Objective To discuss the effectiveness of anterolateral decompression and three column reconstruction through posterior approach for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fracture. Methods Between March 2009 and October 2011, 39 patients with unstable burst thoracolumbar fracture were treated. Of them, there were 32 males and 7 females, with an average age of 43.8 years (range, 25-68 years). The injury causes included falling from height in 17 cases, bruise in 10 cases, traffic accident in 4 cases, and other in 8 cases. The fracture was located at the T10 level in 1 case, T11 in 9 cases, T12 in 6 cases, L1 in 14 cases, L2 in 7 cases, L3 in 1 case, and L4 in 1 case. According to Frankel classification before operation, 5 cases were classified as grade A, 5 as grade B, 9 as grade C, 14 as grade D, and 6 as grade E. Before operation, the vertebral kyphosis Cobb angle was (26.7 ± 7.1)°; vertebral height loss was 37.5% ± 9.5%; and the space occupying of vertebral canal was 73.7% ± 11.3%. The time between injury and operation was 1-4 days (mean, 2.5 days). All patients underwent anterolateral decompression of spinal canal by posterior approach and three column reconstruction. After operation, the vertebral height restoration, correction of kyphosis, decompression of the spinal canal, and the recovery of nerve function were evaluated. Results Increase of paraplegic level, urinary infection, and pressure sore occurred in 1 case, 1 case, and 2 cases, respectively; no incision infection or neurological complications was observed in the other cases, primary healing of incision was obtained. The patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 27 months). The patients had no aggravation of pain of low back after operation; no loosening and breaking of screws and rods occurred; no titanium alloys electrolysis and titanium cage subsidence or breakage was observed. The imaging examination showed that complete decompression of the spinal canal, satisfactory restoration of the vertebral height, and good physiological curvature of spine at 2 years after operation. At last follow-up, 1 case was classified as Frankel grade A, 2 as grade B, 2 as grade C, 10 as grade D, and 24 as grade E, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative one (Plt; 0.05). At immediate after operation and last follow-up, the Cobb angle was (6.3 ± 2.1)° and (6.5 ± 2.4)° respectively; the vertebral height loss was 7.9% ± 2.7% and 8.2% ± 3.0% respectively; and the indexes were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The technique of anterolateral decompression and three column reconstruction through posterior approach is one perfect approach to treat unstable thoracolumbar fracture because of complete spinal cord canal decompression, three column reconstruction, and immediate recovery of the spinal stability after operation.
Objective To observe and measure the approach next to the erector spinae in the thoracic and lumbar segments of the spine and adjacent anatomical structures by the topographic method, to clarify the positioning method and safe range so as to provide the anatomical basis of the approach for spinal canal decompression. Methods Twelve formaldehyde-treated adult cadaver specimens were selected, including 6 males and 6 females with an average age of 43 years (range, 27-52 years) and with an average height of 166 cm (range, 154-177 cm). The related data of the approach at T1-S1 levels were respectively measured: the distance between the lateral edge of the erector spinae and the spinous process, the length of the approach, the angle between the approach and the horizontal plane, the size of intervertebral foramen, and the vertical distance between the segmental artery and the upper edge of the vertebrae. Results The distance between the lateral edge of the erector spinae and the spinous process ranged from (41.75 ± 3.29) mm to (74.54 ± 7.08) mm. The length of the approach ranged from (66.75 ± 10.81) mm to (97.13 ± 13.35) mm. The angle between the approach and the horizontal plane ranged from (38.38 ± 6.16)° to (53.67 ± 4.40)°. The vertical distance between the segmental artery and the upper edge of the vertebrae ranged from (9.50 ± 0.60) mm to (18.30 ± 1.56) mm. The size of foraminal was also measured. The spinal canal could reach when iliocostalis lateral edge was used as the starting point in the lumbar segments, and longissimus lateral edge as the starting point in the thoracic segments. It was confirmed that there was enough safe space for the spinal decompression without the resection of the articular process. Conclusion The approach next to the erector spinae can reach spinal canal to achieve the purpose of decompression through the intervertebral foramen. The minimally invasive approach is feasible and safe. It has the value of the operative application.
