Objective To explore the effectiveness of computer-aided technology in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis combined with stiffness under arthroscopy. Methods The clinical data of 32 patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis combined with stiffness between June 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 22 males and 10 females with an average age of 53.4 years (range, 31-71 years). X-ray film and three-dimensional CT examinations showed osteophytes of varying degrees in the elbow joint. Loose bodies existed in 16 cases, and there were 7 cases combined with ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome. The median symptom duration was 2.5 years (range, 3 months to 22.5 years). The location of bone impingement from 0° extension to 140° flexion of the elbow joint was simulated by computer-aided technology before operation and a three-dimensional printed model was used to visualize the amount and scope of impinging osteophytes removal from the anterior and posterior elbow joint to accurately guide the operation. Meanwhile, the effect of elbow joint release and impinging osteophytes removal was examined visually under arthroscopy. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and elbow range of motion (extension, flexion, extension and flexion) were compared between before and after operation to evaluate elbow function. Results The mean operation time was 108 minutes (range, 50-160 minutes). All 32 patients were followed up 9-18 months with an average of 12.5 months. There was no other complication such as infection, nervous system injury, joint cavity effusion, and heterotopic ossification, except 2 cases with postoperative joint contracture at 3 weeks after operation due to the failure to persist in regular functional exercises. Loose bodies of elbow and impinging osteophytes were removed completely for all patients, and functional recovery was satisfactory. At last follow-up, VAS score, MEPS score, extension, flexion, flexion and extension range of motion significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). Conclusion Arthroscopic treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis combined with stiffness using computer-aided technology can significantly reduce pain, achieve satisfactory functional recovery and reliable effectiveness.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the AO anatomical locking compression plate in treating type C distal humeral fracture. Methods Between July 2008 and April 2009, 13 cases of type C distal humeral fracture were treated with the AO anatomical locking compression plates. There were 5 males and 8 females with an average age of 52.1 years (range, 24-80 years). Fractures were caused by tumbl ing in 7 cases, by traffic accident in 4 cases, and by fall ing from height in2 cases. According to Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 3 cases of type C1, 6 cases of type C2, and 4 cases of type C3. Two cases compl icated by ulnar nerve injuries, 1 by radial nerve injury, 2 by fractures of ulnar olecranon, 3 by fractures of other parts of extremities, and 6 by osteoporosis. The time from injury to hospital ization ranged from 3 hours to 4 days (0.9 day on average). Results All the incisions achieved heal ing by first intention. Thirteen cases were followed up 12 to 21 months with an average of 15.9 months. According to the X-ray films, unions were achieved both at fracture site and the olecranon osteotomy site with a heal ing time of 8 to 13 weeks (10 weeks on average). The function of elbows recovered from 3 to 32 weeks (10 weeks on average). No fixation failure, myositis ossifican, delayed union, or malunion occurred during the follow-up. The Mayo Elbow Performance score ranged from 75 to 100 with an average score of 95.8; the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 92.3%. Conclusion The AO anatomical locking compression plate has a good fixation in treating type C distal humeral fracture. Through the approach of olecranon osteotomy, it is easy to get anatomical reduction, stable fixation, and early exercise.
Objective To review the injury mechanism and the treatment progress of terrible triad of the elbow, and to analyze the direction of further research. Methods Related literature concerning terrible triad of the elbow was extensively reviewed and comprehensively analyzed. Results The main treatment of terrible triad of the elbow is operation. The ultimate goal of treatment is to reconstruct sufficient stability of the elbow. The treatment includes fixation of the coronoid by suture, screw or plate; fixation of radial head by screw and plate, partial or complete replacement of the radial head; fixation of lateral collateral ligament and the medial collateral ligament by bone suture or anchors and the application of the external fixator. These surgical treatments have their own indications and advantages, most get satisfactory results. Conclusion Generally, surgery is needed to maintain the stability of the elbow for patients of terrible triad elbow. However, medial ligament repair or not, the choice of approach, and mechanism of injury still need further study.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation for repair of lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) in treatment of terrible triad of elbow (TTE).MethodsA clinical data of 50 patients with TTE between June 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The LCLC was repaired with transosseous tunnel fixation in 22 patients (transosseous tunnel fixation group) and with drilling fixation in 28 patients (drilling fixation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, fracture side, time from injury to admission, coronoid process fracture classification, radial head fracture classification, and TTE classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded. At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow performance system (MEPS) score, range of motion of elbow joint, and Broberg-Morrey classification were recorded.ResultsThe operation of two groups were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two group (P>0.05). The follow-up time was (24.43±6.84) months in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and (21.55±6.16) months in the drilling fixation group, and the difference was not significant (t=1.534, P=0.132). X-ray films showed that the coronoid process and radial head fractures in the two groups healed, and there was no significant difference in the healing time (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the flexion-extension activity, rotation activity, MEPS score, and Broberg-Morrey grading (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no re-dislocation or instability of the elbow joint. The incidence of complication was 28.57% (8/28) in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and 27.27% (6/22) in the drilling fixation group, showing no significant difference (χ2=2.403, P=0.121).ConclusionBoth transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation can achieve good results in repair of LCLC for TTE.
