Objective To compare short-term quality of life and postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with different routes reconstruction after McKeown esophagectomy. Methods The clinical data of 144 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received McKeown esophagectomy in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2016 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them 93 patients accepted retrosternal approach (a RR group, 71 males and 22 females at an average age of 63.5±7.7 years) and 51 patients accepted posterior mediastinal approach (a PR group, 39 males and 12 females at an average age of 62.3±8.0 years). Short-term surgical outcomes were compared and a Quality of Life Questionnaire of Patients Underwent Esophagectomy 1.0 was performed at postoperative 1st and 3rd month. Results There was no difference in two groups in sex, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and location and clinical stage of tumors (P>0.05). The neoadjuvant therapy was more performed in the RR group (16.1%vs. 5.9%, P=0.075). There were more robot-assisted esophagecctomy operations performed in the PR group (52.9% vs. 45.2%, P=0.020). No significant difference was noted in operation duration, intraoperative blood loss or length of ICU stay between the RR and PR groups (251.3±59.1 min vs. 253.1±27.7 min, P=0.862; 223.7±75.1 ml vs. 240.0±75.1 ml, P=0.276; 3.7±6.6 d vs. 2.3±2.1 d, P=0.139). The patients in the PR group had more lymph nodes dissected and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). Rate of R1/2 resection was higher in the RR group (12.9%vs. 5.9%, P=0.187). No surgery-related mortality was observed in both groups. The anastomotic leak and the anastomotic stricture was higher in the RR group than that in the PR group (25.8% vs. 5.9%, P=0.003). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the quality of life at postoperative 1st and 3rd month. However, the quality of life at postoperative 3rd month significantly improved in both groups (P<0.001). Compared with the PR group, the dysphagia was more severe in the RR group at postoperative 1st month (3.3±1.5 vs. 2.6±1.1, P=0.007), while the reflux symptom was lighter at postoperative 3rd month (3.0±1.8 vs. 3.6±1.6, P=0.045). Conclusion The two different routes reconstruction after McKeown esophagectomy are both safe and feasible. The anterior mediastinal approach increases the risk of anastomotic leak, but with low incidence of reflux symptom.
Abstract: Objective To Evaluate the clinical outcome of gastric tube in radical surgeries to treat esophageal and cardial carcinoma. Methods From January to October 2008, 74 patients with esophageal or cardial carcinoma in Ruijin Hospital were enrolled in our study. Based on the surgical method, they were divided into the gastric tube group and the traditional way group. The gastric tube group had 46 patients, including 36 male patients and 10 female patients, whose age averaged 59.67±9.96 years (36 to 77 years). Among them, 31 patients had esophageal carcinoma with 1 upper, 23 middle and 7 lower esophageal carcinoma, and 15 patients had cardial carcinoma. In this group, 2 patients were treated with anastomosis in the left neck, 19 with anastomosis in the upper aortic arch, 10 with anastomosis in the lower aortic arch and 15 cardial carcinoma patients underwent radical resection. In the traditional way group, there were 28 patients, 25 male patients and 3 female patients, whose age averaged 59.17±11.33 years (37 to 86 years). In these patients, 22 had esophageal carcinoma with 1 in the upper esophagus, 17 in the middle esophagus, 4 in the lower esophagus; and 6 patients had cardial carcinoma. In this group, 2 patients were treated with anastomosis in the left neck , 17 with anastomosis in the upper aortic arch, 3 with anastomosis in the lower aortic arch, and 6 cardial carcinoma patients underwent radical resection. The rate of anastomotic leakage, operation time, and length of stay in hospital of these two groups were observed. Results All surgeries in the two groups were successfully performed. There was no anastomotic leakage case in the gastric tube group, while there were 4 pulmonary infection cases and 1 death case in the traditional way group. There was no statistically difference in the operation time (180.00±10.34 min vs. 185.00±6.23 min, t=1.669, P=0.078) and length of stay in hospital (16.78±9.98 d vs. 16.89±11.53 d, t=1.665, P=0.075) between the gastric tube group and the traditional way group. Conclusion Gastric tube has a good value in clinical application with fewercomplications and without prolonging operation and hospitalization time, which can surely better quality of life of the patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the complications and quality of life (QoL) in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy using gastric tube. MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the postoperative complications and QoL of patients using gastric tube and the whole stomach reconstruction were electronically searched in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to September 30th, 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1 085 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, in terms of postoperative complications, the incidences of reflux esophagitis (OR=0.19, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.32, P < 0.000 01) and intrathoracic stomach syndrome (OR=0.11, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.32, P < 0.000 1) with gastric tube were significantly lower than those of the whole stomach; in terms of QoL, the scores of QoL in the 6th month (MD=18.71, 95%CI 7.72 to 29.71, P=0.000 9) and in the 12th month (MD=22.95, 95%CI 8.21 to 37.69, P=0.002) with gastric tube were significantly higher than those of the whole stomach. In terms of satisfaction degree of QoL, the satisfaction degree of QoL in the 6th month (OR=1.78, 95%CI 1.10 to 2.88, P=0.02) and the 12th month (OR=2.73, 95%CI 1.67 to 4.47, P < 0.000 1) with gastric tube were both significantly higher than those of the whole stomach. ConclusionCompared with the whole stomach reconstruction, the method of gastric tube reconstruction has beneficial effects in reducing the incidences of postoperative complications (such as reflux esophagitis, intrathoracic stomach syndrome) and improves patients' QoL. But there are many uncertain factors about postoperative anastomotic complication and its influence on patients' long-term QoL remains uncertain. Thus, further studies should be conducted.
