Objective To study the effect of anterior plate fixation on the treatment of middle and lower thirds fractures of humerus and the possibility of operating without injuring the radial nerve. Methods Forty-nine patients with the middle and lower thirds fractures of the humerus were treated with anterior plate fixation from March 1998 to December 2002. Of the 49 patients, 27 were with new fractures, 12 with old fractures, and 10 with nonunion fractures. According to AO classification, of the 49 patients, there were 19 type A, 14 type B1, 9 type B2, 5 type B3, 2 type C1. Thirty-seven patients had closed fractures and 12 had open fractures. Of the 12 patients, 8 were type Gustilo Ⅰ, 4 were type Gustilo Ⅱ. Four out of the 49 patients were associated with radial nerve palsy. All patients were treatedwith anterior plate fixation through the anterior approach to the humerus. The radial nerves injured were explored. Results Of the 49 patients, 48 were followed up 6 to 48 months(28.7 months on average). All fractures were healed within 3 to 9 months(4.7 months on average). Fixed plates of 37 patients out of the 49 were removed. No iatrogenic radial nerve injury occurred in the82 times of the operations among the 49 patients. Conclusion The treatment of middle and lower thirds fractures of humerus by anterior platefixation through the anterior approach to the humerus does not interfere with the fracture healing and can prevent the iatrogenic radial nerve injury.
To provide the scientific theoretical basis for cl inical practice by comparing biomechanicalcharacteristics of single compressed plate with intramedullary pin, locking intramedullary nail and simple arm externalfixator with simple internal fixation devices. Methods Eighteen wet humeral bone specimens of adult cadaver were madecompl icated fracture models of humeral shaft and divided into 3 groups according to fixation methods. Fracture was fixed by single compressed plate with intramedullary pin in plate group, by locking intramedullary nail in intramedullary nail group and by external fixator with simple internal fixation devices in external fixator group. The intensity and rigidity of compl icated fracture models of humeral shaft was measured in compress test and torsion test. Results In compress test, the maximum load in plate group (6 162.09 ± 521.06) N and in intramedullary nail group (6 738.32 ± 525.89) N was significantly larger than that in external fixator group (2 753.57 ± 185.59) N (P lt; 0.05); but there was no significant difference between plate group and intramedullary nail group (P gt; 0.05). Under 600 N physiological compress load, the rigidity was (171.69 ± 6.49) N/mm in plate group, (333.04 ± 36.85) N/mm in intramedullary nail group and (132.59 ± 2.93) N/mm in external fixator group; showing no significant difference between plate group and external fixator group (P gt; 0.05), and showing significant difference between intramedullary nail group and plate, external fixator groups (P lt; 0.05). In torsion test, the maximum torque in plate group (38.24 ± 7.08) Nm was significantly larger than those in intramedullary nail group (17.12 ± 5.73) Nm and external fixator group (20.26 ± 6.42) Nm (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between intramedullary nail group and external fixator group (P gt; 0.05). Under 0.80 Nm physiological torque, the rigidity was (16.36 ± 2.07) Ncm/° in plate group and (18.79 ± 2.62) Ncm/° in external fixator group, which was significantly larger than that in intramedullary nail group (11.45 ± 0.22) Ncm/° (P lt; 0.05); but there was no significant difference between plate group and external fixator group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Those fracture models fixed by single compressed plate with intramedullary pin have better compress and torsion intensity, they also have better torsion rigidity but less compress rigidity. Those fracture models fixed by locking intramedullary nail have better compress intensity but less torsion intensity, they also have better compress rigidity but less torsion rigidity. Those fracture models fixed by external fixator with simple internal fixation device have less compress and torsion intensity, they also have less compress rigidity but better torsion rigidity.
