目的 探讨小儿结肠系膜淋巴管瘤的诊断与治疗方法。方法 回顾性分析我院2006年1月至2011年12月期间手术治疗的5例小儿结肠系膜淋巴管瘤的临床资料。结果 3例诊断为腹腔包块性质待查的患儿，术中发现腹腔肿块来源于乙状结肠系膜，其中1例肿块侵犯到降结肠系膜达结肠脾曲而行左半结肠切除＋肠吻合术，另外2例行乙状结肠系膜淋巴管瘤切除＋部分乙状结肠切除＋肠吻合术；1例患儿诊断为急性化脓性阑尾炎合并乙状结肠系膜淋巴管瘤，行阑尾切除＋乙状结肠系膜淋巴管瘤切除＋肠吻合术，1例患儿诊断为乙状结肠系膜淋巴管瘤破裂并弥漫性腹膜炎，行乙状结肠系膜淋巴管瘤切除＋乙状结肠造瘘术，术后6个月后再行二期手术。5例患儿手术后恢复良好，未发生吻合口漏等并发症。术后随访5个月～5年， （2.3±1.1）年，1例失访，余均存活，仍在随访中，所有病例均未复发。结论 日常行阑尾手术中，应常规探查小肠、结肠；未进行肠道准备的结肠一期吻合手术中结肠灌洗可减少吻合口漏等并发症的发生率；腹腔感染严重的患儿结肠一期吻合不可取，结肠造瘘安全；小儿结肠系膜淋巴管瘤术前确诊困难，反复出现腹痛、腹部包块的患儿应想到结肠系膜淋巴管瘤的可能性，行充分的肠道准备后择期手术，手术是肠系膜淋巴管瘤唯一的治疗方法。
Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of the total mesorectal excision （TME） and intersphincteric resection （ISR） for ultra-low rectal cancer and anal sphincter preservation surgery for anorectal cancer， and to evaluate the short term efficacy and postoperative anal function. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of 86 cases with TME＋ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer from January 2009 to December 2010 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were performed. Results Eighty-six patients were successfully performed the operation， the lower edge of tumor from the anus was 1-5 cm （average 1.63cm）； tumor diameter was 2-7 cm （average 3.4cm）. The tumors were high differentiation in 4 cases， moderately differentiation in 60 cases，and poorly differentiation in 22 cases. The pTNM stages were stageⅠin 12 cases， stageⅡA in 11 cases， stage ⅡB in 15 cases， stage ⅢA in 2 cases， stage ⅢB in 23 cases， stage ⅢC in 16 cases， and stage Ⅳ in 7 cases. There were postoperative anastomotic leakage in 3 cases， perianal infection in 2 cases （1 case received reoperation with permanent colostomy because of pelvic peritoneal infection caused by perianal severe infections）. Anastomotic bleeding and anastomotic stenosis were of 2 cases respectively. Rectovaginal fistula， inflammatory ileus， urinary retention， and abdominal infection were of 1 case respectively. Eighty-six patients were followed-up for 12-24 months， the mean time was 18 months. Liver metastases was found in 1 case in 7 months after operation， 2 cases dead in the 7th month and 12th month after operation respectively. Local recurrence were found in 3 cases （3.5%） in 1 year after operation. The survival rate of 1-year was 97.7% （84/86）. The times of defecation was 1-5 times a day. The Kirwan’s score level on function of control defecation was 1-2 grade. Conclusions TME＋ISR for low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer is a viable， safe， and radical operation type for preservation of anus. The short term efficacy is satisfactory.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, radicality, and short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision （TME） in comparison with open procedure for the middle-lower rectal cancer. Methods From October 2005 to October 2008， 52 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer received laparoscopic TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma， while 46 patients underwent conventional open TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma. The operative procedures, clinicopathological data， and short-term and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. Results The other patients were successful in both groups in addition to 2 （3.8%） patients were converted to open procedure in laparoscopic TME group. There was no perioperative death in both groups. The intraoperative blood loss, the time for bowel movement retrieval （first flatus）， and the incision healing in laparoscopic TME group were better than that in open TME group （P＜0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in anastomotic leakage and pulmonary infection （P＞0.05）. Comparison of specimen, no significant differences were observed between two groups in negative distal margin and circumferential resection margin, number of lymph nodes resected, distance of distal resection margin to the tumor （P＞0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in cancer-related death, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 3-year survival rate （P＞0.05）. Conclusions Laparoscopic TME for middle-low rectal cancer is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive technique, and can achieve satisfactory oncological outcome, which provides similar short-term and mid-term outcome compared with the traditional open procedure.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of rectumaerated MSCT examination in diagnosis of mesorectal infiltration of rectal cancer and lymph node metastasis staging. MethodsFrom January 2010 to July 2010, the data of 68 patients with rectal cancer confirmed by pathology were analyzed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University. All the patients underwent rectumaerated MSCT preoperatively and postoperative pathology was taken as the gold standard for evaluation of the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive or negative predictive values of MSCT in diagnosis of mesorectal infiltration and lymph node metastasis.ResultsIn rectum-aerated MSCT scanning, rectum and sigmoid colon was fully expanded, perirectal fat space was clear between perirectal fat space and relatively high density rectal wall and very low density enteric cavity. For mesorectal infiltration of degree Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ, the