ObjectiveTo explore the influence of individualized psychological nursing in perioperative patients with high complex anal fistula on their perioperative anxiety, depression, pain, and recovery. MethodsFifty-seven perioperative patients with high anal fistula treated between May 2011 and March 2012 were randomly divided into observation group (n=28) and control group (n=29). Patients in the control group were treated with traditional way of psychological nursing intervention, while patients in the observation group were given individualized psychological nursing intervention. Then, we compared the two groups of patients in terms of their perioperative anxiety, depression, and pain as well as the length of hospital stay, hospital expenses, wound healing time, and patients' quality of life. ResultsOn the day of surgery and on day 7 after surgery, anxiety, depression and pain scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). Length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses of the observation group were significantly shorter or less than the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant diTherence between the two groups in postoperative wound healing time (P>0.05). The quality of life score for both the two groups of patients after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant diTherence between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionIndividualized psychological nursing can relieve perioperative adverse psychological reactions such as anxiety, depression and pain, and promote postoperative recovery for patients with high complex anal flstula.
Objective To trace and review the treatment of complex anal fistula so as to consider whether current procedures and therapies might offer a better choice. Methods Through the literature collected, with the difficulties and contradictions of the treatment of complex anal fistula as the starting point, the currently widely used seton management, the development and deficiency of biological therapy and sphincter preserving surgery, and the change of treatment model of complex anal fistula were reviewed. The research progress and application prospect of intersphincteric fistula ligation was focus attented. Results The treatment of complex anal fistula would be not too much emphasis of healing or radical cure, and more attention to the anus function, shape, fine feeling, and quality of life, has become a consensus. The seton management remained an useful therapy for the treatment of complicated anal fistula through continuous improvement and development, in despite of it has postoperative relapse or mild to moderate anal incontinence. Biotherapy relied on its minimal invasion rising in recent years especially at abroad, but it is limited wider application in China because of its high cost, unstable efficacy, and high recurrence rate. Sphincter-preserving operation always attracts attentions particularly under the background of invasive treatment. It has been already established about efficacy and security of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract as a novel procedure, which possessed an excellent advantage for protecting anal continence. Conclusion The ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is a promising procedure, which tends to be superior than fistulotomy and seton management, may become a first-line treatment of complex anal fistula.
ObjectiveTo investigate the long-term efficacy of intersphincter approach combined with virtual solid and hanging line in the treatment of posterior high complex anal fistulas and risk factors for recurrence. Methods A total of 167 patients with posterior high complex anal fistula treated in our hospital from April 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively included. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into observation group (n=88) and control group (n=79). The observation group was treated with the combination of virtual solid and hanging line via intersphincter approach, while the control group was treated with cutting and wire hanging drainage. The general clinical data, the height of the internal fistula opening and the anorectal pressure before and after 1, 2 and 3 months were compared between the two groups. The patients were divided into recurrence group (n=50) and non-recurrence group (n=117) according to the recurrence situation during the follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative anal fistula recurrence, and Kaplan-Meier method was ued to draw relapse-free curve. ResultsCompared with the control group, the observation group had longer operative time, shorter wound healing time and shorter hospital stay (P<0.05). At 1, 2 and 3 months after operation, the anal resting pressure and maximum anal retraction pressure in the observation group were significantly increased, while the height of the inner mouth was significantly decreased, with statistical significance (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, gender, regular dressing change to hospital after discharge, history of anal fistula surgery, clarity of internal opening and treatment methods between the recurrence group and the non-recurrence group (P<0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence of patients with posterior high complicated anal fistula were that they didn’t regularly go to the hospital for dressing change after discharge, had a history of anal fistula operation, had unclear internal orifice and underwent thread-drawing drainage (P<0.05). The cumulative relapse-free rate of patients in the observation group and the control group was 84.58% and 67.73% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionsThe treatment of posterior high complex anal fistulas by intersphincter approach combined with virtual solid and hanging line has a good effect in protecting anal function and promoting wound healing. After discharge, the factors affecting postoperative recurrence in patients with posterior high complex anal fistula are not regularly changed dressing, history of anal fistula surgery, unclear internal mouth, cutting and wire hanging drainage, which should be paid attention to.
