ObjectiveTo investigate clinical efficacy and advantages and disadvantages of primary closure with two endoscopes (1aparoscope+choledochoscope) or three endoscopes (laparoscope+choledochoscope+duodenoscope) through the cystic duct for treatment of gallbladder stone with secondary common bile duct (CBD) stones.MethodsThe clinical data of 83 patients with gallbladder stones with secondary CBD stones treated by two or three endoscopes combined with CBD exploration and lithotomy and primary closure through cystic duct from January 2017 to December 2018 in the Chengdu Second People’s Hospital were collected retrospectively. Among them, 41 patients were treated by two endoscopes mode (two endoscopes group), 42 cases were treated by three endoscopes mode (three endoscopes group).ResultsThere were no significant differences in the general conditions such as the gender, age, preoperative diameter of CBD, chronic diseases, etc. between the two and three endoscopes group (P>0.05). All 83 cases underwent the operations successfully and recovered well. The success rate of operation, stone clearance rate, drainage volume of abdominal drainage tube on day 1 after the operation, time of abdominal drainage tube removal after the operation, and hospitalization time had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). The time of operation, intraoperative bleeding volume, and the postoperative pancreatitis rate in the three endoscopes group were significantly more (or higher) than those in the two endoscopes group (P<0.05), but the condition of liver function recovered after the operation was better than that in the two endoscopes group (P<0.05).ConclusionsWith the strict control of the operation indications, it is safe and feasible to use two or three endoscopes through the cystic duct pathway and primary closure of CBD for treatment of gallbladder stone with secondary CBD stones. However, the choice of operative methods of two or three endoscopes should be based on the general situation of the patients before and during the operation.
目的探讨腹腔镜胆道再次手术的适应证、手术方法及临床效果。方法回顾性分析我院2003年2月至2010年11月期间46例腹腔镜胆道再次手术患者的临床资料，对术中及术后结果进行总结。结果本组45例在腹腔镜下完成手术，1例中转开腹。手术时间为45～270 min(平均120 min)，残株胆囊切除时间为(40±10) min，胆总管切开取石+T管引流时间为(150±50) min，胆总管切开取石+等离子碎石+T管引流时间为(180±40) min，术后出血及漏胆腹腔镜探查术时间为（40±15）min。结石一次性取尽23例，术后残余结石2例，住院4～21 d，平均8.6 d。胆管残余结石患者在术后1个月后经T管瘘道用胆道镜取石。术中十二指肠球部损伤3例，及时发现修补; 术后出现右侧胸腔积液4例、肺部感染2例和漏胆1例，均经非手术治疗痊愈。术后电话随访6～24个月（平均15个月），未见异常。结论腹腔镜胆道再次手术可行，并具有创伤小、恢复快等优点，但术前应严格掌握手术适应证，对手术医生的技术要求也较高。
胆囊作为贮存和浓缩胆汁的器官，其内的胆汁易于析出、凝集而形成结石。胆囊最常见的疾病多与结石相关，如胆石症、急慢性胆囊炎、胆囊癌等； 其他影响胆囊的病理状态还包括胆道动力障碍、术后改变等。超声对胆囊结石及胆囊炎的诊断有较高的敏感性及特异性，还可通过摄取高脂食物前后对比评价胆囊功能，是胆囊疾病的传统影像检查手段，但对肥胖患者其图像质量及解剖细节显示较差。目前，常规MRI已经成为重要的胆囊成像方法之一，并可引入经胆道排泄的造影剂进一步清晰显示其解剖及生理。对于超声不能很好评价的胆囊疾病患者应首选MRI检查。
As a new discipline, the cardiac surgery has a great development in the modern age, but still faces many problems and disputes. The emergence of the evidence-based medicine (EBM), which emphasizes the best evidence, and combines the doctor’s clinical experience to make the best judgment, gives the development of the cardiac surgery a new thinking. Four systematic reviews published in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2004) have interprated the importance of EBM on how to resolve the actual problems in different field of the cardiac surgery.
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术手术方法及临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2002年12月至2008年5月我科施行218例胆囊大部切除术患者的临床资料。结果:218例在腹腔镜下完成手术,本组病例中无死亡,无术后出血,无肝外胆道损伤,手术时间20至60分钟,平均35分钟,无中转开腹,未发现远期并发症。结论:在妥善处理残余胆囊并留置引流管的情况下,腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术是一种安全可行、创伤小、并发症少、术后恢复快的手术,具有较强的临床价值。