Abstract： Objective To investigate the clinical application of tubular stomach in cervical esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods A total of 850 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal（3-field）approach between January 2007 and January 2009 in North Jiangsu Hospital were allocated into the tubular stomach group（group A, n=425） and the whole stomach group （group B, n=425）by operation order. Group A included 287 male and 138 female patients with their average age of 58.2±11.5 years. Among them, 27 patients had upper esophageal cancer, 346 patients had middle esophageal cancer and 52 patients had lower esophageal cancer. Group B included 298 male and 127 female patients with their average age of 58.5±12.8 years. Among them, 33 patients had upper esophageal cancer, 338 patients had middle esophageal cancer, and 54 patients had lower esophageal cancer. Operation time, postoperative length of hospital stay and the incidence of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, intra-thoracic stomach syndrome and reflux esophagitis of the two groups were compared. Results All the patients recovered uneventfully with no in-hospital death. There was no statistical difference in operation time （175.0±12.8 min vs.171.0±10.5 min，t=1.702，P＞ 0.05）and postoperative length of hospital stay （16.0±8.5 d vs.16.3±8.8 d，t=1.773，P＞ 0.05） between the two groups. During follow-up of six months, the rates of anastomotic leakage（χ2=5.550，P＜ 0.05）, intra-thoracic stomach syndrome （χ2=10.500，P＜ 0.05）and reflux esophagitis（χ2=9.150，P＜ 0.05） of group A were significantly lower than those of group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic stricture （χ2=0.120，P＞ 0.05） between the two groups. Conclusion Tubular stomach is better than whole stomach for cervical esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer since it is more physiologically and anatomically complied. It can decrease the incidence of anastomotic leakage, intra-thoracic stomach syndrome, reflux esophagitis and improve the postoperative quality of life.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of tubular stomach and whole stomach reconstruction in the treatment of esophageal cancer.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect the randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies on the efficacy comparison between tubular stomach and total gastric reconstruction of esophagus in esophagectomy from their date of inception to May 2019. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of Twenty-nine RCTs were included, and 3 012 patients were involved. The results of meta-analysis showed that the postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.50, 0.83), P=0.000 6], anastomotic stenosis [RR=0.65, 95%CI (0.50, 0.86), P=0.002], thoracic gastric syndrome [RR=0.19, 95%CI (0.13, 0.27), P<0.001], reflux esophagitis [RR=0.23, 95%CI (0.19, 0.30), P<0.001], gastric emptying disorder [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.57), P<0.001] and pulmonary infection [RR=0.44, 95%CI (0.31, 0.62), P<0.001] were significantly reduced, and the postoperative quality of life score and satisfaction were higher at 6 months and 1 year in the tubular stomach group (P<0.05). In terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, they were better in the tubular stomach group than those in the whole stomach group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal decompression time, postoperative closed drainage time, postoperative 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rate, postoperative quality of life score at 3 weeks and 3 months, and postoperative life satisfaction at 3 weeks.ConclusionThe tubular stomach is more advantageous than the whole stomach in the reconstruction of esophagus after esophagectomy.
