目的 对痔切除吻合器痔上黏膜环切术（PPH）与传统手术在治疗混合痔环状脱垂或内痔环状脱垂的疗效进行比较。方法 回顾性分析2002年1月至2004年9月西苑医院收治的832例经内镜确诊为内痔及混合痔患者的临床资料。结果 PPH组： 混合痔247例，治愈228例（92.3%），显效19例（7.7%）; 内痔168例均治愈（100%）； 术后发生大出血2例（0.5%），住院时间3.1~6.3 d，无一例创面感染。传统手术组： 混合痔229例中治愈215例（93.9%），显效14例（6.1%）; 内痔188例中治愈175例（93.1%），显效13例（6.9%）； 术后发生出血3例，肛管狭窄12例，并发症发生率为3.6%，住院时间26.2~27.1 d。结论 对痔的环形脱垂，采用PPH手术并与外痔切除或外剥内扎方法相结合，具有手术操作简单、安全、术后疼痛轻、恢复快等特点，优于传统的外剥内扎手术。
目的：总结吻合器痔上黏膜环切术（PPH）治疗痔病的经验。探讨该术式的有关问题，以便提高疗效。方法：回顾性分析了2001～2006年8月收治痔病541例，其中PPH术42例的临床资料。本组均为Ⅲ度或Ⅳ度痔。局部合并症共22例次：血栓外痔愈合后遗留皮赘14例，肛裂2例。有关全身合并症：前列腺增生7例，慢性泌尿系统感染1例。结果:42例中，35例术后2～5天出院，6例自愿留院到7天，1例慢性尿路感染者术后2～7天多次便血，再次手术后28日痊愈出院。随访13～24个月：32例恢复满意，10例有肛门包块感及包块排粪时轻度脱出，其中3例经进一步处理缓解，另7例观察治疗。结论:(1)PPH手术简单易行，疼痛轻，住院时间短，效果好。(2)为了提高效果术中应注意：①禁忌症为单个痔块脱出和肛管皮肤不平滑并纤维化的Ⅳ度病变者外。我们还发现慢性泌尿系统感染未彻底治愈者也应视为相对禁忌。明显前列腺增生者也应慎重。②术中按经典PPH手术的要求进行操作，扩肛器插入前后，不宜扩肛和下牵痔块。③个别巨大痔块及皮赘性痔块（tag）宜先行切除，再行本术。④重度脱出者，黏膜切除应宽大，必要时切除部分肛垫。
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of automatic ligation of hemorrhoids (ALH) and procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids. MethodsOne hundred and eighty elderly patients with hemorrhoids who were admitted into the First People's Hospital of Jining City from January 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled. According to the operative mode, the patients were divided into ALH group and PPH group, with 90 cases in each group, received ALH and PPH treatment respectively. The postoperative pain, urinary retention, edema, bleeding, infection, anal swelling and anal stenosis were observed in the two groups, and two methods of operation were evaluated in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, healing time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications. ResultsThe VAS scores of the ALH group in the day 1-3 after operation were lower than that of the PPH group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the frequency of the use of analgesics in ALH group was less than that in PPH group (P < 0.01); the amount of blood loss and the healing time of the ALH group were significantly less or shoter than those of the PPH group (P < 0.01); the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the ALH group was 2.22% (2/90), which was significantly lower than that of the PPH group, 27.78% (25/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=23.050, P=0.000); the incidence of perianal edema after operation in the ALH group was 5.56% (5/90), which was significantly lower than that of PPH group of 15.56% (14/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.766, P=0.029). There was no obvious postoperative bleeding in the ALH group(0/90), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding in the PPH group was 7.78% (7/90), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P=0.007). The efficiency of ALH group was 98.89% (89/90) and the PPH group was 97.78% (88/90), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=0.339, P=0.560). Conciusions There is no significant difference between ALH and PPH in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids, but ALH has the advantages of less pain, quicker recovery and fewer complications, it is worthy of popularization and application.
Objective To compare the clinical effect of tissue selecting therapy stapler (TST) and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treatment of hemorrhoid in Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree. Methods Clinical data of 80 cases of hemorrhoid in Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree who treated in The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from May 2015 to July 2015 were retrospectively collected. All the 80 cases were divided into TST group (n=40) and PPH group (n=40) according to the surgical types. The comparison of the clinical effect of 2 groups was performed. Results The operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, anal fall bilge feeling score, postoperative pain score at 3 time points, and the incidence of anal secretions of TST group were lower or shorter than those corresponding indexes of PPH group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in cure rate, the incidence of urinary retention, the incidence of anal stenosis, the incidence of intractable pain, and satisfaction situation between the 2 groups (P>0.05). All of the cases were followed up for 3 months, during the follow-up period, no one suffered from rectal vaginal fistula, fecal incontinence, and recurrence. Conclusion TST and PPH both have satisfactory effect in treatment of hemorrhoid in Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree, but TST has advan- tages of less blood loss, shorter operative time, rapid postoperative recovery, and less pain.
