ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). MethodsThe clinical data of 496 patients with DVT who were treated in our hospital from January 2010 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively, to compare the time of venous pressure decreased to normal (T1) and time of circumference difference decreased to normal (T2) in patients received pure therapy (control group) and pure therapy combined with IPC (combination group), according to different types of patients in acute, sub-acute, and chronic phase. In addition, comparison of the remission rate of pulmonary embolism (PE), incidence of PE, and recurrence of DVT was performed between the control group and combination group too. Results① For DVT patients in acute stage, the time of T1 and T2 of patients in central type, peripheral type, and mixed type who received anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis/catheter thrombolysis+IPC, were significantly shorter than those patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis/catheter thrombolysis (P<0.05). For DVT patients in sub-acute stage, the time of T1 and T2 of patients in central type and mixed type who received anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis+IPC, were significantly shorter than those of patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis (P<0.05), the time of T1 of patients in peripheral type who received anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis+IPC, were significantly shorter than those of patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis (P<0.01), but the time of T2 of patients in peripheral type didn't differed between patients who received only anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulant therapy/systemic thrombolysis +IPC (P>0.05). For DVT patients in chronic stage, the time of T1 and T2 of patients in central type and mixed type didn't differed between patients who received only anticoagulant therapy and anticoagulant therapy +IPC (P>0.05); the time of T1 of patients in peripheral type who received anticoagulant therapy+IPC, were significantly shorter than those of patients who received only anticoagulant therapy (P<0.05), but the time of T2 didn't differed with each other (P>0.05). ② There were 63 patients in control group and 47 patients in combination group had PE before treatment. After the treatment, the PE symptom of control group relieved in 56 patients (88.89%, 56/63) and maintained in 7 patients (11.11%, 7/63), the symptom of combination group relieved in 44 patients (93.62%, 44/47) and maintained in 3 patients (6.38%, 3/47), so the remission rate of PE symptom in combination group was higher (P<0.05). There were 6 patients suffered from new PE in control group[4.26% (6/141)] and 0 in combination group[0 (0/245)] after treatment in patients who hadn't PE before treatment, and the incidence of PE was lower in combination group (P<0.05). ③ There were 325 patients were followed up for 3-36 months with the median time of 27 months, including 157 patents in control group and 168 patients in combination group. During the follow-up period, 74 patients recurred[47.13% (74/157)] in control group and 46 patients recurred[27.38% (46/168)] in combination group, and the recurrence rate was lower in combination group (P<0.05). In addition, 41 patients suffered from post-thrombotic syndrome[26.11% (41/157)] in control group and 27 patients[16.07% (27/168)] in combination group, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome was lower in combination group (P<0.05). ConclusionsIPC can significantly shorten the time of venous pressure and the circumference difference decreased to normal for DVT patients in acute stage and majority DVT patients in sub-acute stage, and it can relieve the clinical symptoms of PE, reduce the incidence rate of PE and recurrence rate of DVT. Therefore, IPC is a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for DVT patients in acute stage and majority DVT patients in sub-acute stage.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of clinical application of determination of lower venous pressure in the diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). MethodsThe 90 patients with DVT of unilateral lower limb who were admitted by using color Doppler or deep veins of lower limb angiography in our hospital during the period of 2013 July to 2014 June were selected and as the research object (case group), 37 cases were male, 53 cases were female; the age was 18-84 years old, mean age was 59.48 years old. According to the development of disease, 90 cases were divided into acute 30 cases, subacute 30 cases, and chronic 30 cases; and according to the pathological types were divided into the central type in 30 cases, 30 cases of peripheral type, and 30 cases of mixed type. At the same time the without lower extremity DVT volunteers of 20 cases were selected as normal control group, including male 9 cases, female 11 cases; age was 21-65 years old, average age was 38.7 years old. The static venous pressure (P0), dynamic venous pressure (P00), and decreased pressure ratio (Pd) of double lower limbs of participants in 2 groups were determinated and comparative analyzed. ResultsThe P0 and P00 of patients with different development of disease and pathological types of the case group were higher than those of the normal control group (P < 0.01), and the Pd was lower than that of the normal control group (P < 0.01). In case group, the P0 and P00 of acute phase were higher than those of the normal control group (P < 0.01), the P0 of central type was higher than that of the peripheral type and mixed type (P < 0.01), and the Pd central type was lower than that of mixed type (P < 0.01). The above 3 indexes' differences of double lower limbs in the normal control group had no statistical significance (P > 0.01). In case group, the P0 and P00 of ipsilateral limb in different development of disease and pathological types were higher than those of the healthy limb, and the Pd were lower than that of the healthy limb (P < 0.01). ConclusionsLower extremity venous pressure measurements can be used in clinical detection for early lower limb DVT, and can be used as the objective index of clinical evaluation curative effect for the treatment of DVT. It is a simple and practical clinical detection method.
