Objective To evaluate the clinical valueof the revision of total hip replacement(THR), to analyse the reason of the rev isions, and to discuss the main difficulties and measures to manage it.Methods From June 1998 to January 2002, 15 cases (15 hips) were revised on totalhip replacement. The reasons for revision in the cases were as follows:failure of primary operative techenique, loosening and sinking of the components, displacement of the prosthesis, erosion of the acetabulum, as well as fracture of the femoral stem. The main difficulties of the revision were:poor health condition of the patients; the remove of the prosthesis of the primary THR,especially the broken femoral stem and the cements; the loss of localbone. The measures to remove the broken femoral stem were described.ResultsAll cases were followed up 2.4 years on average: 2 patients died from heart disease and cerebrovascular disease respectively, while the good results were achieved in the others.No infection, dislocation, loosening, and other complications occurred. The good effects were related with following factors:mild degree of illness; no severe bone defect; most of the first femoral head replacement.Conclusion The revision of THRis a more difficult operation, so that the special instrument and equipment andoperative experience are required.
From 1974 to 1991, two hundred and sixty-four cases of hip replacement were performed. These cases composed of 150 cases of artificial femoral head prosthesis replacement and 114 cases of total hip replacement. Fifteen cases were revised after the first replacement in 7.4 years average (5-16 years). The revision rate was 5.7%. The causes of revision were loose or subside of prosthesis, wear and tear of acetabulum, dislocation of artificial hip joint, etc, which caused pain and dysfunction. The revision cases were followed up for 4.7 years average with good result. To prevent revision, The medully canal shonld not be too wide and in osteoporosis cases, bone cement was suggested to apply. The chondrium of acetabulum should be removed completely.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of acetabular revision using jumbo cementless cups. Methods Between May 1996 and May 2011, 35 patients (35 hips) underwent an acetabular revision with jumbo cementless cups, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 23 females, with an average age of 64.8 years (range, 47-79 years). The time from hip arthroplaty to revision was 1-15 years (mean, 9.7 years). The causes for revision were aseptic loosening in 32 cases, femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 2 cases, and low toxicity infection in 1 case. According to the classification of acetabular bony deficiencies of the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS), 6 cases were classified as type I, 9 cases as type II, and 20 cases as type III; according to the classification proposed by Paprosky, 5 cases were rated as type II A, 9 cases as type II B, 13 cases as type II C, and 8 cases as type III A. The primary hip arthroplasty cups had an outside diameter of 46-52 mm (mean, 49.6 mm), and the revision cups had an outside diameter of 56-68 mm (mean, 60.4 mm). Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. Results Healing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients; without infection or neurovascular injury. Prosthetic dislocation was observed in 1 case at 20 days after operation, and was cured after expectant treatment. One patient died at 6 years after operation, and the other 34 patients were followed up 2-14 years (mean, 8.4 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from 46.4 ± 13.4 at preoperation to 90.4 ± 3.6 at last follow-up (t=18.76, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was significantly decreased, and the distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). Only 1 patient received second revision for aseptic loosening after 10 years; no continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, and osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was shown in the other patients. Conclusion Jumbo cementless cup for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for having the advantages of simple operation, less bone grafts, and good recovery of the acetabular rotation centre.