Objective To investigate the clinical curative effect of divided excision and plastic combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treatment for circular mixed hemorrhoids. Methods Clinical observation on 120 patients with circular mixed hemorrhoids between May 2007 and May 2008 treated by divided excision and plastic combined with PPH was carried out. Results The mean hospital stay after operation was 7.6 d. The wound healing average time was 11.9 d. The incidence rate of postoperative urinary retention was 5.8% (7/120). Average scores of pain in 3 d after operation: 5.3 points (1-8 points) on day 1, 3.6 points （2-9 points） on day 2, 2.2 points （1-8 points） on day 3. All patients were followed up for 12 months, there were 3 cases of hematochezia， 1 case of prolapse, and 1 case of remained abnormal outgrowth skin; the anus function was normal in all cases without anal stricture or tightening feeling. Conclusions Divided excision and plastic combined with PPH can better treat circular mixed hemorrhoids. This operation can not only completely clear the lesions, but also repair and reconstruct the anus and anal canal, protect its size and function. It is an ideal operation for treatment for circular mixed hemorrhoids.
Objective To probe the effects of lumbricus on wound healing after hemorroidectomy.Methods After the solution made from artificial grown lumbricus was sprung to the wound of animal and patient after hemorroidectomy, the wound inflammation, wound healing and changes of laboratory determinations were observed and compared to those of the control group. Results In animal study, lumbricus could inhibit the growth of staphylococci, bacillus coli and bacillus aeruginosus. The time of wound healing in experimental group was 4 days shorter than that in control group. At 4d and 7 day the numbers of the capillary, blood vessel endodermis and desmohemoblast desmocyte and splitting epithelium of trial group were much more than those of control group. At 4d the trial group′s numbers of splitting mesenchymal cell were much more than that of control group. From 3d on the wound healing and granulation filling of experimental group were much quicker than those of control group. In clinical study, the time of wound healing of trial group ( a mean of 16.5 days) was shorter than that of control group (21.2 days). From 3d on, the epidermis′ growth speed of the trial patients was much quicker than that of control group and was without wound infection and granulation overproliferation. Conclusion Lumbricus can inhibit wound inflammation response and accelerate wound healing. Lumbricus is inexpensive and easily preserved, and could be used on the wound after hemorroidectomy to accelerate wound healing.
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with partial internal anal sphincterotomy (Abbreviation: PPH+sphincterotomy) on postoperative wound margin edema and anal function in patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsEighty-five patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids admitted to this hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the study subjects, then they were divided into a PPH group (n=42) and PPH+sphincterotomy group (n=43) according to the different treatment methods. The patient in the PPH group was treated with the PPH, while in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was treated with the partial internal anal sphincterotomy on the basis of the PPH group. The clinical efficacy, degree of pain, edema of wound margin, anal function, and the recurrence rate of symptoms were observed in two groups.Results① There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, course of disease, grading of internal hemorrhoids, and symptoms between the two groups (P>0.05). ② The total effective rate of the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly higher than that of the PPH group [100% (43/43) versus 90.48% (38/42), χ2=4.297, P=0.038]. ③ The VAS score of the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group on the 3rd and 7th day after the treatment (P<0.05), the VAS score of each group at the 3rd or 7th day after the treatment was significantly lower than that before the treatment (P<0.05), and it was significantly lower on the 7th day than that on the 3rd day after the treatment (P<0.05). ④ The postoperative wound margin edema in the PPH group was more serious than that in PPH+sphincterotomy group (χ2=20.237, P<0.001), and the score in the PPH group was significantly higher than that in the PPH+sphincterotomy group (t=13.514, P<0.001). ⑤ The resting pressure of anal canal after the treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), and the diastolic pressure of anal canal after the treatment was significantly higher than that before the treatment (P<0.05) in the two groups. The resting pressure of anal canal in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that in the PPH group and the diastolic pressure of anal canal was significantly higher than that in the PPH group (P<0.05) after the treatment. ⑥ In addition, the total recurrence rate of symptoms at 1 year in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group [6.98% (3/43) versus 23.81% (10/42), χ2=4.647, P=0.031].ConclusionPPH+sphincterotomy could effectively relieve symptoms of severe mixed hemorrhoids, improve clinical efficacy, and reduce recurrence rate.
目的观察吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids，PPH)治疗老年女性患者直肠前突的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我科2004年10月至2010年8月期间经PPH治疗的63例老年女性直肠前突患者的手术经过及术后疗效。结果本组63例患者手术均顺利，手术时间13～35 min (平均21 min)，住院时间3～7 d (平均5 d)，无直肠阴道瘘、肛周脓肿等并发症发生。术后2周均行肛门指诊，2例有轻度炎症，给予对症治疗1周后炎症消失。3例吻合钉未完全脱净，少量残留，给予取出残钉后不适症状消失。术后随访0.5～5年（平均3年），随访率为95.24%(60/63),临床症状完全消失61例，治愈率为96.83%； 症状好转2例，对好转的2例行排粪造影检查，前突均明显减轻，且便秘症状较前有所缓解。结论PPH治疗老年女性直肠前突安全、有效，便秘症状缓解明显，是一种适合临床应用的手术方式。