Venous pressure monitoring is an important indicator for the arteriovenous fistula evaluation. Direct static venous pressure monitoring is recognized as the most accurate way of venous pressure monitoring, which is widely used in the functional monitoring, functional evaluation of arteriovenous fistula, the diagnosis of complications and the evaluation of surgical efficacy. Venous pressure monitoring has obvious advantages and disadvantages, so it is necessary to improve relevant knowledge to correctly guide clinical diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, the study of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula was summarized, in order to improve the understanding of the significance and clinical application of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula.
Objective To explore the effect of cyclopamine （Cyc） which is the inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway on portal venous pressure of normal and liver cirrhosis rats, and it’s possible mechanisms. Moreover, to provide the experimental basis of drug efficacy and clinical treatment. Methods Thirty two healthy male SD rats were randomly average divided into four groups：normal control group, normal treatment group, liver cirrhosis control group, and liver cirrhosis treatment group. The liver cirrhosis models of rat were established by using the thioacetamide （TAA） method, which made 0.03% of TAA as the initial water concentration, and then the concentration of TAA in drinking water was adjusted according to the changes of the weekly body weight of rats lasting for twelve weeks. In thirteenth week, intraperitoneal injection of corn oil （0.1 ml/100 g body weight, 1 time/d） were performed lasting for a week in rats of the normal control group and liver cirrhosis control group; intraperitoneal injection of Cyc 〔1 mg （0.1 ml）/100 g body weight, 1 time/d〕were performed lasting for a week in rats of the normal treatment group and liver cirrhosis treatment group. In fourteenth week, the liver function, portal venous pressure （PVP）, and the ration of liver or spleen weight to body weight were detected, the expressions of α-smooth muscle actin （α-SMA） and typeⅠcollagen α1 （Col1α1） of hepatic stellate cell were detected by using immunohistochemistry. Results PVP were （10.7±0.9） and （12.3±1.3） cm H2O （1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa） in normal control group and normal treatment group, respectivly, the latter was higher than the former （t=-2.918，P=0.011）. PVP were （21.8±0.7） and （14.3±1.4） cm H2O in liver cirrhosis control group and liver cirrhosis treatment group, respectivly, the latter was lower than the former（t=13.602，P=0.000）. The expressions of α-SMA and Col1α1 in liver cirrhosis treatment group was lower than the liver cirrhosis control group. There were no significant difference of the liver function and ration of liver or spleen weight to body weight between the treatment group and the control group （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Cyclopamine could signally reduce the PVP of liver cirrhosis rats through reducing the expressions of α-SMA and Col1α1.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of varicose great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment alone versus combined treatment with iliac vein compression (IVC) intervention in improving lower extremity symptoms and prognosis among the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC. MethodsBased on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with varicose GSV complicated by IVC treated at the Day Service Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2022 to January 2025 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the treatment strategies: the varicose GSV treatment alone group (control group) and the combined treatment group for varicose GSV and IVC (observation group). The primary endpoints included the closure rate of the GSV trunk, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study quality of life/symptom (VEINES-QOL/Sym) questionnaire score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The significance level was set at α=0.05. ResultsA total of 264 patients with left lower extremity varicose GSV complicated by IVC were included. The observation group comprised 32 patients, while the remaining 232 patients underwent 1∶3 propensity score-matching, resulting in 96 matched patients in the control group. The baseline characteristics, including gender, age, and comorbidities, showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the GSV trunk closure rate was 100% in both groups. Within-group comparisons revealed significant improvements in the VCSS and VEINES-QOL/Sym points at 6 and 12 months as compared with preoperative (on admission) values (P<0.05). Between-group comparisons showed that the observation group had greater improvement in the VEINES-QOL/Sym score at 6 months (P=0.028), but no significant difference in the VCSS (P=0.775); At 12 months, the observation group demonstrated significantly better the VCSS (P<0.001) and VEINES-QOL/Sym points (P<0.001) as compared with the control group. ConclusionsFor patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC, both treatment strategies significantly improve symptoms. Results of short-term follow-up (6 months) demonstrate early advantages in quality of life improvement with concurrent IVC intervention, while results of 12-month follow-up indicate superior efficacy in both symptom relief and quality of life enhancement. Therefore, concurrent IVC intervention may provide greater clinical benefits for mid- to long-term prognosis for patients with left lower extremity GSV varicosities complicated by IVC.