目的 观察医用伤口修复液对肛瘘患者术后创面修复的临床疗效。方法 将78例行手术治疗的肛瘘患者随机分为2组，试验组39例，予以医用伤口修复液纱条换药，1次/d，至创面愈合；对照组39例，予以无菌凡士林纱布换药，1次/d，至创面愈合。比较2组患者的创面渗液明显减少时间、出血情况，换药时创面疼痛评分及创面愈合时间。结果 试验组的创面疼痛评分、创面渗液明显减少时间、创面愈合时间及发生创面出血的比例均短于或低于对照组，其差异均具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。所有患者均未发生不良反应。结论 医用伤口修复液对肛瘘患者术后创面修复具有较好的临床疗效。
ObjectiveTo investigate long-term efficacy of infliximab (IFX) combined with seton placement in treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn disease (CD) and to analyze factors affecting its clinical healing and recurrence.MethodsThe patients with perianal fistulizing CD underwent the IFX combined with seton placement therapy from July 2010 to January 2017 were collected from the HIS database of the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The healing and recurrence of perianal fistulizing CD were counted and their influencing factors were analyzed.ResultsA total of 103 patients with perianal fistulizing CD were included in the study. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 64 patients (62.1%) had a complete fistula healing, 34 patients (33.0%) relapsed. The cumulative recurrence rates of fistula in the 1, 3, and 5 years was 21.8%, 32.6%, and 37.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the Montreal classification B1 ［HR=3.987, 95% CI (1.640, 9.694), P=0.023］ and without abscess ［HR=2.724, 95% CI (1.101, 6.740), P=0.030］ were positively associated with the long-term healing of fistula, and the IFX maintenance treatment >3 times ［HR=5.497, 95% CI (1.197, 25.251), P=0.028］ was a risk factor for the recurrence of the fistula.ConclusionsLong-term healing rate of fistula by IFX combined with seton placement therapy is higher. Montreal classification B1, without abscess, and IFX maintenance treatment less than 3 times are expected to have a better long-term efficacy.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of anal fistula clip (AFC) in the treatment of anal fistula, and to evaluate its safety. MethodsA historical cohort study method was conducted. Eighty-three patients with glandular transsphincteric anal fistula in the Xuzhou Central Hospital from September 2018 to May 2021 were collected, of which 42 patients underwent the AFC treatment (AFC group), 41 patients underwent the endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) treatment (ERAF group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of anus pain on postoperative day 1, 3, and 7, wound healing time, Wexner incontinence score of anal function on postoperative month 6, and clinical efficacy (healing and failure) were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in both groups. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the AFC group were shorter or less than those in the ERAF group (P<0.05). No complications such as internal opening infection and bleeding occurred in the two groups. There were no statistical differences in the VAS score of postoperative anus pain at all time point between the two groups (P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 22 months. There was no statistical difference in the wound healing time between the two groups (P>0.05). The Wexner score of anal function in the AFC group was lower than that in the ERAF group (P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference between after operation and before operation (Z=–1.751, P=0.089) in the AFC group, while that in the ERAF group after operation was higher than before operation (Z=–1.859, P=0.014). The healing rate had no statistical difference between the AFC group and ERAF group (85.7% versus 77.5%, χ2=0.925, P=0.336). Conclusion From the results of this study, the AFC is safe and effective in treatment of anal fistula, with the advantages of relatively simple operation, less bleeding during operation, lighter postoperative pain, and good protection of anal function.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety for video-assisted anal fistula therapy in the treatment of complex anal fistula. Methods The databases of CKNI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were retrieved from the time of database establishment to may 31 2022. The two researchers independently screened the literatures and evaluated the quality of the literatures that met the inclusion criteria according to the research purpose and quality evaluation criteria. Meta-analysis were performed with the Revman 5.4.1 software. Results A total of 11 articles and 977 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the video-assisted group were superior to the traditional incision and thread hanging operation group in improved the cure rate [RR=1.14, 95%CI (1.04, 1.24), P<0.05], accelerated wound healing [MD=–10.40, 95%CI (–13.64, –7.17), P<0.05], protected the anal function after surgery [MD=–1.32, 95%CI (–1.85, –0.79), P＜0.05], relieved postoperative 24-hour pain [MD=–1.23, 95%CI (–1.60, –0.86), P＜0.05], shorten the operative time and hospital stay [MD=–9.46, 95%CI (–17.16, –1.75), P<0.05; MD=–3.87, 95%CI (–5.90, –1.84), P<0.05], reduced intraoperative bleeding [MD=–14.24, 95%CI (–17.49, –10.99), P<0.05] and the incidence of postoperative complications [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.56), P<0.05], which difference were statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of 1-year after operation [OR=0.64, 95%CI (0.33, 1.23), P>0.05]. Conclusions Video-assisted anal fistula treatment is a safe and effective sphincter preserving operation for the treatment of complex anal fistula, which is superior to the traditional incision and thread hanging operation. However, due to the limitations and publication bias of the included literature, more prospective, large sample, multi center randomized controlled trial are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy.