目的:观察经鼻内镜检查引导下通过改良三腔二囊管加沙氏导丝引导支撑,结合内镜下硬化剂治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效。方法:14例肝硬化食道静脉曲张破裂出血患者经过经鼻内镜检查后通过改良的三腔二囊管加沙氏导丝支撑下,结合内镜下硬化剂治疗食管静脉曲张破裂出血,观察止血效果以及并发症。结果:14例患者均1次止血成功,1例患者治疗后8h再次出血,行急诊TIPSS手术治疗。主要反应为胸骨后疼痛,持续时间为2～7d,对症处理后消失,3、6个月后再次复查食道胃底曲张静脉明显改善,3例10d左右行内镜下再次硬化治疗(因第1次硬化剂量少或治疗不完全)。结论:经鼻内镜检查行改良三腔二囊管加沙氏导丝引导支撑下,结合内镜下硬化剂治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血是一种有效的治疗方法。
Objective To explore the value of laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy in treatment for gastric stromal tumors. Method The clinical data of 45 patients with gastric stromal tumors performed laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy resection from June 2008 to June 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Results Forty-five patients with gastric stromal tumors were successfully excised by laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy， and the tumors were completely resected and no residual tumor at the edge. The length of surgical incision was about 4-6 cm with an average of 5.1 cm. The mean operation time was 75 min. Postoperative recovery was smooth， no surgery-related comp-lications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 6.8 d. No recurrence or metastasis happened within the follow-up with an average of 16.5 months. The immunohistochemical examination results：43 cases of CD117 was positive， 32 cases of CD34 was positive， 28 cases of SMA was positive， 2 cases of Desmin was positive， 22 cases of S-100 was positive. Conclusions The treatment of gastric stromal tumors through laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy is safe and effective. The benefits include minimal invasiveness， shorter operation time， and rapid postoperative recovery. The laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy can make more precise resection range， and avoid residual tumor and resection of excessive normal gastric tissue.
【摘要】 目的 探讨经鼻胃镜在食管狭窄扩张和支架置入术中的作用。 方法 2007年10月-2009年3月对28例癌性食管狭窄以及并发食管-气管瘘的患者行PENTAX（EG-1580K）超细经鼻电子胃镜检查，计算插入深度，并进行扩张和支架治疗，在胃镜直视下调节输送器内支架上端的位置，观察扩张效果、支架放置成功率、定位的准确性以及并发症情况。 结果 全部患者均行扩张治疗，效果良好，支架一次性放置全部成功，定位准确，自膨满意，最狭窄处的内径由（4.8±1.2）mm扩至（12.5±1.5）mm，食管气管瘘被覆盖治疗效果好，患者的吞咽困难评级由3.25±0.58降至0.94±0.59。 结论 在食管狭窄扩张和支架置入术中应用经鼻超细胃镜患者依从性好，方法简便，安全有效。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the role of nasal endoscopy in the esophagostenosis expansion and esophageal stent. Methods PENTAX (EG-1580K) ultrafine nasal endoscopy was used in 28 patients (October 2007-March 2009) with esophageal cancer complicated with esophagostenosis and fistula to check the e-calculated insertion depth, stent expansion and the average diameter expansion. The endoscopy was carried under the direct vision with the location of the top bracket in order to ensure the accurate stent placement, all without X-ray assist. The success rates of stent placement, positioning accuracy, as well as complications were evaluated. Results The expansion treatments were successful in all patients with one-off operation. The narrowest part increased from (4.9±1.6) mm to (12.7±1.5) mm, and the esophageal fistula was covered. The rating of dysphagia decreased from 3.15±0.68 to 0.91±0.49. Conclusion Nasal endoscopy is simple, safe and effective in the treatment of ultrafine expansion for esophagostenosis and stent implantation with good compliance.
目的:讨论胃镜检查中更加舒适的一种镇静镇痛方法。方法:芬太尼-异丙酚为Ⅰ组,咪唑安定-异丙酚组为Ⅱ组。观察记录各组术中的反应、胃镜操作时间、麻醉药物起效时间、苏醒时间和清醒时间,检查前中后BP、HR和SpO2的变化,及术后问卷调查。结果:Ⅰ组药物的起效快,受检者苏醒及清醒时间短,术中不适反应少,与Ⅱ组比较有统计学意义(Plt;0.01)。结论:镇静无痛苦胃镜检查中芬太尼-异丙酚联合用药更舒适。
ObjectiveTo collect the data of esophageal foreign body patients, and to evaluate the clinical effects of two different surgical methods in our hospital.MethodsThe clinical data of 294 patients who were treated in Gansu Provincal Hospital from January 2012 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data were collected and analyzed by SPSS 22.0. In order to to evaluate the efficacy of flexible esophagoscope (FE) and rigid esophagoscope (RE) in the treatment of esophageal foreign bodies.The patients were divided into two groups: a RE group including 118 patients with 62 males and 56 females at age of 6 (3-37) years and a FE group including 176 patients with 84 males and 92 females at age of 6 (3-59) years.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, age stratification, gender and foreign body type between the two groups. There was a statistical difference in the initial clinical symptoms (P=0.041) or in esophageal foreign bodies position (P=0.037) between the two groups. The success rate of foreign body removal was similar between the two groups (P=0.632). The success rate was 88.9% (105/118) in the RE group, 87.5% (154/176) in the FE group. The operation time was significantly longer in the RE group than that in the FE group (10.8 ±17.4 min vs. 17.5±21.6 min, P<0.001). The postoperative hospitalization time in the RE groups was longer than that in the FE group (21.5 ±24.2 hours vs. 12.5 ±21.3 hours, P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P=0.034). In the RE group, the main complication was mucosal edema (15.3%). And the rate of bleeding was higher (15.9%) in the FE group. There were 30 patients (25.5%) in the RE group with minor postoperative complications versus the FE group with 40 patients (22.7%); and 1 patient (0.8%) in the RE group with severe complications versus the FE group with 5 paients (2.8%).ConclusionBased on the analysis of this study, it is found that RE has higher safety. But the indications are strict, the professional requirements of the operator and the selection of patients are stronger. The FE is convenient to use, the operation crowd is wide, and the suitable crowd is wide. Therefore, for specific patients, after improving the relevant examination and preoperative evaluation of patients, clinicians need to choose appropriate surgical methods to ensure the success of the operation, and reduce the postoperative complications as far as possible.