ObjectiveTo investigate the advantages and effectiveness of anterior neurovascular interval approach for fixation of ulna coronoid process fracture. MethodsBetween February 2011 and April 2015, 8 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by anterior neurovascular interval approach. There were 5 males and 3 females, aged from 14 to 62 years (mean, 34 years). Fractures were caused by falling in 5 cases, traffic accident in 2 cases, and crashing in 1 case. The time between injury and operation was 1-6 days (mean, 3.5 days). According to Adams classification, there were 4 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, 2 cases of type IV, and 1 case of type V. In 1 patient with joint instability, lateral collateral ligament repair was given through another incision after fixation of coroniod fracture and the hinged external fixator, and plast splin was used to fix in the other patients; function exercise was done after removal of external fixtion. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, and no complications of neurovascular injury and deep infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6-48 months (mean, 22 months). The healing time of fracture was 8-15 weeks (mean, 12.6 weeks). Mild myositis ossificans occurred in 1 case. The flexionextension arc of the elbow was (125.00±7.07)° and the forearm rotation was (135.00±7.07)°, showing no significant difference when compared with those of normal side[(126.88±7.53)° and (139.38±8.21)°] (t=0.469, P=0.654; t=2.198, P=0.054). According to Morrey's scale, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases; the excellent and good rate was 100%. ConclusionAnterior neurovascular interval approach for reduction and internal fixation of ulna coroniod fractures has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma, and larger operative field. It can be used alone or combined with other surgical approaches.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical significance of anterior median approach combined with lateral approach to the elbow joint in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 63 cases who used the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach (group A, n=36) or the medial and lateral approach of the elbow (group B, n=27) in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow between March 2014 and July 2019. The operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative Mayo score of the elbow were compared between the two surgical approaches.ResultsThe operation time of group A and group B was (93.78±7.78) and (106.93±10.35) min, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups completed operations successfully, without vascular or nerve injury. All the wounds healed by first intention. No redislocation or reoperation occurred. Ten months after operation, there was no significant difference in the excellence rate of Mayo score of the elbow (83.3% vs. 85.2%) or postoperative complication rate (16.7% vs. 14.8%) between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach and the medial and lateral elbow approach for the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow are equivalent to the postoperative elbow function recovery. The operation time of the former is shorter than that of the latter, and the anterior approach reveals the coronal process intuitively and sufficiently. In the case that there is no medial ligament injury, the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach can be preferred.
Objective To evaluate the short-term results of reconstruction of stiff elbow under arthroscopy technique in patients with elbow osteoarthritis. Methods Between March 2006 and March 2009, 38 cases of elbow osteoarthritis with contracture were treated under arthroscopy technique. There were 26 males and 12 females with an average age of 47.8 years (range, 26-66 years). Unilateral side was affected in all cases, including 13 cases at the left side and 25 at the right side with 30 patients on the dominant side. The disease duration was more than 6 months. X-ray examination showed that 31 patients had free body, and 28 had osteophytosis. Seven patients had ulnar neuritis. The arthroscopy functional reconstruction was performed including synovectomy, free body removal, and osteocapsular arthroplasty. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 6-10 months (mean, 8 months). Transient radial nerve injury occurred in 1 case, re-adhesion of elbow joint in 1 case, and heterotopic ossification of brachial ulnar joint in 1 case at 6 months after operation. In 1 patient compl icated by ulnar neuritis, the disorder of ulnar nerve was not improved, nervous symptoms disappeared after the re-operation of ulnar nerve relaxation after 2 months. The range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at 3 and 6 months had significant differences when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.05), but had no significant difference between two time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). According to MEPS functional criteria, the results were classified as excellent in 20 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case at 6 months after operation, and the excellent and good rate was 92.1%. No new free body or osteophytosis occurred after operation by X-ray examination. Conclusion The arthroscopy is an effective technique to reconstruct the function of stiff elbow, which can obviously improve the range of motion and the function of elbow joint, and has good short-term results.