Objective To determine the efficacy and complication rate of intramedullary nailing versus compression plate in the treatment of adult humeral shaft fracture. Methods We searched the specialized trials register of The Cochrane Collaboration’s Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group, The Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), EMbase (1980 to 2006), PubMed (1966 to 2006), NRR , CCT and CBMdisc (1979 to July 2006). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedic journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomize controlled trials comparing intramedullary nailing versus compression plate for humeral shaft fracture in adults were included and the quality of these trials was critically assessed. Data analyses were done using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8. Results Three randomize controlled trials involving 215 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that intramedullary nailing may increase the re-operation rate (OR=2.68, 95%CI 1.19 to 6.04, P=0.02), pain in the shoulder (OR=13.02, 95%CI 2.23 to 75.95, P=0.004), and the rate of decreased range of motion of the shoulder (OR=18.60, 95%CI 1.01 to 341.83, P=0.05). The rates of no union, infection and iatrogenic radial nerve injury were comparable between intramedullary nailing and compression plate. Meta-analysis was not conducted for the time of union, because the relevant data were not available for the included trials. Conclusions Further well-designed and large-scale randomize controlled trials are required to determine the effects of intramedullary nailing and compression plate on these outcomes, because the trials available for this systematic review are too few and too small.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of two minimally invasive methods: minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) and expandable intramedullary nail ing technique in treatment of middle third humeral shaft fractures. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed and compared from 33 cases with middle third humeral shaft fractures between May 2004 and December 2008. All the patients were divided into 2 groups: 14 patients were treated with MIPOtechnique (group A) and 19 with expandable intramedullary nail ing technique (group B). In group A, there were 10 males and 4 females with an average age of 35 years (range, 21-51 years). The disease cause was traffic accident in 5 cases, tumbl ing in 6 cases, machine related trauma in 2 cases, crushed by a heavy object in 1 case. Six fractures were classified as AO type A, 6 as type B, and 2 as type C. The time from injury to operation was 3 to 11 days with an average of 5.9 days. In group B, there were 12 males and 7 females with an average age of 40 years (range, 19-68 years). The disease cause was traffic accident in 7 cases, tumbl ing in 8 cases, fall ing from height in 3 cases, crush injury in 1 case. Ten fractures were classified as AO type A, 8 as type B, and 1 as type C. The time from injury to operation was 2 to 6 days with an average of 4.2 days. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation time was (104.6 ± 25.8) minutes in group A and (85.0 ± 35.7) minutes in group B, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Incision healed by first intention without iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in 2 groups. The patientswere followed up 21.4 months on average (range, 12-37 months) in group A and 20.5 months on average (range, 22-35 months) in group B. The X-ray films showed bony heal ing in all patients. The fracture union time was (16.4 ± 6.1) weeks in group A and (15.0 ± 2.5) weeks in group B, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). The University of Cal ifornia Los Angeles (UCLA) End- Result scores were 34.1 ± 1.1 in group A and 31.8 ± 2.6 in group B and the Mayo Elbow Performance scores were 100 in group A and 97.6 ± 3.9 in group B; all showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Good cl inical outcomes could be obtained when middle third humeral shaft fractures are treated by either MIPO or expandable intramedullary nail ing techniques. However, MIPO technique could offer better shoulder and elbow functional results.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fracture. Methods From July 2004 to April 2008, 26 patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humeral shaft were recruited, including 8 males and 18 females. Age of patients averaged 66 years old (range, 34-82 years old). According to AO classification, there were 4 cases of type A1, 2 cases of type A2, 8 cases of type B1, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1 and 2 cases of type C2. The time from injury to surgery averaged 2 days (range, 1-5 days). There were 8 osteoporotic fractures. Results All surgical wound healed primarily, and there was no wound infection. Three patients had postoperative radial nerve neurapraxia, which recovered at 4, 6, 8 months respectively. All patients were followed up for 6-24 months with an average of 14.1 months. Radiological examination revealed bony union within 6 months in 25 cases. There was 1 delayed union which remained asymptomatic and eventually healed at 8 months with acceptable Constant-Murley score. There were 3 cases of shoulder impingement syndrome diagnosed at 3 months post-operatively. After implant removal, they all achieved an acceptable Constant-Murley score. According to Constant-Murley scoring system, there were 11 excellent, 10 good and 5 acceptable results. The excellent or good rate was 80.8%. Conclusion MIPO technique using LCP is an effective method to treat proximal humeral shaft fractures, which facil itates functional recovery of the shoulder joint. During the surgery, it is important to achieve a good fracture reduction and to avoid compl ications.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of locking compress plate and extra cortical bone bridge fixation for treating atrophic humeral nonunion. Methods Seventeen patients with atrophic humeral nonuninon were treated with locking compress plate and extra cortical bone bridge fixation between November 2006 and June 2015. Of 17 cases, 11 were male, 6 were female, aged 24-63 years (mean, 38.2 years). Fracture located at the left side in 9 cases and at the right side in 8 cases. The mechanism of injury was traffic accident in 13 cases, falling from height in 3 cases, and heavy pound injury in 1 case. The patients underwent surgery for 1 time in 7 cases, for 2 times in 5 cases, for 3 times in 4 cases, and for 4 times in 1 case. The time from fracture to hospitalization was 10-76 months (mean, 22.6 months). The shoulder function was evaluated by Neer score, and elbow function by Mayo score. Results All incisions healed by first intention. Two cases had transient radial nerve symptoms of numbness. All patients were followed up 27.3 months on average (range, 15-60 months). Radiographic examination showed signs of bone remodeling at 6-8 weeks after operation, and formation of extra cortical bone bridge. All of them achieved bone union within 10 to 41 weeks (mean, 17.6 weeks). At last follow-up, the average Neer score was 83.36 (range, 72-96); and the shoulder function was excellent in 10 cases, good in 5, and fair in 2 with an excellent and good rate of 88.24%. And the average Mayo score was 86.52 (range, 68-100); and the elbow function was excellent in 11 cases, good in 3, and fair in 3 with an excellent and good rate of 82.35%. Conclusion The bone bridging could effectively form by extra cortical grafting technique. Atrophic humeral nonunions can be successfully treated with locking compress plate and extra cortical bone bridge fixation.