Controlling intraoperative bleeding is the core technology of liver surgery, and it is also an important way to improve the benefits of liver surgery and reduce the risk of surgery. In recent years, a number of methods to maintain low central venous pressure have been proposed, including inferior vena cava clamping, restricted fluid infusion, postural changes, intraoperative assisted ventilation, intraoperative hypovolemic venous incision, etc. In addition, more and more indicators used to guide intraoperative fluid input management to maintain low central venous pressure have been discovered, including global end-diastolic volume and stroke volume variability. Therefore, this article summarizes the relationship between low central venous pressure and surgical effect in liver surgery, and the ways to achieve low central venous pressure on the basis of previous research.
目的 探讨肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征的诊断和治疗方法。方法 对笔者所在医院2003年8月至2010年8月期间收治的16例肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 16例肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征患者的临床表现主要为反复发作性进食后上腹部胀痛或隐痛、呕吐且呕吐后症状可缓解（12例），恶心、反酸及嗳气（13例），饭后饱胀感或腹胀（16例），以及食欲不振（13例）。16例患者均行上消化道造影检查明确诊断；3例行腹部彩色多普勒超声检查符合诊断；4例行CT检查排除十二指肠周围占位性病变。16例患者均先行非手术治疗，其中10例患者的腹痛缓解，呕吐消失，好转出院；另6例因治疗无效而行手术治疗，其中行Treitz韧带松解加十二指肠空肠侧侧吻合术2例，行十二指肠空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术3例，行胃大部分切除、胃空肠吻合术（BillrothⅡ式）1例。术后除1例行Treitz韧带松解加十二指肠空肠侧侧吻合术的患者仍有间断腹胀伴恶心外，其余患者均痊愈。结论 肠系膜上动脉压迫综合征主要表现为上腹部胀痛、呕吐、食欲不振及消瘦，确诊依赖于上消化道造影。对其治疗首选非手术治疗，对非手术治疗无效者可采用手术治疗，其中十二指肠空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术是一种有效、易行的手术方式。
Objective To compare efficacy of laparoscopic and open duodenal circular drainage operation for superior mesenteric artery compressing syndrome (SMACS). Methods From December 2012 to December 2015, the clinical data of 23 cases of laparoscopic duodenal circular drainage operation (laparoscope group) and 28 cases of open duodenal circular drainage operation (open group) were analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative analgesics usage, postoperative the first exhaust time, postoperative the first feeding time, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative incidence of complications were compared. The patients were followed up to confirm the effect after the operation. Results There were no differences of the age, sex, and body weight index between the laparoscope group and the open group (P>0.05). The operation time had no significant difference between these two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the open group, the intraoperative bleeding was less (P<0.05), the postoperative ambulation time, postoperative the first exhaust time, postoperative the first feeding time, postoperative hospitalization time were shorter (P<0.05), the rates of postoperative analgesics usage, incision infection, pulmonary infection, and intestinal obstruction were lower (P<0.05) in the laparoscope group. The rates of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic bleeding, and total postoperative complications rate had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 8–36 months. The clinical symptoms disappeared and the body weight increased to normal level in the two groups. Conclusions Preliminary results of in this study show that laparoscopic duodenal circular drainage operation in treatment of SMACS has some advantages such as less trauma, faster recovery, fewer complications and shorter hospitalization time. Laparoscopy will be an ideal choice for treatment of SMACS.