2.2±0.7)年,随访时间无统计学差异(Pgt;0.05)。普里灵疝装置修补组的费用较巴德网塞组低。57例巴德网塞修补术后有2例复发,149例普里灵疝装置腹膜前间隙修补术后无复发。结论:腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术是腹股沟马鞍疝的首选手术方式。