Objective To investigate the influence of cationic liposomemediated endostatin gene on colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Methods Animal model for colorectal carcinoma liver metastasis were established. The plasmid expressing endostatin genelipofectAMINE were injected in vein. Results After cationic liposomemediated endostatin gene were injected in vein, the incidence of liver metastasis and mean numbers of liver tumors were decreased, survival time of animal was significantly longer. Conclusion Intravenous injection of cationic liposomemediated endostatin gene can control the development of colorectal cancer liver metastasis effectively.
ObjectiveTo evaluate effect of RAS gene mutation after liver metastasis resection on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis. MethodsA comprehensive and systematic literature search in the PubMed and other databases was conducted, with the final search ending on January 5, 2022. The impact of RAS gene mutation after liver metastasis resection on survival of patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis was analyzed by the Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.3 software, meanwhile which were analyzed according to subgroups, including study type (retrospective and prospective studies), region (Asian and European), and number of RAS gene mutation sites (>2 and ≤2). ResultsA total of 26 studies with 13 356 patients were included. The integrated analysis results showed that the patients with RAS mutations had statistically shorter OS [HR=1.54, 95%CI (1.43, 1.65), P<0.001] and DFS [HR=1.32, 95%CI (1.19, 1.44), P<0.001] as compared with RAS wild-type. Except the 1-year overall survival rate, the 2–5-year overall survival rate and 1–5-year disease-free survival rate of patients with RAS gene mutation were statistically lower than those of patients with RAS wild-type (P<0.05). The results of subgroup analysis showed that no matter retrospective and prospective studies, as well as studies in Asian and European countries, it was found that the OS and DFS for patients with RAS gene mutation were shorter than those of patients with wild-type (P<0.05); At the same time, subgroup analysis of the number of RAS gene mutation sites showed that OS and DFS of patients with number of mutation sites >2 were shortened as compared with ≤2 (P<0.05). ConclusionFrom the overall analysis results, the survival of patients with RAS gene mutation after liver metastasis resection is worse than that of patients with RAS wild-type for patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis.
ObjectiveTo summarize current treatment methods and research advances of liver metastasis in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).MethodThe related literatures about treatment of liver metastasis in patients with GIST were collected and reviewed.ResultsGIST often occurred liver metastasis, which seriously affected the prognosis of patients. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment, radical resection combined with TKI was the first choice. In addition, radiofrequency ablation and interventional therapy could be selected according to the patient’s condition.ConclusionsComplete resection of tumor and TKI treatment can improve the prognosis and survival rate of GIST patients with liver metastasis. GIST patients with liver metastasis need multi-disciplinary and multi-mode combined treatment.
目的 分析门静脉系统三维解剖结构及其与左侧结直肠癌肝转移灶分布的关系。方法 选取2009年11月至2012年9月期间笔者所在医院行上腹部CT检查的181 例患者作为研究对象，观察其CT影像学资料并重建门静脉系统三维图像，进行门静脉系统解剖结构分型，并分析其中61例左侧结直肠癌伴肝转移患者的CT或MR二维图像及其临床资料，记录肿瘤原发部位，观察肝转移病灶的位置、数目以及门静脉系统的解剖类型。结果 肠系膜上静脉（SMV）和脾静脉（SV）汇合成门静脉主干（MPV），在肝门处分为门静脉右支（RPV）和门静脉左支（LPV） 进入肝脏（A型）者占83.98% （152/181），其中肠系膜下静脉（IMV）汇入SMV （A1亚型） 65例 （35.91%），IMV汇入SV （A2亚型）64例（35.36%），IMV汇入门静脉角（A3亚型） 23例（12.71%）；其他变异（B、C和D型）者29例，占16.02%。61例左侧结直肠癌伴肝转移患者中，IMV汇入门静脉角者12例，其肝转移灶均分布在肝左右叶（100%）；而IMV汇入SMV或SV者49例，其肝转移灶分布在肝左右叶者30例（61.22%），分布在肝左或右叶者19例（38.78%），两种IMV汇入门静脉类型其肝转移灶分布构成比的差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。在39例IMV汇入SV的患者中，肝内门静脉为2支型（A2亚型）者28例，其肝转移灶分布在肝左右叶者21例（75.00%），分布在肝左或右叶者7例（25.00%）；而肝内门静脉为3支型（B2＋C2亚型）的11例中，肝转移灶分布在肝左右叶者3例（27.27%），分布在肝左或右叶者8例（72.73%），两者的肝转移灶分布构成比的差异也有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。结论 门静脉系统的解剖结构复杂多变，与左侧结直肠癌肝转移病灶的分布密切相关。
ObjectiveTo explore the security and feasibility of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (SCRLM). MethodThe data of 36 patients underwent simultaneous surgery for SCRLM in the Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from March 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, and the perioperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity and survival were analyzed. ResultsThe surgical procedure of all 36 enrolled patients were accomplished. The operation time was (328.9±85.8) min. The intraoperative blood loss was 100 (50, 150) mL and 4 cases (11.1%) needed intraoperative transfusion. The time to first flatus was (2.9±0.8) d and the time to liquid diet was (3.2±1.0) d. The average postoperative VAS score was 1.9±0.3. The postoperative length of stay was (6.8±4.3) d, 5 (13.9%) cases developed postoperative complications, which were cured by conservative treatment. No severe complications and death occurred within 30 days after surgery. After a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 15 cases (41.7%) experienced recurrence or metastasis and 1 case (2.8%) died. The 1-, 2- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 89.8%, 55.0%, 29.2%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 100.0%, 87.5%, respectively. There was no significant differences in disease-free survival rates (χ2=1.675, P=0.196) and OS (χ2=0.600, P=0.439) between patients with (n=26) or without (n=10) neoadjuvant. ConclusionsSimultaneous laparoscopic surgery seems to be a secure and feasible strategy for patients with SCRLM, with considerable survival benefits and short-term outcomes including small incision, little bleeding, quick recovery and low complication rate. More high-quality clinical studies are desirable in the future to further confirm the efficacy and safety of this operation.
