ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) after vitrectomy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients. MethodsThree hundred and one patients (301 eyes) with PDR who underwent vitrectomy between January 2008 and December 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Risk factors for NVG after vitrectomy were identified by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. ResultsTwelve of 301 patients (4.0%) developed postoperative NVG in 2 to 18 months after vitrectomy. The incidence of postoperative NVG peaked in 2 to 6 months after vitrectomy (7 eyes, 58.3%). Logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative retinal detachment was a significant risk factor for postoperative NVG in eyes with PDR (P < 0.001). Eyes with postoperative retinal detachment were more likely to develop NVG after vitrectomy than those without postoperative retinal detachment (OR=17.826). Gender, age, duration of diabetes, preoperative serum creatinine levels, glycated hemoglobin levels, preoperative intraocular pressure, preoperative lens status, combined phacoemulsification surgery and tamponade were not associated with postoperative NVG (P > 0.05). ConclusionPostoperative retinal detachment is a major risk factor for NVG after vitrectomy in PDR.
Complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy have become the major indications of vitrectomy. The surgery, however, is not basically a causative therapy. The visual function after operation depends on the degree of retinal ischemia and damage induced. The surgery itself has a potential for severe complications. Therefore it is important to better understand the pathology and to master surgical strategy and techniques in order to improve surgical outcomes and reduce the surgical complications. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2007,23:234-237)
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of small-gauge vitrectomy (SGV) treatment for proliferative diabetic tractional (PDR) with retinal detachment (TRD). MethodsThe data of 42 patients (50 eyes) with PDR combined with TRD who had received SGV treatment were retrospectively analyzed. There were 22 males and 20 females, with an average age of (44.5±11.2) years. There were 16 eyes with TRD involving the macular area, 34 eyes without TRD involving the macular area. The eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or retinal hole were excluded. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was worse than finger counting in 18 eyes, worse than 0.1 in 15 eyes, 0.1-0.3 in 16 eyes and better than or equal to 0.3 in 1 eye. Post-operative tamponade was delivered for patients with iatrogenic retinal breaks, including 5 eyes with long-acting gas and 7 eyes with silicone oil. The mean follow-up time was 9.7 months. The visual outcome, rate of retinal reattachment and complications were analyzed. ResultsThe visual acuity improved in 34 eyes (68.0%), unchanged in 12 eyes (24.0%) and decreased in 4 eyes (8.0%). The difference of visual acuity before and after surgery was statistically significant (t=7.087, P<0.01).The total rate of retinal reattachment was 96%, and 84% of eyes achieved anatomic reattachment after single surgery. The rate of retinal reattachment was 89.5% (34/38) for these eyes without iatrogenic retinal breaks, 4/38 eyes without iatrogenic retinal breaks still had retinal detachment in 3 months after surgery and received tamponade of long-acting gas or silicone oil. The rate of retinal reattachment was 66.7% (8/12) for these eyes with iatrogenic retinal breaks and received post-operative tamponade. There were 17 eyes experienced postoperative vitreous hemorrhage, which were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies or vitreous cavity lavage. There were 9 eyes with transient ocular hypertension, and 4 eyes with neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Among 4 eyes with NVG, 2 of which were controlled through anti-VEGF treatment or laser treatment, and 2 eyes of 2 patients refused to have further treatment. ConclusionSGV is safe and effective treatment for PDR combined with TRD, and intraocular tamponade is not necessary in the absence of iatrogenic retinal break.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of microincision vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) assisted with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treatment. MethodsThis is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 60 patients (70 eyes) with severe PDR diagnosed were enrolled and divided into IVR group (31 patients, 35 eyes) and control group (29 patients, 35 eyes). IVR group patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml ranibizumab solution (10 mg/ml) first, and 3 or 4 days later they received 23G microincision VRS. Control group patients only received 23G microincision VRS. The follow-up time was 3 to 12 months with an average of (4.5±1.8) months. The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, the central retinal thickness (CRT) and retinal reattachment, and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparatively analyzed. ResultsThere was no topical and systemic adverse reactions associated with the drug after injection in IVR group. The incidence of post-operative vitreous hemorrhage (VH) in IVR group and control group was 8.6% and 28.6% at 1 week after surgery, 0.0% and 17.1% at 1 month after surgery, 0.0% and 8.6% at 3 month after surgery respectively. The differences were statistically significant for 1 week (χ2=4.63, P < 0.05) and 1 month (χ2=4.56, P < 0.05), but was not statistically significant for 3 months (χ2=0.24, P > 0.05). The mean post-operative logMAR BCVA of IVR group (0.81±0.40) and control group (1.05±0.42) have all improved than their pre-operative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (t=12.78, 4.39; P < 0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA of IVR group is higher than BCVA of control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.36, P < 0.05). The average post-operative CRT in IVR group was thinner than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.53, P < 0.05). The incidence of a transient high intraocular pressure in IVR group (14.3%) was lower than that in control group (34.3%), the difference was statistically significant (t=4.79, P < 0.05). The incidence of retinal reattachment (t=0.35), epiretinal membrane (χ2=0.97), neovascular glaucoma (χ2=0.51) was no difference between these two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe minimally invasive VRS assisted by IVR treatment for severe PDR can effectively prevent postoperative VH, reduce CRT and improve visual acuity.