ObjectiveTo explore clinical outcomes of complete mechanical cervical side-to-side esophago-gastric tube anastomosis. MethodsClinical data of 60 patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC)who underwent complete mechanical cervical side-to-side esophago-gastric tube anastomosis in the 153rd Central Hospital of People's Liberation Army from June 2010 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 41 male and 19 female patients with their age of 46-78 (64.2±6.4)years and body weight of 58.6±12.6 kg. There were 39 patients with mid-thoracic EC, 15 patients with lower-thoracic EC, and 6 patients with upper-thoracic EC. There was 1 patient with stageⅠ EC, 32 patients with stage Ⅱ EC, 23 patients with stage Ⅲ EC, and 4 patients with stage Ⅳ EC. Six to 12 months after the operation, all the patients received a survey questionnaire regarding their quantity and quality of food intake as well as gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Fifty-two patients received barium swallow, and 38 patients received gastroscopy and esophageal mucosal biopsy during follow-up. ResultsAll the 60 patients were successfully discharged. Average length of hospital stay was 12.0±2.6 days. Average time for anastomosis was 18.4±3.2 minutes. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 1.7% (1/60). During follow-up, all the 60 patients restored normal food intake, and 14 patients (23.3%)had GER symptoms. Barium swallow showed the average anastomotic diameter of 1.6±0.2 cm (range, 1.2 to 2.2 cm). In 45° trendelenburg position, 31 patients (59.6%)had barium GER, but none of the patients had prolonged barium retention, intrathoracic gastric dilation or disturbed gastric emptying. Gastroscopy of 38 patients showed full anastomotic opening in 24 patients (63.2%)and irregular or semiclosed anastomosis in the other 14 patients (36.8%). Mucosal biopsy under gastroscopy showed chronic inflammation in 18.4% (7/38)patients. ConclusionComplete mechanical cervical side-to-side esophago-gastric tube anastomosis can significantly prevent anastomotic stenosis, leak and intrathoracic stomach symptoms with good clinical outcomes.
Objective To compare the outcome of tubular stomach and cervical esophagus laminated anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis. Methods A total of 128 patients with middle and upper esophageal cancer in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2016 were randomly divided into two groups, 64 patients in each group and all patients underwent esophagectomy. In the group A, there were 46 males and 18 females with age of 40–75 years, treated with tubular stomach and cervical esophagus layered anastomosis. There were 51 males and 13 females with age of 43–71 years in the group B receiving mechanical anastomosis. We observed the short-term and long-term efficacy as well as complications. Results In the group A, there was cervical anastomotic fistula in 1 patient, anastomotic stenosis in 2 patients and reflux esophagitis in 12 patients. In the group B, 1 patient suffered chylothorax, 8 patients cervical anastomotic fistula, 4 patients anastomotic stenosis and 14 patients reflux esophagitis. Conclusion Layered anastomosis can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula and stenosis. Tubular stomach can effectively prevent and reduce the reflux esophagitis, and the high long-term quality of life will be achieved after the operation.
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. The comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer based on operation is important. In recent ten years, with the development of surgical techniques and medical instruments, tubular stomach has been widely used. Although the advantages of tubular stomach are becoming more and more obvious, there are still many details and problems for the function and application of tubular stomach worthy of further discussion and study. In this paper, the technical progress, advantages, functions and applications of tubular stomach are reviewed and discussed, and the future prospect is predicted.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between triluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach and traditional esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma (EC)in elderly patients. MethodsA total of 196 elderly patients (>60 years)with EC who received esophagectomy in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital from January 2007 to January 2013 were enrolled in this study. According to different surgical methods, all the patients were divided into triluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach group (group A)and traditional esophagectomy group (group B). There were 96 patients including 51 males and 45 females in group A with their age of 60-81 (66.21±7.32)years, and 100 patients including 54 males and 46 females in group B with their age of 60-82 (65.43±6.37)years. Clinical indexes were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsRadical esophagectomy was successfully performed for all the patients. There was no statistical difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative incidence of chylothorax, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture or mortality between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Time to first passage of flatus and postoperative length of hospital stay of group A were significantly shorter than those of group B, and the incidences of postoperative arrhythmias, pulmonary complications and thoracic-stomach syndrome of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P < 0.05). ConclusionTriluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach can significantly reduce postoperative morbidity, shorten hospital stay and improve quality of life of elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy.