目的:探讨经导管肝动脉灌注化疗栓塞(TACE)与TACE联合三维适形放射治疗(TACE + 3DCRT)原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效.方法:随机分成两组的HCC患者,均不能手术、门脉无癌栓、无远处脏器转移。50例患者行单纯TACE 2次(TACE组)。40例患者在TACE 2次后第四周再行三维适形放射治疗(TACE + 3DCRT组),放疗采用6MVX射线,4～6 Gy/次,隔日一次,3次/周,总剂量45～60 Gy。TACE采用碘化油、顺铂、5氟尿嘧啶、表阿霉素及明胶海绵。结果:TACE组与TACE+3DCRT组近期疗效有效率(完全缓解+部分缓解)分别为68.0%(34/50)、87.5%(35/40),1年生存率分别为78.0%(39/50)、95.0%(38/40),两组差异均有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。TACE的治疗反应主要为栓塞综合征,3DCRT有7.5%(3/40)发生急性放射性肝炎,经对症、保肝处理后缓解。两组患者均能耐受。结论:TACE + 3DCRT治疗不能手术、门脉无癌栓、无远处脏器转移的HCC的疗效较单纯TACE治疗HCC的疗效好。
ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyper-thermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating the hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis. MethodsThe clinical data of 80 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis who were treated in our hospital from January 2004 to January 2012 were collected, and were classified into observation group (n=40) and control group (n=40) according to the treatment. Case of observation group received CRS+HIPEC, and cases of control group received CRS+conventional intraperitoneal injection of chemotherapy. Then the comparison of clinical effect and prog-nosis was performed. ResultsIn observation group, the results of completeness of cytoreduction (CC) grade was:31 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 3 cases in grade 2. In control group, the results of CC grade was:32 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 2 cases in grade 3. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the CC grade (P=0.213). In addition, there were no significant differences between observation group and control group in operation time (6.8 hours vs. 6.5 hours), hospital stay (17.3 days vs.18.7 days), and incidence of adverse reactions[70.0% (28/40) vs. 60.0% (24/40)], P>0.05. All of the cases of observation group and control group were followed up for 10-61 months (average of 42.5 months) and 6-49 months (average of 30.2 months) respectively. During the follow up period, in observation group, there were 18 cases died, 12 cases suffered from recurrence, 5 cases suffered from metastasis, and the rest of 5 cases survived; in the control group, there were 26 cases died, 9 cases suffered from recurrence, and 5 cases suffered from metastasis. However, the survival situation was better in observation group than that of control group (P<0.01). ConclusionCombining CRS and HIPEC for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis was safe and effective, which would be widely applied.
摘要:目的:探讨晚期食管癌切除、纵隔淋巴结清扫及术中纵隔热灌注化疗对残留于气管、支气管、胸主动脉、奇静脉等器官的癌性肉眼微小病灶治疗效果。方法:选择食管癌病变浸润超过外膜层外侵至气管、支气管、胸主动脉、奇静脉等器官患者112例，随机分为两组:治疗组56例,术中42～43℃无菌蒸馏水2000～2500 mL加入顺铂(DDP)150 mg及氟尿嘧啶(5FU)1200 mg在体外循环下行纵隔热灌注化疗40 min;对照组56例,术中未进行纵隔热灌注化疗。结果:治疗组术后第一年有6例出现纵隔区域肿瘤复发及淋巴结转移,术后第二年有11例纵隔区域肿瘤复发及淋巴结转移;对照组术后第一年有14例出现纵隔区域肿瘤复发及淋巴结转移,术后第二年23例出现纵隔区域肿瘤复发及淋巴结转移。结论:晚期食管癌术中纵隔热灌注化疗可明显减少或延迟纵隔区域肿瘤复发及淋巴转移,提高术后第一至第二年生存率。Abstract: Objective: To explore the advanced esophageal cancer resection, mediastinum, lymph node dissection, mediastinum, hot infusion chemoembolization and clinical observation of residual heat infusion chemoembolization and trachea, or the thoracic aorta, bronchus, eye cancer organs such as intravenous of tiny lesions therapeutic effect. Methods: Select esophageal lesions than the outer membrane layer of infiltrating the trachea and bronchus to the thoracic aorta, and 112 cases of patients with venous organs such as random points to two groups: treatment group treated with perfusion of 56 cases at 4243 degrees Celsius sterile 2000 mL distilled water 2500 mL ~ (DDP) joined cisplatin 150 mg, 5fluorouracil (5FU 1200 mg) in extracorporeal circulation downlink mediastinal hot perfusion 40 minutes, control group treated with perfusion of 56 cases without mediastinal hot perfusion chemotherapy. Results: Treatment group in 6 cases occured after first mediastinal tumor recurrence and regional lymph node metastases after 11 cases, the regional recurrence and lymphatic metastasis mediastinal, control group first fill after 14 cases mediastinal tumor recurrence and bureau of regional lymph node metastasis appeared in 23 cases, surgery between regional tumor locally recurrent lymph node metastases. Conclusion: Advanced esophageal intraoperative mediastinal hot perfusion chemotherapy can obviously reduce or delay mediastinal tumor recurrence and regional lymph node metastases, raise the firstsurial.
