ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Zero-profile interbody fusion and fixation device (Zero-P) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. MethodsBetween April 2011 and September 2013, 26 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the Zero-P. Of 26 cases, 12 were male and 14 were female, aged 43-82 years (mean, 58.3 years). The disease duration was from 3 months to 10 years (mean, 5.9 years). The involved segments included C3,4 in 5 cases, C4,5 in 3 cases, C5,6 in 6 cases, and C6,7 in 12 cases. The clinical outcome was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score before operation and after operation. ResultsThe operations were successful and the operation time was 75-140 minutes (mean, 105 minutes); and blood loss was 20-150 mL (mean, 45 mL). There was no complications of infection, neural injury, esophageal fistula, prevertebral hematoma, or leakage of cerebrospinal. Dysphagia occurred in 1 case within 1 week after operation,and disappeared after 1 month. All patients were followed up for an average of 15.3 months (range, 12-18 months). The clinical symptoms were relieved after operation. During follow-up, no implant displacement or subsidence, screw breakage, and cervical instability were observed. At 3 and 12 months after operation, the VAS score and NDI reduced significantly (P<0.05); the JOA score increased significantly (P<0.05); and the intervertebral space height and the cervical Cobb angle improved significantly (P<0.05). But there was no significantly difference between at 3 and 12 months (P>0.05). According to JOA evaluation, the results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 10 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 92.3% at last follow-up. ConclusionThe clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Zero-P is satisfactory and reliable in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. It can restore the cervical physiological curve and the intervertebral space height and decrease the incidence of postoperative dysphagia.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical effects of anterior segmental decompression and autograft fusion in treating multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Between January 2007 and May 2009, 23 patients with multi-level CSM were treated with anterior segmental decompression, autograft fusion, and internal fixation. There were 16 males and 7 females with an average age of 58 years (range, 49-70 years). Consecutive 3 segments of C3,4, C4, 5, and C5, 6 involvedin 15 cases and C4, 5, C5, 6, and C6, 7 in 8 cases. All patients suffered sensory dysfunction in l imbs and trunk, hyperactivity of tendon reflexes of both lower extremities, walking with l imp, and weakening of hand grip. Cervical MRI showed degeneration and protrusion of intervertebral disc and compression of cervical cord. The disease duration was 6 to 28 months (12.5 months on average). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score system was adopted for therapeutic efficacy evaluation. JOA scores were recorded preoperatively, 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Results Dura tear occurred in 1 case and was treated by fill ing with gelatinsponge during operation; no cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed after operation. All the incisions healed by first intention. All cases were followed up 12 to 24 months (15.1 months on average), and no vertebral artery injury or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred. The nervous symptoms in all cases were improved significantly within 1 week after operation. Lower l imb muscle strength increased, upper l imb abnormal sensation disappeared, and l imb moved more agile. A 2-mm collapses of titanium mesh into upper terminal plate were found in 1 case and did not aggravated during followup.The other internal fixator was in appropriate situation, and the fusion rate was 100%. The JOA score increased from 9.1 ±0.3 preoperatively to 14.3 ± 0.4 at 12 months postoperatively with an improvement rate of 65.8% ± 0.2%, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.01). According to Odom evaluation scale, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case. Conclusion Anterior segmental decompression and autograft fusion is a recommendable technique for multi-level CSM, which can make full decompression, conserve the stabil ity of cervical cord, and has high fusion rate.
Objective To investigate the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery and traditional open surgery for the treatment of cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Retrospective selection of patients with OPLL who underwent microscope-assisted and traditional open anterior cervical surgery in West China (Airport) Hospital Sichuan University were selected between January 2016 and August 2020. The patients who underwent traditional open anterior cervical surgery between January 2016 and August 2018 were classified as the conventional group, and the patients who underwent microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery between September 2018 and August 2020 were classified as the microscope group. The baseline characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain before and after surgery, and surgical complications were collected. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Result A total of 46 patients were included. There were 24 cases in the conventional group and 22 cases in the microscope group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay in the microscope group were lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in VSA score and JOA score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in VAS score and JOA score between the two groups 18 months after operation (P<0.001). The comparison of VAS score and JOA score in the two groups before and after operation showed that there was a statistically significant difference between 18 months after operation and before operation (P<0.05). In the microscope group, the average improvement rate of neurological function [(79.90±16.67)% vs. (58.12±17.47)%, t=4.317, P<0.001], excellent and good rate [95.45% (21/22) vs. 66.67% (16/24), χ2=4.354, P=0.037] were higher than those in the conventional group. The total number of complications in the microscope group was lower than that in the conventional group (P=0.024). Conclusion Compared with the traditional open anterior cervical surgery, the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery for OPLL can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of cervical disc replacement for cervical myelopathy. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2008, 20 patients (26 segments) with cervical myelopathy underwent single-level (14 segments) or bi-level (6 segments) cervical disc replacement. There were 8 males and 12 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 26-65 years). The disease duration ranged 2-18 months (mean, 7 months). The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical range of motion (ROM), and the Odom et al. criteria. Heterotopic ossification (HO), osteophyte formation, and prosthesis loosening were observed. