Objective To systematic evaluate the efficacy and safety of the endovascular aortic repair （endovascular stent placement） and open operation in treatment of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection. Methods The literatures about clinical controlled trials of endovascular aortic repair and open operation in treatment of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection that were included in CNKI， Wanfang data， VIP， Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library， OVID， Pubmed Medline， EBSCO， EMBASE， Springer Link，Science Direct， and other databases from January 1991 to January 2013 were retrieved by computer. RevMan 5.1 software were used to analyze the clinical trial data. Results Eight trials （5 618 patients with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection） were included in the analysis.There was statistically significant difference of the 30 d mortality after operation between the endovascular repair group and the open operation group， which endovascular repair group was significantly better than the open operation group〔OR=0.55，95% CI （0.46-0.65）， P＜0.000 01〕. In addition， there were significant difference between the incidence of stroke 〔OR=0.57， 95% CI （0.39-0.84）， P=0.005〕， respiratory failure 〔OR=0.64， 95% CI （0.53-0.78）， P＜0.000 01〕， and cardiac complications 〔OR=0.49，95% CI （0.38-0.64），P＜0.000 01〕，which endovascular repair group was better than the open operation group. However，endovascular repair could not improve the postoperative outcomes of paraplegia〔OR=1.30，95% CI （0.82-2.05），P=0.26〕 and acute renal failure 〔OR=0.86，95% CI （0.41-1.80），P=0.69〕. Conclusion Endovascular repair for treatment acute Stanford type B aortic dissection is preferred method.
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors of noninfectious fever after endovascular repair of aortic dilatation diseases, and explore the management strategy. Methods We reviewed 468 patients who received endovascular aortic repair from January 2021 to October 2023. The patients who were selected were classified into a febrile group and an afebrile group according the fever after operation. The fever data were analyzed, and the demographics, operative data were researched to sieve out the correlation factors. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for the risk factors of postoperative fever if the P value≤0.05 in the univariate analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the predictive indexes of postoperative noninfectious fever. Results75.08% (229/305) patients had noninfectious fever after aortic repair and 98.25% of them had fever within 2 days. There were 229 patients in the febrile group, mean age 65 (53.0,73.0) years (83.4% males , and 76 patients in the afebrile group, mean age 71(65.0,76.7) years(84.2% males). Univariate analysis showed that the number of patients with coronary heart disease, using statins before operation and aortic aneurysm in the febrile group were significantly lower than those in the afebrile group, and patients were younger in the febrile group. The logistic regression showed that age, surgical site, type of disease, preoperative hyperthermia, type of stent were positively correlated with noninfectious fever, while statin use was negatively associated with noninfectious fever. And age, surgical site, preoperative hyperthermia and stent type were analyzed by means of ROC curve (P<0.01). Conclusion Noninfectious fever is very common after aortic repair. The relationship between fever and infection should be comprehensively judged according to the risk factors of noninfectious fever and the disease status to promote rational use of antibiotics.
Objective To investigate the early effectiveness of total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (TPEVAR) in treating asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAAA) by comparing with surgical femoral cutdown endovascular aneurysm repair (SFCEVAR). Methods Between January 2010 and May 2011, 41 cases of AAAA were treated with TPEVAR in 26 cases (TPEVAR group) and with SFCEVAR in 15 cases (SFCEVAR group). The maximum tumor diameter ranged from 3.5 to 9.2 cm (mean, 5.7 cm) in TPEVAR group, and ranged from 3.5 to 10.0 cm (mean, 6.9 cm) in SFCEVAR group. There was no significant difference in gender or age between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All patients underwent EVAR successfully. The patients were followed up 6-23 months (mean, 13.5 months). No significant difference was found in the outer diameters of the delivery system for main body and iliac leg, operation time, contrast media dosage, hospitalization days, or postoperative hospitalization days between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The patients of SFCEVAR group had more bleeding volume and longer ICU stay than patients of TPEVAR group (P lt; 0.05). The incidence of minor complication was 7.7% (2/26) in TPEVAR group and 33.3% (5/15) in SFCEVAR group, showing no significant difference between 2 group (χ2=4.42, P=0.08); the incidence of major complication in SFCEVAR group (20.0%, 3/15) was significantly higher than that in TPEVAR group (0) (χ2=5.61, P=0.02). Conclusion TPEVAR shows safer and more effective than SFCEVAR in treating AAAA.
目的 总结腔内修复术治疗主动脉夹层的经验。方法 选择2011年7月至2013年1月期间我院住院的胸主动脉夹层患者15例，术前均采用CTA评估，全部行腔内修复术。结果 15例患者采用腔内修复手术全部成功，手术时间95～165min，（120±26） min；失血量30～160mL，（68±34） mL。10例采用经股动脉入路，5例采用经股动脉及肱动脉入路。13例单一破口者各植入支架1枚，手术全部成功。15例患者未发生截瘫，无一椎基底动脉缺血症状，无下肢缺血改变，无伤口感染及腹股沟区淋巴瘘。2例存在Ⅱ型内漏，未经处理自行闭合。随访胸腹主动脉CTA扫描显示覆膜支架均未移位，未发现植入支架后并发近端夹层者。结论 腔内修复术治疗主动脉夹层是一种有效的治疗方法，具有安全性高、术后并发症少、治疗效果好等优点。
Aortic dissection is a disease with high mortality rates. Due to the urgency of time, the diagnosis, treatment processes, and strategies of acute aortic dissection follow specific guidelines. However, patients with chronic aortic dissection are often neglected. Choosing the best medication therapy and surgical interventions remains challenging, and there is still a lack of guideline recommendations. With the improvement of imaging diagnostic methods for aortic diseases, the progress of endovascular surgical techniques, and the development of new endovascular graft devices in recent years, clinical data of the treatment of chronic aortic dissection is also gradually increasing. This article summarized the current new technologies and clinical research results for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic aortic dissection, aiming to provide new suggestions for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic aortic dissection.
Objective To investigate the technical feasibility and effectiveness of intraoperative sac embolizaion with coils and fibrin glue for preventing type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods A patient with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), which had high risk of type Ⅱ endoleaks, was treated with combined packing of coils and fibrin glue in order to prevent type Ⅱ endoleak after EVAR. Percutaneous catheter preset and balloon occlusion were used to ensure accurate packing. Results At the end of the operation, the angiography showed that the blood flow of the stent and distal artery was unobstructed, there was no type Ⅰ and Ⅲ endoleaks, and delayed angiogram showed no collateral circulation of aneurysm. The procedure was successful. The operative duration was 120 min and the blood loss was only 20 mL. No complications such as colonic ischemia and ectopic embolism occurred, and the patient was discharged on 3 days after operation. At 6 months after follow-up, the computerized topographic angiography showed that the aneurysm cavity was completely thrombotic, without type II endoleak, and the diameter and volume of aneurysm were reduced. Conclusions The technique of intraoperative sac embolizaion with coils and fibrin glue during EVAR is safe and effective to prevent postoperative endoleaks, which is simple and feasibility. Intraoperative indwelling catheter and balloon blocking are the key points of successful implementation of this technique.