Objective To investigate the clinical effect of polylactic acid membrane in prevention of epidural scar and adhesion. Methods From July 1998 to April 2000, 62 patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomly assigned into two groups. All were treated surgically with discectomy by fenestration or laminectomy.One group were placed with a thin of polylactic acid membrane covering the interlaminar space(n=32). The thickness of the film was 0.1mm. The other group was blank control(n=30). After 2 weeks of operation, we observed the local and systemic reactions. After 6 months clinical symptoms were revaluated and the degrees of epidural scar and adhesion were determined by CT scans. Results After 2 weeks, we found no adverse systemic reactions in all patients. Wound healing was excellent. No abnormalities of hepatic and renal functions as well as blood for routine were found. Temperature after operation was normal. After 6 months, the curative effects were as follows in experimental group and in control group: excellent in 27 patients and in 24 patients, good in 4 patients and in 4 patients, fair in 1 patient and in 1 patient, and poor in 0 patient and in 1 patient, respectively. There are no significant difference between two groups. The CT scans showed no adhesion between the epidural scar and the dural sac in all patients of experimental group. There existed various extents of adhesion in control group. Conclusion The results demonstrate that the polylactic acidmembrane can effectively prevent the epidural scar adhesion with a good biocompatibility and no toxity. Its clinical application was promising.
Objective To study the effect of the allogeneic bone sheet that has been treated by the freezedrying and radiation sterilization in preventing the epidural adhesion after laminectomy in sheep. Methods Laminectomy was performed on L3,4and L4,5 of 12 adult male sheep. Afteroperation, one site of L3,4 or L4,5was covered by the allogeneicbone sheet in “H” shape after the freeze-drying and radiation sterilization treatment; and the other site was used as a control. The sheep were killed and the specimens were retrieved at 4，8，12，16，20 and 24 weeks after operation to observe the scar formation process. X-ray andCT scan were performed in the segments of L3,4and L4,5at 4 and 24weeks. Results Four weeks after operation, the position and the shape of the allogeneic bone sheet were good in condition, and no lumbar spinal stenosis or compression of the dura was found in the experimental sections. Twentyfour weeks after operation theexamination on the experimental sections revealed that the vertebral canal reconstruction was completed, the allograft was absorbed almost completely, and inosculation with the lamina of the vertebra and the shape of the lumbar spine were good, with no fibroid tissues found in the epidural area. Compared with the control segment, the dura adhesion degree in the laminoplasty segment was significantly decreased (Plt;0.01), and the dura sac remained in a good shape. There was no obvious compression on the dura. Conclusion The allogeneic bone sheet after the treatment of freeze-drying and radiation sterilization can effectively reduce the scar formation after laminectomy and prevent postoperative recurrence of the spinal stenosis.
Objective To explore anesthetic quality of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer. Methods One hundred and seventy-eight patients who were diagnosed as rectal cancer and received operation in the Central Hospital of Bazhong City from June 2010 to June 2012 were included retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia， and the patients who received general anesthesia only were defined as group A， the patients who received epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia were defined as group B. The anesthetic quality and anesthetic adverse reaction were observed in two groups. Results The differences of baseline characteristics in two groups were not significant （P＞0.05）. The difference of anesthetic quality in two groups was not significant （P＞0.05）. In terms of anesthetic adverse reaction， the incidence rate of hypertension， hypotension，tachycardia， or postoperative nausea and vomiting of the group B was significantly lower than those of the group A （P＜0.05）. The incidence rate of bradycardia， premature ventricular contractions， or time of gastrointestinal function recovery had no significant differences （P＞0.05）. There was no nerve dysfunction of lower limb in two groups. Conclusion Epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer as compared with general anesthesia only not only has the same anesthetic quality， but also has obvious advantages in decreasing anesthetic adverse reaction.
Objective?To systematically evaluate the effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods?We searched PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI databases from 1990 through Oct. 2009 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed and the data was extracted according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook. The homogeneous RCTs were pooled using RavMan 4.2.10 software. Results?Sixteen RCTs involving 1 316 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analyses showed that thoracic epidural anesthesia significantly reduced time to tracheal extubation (MD= –332.43, 95%CI –640.19 to –24.68, P=0.03), visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest on postoperation day 1 (MD= –1.23, 95%CI –2.19 to –0.27, P=0.01), VAS scores with movement on postoperation day 1 (MD= –2.52, 95%CI –4.65 to –0.39, P=0.02) and day 2 (MD= –1.5, 95%CI –2.56 to –0.43, P=0.006), and incidences of myocardial ischemia (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.97, P=0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative pulmonary function, incidences of myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and mortality. Conclusions?Thoracic epidural anesthesia could reduce postoperative time to tracheal extubation, VAS score, and incidences of myocardial ischemia, but it does not affect postoperative pulmonary function, incidences of myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and mortality. More high-quality RCTs are required.
【摘要】 目的 评价抚触对硬膜外麻醉穿刺疼痛的影响及效果。 方法 2009年1-12月，将485例行硬膜外麻醉穿刺患者随机分为抚触组（术中行抚触干预）和对照组（常规护理），观察两组患者的穿刺程度、穿刺时间。 结果 抚触组患者疼痛程度、穿刺时间较对照组有明显改善，且差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.01）。 结论 抚触可降低应激引起的硬膜外麻醉穿刺患者的疼痛程度，保持穿刺体位从而缩短穿刺时间，有利于麻醉操作顺利进行。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effect of touching on alleviating the pain in patients undergoing epidural anesthesia puncture. Methods A total of 485 patients who underwent epidural puncture from January to December 2009 were randomly divided into two groups: 259 in touching group and 226 in control group. In the touching group, the patients were touched and consoled while undergoing epidural puncture. The pain extent and time of puncture were observed and recorded. Results The level of pain and time of puncture were obviously alleviated and shortened in the touching group and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion Touching could reduce the stress and pain caused by epidural puncture, which may lead to maintain the puncture position and thereby shorten the puncture time. It helps to finish the narcotic operation favorably.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia versus epidural patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative analgesia, sedation, and the incidence of side effects. Methods We searched the specialized trials registered in the Cochrane anesthesia group, The Cochrane Library (CCTR), MEDLINE (1966 to Sept. 2008), EMbase (1966 to Sept. 2008), PubMed (1966 to Sept. 2008), and handsearched some Chinese anesthesia Journals and Clinical anesthesia journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of intravenous versus epidural analgesia for post-operation were included. The quality of the trials was critically assessed. RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Thirteen RCTs involving 580 patients of intravenous versus epidural analgesia for post-operation were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that there were no significant differences in postoperative analgesia and sedation at the hour-points of 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hours after operation. There were no significant differences in plasma fentanyl concentration in the two groups on the same analgesia effects. There were also no significant differences in side effects. Conclusion Both intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural patient-controlled analgesia have the same clinical effects. Compared with epidural patient-controlled analgesia, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia has fewer side effects and is more convenient. At the same time, it can reduce more costs of hospitalization. But because of the low quality and small sample size of the included studies, more well-designed, large scale, randomized controlled trials are needed.