目的 总结对急腹症在病情判断方面的经验。方法 回顾性分析310例急腹症患者的临床资料。结果 即时确诊211例，经短暂观察确诊54例，经手术探查确诊32例，未明确诊断但经保守治疗痊愈好转6例，误诊、漏诊7例，总确诊率为95.8%。结论 急腹症的病情判断和动态观察是明确诊断和及时治疗的前提。只有勤于实践并掌握正确的方法才能提高分析判断能力。
ObjectiveTo research on the correlation between modified shock index (MSI), traditional vital sign assessment indexes and the proportion of patients entering resuscitation room through emergency triage, and to discuss its significance and advantages for emergency triage. MethodA total of 22 153 emergency patients between January 1 and May 31, 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. We counted the shock index (SI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), MSI, and evaluated the reference range of MSI, based on which, the patients were divided into groups, and the proportion of patients entering resuscitation room in each group was compared. Based on pulse, systolic blood pressure (SBP), SI, MAP and MSI, the patients were again grouped for comparing the proportion of patients entering resuscitation room, and the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and odds ratio (OR) were also analyzed. ResultsReference value of MSI ranged from 0.34 to 1.70 times/(min·mm Hg) (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa). Positive predictive values:MSI (16.239%) >MAP (6.115%) >pulse (5.746%) >SBP (5.321%) >SI (3.689%). The negative predictive values were all at high levels and similar with each other. OR:MSI (6.138) >MAP (2.498) >pulse (2.431) >SBP (2.117) >SI (1.361). ConclusionsPulse, SBP, SI, MAP, and MSI are correlated with the proportion of patients entering resuscitation room, and can be regarded as guide for emergency triage, among which MSI may be superior to all other indexes.