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, with no severe complication. Twenty patients were followed up 30-48 months (mean, 34 months). At 28 months after operation, according to Odom et al. criteria, the results were excellent in 17 cases and good in 3 cases. The VAS scores of the neck, shoulder, and upper limb were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05). At 30 months after operation, X-ray films showed that 20 replaced segments were mobile and ROM was (10.6 ± 4.5)°, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) when compared with that of upper adjacent segment (10.8 ± 3.7)° and lower adjacent segment (7.5 ± 4.2)°. HO occurred in 10 cases (13 segments). No displacement, subsidence, or loosening occurred except 1 case of retrodisplacement of the prosthesis. ConclusionCervical disc replacement can obtain good effectiveness. It can maintain normal cervical ROM and physiological curvature. But it needs further long-term follow-up to evaluate the function and the influence on the adjacent segments.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of microplate fixation in open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty (ELP) by comparing with anchor fixation. Methods Between January 2005 and October 2008, 35 patients with multi-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy were treated. Of them, 15 patients underwent ELP by microplate fixation (microplate group) and 20 patients underwent ELP by anchor fixation (anchor group). In microplate group, there were 10 malesand 5 females with the age of (51.2 ± 11.5) years; the disease duration ranged from 6 to 60 months (mean, 14 months); and the preoperative Japanese Orthopoaedic Association (JOA) score was 7.7 ± 2.5. In anchor group, there were 13 males and 7 females with the age of (50.7 ± 10.8) years; the disease duration ranged from 3 to 58 months (mean, 17 months); and the preoperative JOA score was 7.8 ± 2.9. There was no significant difference in the general data, such as gender, age, and JOA score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention. Thirty-five cases were followed up 24-68 months (mean, 32 months). The operation time was (113 ± 24) minutes in anchor group and (111 ± 27) minutes in microplate group, showing no significant difference (t=0.231 3, P=0.818 5). The rate of spinal canal expansion in microplate group (60% ± 24%) was significantly higher than that in anchor group (40% ± 18%) (t=2.820, P=0.008). The JOA scores of 2 groups at 3 months and 24 months after operation were significantly higher than the preoperative scores (P lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference in JOA score between 2 groups at 3 months after operation (t=1.620 5, P=0.114 6), but the JOA score of microplate group was significantly higher than that of anchor group at 24 months after operation (t=3.454 3, P=0.001 5). X-ray film, MRI, and CT scan at 3-6 months after operation displayed that door spindle reached bony fusion. There was no occurrence of ‘‘re-close of door’’ in 2 groups. The rate of compl ication in microplate group (13.3%, 2/15) was significantly lower than that in anchor group (25.0%, 5/20) (χ2=7.160 0, P=0.008 6). Conclusion ELP by microplate fixation can achieve the stabil ity quickly after operation, which can help patients to do functional exercises early, and has satisfactory effectiveness and less complications.
ObjectiveTo review the application and progress of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technology in the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases, and to provide reference for clinical treatment decisions. MethodsThe literature related to UBE technology in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) at home and abroad was extensively reviewed, and the surgical methods, indications, effectiveness, and safety were analyzed and summarized. ResultsUBE technology is effective in the treatment of CSR and CSM, and has the advantages of good surgical field, reducing the injury of the posterior structure of the cervical spine, and protecting the facet joint process, but in general, the indications are relatively narrow, limited to single-segment or adjacent double-segment lesions, and the requirements for the operator are relatively high, and the learning curve is long. ConclusionUBE technology can be applied to the treatment of CSR and CSM, but it needs to be carried out by experienced UBE surgeons for specific cases.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of prophylactic C4, 5 foraminal dilatation in posterior cervical open-door surgery on postoperative C5 nerve root palsy syndrome.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (cervical spinal cord compression segments were more than 3) who met the selection criteria between March 2016 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 40 patients underwent prophylactic C4, 5 foraminal dilatation in posterior cervical open-door surgery (observation group) and 40 patients underwent simple posterior cervical open-door surgery (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, Nurick grade of spinal cord symptoms, and preoperative diameter of C4, 5 intervertebral foramen, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The occurrence of C5 nerve root paralysis syndrome was recorded and compared between the two groups, including incidence, paralysis time, recovery time, and spinal cord drift. VAS and JOA scores were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and function before operation and at 12 months after operation.ResultsThe incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, and there was no early postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Patients of both groups were followed up 12-23 months, with an average of 17.97 months. C5 nerve root paralysis syndrome occurred in 8 cases in the observation group (3 cases on the right and 5 cases on the left) and 2 cases in the control group (both on the right). There was significant difference of the incidence (20% vs. 5%) between the two groups (χ2=4.114, P=0.043). Except for 1 case in the observation group who developed C5 nerve root palsy syndrome at 5 days after operation, the rest patients all developed at 1 day after operation; the recovery time of the observation group and the control group were (3.87±2.85) months and (2.50±0.70) months respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (t=–0.649, P=0.104). At 12 months after operation, the JOA score and VAS score of cervical spine in the two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the difference of the cervical spine JOA score and VAS score between at 12 months after operation and before operation and the degree of spinal cord drift between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionProphylactic C4, 5 foraminal dilatation can not effectively prevent and reduce the occurrence of postoperative C5 root palsy, on the contrary, it may increase its incidence, so the clinical application of this procedure requires caution.