Objective To evaluate the rational of peritoneal warm perfusion chemotherapy after the operation. MethodsOne hundred and two patients with gastric cancer were included in this study. One hundred milliliter of peritoneal fluid were collected respectively after opening the abdomen,before closing the peritoneal cavity,and after hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy for free cancer cells examination. ResultsAfter opening the abdomen, the positive rate of free cancer cells was 36.3%(37/102), and the positive rate before closure of peritoneal cavity was 52.9%(54/102), 31 cases of free cancer cells were found killed after the warm perfusion chemotherapy,the effect rate was 57.4%(31/54).The free cancer cells positive rate related to the tumor infiltration depth, serous membrane invasion area and the type of histopathology. Conclusion In the peritoneal cavity of patients with gastric cancer, free cancer cells are able to survive and have a high degree of activity. Hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy is an effective method to kill free cancer cells.
目的 探讨临床治疗原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓的有效方法及疗效。方法 对我院2008年1月至2010年1月期间收治的29例原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,并按治疗方法的不同将患者分为经动脉导管栓塞术（TAE）治疗组和TAE＋门静脉灌注化疗治疗组，比较2组患者的治疗效果。结果 TAE治疗组治疗有效率、门静脉癌栓缩小率和AFP转阴率分别为43.75%、18.75%和37.50%，TAE＋门静脉灌注治疗组分别为76.92%、61.54%和61.54%，2组比较后者优于前者（P＜0.05）。TAE＋门静脉灌注治疗组患者治疗后半年及1年生存率高于TAE治疗组（P＜0.05）。TAE治疗组患者生存时间为４～18个月，中位生存期为8个月；TAE＋门静脉灌注治疗组患者生存时间为5～18个月，中位生存期为11个月。结论 TAE＋门静脉灌注化疗是一种安全可行的治疗方法，可延长原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者的生存时间。
Objective To evaluate the curative effectiveness and safety of prophylactic chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) during the radical surgery of advancing gastric cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1980 to December 2002), EMBASE (1989 to December 2002), BIOSIS Previews (1980 to December 2002), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2003) and CBMdisc (1981 to December 2002). Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing curative gastrectomy (CG) plus CHPP with CG for advancing gastric cancer were collected. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed, and a meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 4.2 software. Results Seven RCTs involving 744 patients met the selection criteria, all trials were of lower methodological quality. ① Meta-analysis results showed that no significant difference was found comparing CG plus CDDP (cisplatin) with CG for peritoneal recurrence after operation (The pooled OR 0.69，95%CI 0.43 to 1.12). Compared with CG alone, CG plus CDDP plus MMC significantly reduced peritoneal recurrence after operation during ≥5 years follow up (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.37), but this effect was not seen during lt; 5 years follow up (OR 0.35，95%CI 0.06 to 2.10). ② CG plus CDDP significantly reduced mortality after operation during ＜5 and ≥5 years follow up, compared with CG alone (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.75; the pooled OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41 to 0.95), CG plus CDDP plus MMC significantly reduced mortality after operation during ≥5 years follow up, compared with CG alone (the pooled OR 0.45, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.74), but this effect was not seen during lt; 5 years follow up (OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.08 to 1.15). ③ Side effects were reported in only one study and no significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.96). Conclusions Because of the small number of included studies, the lower methodological quality, and the differences in diagnostic criteria of peritoneal recurrence after operation, the reviewers feel that no firm conclusion could be drawn. Some well designed RCTs of CHPP for advancing gastric cancer should be undertaken to further evaluate its effectiveness.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sorafenib (SORF) separately or combined in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases for studies on HAIC and SORA separately or in combination in the treatment of advanced HCC from inception to November 1, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 21 studies involving 2 501 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.87, P=0.02), objective response rate (ORR) (OR=4.00, 95%CI 2.74 to 5.85, P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (DCR) (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.75, P=0.004) were higher in the HAIC group than the SORF group, while the incidence of adverse reactions was not increased. However, HAIC combined with SORF showed no significant difference in OS, ORR, DCR or progression-free survival (PFS) compared with SORF alone. Moreover, combined treatment increased the adverse reactions of blood system. Conclusion The current study suggests that HAIC can improve OS, ORR and DCR in patients with advanced HCC; however, there is no additional benefit when combining SORF with HAIC. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of hyperthermia (HT) plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) versus IHPC alone for malignant ascites. Methods Such databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP, WanFang, CNKI and CBM were electronically and comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HT plus IHPC vs. IHPC alone for malignant ascites from inception to March 2013. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed quality of the included studies. References of the included studies were also retrieved. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 16 RCTs involving 984 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the IHPC alone group, the HT plus IHPC group had a higher effective rate of controlling ascites (OR=3.40, 95%CI 2.58 to 4.48, Plt;0.000 01), better improvement in quality of life (OR=2.77, 95%CI 1.90 to 4.05, Plt;0.000 01), with significant differences. The two groups were alike in 1-year survival with no significant difference (OR=1.80, 95%CI 0.61 to 5.31, P=0.28). As for safety, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidences of nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension and pain, myelosuppression, diarrhea, and constipation. Conclusion The results of this systematic review show that, compared with IHPC alone, HT plus IHPC improves the effective rate as well as the quality of life of patients with malignant ascites, and it does not increase the incidences of adverse reactions. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality RCTs with larger sample size are needed to verify the above conclusion.