Objective To analyze the main reasons of acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to disscuss the prevention and management. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed from 19 patients undergoing revision for acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary THA between January 2003 and June 2010. There were 11 males and 8 females, aged from 55 to 79 years (mean, 67.2 years). The locations were lefthip in 9 cases and right hip in 10 cases. The cementless hip prosthesis was used in 12 cases and cement hip rosthesis in 7 cases. The revisions were performed at 3 weeks to 6 months after primary THA. The reasons of early failure were analyzed. Both the coverage rate of acetabulum-bone and the Harris hip score were compared between pre- and post-revision. Results The main reason of acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary THA may be unsuitable treatment of acetabulum, improper selection of acetabular component, and incorrect place angle of acetabular component. Sciatic nerve palsy occurred in 1 case and recovered at 7 weeks after revision. Sl ight fracture of the acetabulum in 1 case and healed at 3 months after revision. All incisions healed by first intention. No infection, vessel injury, displacement of acetabular component, or deep vein thrombosis occurred. The patients were followed up 11-73 months (mean, 28 months). At last follow-up, no acetabular component instabil ity was observed. The coverage rate of acetabulum-bone was increased from 67.9% ± 5.5% before revision to 87.7% ± 5.2% after revision, showing significant difference (t=11.592，P=0.003). The Harris hip score at last follow-up (84.4 ± 4.6) was significantly higher than that at pre-revision (56.5 ± 9.3) (t=11.380，P=0.005). Conclusion Detailed surgical plan, proper choice of component, correct place angle and elaborative planning, and proficient surgical skill are necessary to achieve the initial stability of acetabular component in THA．
Objective To analyze the effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Methods Between October 2003 and December 2007, 36 patients with FBSS were treated with TLIF. There were 19 males and 17 females with an average age of 52.6 years (range, 46-68 years) and an average disease duration of 1.6 years (range, 3 months-15 years). Of 36 patients, reoperation was performed in 25, 10 received 3 operations,and 1 had 5 operations. A total of 50 segments were involved in fusion, including L4, 5 in 12 cases, L5, S1 in 10 cases, L3, 4 and L4, 5 double segments in 8 cases, and L4, 5 and L5, S1 double segments in 6 cases. According to X-ray films, CT, and MRI examination, 12 patients were diagnosed as having lumbar instabil ity secondary to total laminectomy, 18 as having recurrence of lumbar disc protrusion, and 6 as having recurrence of lumbar spondylol isthesis. Results Dural rupture occurred in 1 case and was repaired by suturing without cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed; 1 had deep incision infection of Staphylococcus; and 1 had transient single irritation sign because of hematoma formation and was cured after symptomatic treatment. The other incisions healed by first intention. No patients had permanent nerve injury or deterioration. Thirty-three cases were followed up 18-72 months (mean, 35.2 months). At 12 months, all the operated segments reached interbody fusion, and no breakage of screw or Cage dislocation occurred. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores showed significant difference (t=2.45, P=0.01) between before operation (14.2 ± 4.1) and 18 months after operation (23.9 ± 2.6). The rate of cl inical improvement was 90.9% (23 cases of excellent, 7 cases of good, 3 cases of acceptable). Conclusion The TLIF simpl ifies the manipulation of lumbar revision surgery and decreases the operation risk and the operative compl ications for the treatment of FBSS.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed hemi-pelvic prosthesis for revision of aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. MethodsBetween February 2017 and January 2020, 11 patients with aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis were revised using 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses. There were 7 males and 4 females with an average age of 44 years (range, 25-60 years). In the first operation, all patients underwent total tumor resection, modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis reconstruction, and autologous femoral head transplantation. According to the Enneking pelvic partition system, 8 cases were resected in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ and 3 cases in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ. The interval from the initial operation to this revision ranged from 14.3-66.2 months, with an average of 35.8 months. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. At 6 months after the first operation, before revision, and at last follow-up, the American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the recovery of lower limb function. The pain-free walking distance of patients without brace assistance was recorded at last follow-up. X-ray films were taken at 1 month after the first operation, before revision, and at 1 month after revision, the acetabulum position was assessed by the differences in weight arm and cup height between bilateral hip joints. At last follow-up, the digital X-ray tomography was taken to evaluate the prosthesis-bone integration and the occurrence of aseptic loosening. Results The operation time was 182.6-238.0 minutes (mean, 197.4 minutes). The amount of intraoperative bleeding was 400-860 mL (mean, 550.0 mL). All incisions healed by first intention with no infection, hip dislocation, nerve damage, or vascular-related adverse events. The MSTS score and Harris score at last follow-up were significantly higher than those at 6 months after the first operation and before revision (P<0.05), while the score before revision was significantly lower than that at 6 months after the first operation (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the patients were able to walk more than 1 000 meters painlessly without brace assistance. Imaging review showed that the difference of cup height at 1 month after revision was significantly lower than that at 1 month after the first operation and before revision, and at 1 month after the first operation than before revision operation, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the difference of weight arm among three time points (P>0.05). All prostheses were well integrated, and no aseptic loosening of the prosthesis or screw fracture occurred. Conclusion Revision with 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses benefited in reconstructing stable pelvic ring and natural bodyweight transmission for patients encountering the aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. Early postoperative rehabilitation training can maximize the recovery of patient limb function, reduce pain during walking, and reduce the incidence of complications.
