ObjectiveTo assess the mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision and to analyze the relevant factors that may affect the surgical outcomes.MethodsThe clinical data of 24 patients who underwent ACL revision surgery between April 2009 and July 2018 and were followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 males and 4 females with a median age of 30 years [interquartile distance (IQR) was (25, 36) years]. The median body mass index was 24.45 kg/m2 and IQR was (22.93, 25.93) kg/m2. The median time between ACL revision and reconstruction was 41 months and IQR was (15, 85) months. The direct cause of the failure of reconstruction surgery included 14 cases of trauma, 8 cases of no obvious cause, and 2 cases of infection. During the revision operation, 14 patients had a poor bone tunnel position, all of which were drilled with new tunnels, the remaining 10 patients were freshly modified on the basis of the original bone tunnel. Seventeen patients used autogenous tendon revision, 7 patients used LARS ligament; 16 patients had cartilage injury. The Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and the Tegner sports rating score were used for functional evaluation before operation, at 1 year after operation, and at last follow-up. The Likert satisfaction score was recorded at last follow-up.ResultsPatients were followed up with a median time of 47 months and IQR was (32, 61) months. The Lysholm score, IKDC score, and Tegner sports rating score were significantly improved at 1 year after operation and at last follow-up when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between at last follow-up and at 1 year after operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the median Likert satisfaction score was 4.0 and IQR was (3.0, 4.5). According to the presence or absence of cartilage damage and the type of graft, the above scores at last follow-up were compared between the groups, and the differences were not significant (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 2 patients had graft fractures due to trauma again, and autogenous iliac bones were taken to fill the bone tunnel, and the second stage was revised; the rest of the patients recovered satisfactorily.ConclusionWith preoperative identification of the cause of ACL reconstruction failure, the stability and function of knee joint can be significantly improved by selecting appropriate bone tunnels and grafts during the revision and by active rehabilitation exercises.
Objective To evaluate the clinical valueof the revision of total hip replacement(THR), to analyse the reason of the rev isions, and to discuss the main difficulties and measures to manage it.Methods From June 1998 to January 2002, 15 cases (15 hips) were revised on totalhip replacement. The reasons for revision in the cases were as follows:failure of primary operative techenique, loosening and sinking of the components, displacement of the prosthesis, erosion of the acetabulum, as well as fracture of the femoral stem. The main difficulties of the revision were:poor health condition of the patients; the remove of the prosthesis of the primary THR,especially the broken femoral stem and the cements; the loss of localbone. The measures to remove the broken femoral stem were described.ResultsAll cases were followed up 2.4 years on average: 2 patients died from heart disease and cerebrovascular disease respectively, while the good results were achieved in the others.No infection, dislocation, loosening, and other complications occurred. The good effects were related with following factors:mild degree of illness; no severe bone defect; most of the first femoral head replacement.Conclusion The revision of THRis a more difficult operation, so that the special instrument and equipment andoperative experience are required.
Objective To study the effect of all-coated long stem prosthesis associated with allograft in revision total hip replacement (THR). Methods From January 1997 to January 2004, 20 patients with non-infectious loosened implant after primary THR were treated. There were 12 males and 8 females with a mean age of 65 years (58-77 years). The average period between primary THR and revision THR was 12 years (3-18 years). According to classification of Paprosky, there were10 cases of type II, 6 cases of type IIIA, 3 cases of type IIIB and 1 case of type IV. All-coated long stem prosthesis was used in all cases. Impacting bone grafting was done in 12 cases and impacting bone grafting associated with cortical strut grafting in 8 cases. The mean amount of morsel ized bone was 20 g (5-35 g), the length of cortical bone was 10-22 cm. Results All the incisions got heal ing by first intension. All patients were followed up for an average period of 36 months (16-48 months). Dislocation occurred at 5 days after operation and was cured with closed reduction and traction in 1 case. There was significant difference (P lt; 0.05) in the mean Harris score between preoperation (50.0 ± 2.3) and postoperation (90.0 ± 2.5). The X-ray checking showed that continuous radiolucent l ine of 3 mm occurred in 1 case, prosthesis subsidence of 5 mm and 7 mm in 2 cases and that no bone absorption was observed. Seven cases of cortical bone grafting union was achieved within 3 years except 1 case of cortical bone un-union. Conclusion It can obtained the initial stabil ization of prosthesis to use all-coated long stem prosthesis associated with allograft in revision THR to treat femur bone defect after THR. The short-term effects of the cl inical and X-ray checking are satisfactory, but future effect is to be observed.
fter total hip replacement ,massive bone defect occured freqently due to wearing and loosening of the prcathesis.The use of deep-freezing allograft to su pport a new implant was an attractive solution. Deep-freezing decreased the immune antigenicity of the transplanted allograft.From 1972 to 1990. the deep-freezing allografts were used in rcvision total hip replacement in 212 cases,in which 187 cases(198 hips) were followed-up for over 1 year.The general effective rate was 85%....
