ObjectiveTo explore an effective and safe drainage method, by comparing open thoracic drainage and conventional thoracic drainage for lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic pneumonectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 147 patients who underwent thoracoscopic pneumonectomy from January 2015 to March 2018 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 128 males and 19 females. Based on drainage methods, they were divided into an open drainage group (open group) and a conventional drainage group (regular group). The incidence of postoperative complications, chest tube duration, drainage volume at postoperative 3 days, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost and quality of life were compared between the two groups.ResultsPostoperative complication rate was lower in the open group than that in the regular group (10.20% vs. 23.47%, P=0.04). The chest tube duration of the open group was longer compared with the regular group (5.57±2.36 d vs. 3.22±1.23 d, P<0.001). The drainage volume at postoperative 3 days was less in the regular group. In the open group, ambulation was earlier, thoracocentesis was less and re-intubation rate was lower (all P<0.001). The postoperative hospital stay in the regular group was significantly longer than that in the open group (8.37±2.56 d vs. 6.35±1.87 d, P<0.001) and hospitalization cost was significantly higher (66.2±5.4 thousand yuan vs. 59.6±7.3 thousand yuan, P<0.001). Besides, quality of life in 1 and 3 months after operation was significantly better than that in the open group (P<0.001).ConclusionCompared with the regular chest drainage, the effect of open thoracic drainage is better, which can help reduce postoperative complications, shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce the hospitalization cost and improve the quality of postoperative life. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
With the ongoing evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery techniques, innovative anatomical approaches facilitating rapid perioperative recovery while achieving optimal aesthetic results and pain-free outcomes have become a pivotal direction in pulmonary resection. While periareolar incisions have demonstrated well-established advantages in cosmetic preservation and pain management in breast and thyroid procedures, the standardization of this approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection requires further refinement. This consensus synthesizes the collective expertise of China's leading thoracic surgery centers in periareolar approach pulmonary resections. It aims to establish comprehensive clinical consensus that encompasses prerequisite surgical criteria, standardized perioperative management protocols, technically optimized operative procedures, and evidence-based complication prevention and management strategies, ultimately providing guidance for the standardized application of this innovative surgical technique.
Objective To evaluate the validity of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy in thoracic diseases treatment. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 34 consecutive patients who underwent VATS pneumonectomy in Xiangya Hospital Central South University between January 2013 and October 2015. There were 26 males and 8 females at age of 35–69 (53.8±7.7) years. Results VATS pneumonectomy was completed successfully in 32 patients (5.8% conversion rate). The average operation time was 182.5±52.4 min. The average blood loss was 217.1±1 834.8 ml. Chest tube drainage flow was 3–11 (6.0±1.7) days and postoperative hospital stay was 5–12 (7.6±1.8) days. Eleven patients got postoperative complications (34.3%), mainly pulmonary infections. The 32 patients were followed up for 10 (1–21) months. Two patients died of lung metastasis 16 or 17 months after the operation. One patient died of sudden cardiac arrest 3 months after operation. Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) happened in one patient after hospital discharge in 2 months. Conclusion VATS is feasible for pneumonectomy. However, further studies and follow-up are needed to verify the benefits of VATS pneumonectomy for lung cancer.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical data of pulmonary lobectomy in patients with massive hemoptysis of pulmonary tuberculosis after bronchial artery embolization in the short and long term, so as to provide a reference for clinical choices of appropriate operation time.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients with massive hemoptysis of pulmonary tuberculosis, who had received pulmonary lobectomy after bronchial artery embolization in Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital from January 2015 to November 2017, including 29 males and 4 females aged of 23-66 (52.64±9.70) years. According to the time interval between bronchial artery embolization and lobectomy, the patients were divided into a short-term group (<2 weeks, 14 patients) and a long-term group (>1 month, 19 patients). The clinical data, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative extubation time and serious postoperative complications, were observed in the two groups for statistical analysis.ResultsThe operative time (297.13±75.69 min vs. 231.32±67.57 min, P=0.013), intraoperative blood loss (685.74±325.51 mL vs. 355.83±259.11 mL, P=0.002), postoperative extubation time (14.07±5.24 d vs. 8.90±3.57 d, P=0.003) of the short-term group were all higher than those in the long-term group.ConclusionFor the patients with massive hemoptysis of pulmonary tuberculosis, who had surgical indications and no risk of early rebleeding after bronchial artery embolization, pulmonary lobectomy should be performed late until the patient's physical condition and the primary disease was stable.
Objective To assess the effects of physiotherapy on pulmonary function in COPD patients with lung cancer after lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Methods Fifty-five COPD patients with lung cancer undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy from January 2005 to May 2014 were recruited in the study. They were divided into group A received comprehensive physiotherapy before surgery and group B without comprehensive physiotherapy before surgery. The changes of lung function and tolerance were compared before physiotherapy (T1 time point) and after physiotherapy (T2 time point) in the group A, and between two groups before lung resection (T2 time point) and after lung resection (T3 time point). Results In group A, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), vital capacity (VC), peak expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity (FEF50) and FEF25 increased significantly respectively by 16.96%, 14.75%, 20.69% and 13.79% compared with those before physiotherapy. Meanwhile, six-minutes walking distance (6MWD) achieved a significant improvement. After resection of lung, FEV1 and VC appeared to reduce, and pulmonary small airway function, tolerance, and clinical features deteriorated significantly. The differences between T2 and T1 in FEV1, FEF50 and FEF25 in the patients with FEV1%pred ≥80% and 50%-80% were similar with those in the patients with FEV1%pred<50%. The differences between T2 and T3 in FEF50 and FEF25 in the patients with FEV1%pred≥80% and 50%-80% were higher than those with FEV1%pred<50%. For the patients with lobectomy, FEV1 and VC in the group B were lower than those in the group A (FEV1: 10.24% vs. 22.44%; VC: 10.13% vs. 20.87%). For the patients with pulmonary resection, FEV1 and VC had little differences (FEV1: 36.33% vs. 36.78%; VC: 37.23% vs. 38.98%). Conclusion Physiotherapy is very important for the preoperative treatment and postoperative nursing of COPD patients with primary lung cancer.