ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic factors of malignant tumors in ampulla, lower bile duct, head of pancreas, uncinate process, and neck of pancreas after operation.MethodThe recent literatures on malignant tumors in this region at home and abroad were summarized.ResultsThe prognosis of five groups of malignant tumors in ampulla, lower bile duct, head of pancreas, uncinate process, and neck of pancreas was correlated with their origin, growth site, tumor diameter, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, pathological and histological classification, and cutting edge status. The different location and pathological classification of tumors made the different neurovascular invasion rate, lymphatic metastasis rate, and R0 resection rate.ConclusionsBy summarizing and analyzing the origin, growth site, diameter, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, pathological and histological classification, and cutting edge status of tumors, we can improve the clinical prediction of tumors in this region, select appropriate surgical methods before operation, and formulate more reasonable adjuvant treatment plan after operation, in order to improve the pertinence of the treatment of tumors in this region, improve the prediction, and finally better serve the clinical work.
Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of extended and standard surgery for carcinoma of head of pancreas by using meta-analysis. Methods Related articls （1990-2012） were searched in Pubmed， WOS， Embase， WanFang， SinoMed， and CNKI. Study on quality of these literatures were evaluated by using the Jadad score. The patients with pancreatic head carcinoma underwent extended radical resection and standard radical resection were classified to treatment group and control group， respectively. The mortality， morbidity， and survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation in the two groups were evaluated by using meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 studies fitted the selection crit-eria， including 744 patients. Among them 357 cases were in standard radical resection group and 387 cases in the extended radical resection group. The results of meta-analysis showed that： ①The morbidity after operation did not significantly differed between the extended radical resection group and standard radical resection group （OR=1.360， 95% CI=0.990-1.870， P=0.050）. ②The mortality of the two groups did not significantly differed （OR=0.870， 95% CI=0.430-1.760，P=0.700）. ③There were no significant differences in survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year between the two groups （OR=0.880， 95% CI=0.450-1.720， P=0.710；OR=0.940， 95% CI=0.590-1.480，P=0.710；OR=1.000， 95% CI=0.600-1.67， P=1.000）. Conclusion Compared with standard radical resection， extended radical resection can not improve the survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation， and can’t reduce the mortality and morbidity after operation
ObjectiveTo compare surgical safety and postoperative efficacy of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and standard PD (Whipple).MethodsA total of 123 patients underwent PD in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2013 to December 2017 were included, including 47 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma and 76 patients with periampullary carcinoma, then were divided into a TMpE group and a Whipple group respectively. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative complications, and postoperative survival of patients with the same site between the Whipple group and the TMpE group were retrospectively compared.Results① There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the TMpE group and the Whipple group in the pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary carcinoma (P>0.05). ② For the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, there were no significant differences in the operative time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time between the TMpE group and the Whipple group (P>0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss in the TMpE group was significantly higher than that in the Whipple group (P=0.038); For the patients with periampullary carcinoma, the above indexes had no significant differences between the TMpE group and the Whipple group (P>0.05). ③ The total incidence of complications in the TMpE group was significantly higher than that in the Whipple group for the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (χ2=6.595, P=0.010), which had no significant difference between the TMpE group and the Whipple group for the patients with periampullary carcinoma (P>0.05). ④ The cumulative survival curve in the TMpE group was better than that in the Whipple group for the patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (χ2=9.597, P=0.002), which had no significant difference between the TMpE group and the Whipple group for the patients with periampullary carcinoma (χ2=0.844, P=0.358).ConclusionsFor patients with pancreatic head cancer, comparing with standard Whipple, although TMpE PD increases intraoperative blood loss and overall incidence of complications, it could significantly improve long-term survival and there are no significant differences in postoperative recovery time and operative safety between Whipple and TMpE; For patients with periampullary carcinoma, there are no significant differences in surgical safety, long-term survival rate, and survival time between TMpE and Whipple.