accuracies were 92.6%（63/68）, 91.1%(62/68), and 95.6%(65/68), respectively; sensitivities were 91.2%(31/34), 85.0%(17/20), and 92.9%(13/14), respectively; specificities were 94.1%(32/34), 93.8%(45/48), and 96.3%(52/54), respectively; positive predictive values were 93.9%(31/33), 85.0%(17/20), and 86.7%(13/15), respectively; negative predictive values were 91.4%(32/35), 93.8%(45/48), and 98.1%(52/53), respectively. For lymph node metastasis in N0, N1, and N2, the accuracies were 92.6%(63/68）,85.3%(58/68）, and 92.6%(63/68）, respectively; sensitivities were 86.2%(25/29), 90.0%(27/30), and 66.7%(6/9), respectively; specificities were 97.4%(38/39), 81.6%(31/38), and 96.6%(57/59), respectively; positive predictive values were 96.2%(25/26), 79.4%(27/34), and 75.0%(6/8), respectively; negative predictive values were 90.5%(38/42), 92.1%(35/38), and 95.0%(57/60), respectively. ConclusionsRectumaerated MSCT scaning can clearly show the depth of rectal carcinoma infiltration in the mesorectum, and N staging of mesorectal lymph node metastasis of MSCT has a higher consistency with that of pathological staging. Rectumaerated MSCT scanning is an important referenced method for clinical preoperative staging and individualized chemotherapy regimen.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo detect the spreading scope of rectal cancer to mesorectum by RT-PCR using carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA as a marker and to investigate the excision scope of mesorectum in resection of rectal cancer. MethodsForty specimens from 40 rectal cancer patients who underwent curative operation was employed to detect the metastatic deposits scattered in the mesorectum by RT-PCR using CEA as a marker. ResultsNine of 40 (22.5%) specimens contained metastatic deposits scattered in the mesorectum. The metastasis was just within the range of 4cm mesorectum under the verge of tumor. The tumor spreading to mesorectum is correlated with Dukes stages，the infiltrated depth of bowel wall, tumor differentiation and tumor type(P＜0.05), and is not correlated with the size of tumor and the level of CEA(Pgt;0.05). ConclusionThe excision of mesorectum should be within the range of 5cm under the verge of tumor in surgical management of rectal cancer.
Objective To compare efficacy of laparoscopic and open duodenal circular drainage operation for superior mesenteric artery compressing syndrome (SMACS). Methods From December 2012 to December 2015, the clinical data of 23 cases of laparoscopic duodenal circular drainage operation (laparoscope group) and 28 cases of open duodenal circular drainage operation (open group) were analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative analgesics usage, postoperative the first exhaust time, postoperative the first feeding time, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative incidence of complications were compared. The patients were followed up to confirm the effect after the operation. Results There were no differences of the age, sex, and body weight index between the laparoscope group and the open group (P>0.05). The operation time had no significant difference between these two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the open group, the intraoperative bleeding was less (P<0.05), the postoperative ambulation time, postoperative the first exhaust time, postoperative the first feeding time, postoperative hospitalization time were shorter (P<0.05), the rates of postoperative analgesics usage, incision infection, pulmonary infection, and intestinal obstruction were lower (P<0.05) in the laparoscope group. The rates of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding, and total postoperative complications rate had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 8–36 months. The clinical symptoms disappeared and the body weight increased to normal level in the two groups. Conclusions Preliminary results of in this study show that laparoscopic duodenal circular drainage operation in treatment of SMACS has some advantages such as less trauma, faster recovery, fewer complications and shorter hospitalization time. Laparoscopy will be an ideal choice for treatment of SMACS.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for the middle-lower rectal cancer in municipal hospital.MethodsThe pathological data of 94 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer (49 cases underwent laparoscopic TME, while 45 cases received open TME), who treated in The First People’s Hospital of Ziyang from Jan. 2015 to Jun. 2017, were retrospectively collected and analyzed.ResultsTwo patients (4.1%) in laparoscopy group were converted to open surgery. Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had significantly less volume of intraoperative bleeding, shorter abdominal incision, earlier time to the first flatus and liquid diet, and lower rate of 30-day postoperative complication (P<0.05), but had longer operative time (P=0.033). While there were no significant difference on postoperative stay, the specimen length, distal margin, and number of harvested lymph nodes between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic TME is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive technique for middle-lower rectal cancer, and produce more favourable short-term outcome than open surgery in municipal hospital.