To explore the possibil ity of treating mid-distal humeral shaft fractures associated with radial nerve palsies with minimal invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques. Methods From April 2003 to October 2006, 10 patients with mid-distal humeral shaft fractures associated with radial nerve palsies were treated. All patients were male, aged 19-58 years. According to AO/ASIF classification, there were 4 cases of B1 type, 2 cases of B3 type, 1 case of A2 type, 1 caseof B2 type, 1 case of C3 type and 1 case of A3 type. A straight 4.5 mm dynamic compression plate was placed on the anterior aspect of humerus through two small incisions located on the anterior side of proximal and distal part of the arm. The radial nerve exploration was performed through a lateral small incision made on the fracture site. The fractures were then reduced by manual manipulation and the plate was fixated to the main fragments with 3 screws in each end of the plate. The postoperative compl ications, the bone heal ing time, and the recovery time of the radial nerve functions were recorded. The functions of the affected shoulder and elbow were assessed with UCLA and Mayo elbow performance score system respectively. Results All incision healed by first intention. Ten patients were followed up 9-36 months with an average of 15.7 months. The X-ray films showed that the union of fractures was achieved 12-16 weeks (13.6 weeks on average). The function of the radial nerves recovered completely 12-36 weeks (17.8 weeks on average) in 9 patients. The abductions of the affected shoulder were 150-170° (165° on average). The ROM of the elbows were 130-140° (135.5° on average). According to the UCLA shoulder scoring system, 9 patients achieved the excellent result and 1 patient achieved the good result. All the patients had the excellent results according to Mayo elbow performance score system. Conclusion The mid-distal humeral shaft fractures associated with radial nervepalsies can be treated with MIPO technique and the good results can be obtained.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of lateral approach minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and helical plate MIPO in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Methods The clinical data of patients with proximal humeral shaft fractures who underwent MIPO via lateral approach (group A, 25 cases) and MIPO with helical plate (group B, 30 cases) between December 2009 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, American Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, and complications were compared between two groups. The angular deformity and the fracture healing were evaluated according to anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films postoperatively. The modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score for shoulder and the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score for elbow were analyzed at last follow-up. Results The operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (P<0.05). However, the intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times presented no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-90 months, with an average of 19.4 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the quality of postoperative fracture reduction, there were 4 (16.0%) and 11 (36.7%) patients with angulation deformity in group A and group B, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of angulation deformity (χ2=2.936, P=0.087). All fractures achieved bony union, there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between group A and group B (P>0.05); delayed union occurred in 2 cases and 1 case in group A and group B, respectively (healing time was 30, 42, and 36 weeks after operation, respectively). In group A and group B, 1 patient had superficial infection of incision, respectively; 2 patients and 1 patient had subacromial impact after operation, respectively; and 3 patients in group A had symptoms of radial nerve paralysis of different degrees; all of them were cured after symptomatic treatment. The overall complication incidence of group A (32%) was significantly higher than that of group B (10%) (χ2=4.125, P=0.042). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified UCLA score and MEPs score between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both lateral approach MIPO and helical plate MIPO can achieve satisfied effectiveness in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Lateral approach MIPO may be beneficial to shorten the operation time, while the overall complication incidence of helical plate MIPO is lower.