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of posterior laminotomy decompression and bone grafting via the injured vertebrae for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. MethodsBetween November 2010 and November 2012, 58 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated by posterior fixation combined with posterior laminotomy decompression and intervertebral bone graft in the injured vertebrae. There were 40 males and 18 females with a mean age of 48 years (range, 25-58 years). According to Denis classification, 58 cases had burst fractures (Denis type B); based on neurological classification of spinal cord injury by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classifications, 5 cases were rated as grade A, 18 cases as grade B, 20 cases as grade C, 14 cases as grade D, and 1 case as grade E. Based on thoracolumbar burst fractures CT classifications there were 5 cases of type A, 20 cases of type B1, 10 cases of type B2, and 23 cases of type C. The time between injury and operation was 10 hours to 9 days (mean, 7.2 days). The CT was taken to measure the space occupying of vertebral canal. The X-ray film was taken to measure the relative height of fractured vertebrae for evaluating the vertebral height restoration, Cobb angle for evaluating the correction of kyphosis, and ASIA classification was conducted to evaluate the function recovery of the spinal cord. ResultsThe operations were performed successfully, and incisions healed primarily. All the patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 15 months). CT showed good bone graft healing except partial absorption of vertebral body grafted bone; no loosening or breakage of screws and rods occurred. The stenosis rates of fractured vertebral canale were 47.56%±14.61% at preoperation and 1.26%±0.62% at 1 year after operation, showing significant difference (t=24.46, P=0.00). The Cobb angles were (16.98±3.67)° at preoperation, (3.42±1.45)° at 1 week after operation, (3.82±1.60)° at 1 year after operation, and (4.84±1.70)° at 3 months after removal of internal fixation, showing significant differences between at pre-and post-operation (P < 0.05). The relative heights of fractured vertebrae were 57.10%±6.52% at preoperation, 96.26%±1.94% at 1 week after operation, 96.11%±1.97% at 1 year after operation, and 96.03%±1.96% at 3 months after removal of internal fixation, showing significant differences between at pre-and post-operation (P < 0.05). At 1 year after operation, the neural function was improved 1-3 grades in 56 cases. Based on ASIA classifications, 1 case was rated as grade A, 4 cases as grade B, 10 cases as grade C, 23 cases as grade D, and 20 cases as grade E. ConclusionTreatment of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae burst fractures by posterior laminotomy decompression and bone grafting via the injured vertebrae has satisfactory effectiveness, which can reconstruct vertebral body shape and height with spinal cord decompression and good vertebral healing. It is a kind of effective solution for thoracolumbar burst fracture.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of one-hole split endoscope (OSE) technique in the treatment of single segment lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods The clinical data of 32 single segment LSS patients treated with OSE technique for simple spinal canal decompression between January 2022 and December 2022, who met the selection criteria, were retrospectively analysed. There were 18 males and 14 females, the age ranged from 45 to 82 years, with an average of 65.1 years. The disease duration was 9-72 months, with an average of 34.9 months. The surgical segments included L3, 4 in 3 cases, L4, 5 in 19 cases, and L5, S1 in 10 cases. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative radiation exposure frequency, postoperative mobilization time, and the area of the patient’s lesion segment dural sac before operation and at 1 month after operation were recorded. Low back pain and leg pain were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after operation; functional recovery was assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI) before operation and at 3 months and 12 months after operation; the effectiveness was assessed by modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up. Results All 32 patients successfully completed the operation, with an average incision length of 2.05 cm, an average operation time of 88.59 minutes, an average intraoperative blood loss of 46.72 mL, an average intraoperative radiation exposure frequency of 3.84 times, and an average postoperative mobilization time of 11.66 hours. All patients were followed up 12-16 months, with an average of 13.5 months. One patient experienced lower limb numbness, pain, and decreased muscle strength after operation, while the remaining patients did not experience complications such as dural tear or important nerve damage. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI in patients at various time points after operation were significantly better than preoperative ones, and each indicator further improved with time. The differences between time points were significant (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the area of the patient’s lesion segment dural sac was (123.13±19.66) mm2, which significantly increased compared to preoperative (51.25±9.50) mm2 (t=−18.616, P<0.001). At last follow-up, the improved MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the effectiveness, with 18 cases achieving excellent results, 11 cases being good, and 3 cases being fair, with an excellent and good rate of 90.6%. ConclusionThe effectiveness of using OSE technique for simple spinal canal decompression treatment of single segment LSS is satisfactory, with the advantages of minimal surgical trauma and fast recovery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of minimally invasive passage in posterior laminotomy decompression and intervertebral bone grafting combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures. MethodsBetween January 2013 and March 2015, 53 patients with Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated by minimally invasive passage in posterior laminotomy decompression and intervertebral bone grafting combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There were 37 males and 16 females with a mean age of 43 years (range, 16-57 years). The causes included falling injury from height in 23 cases, traffic accident injury in 15 cases, heavy pound injury in 7 cases, and falling injury in 8 cases. The time between injury and operation was 7 hours to 12 days (mean, 6.7 days). The involved segments included T11 in 2 cases, T12 in 7 cases, L1 in 20 cases, L2 in 18 cases, and L3 in 6 cases; based on the neurological classification of spinal cord injury by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), 3 cases were rated as grade A, 5 cases as grade B, 12 cases as grade C, 24 cases as grade D, and 9 cases as grade E. The operation time, bleeding volume, and postoperative drainage were recorded; postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for pain evaluation, and ASIA for neurological function assessment; CT and X-ray films were taken to observe fracture healing, bone fusion, and grafted bone absorption; The vertebral canal patency rate was calculated; the relative height of fractured vertebrae and Cobb angle were measured. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in all patients; the average operation time was 150 minutes (range, 90-240 minutes); the average bleeding volume was 350 mL (range, 50-500 mL); the average postoperative drainage was 80 mL (range, 20-150 mL); and the average VAS score was 2.3 (range, 1.5-4.7) at 3 days after operation. The incisions healed primarily. All the patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). All fractures healed at 3-9 months (mean, 6 months). No complications of broken nails, broken rod, and screw loosening occurred. At last follow-up, the vertebral canal patency rate was significantly improved when compared with preoperative value (t=27.395, P=0.000). The Cobb angle, and the anterior and posterior heights of of traumatic vertebra were significantly improved at 1 week, 1 year, and last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between different time points after operation (P > 0.05). The neurological function was improved in different degrees; 1 case was rated as grade A, 4 cases as grade B, 7 cases as grade C, 15 cases as grade D, and 26 cases as grade E, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (Z=-5.477, P=0.000). ConclusionMinimally invasive passage in posterior laminotomy decompression, bone graft in the injured vertebrae combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is an effective method to treat Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures, which not only can fully decompression, but also can effectively maintain the postoperative injured vertebral height, reduce the postoperative failure risk of internal fixation and decrease operation trauma.
In recent years, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in spine surgery and achieved satisfactory results. In order to standardize the ERAS implementation process and application in percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression/discectomy (PEID), we reviewed the literatures and cited evidence-based medicine data, and had a national comprehensive discussion among experts of the Group of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery and Enhanced Recovery, Professional Committee of Orthopedic Surgery and Enhanced Recovery, Association of China Rehabilitation Technology Transformation and Promotion. Altogether, the up-to-date expert consensus have been achieved. The consensus may provide the reference for clinical treatment in aspect of the standardization of surgical operations, the reduction of surgical trauma and complications, the optimization of perioperative pain and sleep management, the prevention of venous thrombosis, and the guidance of patients’ functional training and perioperative education.