【摘要】 目的 探讨无痛胃镜两种方式——清醒镇静和静脉麻醉下治疗食管静脉曲张或出血的可行性。 方法 2004年11月-2008年5月， 根据病情或患者要求，对13例患者行清醒镇静即静脉推注咪达唑仑+芬太尼，30例行静脉麻醉即静脉推注咪达唑仑+丙泊酚。43例患者中36例行套扎治疗，7例行1%乙氧硬化醇注射治疗。 结果 43例均成功完成治疗，急诊止血率100%（11/11），治疗后4周复查，显效24例，占55.8%，有效17例，占39.5%，无效2例，总有效率95.3%。静脉麻醉组术后遗忘度100%，清醒镇静组插镜过咽和治疗过程中发生恶心分别为76.9%、46.1%。两组患者在治疗过程中及治疗后均未发生大出血。 结论 无痛胃镜下行食管静脉曲张治疗安全、疗效确切，以硬化剂注射治疗者应采用静脉麻醉。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the effect of painless gastroscopy- conscious sedation and intravenous anesthesia on treating esophageal varices or bleeding. Methods From November 2004 to May 2008, according to the disease condition or patient′s requirements, anesthetists assessed 13 patients who underwent conscious sedation with the intravenous injection of midazolam + fentanyl; 30 patients underwent intravenous anesthesia with intravenous injection of midazolam+propofol. Thirty-six patients underwent set tie treatment, and seven underwent 1% aethoxysklerol injection therapy. Results AN of the 43 patients completed the treatment successfully, and the emergency bleeding rate was 100% (11/11). Four weeks after the treatment, 24 cases had apparent therapeutic effect, accounting for 55.8%; 17 patients had effect, accounting for 39.5%; 2 patients had no effect; the total effective rate was 95.3%. The postoperative forgotten degree of the patients in intravenous anesthesia group was 100%. The nausea rate happened during the mirrors inserting and treatment in the conscious sedation group was 76.9% and 46.1%, respectively. No hemorrhage occurred in both of the tow groups. Conclusion Painless endoscopic is safe and effective for esophageal varices. Intravenous anesthesia should be used in Sclerotherapy.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of lidocaine mucilage diluent and simethicone emulsion in gastroscopy examination, in order to provide effective drugs for gastroscopy. MethodsWe selected 201 outpatients and the inpatients who underwent gastroscopic examination between August and October 2014 as the research subjects. Based on the kind of drug, the patients were randomly divided into research group (n=100) and control group (n=101). Patients in the research group accepted lidocaine mucilage diluent, while those in the control group received simethicone emulsion. Then we observed and compared the definition of gastroscopy, adverse drug reactions, examination time and drug price between the two groups. ResultsThe frequencies of high, medium, and low definition of gastroscopy were respectively 63.00%, 34.00% and 3.00% among the patients in the research group, and 69.31%, 26.73% and 3.96% among patients in the control group; there was no significant differences between the two groups (Z=-0.854, P=0.393). The adverse reaction rates, testing time, and drug prices for the two groups were 0.99% vs.1.00% (P>0.05), (6.5±2.1) minutes vs.(6.6±2.0) minutes (t=0.458, P>0.05), and RMB (9.0±1.2) yuan vs.(42.8±2.8) yuan (t=227.644, P<0.05), respectively. ConclusionLidocaine mucilage diluent and simethicone emulsion both have good effect for gastroscopic examination, which can raise the gastroscopic definition, promote endoscopic operation and observation by doctors, shorten examination time, and reduce adverse drug reactions. Both are of great value in clinical application, and lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage diluent is cheaper, which can be widely used and promoted clinically.
Objective To summarize the research progress of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) in application for gastric diseases. Method By searching the literatures in domestic and foreign database, the latest literatures on the application of MCCE for gastric diseases were reviewed. Results Compared with traditional gastroscopy, the diagnostic accuracy of MCCE was comparable to that of traditional gastroscopy, and there was no serious complications had been reported in use of MCCE. In addition, MCCE had advantages of comfort, safety, and prevention of cross-infection. However, it could not be used for biopsy and treatment. With the constant technical innovation, application of MCCE would be more extensive in future. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of MCCE in gastric diseases is high. Compared with traditional gastroscopy, it has more advantages. The shortcomings of MCCE can be improved with the development of science and technology, and it can be used for the initial screening of gastric diseases.