ObjectiveTo investigate the short- and mid-term effectiveness of revision hip arthroplasty by using impaction bone allograft and acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects.MethodsA clinical data of 42 patients (44 hips) with severe acetabular defects between February 2011 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty by using impaction bone allograft and acetabular components. Cemented cup (24 cases, 24 hips) and non-cemented cup (18 cases, 20 hips) were used in the revision surgery. There were 17 males and 25 females with an average age of 62.8 years (range, 22-84 years). The interval between the first total hip arthroplasty and revision was 2.5-12.0 years (mean, 8.3 years). The patients were accepted revision surgery for prosthesis aseptic loosening in 32 hips (31 cases) and the periprosthetic infection in 12 hips (11 cases). Twenty-nine hips (28 cases) were Paprosky type ⅢA and 15 hips (14 cases) were type ⅢB. The preoperative Harris score was 22.25±10.31 and the height of hip rotation center was (3.67±0.63) cm and the length difference of lower limbs was (3.41±0.64) cm.ResultsThe operation time was 130-245 minutes (mean, 186 minutes) and the intraoperative blood loss was 600-2 400 mL (mean, 840 mL). The postoperative drainage volume was 250-1 450 mL (mean, 556 mL). Superficial infection of the incision occurred in 1 case, and the incisions healed by first intention in the other patients. All patients were followed up 6-87 months, with an average of 48.6 months. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 85.85±9.31, which was significantly different from the preoperative score (t=18.563, P=0.000). Imaging examination revealed that the allogeneic bone gradually fused with the host bone, and no obvious bone resorption was observed. At last follow-up, the height of the hip rotation center was (1.01±0.21) cm, which was significantly different from the preoperative level (t=17.549, P=0.000); the length difference of lower limbs was (0.62±0.51) cm, which was significantly different from the preoperative level (t=14.211, P=0.000). The Harris score in the cemented group and non-cemented group increased significantly at last follow-up. The height of the hip rotation center decreased, and the hip rotation centers of both groups were within the Ranawat triangle zone. The length difference of the lower limbs also decreased, and the differences in all indexes were significant between pre- and post-operation (P<0.05). There was significant difference in the height of the hip rotation center between groups (t=2.095, P=0.042), but there was no significant difference in the Harris score and the length difference of lower limbs between groups (P>0.05).ConclusionFor severe acetabular defect (Paprosky type Ⅲ), the hip can be reconstructed with the impaction bone allograft and cemented or non-cemented components in revision hip arthroplsty. The short- and mid-term effectiveness are satisfactory.
Objective To analyze the main reasons of acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to disscuss the prevention and management. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed from 19 patients undergoing revision for acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary THA between January 2003 and June 2010. There were 11 males and 8 females, aged from 55 to 79 years (mean, 67.2 years). The locations were lefthip in 9 cases and right hip in 10 cases. The cementless hip prosthesis was used in 12 cases and cement hip rosthesis in 7 cases. The revisions were performed at 3 weeks to 6 months after primary THA. The reasons of early failure were analyzed. Both the coverage rate of acetabulum-bone and the Harris hip score were compared between pre- and post-revision. Results The main reason of acetabular component initial instabil ity after primary THA may be unsuitable treatment of acetabulum, improper selection of acetabular component, and incorrect place angle of acetabular component. Sciatic nerve palsy occurred in 1 case and recovered at 7 weeks after revision. Sl ight fracture of the acetabulum in 1 case and healed at 3 months after revision. All incisions healed by first intention. No infection, vessel injury, displacement of acetabular component, or deep vein thrombosis occurred. The patients were followed up 11-73 months (mean, 28 months). At last follow-up, no acetabular component instabil ity was observed. The coverage rate of acetabulum-bone was increased from 67.9% ± 5.5% before revision to 87.7% ± 5.2% after revision, showing significant difference (t=11.592，P=0.003). The Harris hip score at last follow-up (84.4 ± 4.6) was significantly higher than that at pre-revision (56.5 ± 9.3) (t=11.380，P=0.005). Conclusion Detailed surgical plan, proper choice of component, correct place angle and elaborative planning, and proficient surgical skill are necessary to achieve the initial stability of acetabular component in THA．
Objective To investigate the analgesic effect of locally injecting a “cocktail” analgesia containing a high-dose compound betamethasone during revision hip arthroplasty, and also to study the usage of opioid drugs. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 180 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the hip prosthesis between January 2015 and December 2021. Among them, 95 patients received intraoperative injection of “cocktail” analgesia containing high-dose compound betamethasone (group A), and 85 patients received intraoperative injection of traditional “cocktail” analgesia (group B). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus between the two groups (P>0.05). The hospital stay, use of opioid drugs within 72 hours, and the incidence of adverse reactions within 72 hours after operation [including nausea and vomiting, insomnia, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), infection, etc.] were recorded and compared between the two groups. The pain relief of patients was evaluated using the static and dynamic visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation. The incidence of complications (including prosthesis re-loosening, hip joint dislocation, hip joint stiffness, limping, chronic pain, etc.) at 2 years after operation was recorded, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate the function at 2 years after operation. Results In group A, the utilization rate of opioid drugs within 72 hours after operation was significantly lower than that in group B (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, as well as the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, insomnia, DVT, and infection within 72 hours after operation (P>0.05). The VAS scores of both groups decreased with time, and the differences between different time points were significant (P<0.05). The static and dynamic VAS scores of group