Objective To evaluate the application of surgical strategies for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving the C2 segment. Methods The literature about the surgery for cervical OPLL involving C2 segment was reviewed, and the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of surgery were summarized. Results For cervical OPLL involving the C2 segments, laminectomy is suitable for patients with OPLL involving multiple segments, often combined with screw fixation, and has the advantages of adequate decompression and restoration of cervical curvature, with the disadvantages of loss of cervical fixed segmental mobility. Canal-expansive laminoplasty is suitable for patients with positive K-line and has the advantages of simple operation and preservation of cervical segmental mobility, and the disadvantages include progression of ossification, axial symptoms, and fracture of the portal axis. Dome-like laminoplasty is suitable for patients without kyphosis/cervical instability and with negative R-line, and can reduce the occurrence of axial symptoms, with the disadvantage of limited decompression. The Shelter technique is suitable for patients with single/double segments and canal encroachment >50% and allows for direct decompression, but is technically demanding and involves risk of dural tear and nerve injury. Double-dome laminoplasty is suitable for patients without kyphosis/cervical instability. Its advantages are the reduction of damage to the cervical semispinal muscles and attachment points and maintenance of cervical curvature, but there is progress in postoperative ossification. Conclusion OPLL involving the C2 segment is a complex subtype of cervical OPLL, which is mainly treated through posterior surgery. However, the degree of spinal cord floatation is limited, and with the progress of ossification, the long-term effectiveness is poor. More research is needed to address the etiology of OPLL and to establish a systematic treatment strategy for cervical OPLL involving the C2 segment.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) printing artificial vertebral body and interbody fusion Cage in anterior cervical disectomy and fusion (ACCF) combined with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACDF).MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent ACCF combined with ACDF between May 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 patients were treated with 3D printing artificial vertebral body and 3D printing Cage as 3D printing group and 16 patients with ordinary titanium mesh Cage (TMC) and Cage as TMC group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, surgical segment, Nurick grade, disease duration, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Cobb angle of fusion segment between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization stay, complications, and implant fusion at last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups; JOA score was used to evaluate neurological function before operation, immediately after operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up; VAS score was used to evaluate upper limb and neck pain. Cobb angle of fusion segment was measured and the difference between the last follow-up and the immediate after operation was calculated. The height of the anterior border (HAB) and the height of the posterior border (HPB) were measured immediately after operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the subsidence of implant was calculated.ResultsThe operation time of 3D printing group was significantly less than that of TMC group (t=3.336, P=0.002); there was no significant difference in hospitalization stay and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 16 months). There was no obvious complication in both groups. There were significant differences in JOA score, VAS score, and Cobb angle at each time point between the two groups (P<0.05). There was an interaction between time and group in the JOA score (F=3.705, P=0.025). With time, the increase in JOA score was different between the 3D printing group and the TMC group, and the increase in the 3D printing group was greater. There was no interaction between time and group in the VAS score (F=3.038, P=0.065), and there was no significant difference in the score at each time point between the two groups (F=0.173, P=0.681). The time of the Cobb angle interacted with the group (F=15.581, P=0.000). With time, the Cobb angle of the 3D printing group and the TMC group changed differently. Among them, the 3D printing group increased more and the TMC group decreased more. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA score between the two groups (t=0.681, P=0.502), but the Cobb angle difference of the 3D printing group was significantly smaller than that of the TMC group (t=5.754, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the implant fusion rate of the 3D printing group and TMC group were 92.3% (12/13) and 87.5% (14/16), respectively, and the difference was not significant (P=1.000). The incidence of implant settlement in the 3D printing group and TMC group at 6 months after operation was 15.4% (2/13) and 18.8% (3/16), respectively, and at last follow-up were 30.8% (4/13) and 56.3% (9/16), respectively, the differences were not significant (P=1.000; P=0.264). The difference of HAB and the difference of HPB in the 3D printing group at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly lower than those in the TMC group (P<0.05).ConclusionFor patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing ACCF combined with ACDF, compared with TMC and Cage, 3D printing artificial vertebrae body and 3D printing Cage have the advantages of shorter operation time, better reduction of height loss of fusion vertebral body, and maintenance of cervical physiological curvature, the early effectiveness is better.