Objective To determine if supervised hospital-based exercise can maintain the benefits of functional exercise ability and quality of life gained from a pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD.Methods A prospective and randomized study was carried out. Following completion of an eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program in hospital, 43 COPD patients were recruited and randomized into either a supervised group ( supervised, every 10 days, hospital-based exercise, 22 cases ) or a control group ( unsupervised home exercise,21 cases) and followed for 12 months. Measurements were taken at baseline and 12 months later. Exercise measurements include six-minute walk test( 6MWT) and pulmonary function test. Quality of life was measured using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ( CRQ) . Results After 12 months of different exercise program,6MWT in the supervised group was significantly longer than that in the unsupervised group[ ( 532. 0 ±168. 4) m vs ( 485. 0 ±151. 6) m, P lt; 0. 05] . There was no significant difference in pulmonary function between the two groups. The quality of life of the supervised group was higher than that of the unsupervised group( 114. 6 ±20. 8 vs 105. 6 ±21. 7, P lt;0. 05) . Conclusions After the completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program, a supervised, every 10 days, hospital-based following exercise program can maintain better functional exercise capacity and quality of life compared to home exercise in COPD patients.
Pulmonary rehabilitation therapy is gaining more attention. The recent systematic review of domestic and foreign relevant literature indicates pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation exercise training performs an important role in per-operative period. The rehabilitation therapy can efficiently improve exercise tolerance and quality of life of patients with lung cancer, reduce post-operative complications, shorten hospitalization time, and increase opportunity of operation. However, the evidence comes from small samples reported by present clinical study, and a standard treatment guideline of pulmonary rehabilitation has not been established until now. Further researches are expected to provide demonstration and promote pulmonary rehabilitation. It is an important part of comprehensive treatment of lung cancer. The therapy will benefit more patients suffering from lung cancer.
Objective To examine the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in patients post-stroke. Methods We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database for randomized controlled trials of investigating the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in stroke patients published before September 2018. The patients in the training group were treated with pulmonary rehabilitation, including respiratory muscle training, chest breathing, or abdominal breathing training, with or without respiratory training device. The patients in the control group received conventional stroke rehabilitation. The outcome indicators included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1 percentage predicted (FEV1%pred), peak expiratory flow rate, maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), maximal expiratory pressure, exercise endurance, and quality of life. Two researchers independently carried out literature retrieval and data extraction, using Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and standard data extraction forms adapted from Cochrane Collaboration model to evaluate the studies quality. The Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. Results Eleven studies met the study criteria with a total of 500 stroke patients, including 274 patients in the training group and 226 patients in the control group, respectively. The Meta-analysis showed that after pulmonary rehabilitation training, the values of FVC [mean difference (MD)=0.30 L, 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.26, 0.34) L, P<0.000 01], FEV1 [MD=0.28 L, 95%CI (0.25, 0.32) L, P<0.000 01], and 6-minute walking test [MD=43.43 m, 95%CI (7.92, 78.95) m, P=0.02] in the training group were significantly higher than those in the control group, as well as the change of PImax [MD=6.49 cm H2O (1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa), 95%CI (3.67, 9.32) cm H2O, P<0.000 1]. The advantages of pulmonary rehabilitation training had not been found in improving FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred (P>0.05). Conclusions The implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation training in the way of respiratory muscle training combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy could improve two kinds of indicators of pulmonary function referring to FVC and FEV1, inspiratory muscle strength and 6-minute waking distance. The long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation training on stroke patients, the respiratory training mode of different prescriptions, the endurance of exercise and the quality of life need further study.