ObjectiveTo summarize the molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM), in order to provide new ideas for future treatment. MethodThe literatures about mechanism and treatment strategy of GCLM in recent years were searched and reviewed. ResultsMost patients with gastric cancer were in advanced stage or had developed distant metastases when they were first diagnosed, among which liver was the common site of metastasis. The complex molecular mechanisms of GCLM had not been fully clarified. Molecular mechanisms at different levels, including non-coding RNA, circulating tumor cells, exosomes, tumor microenvironment and signaling pathways, were relatively independent and interacted with each other, providing potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for GCLM. At present, the best treatment method for patients with GCLM was mainly divided into local and systemic treatment. The local treatment included surgical treatment, radiofrequency ablation and proton beam therapy, while the systemic treatment included systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, among which the targeted therapy and immunotherapy were the focus of recent research. ConclusionsThe mechanism of GCLM is the result of the interaction between tumor cells and the microenvironment at the site of metastasis. Understanding them is of great significance to guide clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there is no unified treatment standard for GCLM. To achieve the ideal treatment effect, we should not only rely on single therapy, but also adopt multi-disciplinary and individual therapy according to the specific disease status of patients and the nature of tumors.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the diagnostic value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) for liver metastases. MethodsWe searched databases including CNKI, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library from January 2011 to December 2014 to collect diagnostic tests about Gd-EOB-DTPA for liver metastases. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies by using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 studies from seven countries were included, involving 2 040 nodules from 701 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of Gd-EOB-DTPA for liver metastases were 0.92 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.95), 0.94 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.97), 14.51 (95%CI 8.01 to 26.28), 0.08 (95%CI 0.06 to 0.12), and 177.98 (95%CI 89.50 to 353.94), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of SROC was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95 to 0.98). The results of subgroup analysis showed that Gd-EOB-DTPA had better Sen in nodules >10 mm than the nodules ≤10 mm in diameter (>10 mm: pooled Sen=0.97, 95%CI 0.94 to 0.99; ≤10 mm: pooled Sen=0.75, 95%CI 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001); The 3.0T MR had better Sen in diagnosing liver metastases compared with 1.5T MR (3.0T: pooled Sen=0.95, 95%CI 0.92 to 0.97; 1.5T: pooled Sen=0.90, 95%CI 0.87 to 0.94; P<0.001). ConclusionGdEOB-DTPA is of value for the detection of liver metastases. In particular, it is of high sensitivity for the detection of nodules larger than 10 mm, and for the cases using 3.0T high-field MR system. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of different surgical methods on survival and relapse-free survival in colorectal liver metastases. MethodsClinical data of 71 cases of colorectal liver metastases who treated in PLA General Hospital from January 2002 to may 2013 were collected retrospectively, to analyzed the effect of different surgical methods on survival and relapse-free survival of this kind of cases. ResultsAll of primary lesions underwent radical resection. And for the liver metastases, 20 cases didn't received any intervention (non-intervention group), 20 cases underwent resection of liver metastases, 20 cases underwent radiofrequency ablation, and 11 cases underwent radiofrequency ablation and resection of liver metastases (all 61 cases who received intervention were classified to intervention group). Results of Cox proportional hazards model showed that, in the condition of controlling other confounding factors, intervention can improve the survival (HR=1.724, P=0.043) and relapse-free survival (HR=0.701, P=0.048) of cases of colorectal liver metastases, cases who received intervention had better survival situation and the relapse-free survival situation. ConclusionFor cases of colorectal liver metastases, in condition of radical operation for colorectal cancer, the intervention for liver metastases can prolong the survival time and relapse-free survival time.