The great clinical efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been illustrated by the decreased incidence of perioperative complications and the shortened length of in-hospital stay. Furthermore, the ERAS programs have their own key techniques and strategies in the clinical application to the unique diseases and operative modes. The key technology of an ERAS program is the minimally invasive surgery, which has been widely utilized in the surgical specialties. The main strategy in an ERAS program consists of the intensive pulmonary rehabilitation and optimal perioperative care that aim to improve the in-hospital outcomes of lung cancer patients who are considered at high surgical risk. Pulmonary rehabilitation is regarded as the mainstay of the ERAS strategies but its clinical protocols still remain less mature. The purpose of this overview is to summarize the current pulmonary rehabilitation programs in terms of the suitable crowd, the feasible protocols and the clinical significance.
ObjectiveTo understand the obstacles in the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation between doctors and patients.MethodsMedical staff and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in public hospitals in this region were randomly sampled, and a questionnaire survey was conducted on possible obstacles to the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation.ResultsTotal of 265 medical staff and 120 COPD patients were recruited in this survey. The obstacles of pulmonary rehabilitation practice of medical staff in clinical work are poor cooperation of patients and their families (84.2%), medical staff’s insufficient awareness of pulmonary rehabilitation (82.3%), and lack of practice and guidelines (78.9%), lack of objective conditions such as site, equipment and equipment (75.1%), lack of multidisciplinary teams (74.3%), pulmonary rehabilitation has fallen by the wayside (73.6%) etc. The main obstacles for COPD patients in pulmonary rehabilitation are lack of access to relevant knowledge (52.4%), insufficient knowledge (36.5%), inconvenient transportation, economic problems and other objective conditions (33.3%). After multiple correspondence analysis, there are differences in the degree of correlation between obstacle factors and groups with different characteristics.ConclusionsThere are many factors hindering the development of pulmonary rehabilitation and there are certain differences among different populations, but the lack of understanding of pulmonary rehabilitation between doctors and patients is the primary problem. It is necessary to improve the cognition of both doctors and patients on pulmonary rehabilitation, and then to solve the obstacles in the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Objective To investigate the knowledge level about pulmonary rehabilitation in respiratory physicians in Shanghai. Methods A self-designed questionnaire about pulmonary rehabilitation was sent to respiratory physicians in 18 tertiary-care referral hospitals of Shanghai from June to September 2011. Results A total of 237 valid questionnaires were collected. Accuracy rate of single-answer questions was(62.1±18.3)% , while correct rate of multiple-answer questions ( more than one answer) was ( 35.5±15.6) % . Neither working years nor doctor rank had correlation with accuracy of questionnaires. Conclusion The knowledge about pulmonary rehabilitation in respiratory physicians of Shanghai was poor. We need to strengthen the relevant training and continuing education.
Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the traditional outpatient and medical center pulmonary rehabilitation models for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been limited, while pulmonary rehabilitation technology has always been the focus of clinical and scientific research in rehabilitation. This article reviews the application status of remote pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease under the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic in recent years. From the selection and method of remote pulmonary rehabilitation equipment before the epidemic, to the development of rehabilitation forms and equipment innovation after the epidemic, the current status and problems of remote pulmonary rehabilitation are clarified. Establishing a remote pulmonary rehabilitation model in line with China’s national conditions is the direction and goal of future development.
ObjectiveTo observe the curative effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsSixty-four patients with stable moderate to severe COPD who visited during January 2016 and December 2017 were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 32 cases in each group. The spirometry was conducted in all patients. The right deep inspiratory end diaphragm thickness and the quiet end expiratory diaphragm thickness were measured by ultrasound, and the diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF) was calculated. The routine drug treatment was given in both groups. The comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation treatment was given in the observation group (include breath training, exercise training, health education and nutrition guide). The pulmonary function, diaphragm function, severity and quality of life were evaluated before and 6 months later after the treatment.ResultsIn the observation group, the predicted value of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%pred), FEV1/FVC ratio and DTF were all significantly improved compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05). While the BODE index was significantly declined compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05).ConclusionPulmonary rehabilitation treatment can help improve pulmonary function, diaphragm function, condition of the disease and quality of life.
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive intervention to the chronic respiratory diseases, that its benefits in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been well established. Localization of PR in China is one of the key health strategies as there are nearly 100 million patients with COPD which causes huge disease burden. In addition, the evidence of PR for patients with other chronic respiratory diseases and post-thoracic surgery should be accumulated too. Now clinician, patients, and policy makers have few recognition of PR, which needs large-scaled standardized training and popularizing. This article starts with the definition of PR, reviews its population, implementation, settings, as well as the current situation of PR in our country in order to make clinicians, researchers, and policy makers have better understanding of PR and to make some suggestions on direction of the future research and clinical work.
ObjectiveTo clarify the effectiveness of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) and provide evidence for the application of PPR on lung cancer patients by meta-analysis.MethodsAccording to inclusion and exclusion criteria, literatures related to PPR on lung cancer patients were retrieved from major databases between the date of establishment of each database and January 2019, and then data required were extracted from the selected literatures. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0.ResultsTwelve randomized controlled trials were involved in meta-analysis, including 658 patients who were well-diagnosed and prepared for surgery, with 307 patients in the PPR group and 351 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in the PPR group, the pulmonary function including forced vital capacity [MD=0.31, 95%CI (0.21, 0.42), P<0.01], forced expiratory volume in one second [MD=0.27, 95%CI (0.20, 0.34), P<0.01] and activity tolerance including 6-minute walk distance [MD=50.55, 95%CI (35.98, 65.13), P<0.01] were significantly better than the control group, and the postoperative complication rate was lower ［MD=0.28, 95%CI (0.18, 0.43), P<0.01］, postoperative hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.09, 95%CI (–2.41, –1.77), P<0.01].ConclusionsA period of PPR on lung cancer patients can improve postoperative pulmonary function and activity tolerance, and reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay, which is beneficial to postoperative recovery.
Objective To examine the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in patients post-stroke. Methods We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database for randomized controlled trials of investigating the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in stroke patients published before September 2018. The patients in the training group were treated with pulmonary rehabilitation, including respiratory muscle training, chest breathing, or abdominal breathing training, with or without respiratory training device. The patients in the control group received conventional stroke rehabilitation. The outcome indicators included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1 percentage predicted (FEV1%pred), peak expiratory flow rate, maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), maximal expiratory pressure, exercise endurance, and quality of life. Two researchers independently carried out literature retrieval and data extraction, using Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and standard data extraction forms adapted from Cochrane Collaboration model to evaluate the studies quality. The Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. Results Eleven studies met the study criteria with a total of 500 stroke patients, including 274 patients in the training group and 226 patients in the control group, respectively. The Meta-analysis showed that after pulmonary rehabilitation training, the values of FVC [mean difference (MD)=0.30 L, 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.26, 0.34) L, P<0.000 01], FEV1 [MD=0.28 L, 95%CI (0.25, 0.32) L, P<0.000 01], and 6-minute walking test [MD=43.43 m, 95%CI (7.92, 78.95) m, P=0.02] in the training group were significantly higher than those in the control group, as well as the change of PImax [MD=6.49 cm H2O (1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa), 95%CI (3.67, 9.32) cm H2O, P<0.000 1]. The advantages of pulmonary rehabilitation training had not been found in improving FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred (P>0.05). Conclusions The implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation training in the way of respiratory muscle training combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy could improve two kinds of indicators of pulmonary function referring to FVC and FEV1, inspiratory muscle strength and 6-minute waking distance. The long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation training on stroke patients, the respiratory training mode of different prescriptions, the endurance of exercise and the quality of life need further study.