ObjectiveTo observe the curative effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsSixty-four patients with stable moderate to severe COPD who visited during January 2016 and December 2017 were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 32 cases in each group. The spirometry was conducted in all patients. The right deep inspiratory end diaphragm thickness and the quiet end expiratory diaphragm thickness were measured by ultrasound, and the diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF) was calculated. The routine drug treatment was given in both groups. The comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation treatment was given in the observation group (include breath training, exercise training, health education and nutrition guide). The pulmonary function, diaphragm function, severity and quality of life were evaluated before and 6 months later after the treatment.ResultsIn the observation group, the predicted value of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%pred), FEV1/FVC ratio and DTF were all significantly improved compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05). While the BODE index was significantly declined compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05).ConclusionPulmonary rehabilitation treatment can help improve pulmonary function, diaphragm function, condition of the disease and quality of life.
Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the traditional outpatient and medical center pulmonary rehabilitation models for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been limited, while pulmonary rehabilitation technology has always been the focus of clinical and scientific research in rehabilitation. This article reviews the application status of remote pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease under the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic in recent years. From the selection and method of remote pulmonary rehabilitation equipment before the epidemic, to the development of rehabilitation forms and equipment innovation after the epidemic, the current status and problems of remote pulmonary rehabilitation are clarified. Establishing a remote pulmonary rehabilitation model in line with China’s national conditions is the direction and goal of future development.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the impact of shortterm preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on the exercise capacity of lung cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（COPD）. Methods Between March 2009 and August 2010, 30 lung cancer patients with moderate or severe COPD were treated with preoperative comprehensive PR for two weeks in Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital. The sample was comprised of 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 62.5±7.7 years. Twelve of the patients had moderate COPD, while 18 had severe COPD. We collected information on the length of postoperative hospital stay for each patient,as well as any pulmonary complications. Results (1) The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume in one second % (FEV1%), forced expiratory volume in/ forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC),and maximal ventilatory volume (MVV) (1.30±0.30 L, 59.19±18.00 L, 47.74±1200 L, 56.63±13.00 L) values after PR were slightly better than those before PR(1.24±0.40 L, 51.89±14.00 L, 46.59±10.00 L, 49.67±13.00 L), but not significantly so(Pgt;0.05). The results for carbon monoxide diffusion capacity were similar. (2) The sixminute walking distance (before: 502.67±157.00 m, after: 594.87±116.00 m), peak expiratory flow (before: 209.33±66.00 L/min, after: 255.33±70.00 L/min), dyspnea index (Borg index) (before: 0.26±0.20, after: 0.12±0.10), and fatigue index (before:0.24±0.20, after: 0.12±0.10) all improved significantly aftercomprehensive PR (Plt;0.05). (3) All 30 patients underwent surgery, and none died during the perioperative period. Eight patients experienced cardiopulmonary complications. The average hospitalization time after surgery was 8.0±2.4 days. Conclusion Preoperative comprehensive PR appears to significantly improve exercise capacity and reduce the rate of postoperative lung complications in lung cancer, patients with lower cardiopulmonary function.
ObjectiveTo clarify the effectiveness of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) and provide evidence for the application of PPR on lung cancer patients by meta-analysis.MethodsAccording to inclusion and exclusion criteria, literatures related to PPR on lung cancer patients were retrieved from major databases between the date of establishment of each database and January 2019, and then data required were extracted from the selected literatures. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0.ResultsTwelve randomized controlled trials were involved in meta-analysis, including 658 patients who were well-diagnosed and prepared for surgery, with 307 patients in the PPR group and 351 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in the PPR group, the pulmonary function including forced vital capacity [MD=0.31, 95%CI (0.21, 0.42), P<0.01], forced expiratory volume in one second [MD=0.27, 95%CI (0.20, 0.34), P<0.01] and activity tolerance including 6-minute walk distance [MD=50.55, 95%CI (35.98, 65.13), P<0.01] were significantly better than the control group, and the postoperative complication rate was lower ［MD=0.28, 95%CI (0.18, 0.43), P<0.01］, postoperative hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.09, 95%CI (–2.41, –1.77), P<0.01].ConclusionsA period of PPR on lung cancer patients can improve postoperative pulmonary function and activity tolerance, and reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay, which is beneficial to postoperative recovery.