Sixteen cases unresectable carcinoma of the head of the pancreas complicated with jaundice were treated by one stage cholecysto-jejunal and gastro-jejunal loop double anastomosis, the same result of jaundice drainage and prevention of bile reflux were obtained when compared with simple cholecysto-jejunal loop anastomosis, on the other hand, the obstructive symptoms resulting from postoperative cancerous comppression of duodenum and pylorus were avoided as well. The operation is simple with less physiologic disturbance and the patient can lead better postoperative live.
Forty-five pancreatoduodenectomies had been performed in our hospital from 1981 to 1994, of which 35 cases were diagnosed as carcinomas of Vater’s ampulla or pancreatic head, and 10 (cases) as benign lesions. Through analysis of misdiagnosed cases, the authors emphasize that it is important to take correct history of jaundiced patients in detail according to the character of the jaundice and associated symptoms before any operation done. Secondly, all clinical materials must be thoroughly collected and special examinations for diagnosis should be chosen scientifically to avoid relying only on one sort of examination result as diagnostic standard. Thirdly, during operation the area of pancreatic head should be explored carefully and any lesions in doubt should be examined pathologically by puncture biopsy and frozen section to avoid misdiagnosis and thus performing pancreatoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy between laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in treatment of carcinoma of head of pancreas. MethodsClinical data of 60 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of head of pancreas who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from October 2004 to October 2009 were collected, of which 26 patients were in LPD group and 34 patients were in OPD group. ResultsOperative time and hospitalization expense of patients in LPD group were both longer or more than those of OPD group (P<0.05), but blood loss, time of starting activity, time of aeration, time of pulling out the drainage tube, time of pulling out the stomach tube, time of absolute resting on bed, and hospitalization time in LPD group were all shorter or lower than those of OPD group (P<0.05). There were 25 patients suffered with postoperative complications, including 10 patients in LPD group and 15 patients in OPD group, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in total incidence of postoperative complication (P>0.05). But in the specific postoperative complication, the incidences of pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula of LPD group were higher than those of OPD group (P<0.05), but incidences of incision infection, pulmonary infection, and systemic infection were all lower than those of OPD group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up for 1-60 months with the median time of 21.5 months. During the follow-up period, in LPD group, 24 patients suffered with recurrence, 20 patients suffered with tumor metastasis, and 24 patients died; in LPD group, 31 patients suffered with recurrence, 25 patients suffered with tumor metastasis, and 31 patients died. There were no significant difference between the 2 groups in the recurrence rate, metastasis rate, mortality, and survival situation (P>0.05). ConclusionsFor carcinoma of head of pancreas, postoperative recovery and infection complications of LPD are significantly superior than those of OPD. But compared with the OPD, it has no obvious advantage in reducing the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, and other complications, and it also has no obvious advantage in improving the long-term survival situation too.
目的探讨如何减少胰十二指肠切除术后并发症及提高胰头及壶腹周围癌的疗效。方法总结我院41例胰头及壶腹周围癌患者行胰十二指肠切除术治疗的经验。结果癌肿切除率为17.7%，手术并发症发生率为26.8%，手术死亡率为14.6%。而1990年后仅发生2例且无胆、胰瘘发生，亦无死亡。结论应用胰肠、胆肠吻合口处双管减压引流，防止了术后胰、胆瘘的发生，是降低并发症及死亡率的重要手段。
【摘要】目的探讨提高可切除胰头癌疗效和降低手术风险的方法。方法回顾我院1996年1月至2001年12月期间行根治性胰十二指肠切除术治疗的胰头癌病例，对可切除胰头癌患者的术前评估、围手术期治疗和术式选择进行分析。结果外科收治胰头癌271例，行根治性切除术73例，根治切除率为26.9%（73/271），围手术期死亡率为6.8%（5/73）。其中56例行改良扩大的胰十二指肠切除术，1年和3年生存率分别为71.4%和33.9%。结论根治性胰十二指肠切除术是可切除胰头癌惟一可能提供治愈机会的治疗选择。加强术前评估并同时重视围手术期处理，有助于改善预后。