Objective To explore the failure cause of posterior approach orthopaedic operation of thoracolumbar hemivertebra, and to summary strategies of revision. Methods The cl inical data from 9 cases undergoing posterior approach orthopaedic operation failure of thoracolumbar hemivertebra between June 2003 and June 2008, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 4 females with a median age of 12 years (range, 1 year and 10 months to 24 years). All malformations were identified as fully segmented hemivertebra from the original medical records and X-ray films, including 2 cases in thoracic vertebra, 5 cases in thoracolumbar vertebra, and 2 cases in lumbar vertebra. The preoperative scol iotic Cobb angle was (45.4 ± 17.4)°, and kyphotic Cobb angle was (29.8 ± 22.0)°. The reason of primary surgical failure were analyzed and spinal deformity was corrected again with posterior revision. Results All surgeries were finished successfully. The operation time was 3.0-6.5 hours (mean, 4.5 hours), and the perioperative bleeding was 400-2 500 mL (mean, 950 mL). All incisions healed by first intention; no infection or deep venous thrombosis occurred. Numbness occurred in unilateral lower extremity of 1 case postoperatively, and the symptom was rel ieved completely after treatment of detumescence and neural nutrition. All cases were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 18 months). No pseudoarthrosis and implant failure occurred. The X-ray films showed that the bone grafts completely fused within 8-14 months (mean, 11 months) after operation. The Cobb angles of scol iosis and kyphosis at 1 week after operation and the last follow-up were obviously improved when compared with preoperative ones, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). No obvious correction loss was observed either in coronal or sagittal plane. Conclusion The failure causes of posterior approach orthopaedic operation are hemivertebra processing, selection of fixation and fusion range, and selection of internal fixation. If the strategies of revision are made after the above-mentioned failure causes are considered, the cl inical results will be satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer. Methods The clinical data were analyzed from 23 patients (23 knees) undergoing two-stage revision for late infection after primary TKA between January 2007 and December 2009. There were 15 males and 8 females, aged from 43 to 75 years (mean, 65.2 years). Infection occurred at 13-52 months (mean, 17.3 months) after TKA. The time interval between infection and admission ranged from 15 days to 7 months (mean, 2.1 months). One-stage operation included surgical debridement and removal of all knee prosthesis and cement, then an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer was implanted. The re-implantation of prosthesis was performed after 8-10 weeks when infections were controlled. The American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and Knee Society Score (KSS) were used to compare the function of the knee between pre- and post-revision. The rate of infection control and complication were analyzed. Results All incisions healed primarily. Re-infection occurred in 2 cases after two-stage revision, and infection was controlled in the other 21 cases, with an infection control rate of 91.3%. The patients were followed up 2-5 years (mean, 3.6 years). The HSS score was increased from 60.6 ± 9.8 at pre-revision to 82.3 ± 7.4 at last follow-up, the KSS score was increased from 110.7 ± 9.6 at pre-revision to 134.0 ± 10.5 at last follow-up, all showing significant differences (P lt; 0.01). Radiographs showed that prosthesis had good position with no loosening, fracture, or periprosthetic radiolucent. Conclusion Two-stage revision using an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer is an effective method to control infected TKA and to restore the function of affected knee.
【Abstract】 Objective To review the progress in the treatment of bone defect by porous tantalum implant. Methods Recent l iterature was extensively reviewed and summarized, concerning the treatment method of bonedefect by porous tantalum implant. Results By right of their unique properties, porous tantalum implants have achievedvery good results in the treatment of certain types of bone defects. Conclusion Porous tantalum implants have their ownadvantages and disadvantages. If the case is meet to its indications, this method can obtain a good effect. Porous tantalum implants provide a new way for the cl inical treatment of bone defects.