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of intravitreal tamponade of C3F8 with silicon oil on postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and visual prognosis after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsThe clinical data of 121 patients (127 eyes) who underwent primary vitrectomy due to PDR were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into two groups according to different intravitreal tamponade, including C3F8 tamponade group (53 patients with 56 eyes) and silicone oil tamponade group (68 patients with 71 eyes). There was no difference of gender (χ2=0.956), age (t=1.122), duratiion of diabetes (t=0.627), fasting blood glucose (t=1.049), systolic pressure (t=1.056), diastolic pressure (t=0.517), history of hypertension (χ2=0.356), nephropathy (χ2=1.242), preoperative laser photocoagulation (χ2=1.225) and All the patients underwent three port pars plana vitrectomy. The mean follow-up was 2 years ranging from 6 months to 4 years. And then the incidence and onset time of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and postoperative BCVA of the two groups were compared. ResultsPostoperative vitreous hemorrhage occurred in 14 of 56 eyes (25.00%) in C3F8 tamponade group. The average onset time of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage were (64.64±59.09) days ranging from 7-225 days and mostly were within 30-60 days (35.71%, 5/14). Postoperative vitreous hemorrhage also occurred in 7 of 71 eyes (9.89%) of silicone oil tamponade group after silicone oil removal with an average onset time of (25.29±20.46) days ranging from 3-65 days and were mostly within 15-30 days (42.86%, 3/7). There was a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage between the two groups (χ2=5.200, P<0.05). BCVA of the two groups was improved significantly after operation (Z=2.472, 3.114; P<0.05). Postoperative BCVA of silicone oil tamponade group was poorer than C3F8 tamponade group (Z=1.968, P<0.05). ConclusionBoth C3F8 and silicone oil tamponade can improve the visual acuity after vitrectomy for PDR. Compared with C3F8, silicone oil tamponade had lower incidence and late onset of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy for PDR.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) combined with vitrectomy in treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsThis is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 62 patients (70 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy for PDR were enrolled and divided into IVR group (30 patients, 34 eyes) and control group (32 patients, 36 eyes).IVR group patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml ranibizumab solution (10 mg/ml) 3 or 5 days before surgery. The follow-up time was 3 to 18 months with an average of (4.5±1.8) months. The surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, iatrogenic retinal breaks, use of silicone oil, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparatively analyzed. ResultsThe difference of mean surgical time (t=6.136) and the number of endodiathermy during vitrectomy (t=6.128) between IVR group and control group was statistically significant (P=0.000, 0.036). The number of iatrogenic retinal break in IVR group is 8.8% and control group is 27.8%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.154, P=0.032). Use of silicone oil of IVR group is 14.7% and control group is 38.9%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.171, P=0.023). The incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 3 month after surgery was 11.8% and 30.6% respectively in IVR group and control group. The differences were statistically significant (χ2=3.932, P=0.047). The 6 month postoperative mean BCVA of IVR group and control group have all improved than their preoperative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (t=4.414, 8.234; P=0.000).But there was no difference between the mean postoperative BCVA of two groups (t=0.111, P=0.190). There was no topical and systemic adverse reactions associated with the drug after injection in IVR group. ConclusionsMicroincision vitreoretinal surgery assisted by IVR for PDR shorten surgical time, reduces the intraoperative bleeding and iatrogenic retinal breaks, reduces the use of silicon oil and the postoperative recurrent vitreous hemorrhage. But there was no significant relationship between vision improvement and IVR.