Objective To investigate the operational method of cervical vertebral flavectomy and its cl inical appl ication in the management of cervical canal stenosis. Methods From June 1997 to June 2007, 25 patients suffering from cervical spinal canal stenosis caused by obvious flaval l igament hypertrophy were given flavectomy. There were 22 males and 3 females, with an age range of 32 to 68 years (average 54 years). The course of disease was from 3 weeks to 7 years, with an average of 3 years and 7 months. All patients had degenerative cervical canal stenosis; of them, 5 cases had a history of cervical injury 2 to 3 weeks before operation (3 cases of fall ing injury and 2 cases of traffic accident injury). The X-ray film, CT, and MRI examinations showed that the compression locations were C4-7 in 12 cases, C3-7 in 9 cases, C5-7 in 3 cases, and C6,7 in 1 case. Spinous process and vertebral lamella were exposed by central posterior approach. The insertions of flaval l igaments were cut off at the superior vertebral lamella border, then the starting points of which were cut down from the anterior side of the upper vertebral lamella at their inferior border after l ifting up the flaval l igaments. The residual flaval l igaments in front of the vertebral lamella were scraped off by slope rongeur, the dura mater then could be seen to inflate from the intervertebral lamella space, showing the compression having been rel ieved. Twenty-five cases were all given posterior flavectomy. At 1 week to 3 months after operation, 12 patients received anterior cervical discectomy or vertebral gaining decompression with fusion by bone graft. Results The time for flavectomy was from 60 to 180 minutes, with an average of 95 minutes. The blood loss during operation was from 90 to 360 mL, with an average of 210 mL. The dura maters were lacerated by knife tips during operation with the cervical vertebrae in hyperflexion in 2 cases. Immediate suture and repair were performed and there were no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. All the incisions healed by first intension after operation. All of the 25 cases were followed up from 2 to 10 years, with an average of 3 years and 9 months. All patients had no compl ication of axial symptoms, and no restenosis at their operation site of cervical canal stenosis. The section area ratios of functional spinal canal to spinal cord were 1.12 ± 0.07 before operation and 2.11 ± 0.19 at 24 months after operation, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The range of motion of cervical vertebrae was (39.4 ± 3.2)º befeore operation and (42.1 ± 2.9)° at 24 months after operation in 13 cases without anterior cervical discectomy fusion, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); was (34.3 ± 3.4)° before operation and (29.2 ± 3.6)° at 24 months after operation in 12 cases with anterior cervical discectomy fusion, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The bone graft achieved bony union 3-5 months after operation (average 3.8 months). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were 7.9 ± 2.2 before operation and 15.6 ± 1.4 at 24 months after operation, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05), with an average improvement rate of 86.3%. Conclusion Cervical flavectomy could rel ieve compression to spinal cord and nerves caused by the flaval l igament hypertrophy without damaging the normal integral ity of bony canal, thus avoiding the compl ication of axial symptoms and so on which are encountered in open-door expansile cervical laminoplasty.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (ULBD) with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and uniportal interlaminar endoscopy (UIE) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods A clinical data of 52 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, who met the selection criteria and treated with ULBD between March 2021 and November 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were allocated into UBE group (23 cases) and UIE group (29 cases) according to the surgical methods. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in age, gender, body mass index, surgical segment, type of lumbar stenosis, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), disc height, and dural sac area between the two groups. Perioperative indexes (incision length, operation time, hospital stay, and surgical complications), clinical indicators (VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, and ODI before operation and at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after operation), and imaging indicators (disc height and dural sac area before operation and at 1, 12 months after operation, and dural sac expansion area) were recorded and compared between the two group. Results All operations in both groups were successfully completed. Compared with the UIE group, the UBE group had shorter operation time and longer incision length, with significant differences (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in hospital stay and incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 14 months). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI after operation significantly improved when compared with preoperative values (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the above indicators between different time points after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at different time points (P>0.05). Imaging examination showed that there was no significant difference in disc height between the two groups at different time points after operation (P>0.05). However, the dural sac area and dural sac expansion area were significantly larger in the UBE group than in the UIE group (P<0.05). Conclusion ULBD with UBE and UIE can achieve satisfactory effectiveness in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. But the former has more thorough decompression and better dural sac expansion than the latter.