A were significantly lower than those of group B at 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in static and dynamic VAS scores between the two groups at 72 hours after operation (P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up 2-8 years, with an average of 5.73 years. At 2 years after operation, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the incidence of complications and HHS score (P>0.05). Conclusion“Cocktail” analgesia containing a high-dose compound betamethasone for early analgesia after revision hip arthroplasty can effectively reduce postoperative pain and the use of opioid drugs, but will not increase the incidence of infection and DVT after operation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the current problems and corresponding solutions regarding the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 27 patients with PJI who underwent two-stage revision with antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer between January 2001 and January 2013. There were 12 males and 15 females, with an average age of 62.7 years (range, 25-81 years). All arthroplasties were unilateral, including 19 hip PJI and 8 knee PJI. The mean duration from primary arthroplasty to PJI was 25 months (range, 3-252 months). After infection was controlled with the antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer combined with systematic antibiotics treatment, two-stage revision was performed. The effectiveness was evaluated. ResultsOne patient died of myocardial infarction at 2 days after surgery. Infection was controlled, and two-stage revision was successfully performed in 19 patients; deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 of 3 patients who experienced hip spacer fractures, which was cured after conservative management. The spacers were removed and bacteria-sensitive antibiotics was used because of recurrent infections after the first-stage surgery in 7 patients; 3 patients gave up treatment because infection was not controlled, 4 patients received revision after infection was controlled. Twenty-three patients were followed up 1-5 years (mean, 2.3 years). The average Harris hip score and KSS score at 1 years after revision were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). In the 8 patients with gram-negative or fungus infection, 7 were found to have recurrent infection after the first-stage surgery; in the 12 patients with gram-positive infection, no recurrent infection was found. Failed treatment was observed in 1 patient with gram-positive and gram-negative infections and 2 with fungus infection, respectively. ConclusionAntibiotic-impregnated cement spacer has a satisfactory effectiveness for PJI. However, complication of spacer fracture should be noted, especially hip spacers. If the pathogen is gram-negative bacteria or fungus, the implanted spacer may increase the possibility of recurrent infection.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of cemented polyethylene liner technique in hip revision.MethodsBased on inclusion criteria, the clinical data of 26 patients who were undergone hip revision between January 2011 and December 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 14 cases were treated with isolated liner exchange (group A) and 12 cases were treated with cemented polyethylene liner technique (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, the time from primary total hip arthroplasty to revision, and the preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The post-operative Harris score and complications were compared between 2 groups, and X-ray findings of the hip joint were recorded to review the position of hip components.ResultsAll patients were followed up 4.4-6.4 years (mean, 5.4 years). Except for two femoral fractures during the revision (1 in each group), there was no other complication in 2 groups. The hip pain relieved and the lame gait corrected in 2 groups. The hip’s function of 2 groups improved gradually after operation, with a better Harris score at 3 months and the best at last follow-up, compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris score at difference time points after operation between 2 group (P>0.05). X-ray films showed no dislocation, aseptic loosening, and other interface related complication.ConclusionFor the cases without the chance to do change liner, cemented polyethylene liner technique has a good effectiveness. But restrict patient selection should be considered before hip revision.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) printed trabecular metal pads for Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular defect in hip revision.MethodsBetween August 2014 and December 2015, the 3D printed trabecular metal pads were used to repair Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular defects and reconstruct the annular structure of the acetabulums in 5 cases of primary hip revision. There were 3 males and 2 females, aged from 50 to 72 years, with an average age of 66 years. The time from initial replacement to revision was 10 to 18 years, with an average of 14.4 years. The types of prostheses in primary replacement were non-cemented in 3 cases and cemented in 2 cases. The types of acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type ⅢA in 3 cases and Paprosky type ⅢB in 2 cases. The preoperative Harris score was 34.23±11.67. The height of rotation center of affected hip was (38.17±8.87) mm and the horizontal position was (35.62±9.12) mm.ResultsThe operation time was 120-180 minutes, with an average of 142 minutes. The intraoperative bleeding volume was 800-1 700 mL, with an average of 1 100 mL. Five patients were followed up 18-24 months (mean, 21 months). At last follow-up, the Harris score was 79.82±8.70, which was significantly higher than that before operation (t=16.991, P=0.000). At 1 week after operation, the abduction angle of acetabular cup was 38-42° (mean, 39.4 °) and the anteversion angle was 13-18 ° (mean, 14.6°). The height and horizontal position of rotation center of affected hip were (22.08±8.33) mm and (29.03±6.28) mm, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference when compared with those of healthy hip [(28.62±7.73), (27.29±4.22) mm] (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no complication such as prosthesis loosening, dislocation, or periprosthetic fracture.ConclusionIn hip revision, 3D printed trabecular metal pads can repair Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular defect, reconstruct the structure of acetabulum, provide a stable supporting structure for the acetabular cup, reconstruct the relatively normal rotation center of the hip joint, avoid iatrogenic bone loss, and achieve satisfactory functional recovery of the hip. The long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.