Four hundred and eighty two paients suffering from intrahepatic bile duct stone undergoing lobectomy and segmental resection (from 1975 to 1994,9) has reported. 63% of the patient in this group underwent 1-5 operations, including different types of biliary-intestinal anastomosis (21.6%). 482 cases underwent different types of hepatectomy, including left lateral-lobetomy 321 cases (66.6%),left hemihepatectomy 80 cases(16.6%), right hemihepatectomy 19 cases (3.9%), and multiple segmental resections 39 cases (8.1%, including Ⅴ+Ⅷ 11 cases, Ⅵ+Ⅶ 28 cases). Other type hepatectomy combined with guadrate lobectomy 20 cases (4.1%). Postoperative complication rate was 10.2%, including diliary fistula. hemobilia and subdiaphragmatic and resectional surface infectioin, 85% of the patients were followed up with an excellent result of 88%. The authors emphsize that hepatic lobectomy nad segmental resection is the core of treatment and selection of operative methods depends on clinical-patholigic types of the disease.
目的 探讨与评价术中B超定位下经肝胆管取石在肝内胆管结石治疗中的手术指征及优劣性。方法 总结2002～2006 年29例肝内胆管结石行肝叶切除+经肝胆管取石患者的临床资料,对其手术效果及并发症进行分析。结果 无胆管损伤及手术死亡病例, 并发症发生率为37.93%，残石率为10.34%。结论 术中B超定位下经肝胆管取石结合肝叶切除对肝内胆管结石是一种较好的治疗方式，主要适用于Ⅱb型肝内胆管结石患者。
Objective To investigate the risk factors for delayed discharge following same-day choledochoscopic lithotomy for residual stones after biliary tract surgery. Methods The clinical data of 607 patients with residual stone after biliary tract surgery admitted to the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University between July 2019 and July 2022 were retrospectively collected. According to whether the patients were discharged on the same day, they were divided into same-day discharge group and delayed discharge group. The differences in gender, age, first surgical procedure (surgical method, hepatectomy or not, intraoperative choledochoscopy or not), choledochoscopic lithotomy (first choledochoscopy or not, lithotomy method, number of stones and site of stones), operation duration, hospital stay, hospital cost, and postoperative complications (fever, poor drainage, and T tube dislodgement) between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Multiple logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for delayed discharge following same-day choledochoscopic lithotomy. Results All patients were admitted and discharged within 24 h, among them, 557 cases (91.8%) were discharged on the same day and 50 cases (8.2%) were discharged the next day. The results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that choledochoscopy for the first time [odds ratio (OR)=2.359, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.303, 4.273), P=0.005], lithotomy after electrohydraulic lithotripsy [OR=1.857, 95%CI (1.013, 3.402), P=0.045], and multiple stones (number of stones ≥2) [OR=2.741, 95%CI (1.194, 6.288), P=0.017] were independent risk factors for delayed discharge. Conclusion The operation of same-day choledochoscopic lithotomy is mature, and choledochoscopy for the first time, lithotomy after electrohydraulic lithotripsy, and multiple stones (number of stones ≥2) are independent risk factors for delayed discharge.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo evaluate the advances in minimally invasive surgery treatment for hepatolithiasis. MethodsLiteratures about the advances in minimally invasive surgery treatment for hepatolithiasis were collected and reviewed. ResultsHepatectomy and bile duct exploration using laparoscopy can get better effect. Fibrocholedochoscopy play an important role in the course of operation and after operation for hepatolithiasis. ConclusionThe individualization treatment program should be used for hepatolithiasis. Association application of multipathway minimally invasive operation, such as laparoscopy, fibrocholedochoscopy and so on, can increase the cure rate of hepatolithiasis.
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ureteroscope in cholelithiasis treated by laparoscopic surgery. Methods The clinical data of 36 patients admitted because of hepatolithus with ureteroscope combination in laparoscopic surgery from February 2007 to September 2009 in Guidong People’s Hospital of Guangxi were analyzed retrospectively. Results In 33 cases, stones were removed once by ureteroscope in laparoscopic surgery with residual stones (in 3 cases residual stone were removed secondarily through T tube) and the other 3 cases were transferred to laparotomy forcedly due to bleeding of biliary duct and vessels of porta hepatis and tearing of bile duct. During operation, blood loss was 30-280 (94.51±54.70) ml; operation time was 110-260 (147.22±48.45) min; recovery time of bowel movement was 1-3 (2.03±0.76) d; postoperative hospitalization time was 6-13 (7.12±1.65) d (some discharged with T tube); the time of patients of T tubes pulled out was 28-45 (38.92±6.52) d. Bile leakage happened in 1 case and infection of biliary tract in 1 case, no complications such as biliary stricture or bile duct bleeding were found after operation. Conclusions Treatment of intrahepatic bile duct or a single extra-hepatic sand-like stones with ureteroscopy usage in laparoscopic surgery is feasible and less invasive. It is a minimally invasive treatment for intra- or extra-hepatic stones due to rapidly postoperative rehabilitation.
目的 探讨腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术仪治疗肝胆管结石的安全性及治疗效果。 方法 回顾分析2008年7月－2012年6月183例胆道结石患者，行腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石仪治疗或单纯经内镜Oddi括约肌切开取石治疗的临床资料。87例患者在术中均应用微爆破碎石仪碎石（微爆破组），96例患者行单纯经内镜Oddi括约肌切开术或经内镜乳头切开术碎石（对照组）。 结果 微爆破组碎石成功率100%，结石取净率85.06%（74/87），微爆破组的碎石时间、平均住院时间、平均住院总费用、并发症发生率均明显低于对照组（P＜0.05）。 结论 腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术在治疗肝胆管结石病方面，具有微创、安全、经济有效的优点，能降低结石残留率及取石次数，值得临床推广。