目的:探讨住院患者急性肾功能衰竭(ARF)的临床病因方法:回顾性分析139例ARF患者的临床资料,探讨其病因、肾衰类型及危险因素。结果:139例ARF患者中,肾前性90例,肾性37例,肾后性12例。其中,60岁以上的老年人73例,占52.5%。引起ARF的根本病因中,感染、心衰及创伤为引起ARF的主要病因。结论:注意有效血容量不足的症状及体征、及时扩容及控制感染可以减少ARF的发生。同时,60岁以上老年人仍是高危人群,应重在预防。
【摘要】 目的 探讨开展优质护理服务对早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响。 方法 将2009年9月-2010年6月收治的80名早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者，随机分成对照组和试验组，每组各40例。试验组实施优质护理服务，对照组按常规护理，半年后采用自测健康评定量表（SRHMS V1.0）对患者进行问卷调查，从而了解和评判优质服务对早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响及效果。 结果 试验组在器官功能、日常生活功能、生理健康子量表总分3个维度，在负向情绪、正向情绪、认知功能、心理健康子量表总分4个维度，在角色活动、社会健康子量表总分2个维度与对照组比较，差异均有统计学意义（Plt;0.05），在社会支持和社会资源方面与对照组的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 开展优质护理服务能明显提高患者治疗疾病的信心，对有效控制患者病情发展有一定的影响与作用。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the impact of quality care on early chronic renal failure patients. Methods Eighty patients in early stages of chronic renal failure in our department between September 2009 and June 2010 were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group with 40 patients in each group. Quality and Conventional care were implemented on the two groups respectively. Six months later, self-rated health measurement scale (SRHMS V1.0) was used to analyze the impact of quality care on the patients. Results The results of the measurement showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in organ function, daily life function, physiologic health, negative emotion, positive emotion, cognitive ability, psychological health, role activity and social health (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences between them in social support and social resources. Conclusion Carrying out high-quality care can significantly improve the active treatment confidence of the patients and can effectively control the development of the disease.
目的:观察黄芪注射液治疗糖尿病肾病的临床疗效。 方法:将116例糖尿病肾病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组在对照组的基础上同时使用黄芪注射液,观察治疗后4周24小时尿蛋白定量、血肌酐、尿素氮、血尿β2微球蛋白、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、血尿酸等变化.结果:治疗组治疗后24小时尿蛋白定量、血尿酸均有不同程度的改善,与治疗前比较Plt;0.05,治疗组与对照组比较Plt;0.05。而血尿β2微球蛋白、血胆固醇无明显变化。结论:黄芪注射液对糖尿病肾病有较好的疗效。
摘要:目的: 观察低分子肝素联合ACEI/ARB治疗糖尿病肾病(DN)的疗效。 方法 :将55例2型DN患者随机分为对照组(ACEI/ARB)和治疗组(ACEI/ARB+低分子肝素),疗程8周。比较两组治疗前和治疗后24h尿蛋白,Scr、BUN、血浆白蛋白等指标的变化。 结果 :(1)治疗后治疗组和对照组24h尿蛋白、Scr均显著下降(〖WTBX〗P lt;001,〖WTBX〗P lt;005),治疗组比对照组下降更为明显(〖WTBX〗P lt;005)。(2)治疗后两组血浆白蛋白均增加(〖WTBX〗P lt;001),治疗组与对照组治疗后比较无明显差异(〖WTBX〗P gt;005)。(3)治疗后两组BUN均降低(〖WTBX〗P lt;005),治疗组与对照组治疗后比较无明显差异(〖WTBX〗P gt;005)。(4)治疗后两组TC和TG均无明显变化。 结论 :联合应用低分子肝素能有效减少DN患者的蛋白尿,改善肾功能。Abstract: Objective: To study the clinical effects of lowmolecularweight heparin (LMWH) and ACEI/ARB on diabetic nephropathy(DN).Methods :55 patients of type 2 Diabetic nephropathy were randomly divided into treatment group(ACEI/ARB+ LMWH)and control group (ACEI/ARB).SCr,quantity of protein in 24hour urine,BUN and plasma albumin figures were compared between two groups before treatment and eight weeks after treatment.Results :(1)SCr,quantity of protein in 24hour urine had been decreased significantly in both groups(P lt;001,P lt;005),and more significantly in treated group than in control group (P lt;005).(2)Plasma albumin increased significantly in both groups(P lt;001).But no significantly increase of plasma albumin had been found in treatment group during the followup(P gt;005).(3)BUN decreased significantly in both groups(P lt;005), but no significantly decrease of BUN had been found in treatment group during the followup(P gt;005).(4)There were no significantly difference in TC and TG between two groups.Conclusion : LMWH and ACEI/ARB can ameliorate proteinuria and improve renal function of the patients with DN.
Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organs of the body. Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Vimentin, a member of the intermediate filament protein family, is involved in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including lupus nephritis. More and more studies have shown that vimentin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, and has an important influence on the disease development, treatment and prognosis of lupus nephritis. This review focuses on the structure, function and post-translational modification of vimentin, the relationship between vimentin and the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, and the significance of vimentin expression levels in renal tissues, serum and urine, in order to provide theoretical basis for future mechanism research and clinical application.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis. Methods We searched CBM (November 1979 to February 2006), Chinese Cochrane Centre Database (2005), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (November 1966 to February 2006) and EMBASE (1975 to February 2006) for randomize controlled trials. Data were extracted and analyzed using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.7. Results Nine randomize controlled trials involving 512 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the total clinical effective rate and complete remission rate were not significantly higher for MMF than for cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or both. Renal survival rate and relapse rate of MMF were not significantly different from those for cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or both. Patient survival rate and safety of MMF were significantly improved compared with cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or both. Conclusion More large-scale multi-center randomized trials are needed to investigate the role of MMF in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.
Studies of evidence-based medicine have provided much important evidence, clarified problems, and guided the clinical practice in the treatment of renal diseases. As examples, several therapeutic problems in renal hypertension, renal anemia and low protein diet for the patients with chronic kidney disease are discussed in this paper.
Objective To evaluate the safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) for rejection after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Jun. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to Jun. 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004) and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979 to Jun. 2004). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MMF with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.1.1 software. Results Twenty-Four RCTs comparing MMF (2 g/day or 3 g/day) with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were identified. The digest system morbidity of MMF group was higher than that of AZA group. The incidence of vomiting, bellyache and diarrhea of MMF 3 g/day group was statistical by higher than that of AZA group (P＜0.05). The cytom egalovirus (CMV) infection morbidity of MMF 3 g/day group during 6 months, 1 year and 2 years follow-up was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but for MMF 2 g/day group, this difference was only seen during 1 year follow-up. Leukopenia incidence of MMF 3g/day group was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but this difference was not seen in MMF 2 g/day group. Thrombocytopenia incidence of MMF 3 g/day group was lower than AZA group with statistical difference. For skin carcinoma morbidity, no statistical difference was found among MMF 3 g/day, MMF 2 g/day and AZA groups. Conclusions Compared with AZA, MMF represents higher digest system side-effects incidence, higher morbidity of leucopenia and CMV infection and lower incidence of thrombocytopenia. The dose-response relationship of adverse drug reaction is found.